Wall Street Traders Shift Crypto Market Activity to Weekdays

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-07-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-07-27

Анотація

For decades, Wall Street adhered to a strict Monday-Friday schedule, a rhythm initially challenged but not fully overturned by the 24/7 nature of cryptocurrencies. However, institutional adoption is now fundamentally reshaping crypto market dynamics, shifting most price discovery and trading activity to traditional U.S. market hours (9:30 AM - 4:00 PM ET). According to Kaiko Research, weekend trading volume has fallen from roughly 25% to about 16% of the total. This concentration creates a significant "liquidity vacuum" on weekends when institutional support withdraws. Analysis by BridgePort shows the market becomes more vulnerable: trading costs rise by an average of 11% due to wider spreads, market depth for $100k trades worsens by nearly 9%, and displayed liquidity drops over 5%. Consequently, smaller trades can trigger sharper price swings. The massive success of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs has been a key driver of this structural shift. While providing steady weekday demand, their complete inactivity on weekends exacerbates the liquidity gap. Large capital movements, like the over $0.5 billion withdrawn from U.S. spot ETFs since October 2023, are easily absorbed on weekdays but can cause significant turbulence on thinner weekends. Ultimately, weekend trading now requires heightened caution due to a "thin" market, absent major market makers, and multiplied risks of sudden price jumps and slippage. Understanding these hidden liquidity mechanisms has become crucial for naviga...

For decades, the rhythm of life on Wall Street followed a strict schedule—Friday evening meant market close and weekend rest. The 24/7 nature of cryptocurrencies has only partially forced institutional players to reconsider one of their oldest habits: waiting for Monday.

The continuous trading environment is changing market participants' approaches to risk management and reacting to price movements, even as traditional stock exchanges continue to take weekends off. Big money is forced to adapt to digital assets that 'never sleep'.

Institutional adoption, which was supposed to bring stability and reduce volatility, has in practice led to a structural shift and a mismatch in liquidity. In the early days of the crypto industry, weekends were the time of the most active price movements, accounting for about 25% of total trading volume.

Today, this picture has changed. According to data from research company Kaiko Research, the share of trading on weekends has shrunk to 16%, as price discovery has almost completely moved to US market hours, i.e., from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. As soon as trading desks in New York close, the institutional 'safety net' disappears, leaving the market alone with heightened unpredictability.

The reduced activity of major players on Saturdays and Sundays makes moving significant capital more expensive and risky. Analytics from BridgePort, a company specializing in crypto infrastructure, clearly demonstrates the market's vulnerability during hours when Wall Street is not working.

In particular, trading costs on weekends increase by an average of 11% due to widening spreads. Simultaneously, the effective market depth for trades worth $100,000 deteriorates by almost 9%, and overall displayed liquidity falls by more than 5% compared to weekdays. In other words, far less trading volume is required on weekends to trigger a sharp price change, turning minor dips into large-scale chain reactions.

The huge success of US spot Bitcoin ETFs has become the very factor that fundamentally changed the DNA of the crypto market and exacerbated this difference. Although exchange-traded funds provide steady demand during the work week, their complete absence on weekends creates a real liquidity vacuum. To understand the scale of traditional instruments' influence, one only needs to look at fund flows: since October 2025, investors have withdrawn over $5 billion from US spot ETFs, an amount easily absorbed by deep markets on weekdays but capable of causing serious turbulence on weekends.

As a result, trading on weekends now requires increased caution, as a 'thin' market and the absence of large market makers multiply the risks of sudden jumps and slippage. Understanding these hidden liquidity mechanisms has become the main key to success in the new financial reality.

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the article, what is the main factor that has fundamentally changed the DNA of the cryptocurrency market?

AAccording to the article, the huge success of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US has been the main factor that fundamentally changed the DNA of the cryptocurrency market and exacerbated the liquidity differences between weekdays and weekends.

QHow has the proportion of cryptocurrency trading volume on weekends changed, as reported by Kaiko Research?

AAccording to Kaiko Research, the share of cryptocurrency trading on weekends has fallen from about 25% in the early days of the industry to 16% currently, as price formation has almost completely shifted to US market hours.

QWhat are the specific consequences of reduced Wall Street activity on cryptocurrency markets during weekends, according to data from BridgePort?

AAccording to data from BridgePort, on weekends: trading costs increase by an average of 11% due to wider spreads; effective market depth for $100,000 trades deteriorates by almost 9%; and overall displayed liquidity falls by more than 5% compared to weekdays.

QWhy does the article state that trading on weekends now requires greater caution?

AThe article states that trading on weekends requires greater caution because the market is 'thin', with the absence of major market makers, which significantly increases the risks of sudden price jumps and slippage. A much smaller trade volume can trigger sharp price changes, turning minor dips into large chain reactions.

QWhat phenomenon does the article describe as disappearing once trading desks in New York close?

