Bernstein Research Report Analysis: Global Semiconductor Equipment WFE Grows 75% in Two Years, DRAM and Logic Chips Are the Biggest Drivers

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-08-13Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-13

Анотація

Bernstein significantly raises its global Wafer Front-End (WFE) equipment spending forecast: $148B in 2026 (from $141B), $204B in 2027 (from $175B), and $259B in 2028 (from $198B). This represents a cumulative 75% growth over two years, confirming a strong equipment upcycle. Memory, especially DRAM, is the primary driver, with DRAM WFE expected to surge 53% in 2027 and 37% in 2028. Logic/Foundry follows, driven by advanced node investments. The forecast upgrades are broad-based, but the largest incremental contribution comes from memory spending outside China and logic/foundry expansion within China. Bernstein expects China's WFE demand to be resilient, jumping to $101B in 2028 from $573B in 2027 due to comprehensive expansion across memory, advanced logic, and mature nodes. A key factor is the DUV lithography shortage, which is expected to ease in H2 2026, allowing imports to recover. Top equipment picks include ASML (preferred in Europe) for its exposure to DRAM and advanced logic, and Applied Materials (top US pick) for its broad exposure and attractive valuation. In China, NAURA is favored due to its comprehensive product portfolio and significant advanced logic exposure. Bernstein views the recent sector pullback as an attractive entry point, arguing that market expectations for 2027/2028 demand strength remain too low and that supplier guidance is conservative.

Author: Rita

Bernstein has significantly raised its forecast for global wafer fab equipment (WFE) spending: 2026 raised from $141B to $148B, 2027 from $175B to $204B, and 2028 from $198B to $259B. A cumulative two-year growth of 75%, further confirming the judgment of an equipment spending upcycle. WFE refers to wafer front-end equipment, the core equipment like lithography, etching, and deposition required for front-end chip manufacturing processes. "Logic chips" in the title refer to computing chips like CPUs, GPUs, ASICs, and their wafer foundry capacity.

The upward revision covers nearly all application areas and regions, but the increment comes more from memory chips in regions outside China and from China's foundry and logic chips. DRAM and NAND are the strongest-growing segments, followed by logic and foundry. Bernstein believes the current equipment spending upcycle is sustainable, and the recent pullback in the semiconductor equipment sector offers an attractive entry opportunity.

WFE Grows 75% in Two Years, DRAM Is the Biggest Driver

Memory chips are the core driver of this cycle. Bernstein forecasts DRAM WFE growth of 53% and 37% in 2027 and 2028, and NAND growth of 58% and 42% for the same period. The upward revision in DRAM capital expenditure comes from both a pull from regions outside China and Chinese DRAM manufacturers, while NAND benefits from technology upgrades and capacity expansion.

Logic and foundry growth is slightly lower, with projected increases of 20% and 19% for 2027 and 2028 respectively, mainly driven by advanced node investments. Intel's IDM spending is slightly revised upward, while the China portion remains stable.

DRAM WFE is projected to reach $69B in 2027 (previous forecast $57B), NAND $20B (previous $18B), and logic/foundry $104B (previous $89B). The growth rates for DRAM and NAND WFE are higher than for logic/foundry, which is uncommon in past cycles.

Regions Outside China Contribute the Largest Increment

The main increment comes from regions outside China. Of the $22.8B upward revision for 2027, DRAM accounts for $10.7B and logic/foundry for $9.8B; of the $36.8B upward revision for 2028, DRAM accounts for $18B and logic/foundry for $15B. The $7B upward revision for 2026 is slower-paced, with foundry contributing $3.4B, DRAM $2.6B, and the remainder from other segments.

Guidance from major equipment suppliers is largely consistent with Bernstein's forecast. Tokyo Electron expects WFE of about $120B in 2026, over $150B in 2027, and over $190B in 2028; Lam Research expects close to $110B in 2026 and entering the low $150B range in 2027; KLA expects the low $120B range in 2026, over $150B in 2027, and over $190B in 2028. These figures differ significantly from Bernstein's forecasts. Bernstein believes equipment company guidance is conservative, and upward revisions are likely as order visibility improves in upcoming earnings seasons.

China's WFE Resilience Exceeds Market Expectations

Bernstein forecasts China's WFE demand for 2026-2028 at $57B, $57.3B, and $101B respectively. The figures for 2026 and 2027 are nearly flat, mainly due to DUV lithography tool shortages hampering imports. In 2028, it jumps to $101B with capacity expansion across all segments.