AThe article describes that once trading desks in New York close for the weekend, the institutional 'safety net' disappears, leaving the market alone to face increased unpredictability.

Пов'язані матеріали

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

This article analyzes recent news about China's domestic DUV lithography machines, advising a measured perspective. A state-backed enterprise plans to deliver about 5 immersion DUV systems this year, with a 2027 target of 20 units, aimed at 28nm processes. While this marks a step from R&D into initial customer validation, the author cautions against over-optimism. The piece clarifies this is DUV, not EUV technology. DUV is crucial but cannot economically solve challenges for advanced nodes like 5nm or below, where EUV is key. The 5-unit volume is minimal compared to ASML's annual output of over 130 such machines. The author highlights unverified claims regarding specs like 90% yield and warns against conflating this news with unconfirmed reports about Shanghai Micro Electronics' production. China's EUV efforts, while progressing with a prototype, remain in early testing, facing significant hurdles in core components like high-precision optics. The analogy of a "DeepSeek moment" is deemed misleading, as lithography involves slow, iterative precision engineering, not rapid software-like breakthroughs. Current progress represents establishing a potential second supply source and gaining vital engineering experience rather than an imminent industry disruption. For investors, the key indicators to watch are formal customer acceptance, stable operational performance, repeat orders, and growth in production volume and component localization. The conclusion is that this is a positive but early-stage development, far from altering the global competitive landscape.

marsbit15 хв тому

Take a Calm Look at Domestic Lithography Machines: 5 Units Delivered, How Far Are We from Challenging ASML?

marsbit15 хв тому

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

Title: 800x Golden Dog: How 'Gacha' Mechanics Are Rescuing NFT Trading In the past month, the on-chain TCG (Trading Card Game) narrative, centered around "gacha" or loot box mechanics, has emerged as a major crypto-native revenue generator, second only to platforms like Hyperliquid and pump.fun. Recently, this trend hit Ethereum with Fake World Assets (FWA). Within just over a week, FWA generated approximately $1.3 million in revenue, ranking 15th in the past week's crypto app earnings. Its token, $FWA, surged from an initial market cap of ~$47,550 to a peak of ~$38.8 million—an 800x gain. Meanwhile, Collector Cards' token $CARDS declined significantly from its previous highs. FWA, developed by the team behind "PunkStrategy," operates as an NFT gacha system with a built-in token flywheel. Users deposit NFTs paired with ETH as liquidity into pools. Each deposit creates a personal pool; more ETH deposited lowers the chance of the NFT being "won" in a draw. Players spend ETH to "draw" (gacha). If they get an undesirable NFT, they can instantly sell it back to the original depositor at an 85% discount, generating income for the depositor. A 1% fee is taken on each draw and on depositor earnings when an NFT is kept. The key to FWA's momentum is its token $FWA. It cannot be bought directly externally. The primary way to acquire it is by playing the gacha and choosing to receive $FWA (instead of ETH) when selling back an unwanted NFT. This mechanism creates constant buy pressure for $FWA as players engage, especially during its price ascent. Early participants who held $FWA benefited massively from subsequent inflows. This contrasts with projects like Collector Cards, which, despite strong revenues, suffer from perceived low token utility beyond buybacks. In conclusion, while FWA's flywheel design—linking speculative token gains directly to NFT trading activity—has driven rapid growth, its sustainability is questionable. The model relies heavily on continuous $FWA price appreciation to offset the inherent negative expectancy of each draw. When price momentum stalls, activity will likely decline. The case highlights that in crypto markets, pure profitability narratives can be fleeting; understanding the relationship between attention, token buy pressure, and sustainable mechanics is crucial to avoid speculative pitfalls.

marsbit40 хв тому

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

marsbit40 хв тому

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic systems, including banks and governments, but decentralized cryptocurrencies with public ledgers like Bitcoin are likely the first practical target. Experts warn that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC), capable of running Shor's algorithm to break the elliptic curve cryptography securing most crypto wallets, could emerge around 2029. Recent research shows the required quantum resources for such attacks are shrinking dramatically, potentially enabling key extraction in minutes. The core vulnerability for cryptocurrencies is not the cryptography itself—post-quantum standards are being developed—but the slow, decentralized governance required to implement upgrades. Unlike centralized banks that can swiftly transition, Bitcoin needs near-unanimous consensus among its global network, a historically difficult process as seen in past upgrades. Estimates suggest migrating all vulnerable Bitcoin funds could take at least 76 days of dedicated network time, and it must be completed before a CRQC exists to prevent "now-or-never" attacks on exposed keys. The threat is not binary; it begins when a quantum computer can decrypt data before it loses value, not necessarily in real-time. A significant portion of Bitcoin (estimated at millions of coins) already has public keys permanently exposed on-chain, making them vulnerable to eventual "static attacks." While technical solutions exist, the race is against time for decentralized networks to coordinate a defensive transition, serving as an early warning for the broader financial system.

marsbit51 хв тому

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

marsbit51 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片