The 2026 forecast is revised down by $1.1B from the previous one, mainly due to weak imports from DUV tool shortages, but domestic equipment makers are expected to achieve 41% year-on-year growth, reaching $16B in revenue. Forecasts for 2027-2028 are significantly revised up by $6.3B and $24B respectively, with expansion across all Chinese segments—memory, advanced logic, and mature logic—all expanding capacity.

Memory remains the strongest segment, with year-on-year growth rates of 88%, 81%, and 62% for 2026-2028. The surge in advanced logic primarily stems from Huawei's advanced packaging solutions, which stack multiple chips to enhance performance, consuming more wafers. For mature logic, domestic NAND manufacturers outsourcing CMOS production to foundries, AI-driven new demand, and the industrial and automotive upcycle are collectively pushing mature node supply to tighten, prompting foundries to resume aggressive capacity expansion.

Bernstein expects China's WFE imports to recover in the second half of 2026, with annual imports hitting a new high of $41B. Global equipment suppliers' China revenue in 2026 will likely be flat year-on-year, better than the previous expectation of a "year-on-year decline," and may be further revised upward in coming quarters.

ASML, Applied Materials, and Naura Each Have Their Positioning

ASML is Bernstein's top pick in European semiconductor equipment, with projected revenue CAGR of 34% from 2025 to 2028, supported by rising DRAM and advanced logic capital expenditure and increased lithography intensity. Both EUV and DUV will see strong growth, with EUV shipments nearly doubling from 48 units in 2025 to 118 units in 2028. While China revenue share is expected to decline to 20% per company guidance (33% in 2025, 41% in 2024), there is significant upside potential from China's continued demand for DUV systems.

Applied Materials sees the largest target price increase, raised from $525 to $675 (+29%). Lam Research is raised from $360 to $385, KLA from $225 to $250, all three maintaining Outperform ratings. Among Bernstein's US equipment stocks, Applied Materials ranks first due to its largest exposure to advanced logic, DRAM, and packaging, coupled with relatively cheaper valuation; Lam Research has stronger execution and NAND upgrade exposure but higher valuation; KLA's growth this year is slightly slower (due to longer lead times), but it has the largest advanced logic exposure and higher upside potential post-2027.

Among Chinese equipment stocks, Bernstein's ranking is Naura优于 Zhongwei优于拓荆科技(Tuojing Technology), all three maintaining Outperform ratings. Naura benefits the most from its broadest product portfolio (covering deposition, dry etch, thermal, cleaning) and largest advanced logic exposure (~40%), making it the biggest beneficiary during accelerated advanced logic capacity expansion. The recent sector pullback provides an attractive entry opportunity, as the market's underestimation of 2027 demand strength will be gradually corrected in the second half of the year.

Bernstein believes the global semiconductor equipment sector is in one of its strongest upcycles since 2008. The intensity of DRAM and advanced logic capital expenditure is systematically underestimated by the market, the resilience of the China market is misunderstood as unsustainable, and major equipment supplier guidance is conservative. Behind the 75% WFE growth in two years is the structural expansion undergoing across the entire semiconductor manufacturing chain.

Disclaimer

This article is Tide Research's organization and interpretation of a third-party brokerage research report (Bernstein, August 11, 2026), combined with compilation of public market information. The ratings, target prices, profit forecasts, and related judgments cited in the article are the views of that brokerage's analyst, representing only the stance of their institution, and do not represent the views of Tide Research, nor constitute any investment advice.

Markets involve risks; decisions should be independent. This article should not serve as the basis for buying or selling any securities.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the key driver behind the projected 75% cumulative growth in global Wafer Front End (WFE) spending over the next two years according to Bernstein's report?

AThe key driver is the strong capital expenditure in memory chips, particularly DRAM and NAND. Bernstein's report states that DRAM and NAND are the strongest growth segments, with DRAM being the primary contributor to the WFE growth cycle.

QWhich region is identified as providing the largest incremental contribution to the WFE spending forecast increases for 2027 and 2028?

AThe largest incremental contribution comes from regions outside of China. For instance, in 2028, of the $36.8 billion upward revision, DRAM accounted for $18 billion and logic/foundry for $15 billion from regions excluding China.

QHow does Bernstein's report describe the resilience and outlook for China's WFE demand, especially regarding the significant jump in 2028?

ABernstein states that China's WFE demand shows resilience beyond market expectations. Demand is forecast to jump to $101 billion in 2028 from $57.3 billion in 2027, driven by comprehensive expansion across all segments including memory, advanced logic (spurred by Huawei's advanced packaging), and mature logic.

QAmong the major global equipment suppliers (Tokyo Electron, Lam Research, KLA), how do their provided WFE market guidance figures compare to Bernstein's own predictions?

AThe guidance from major suppliers like Tokyo Electron, Lam Research, and KLA is significantly lower and more conservative than Bernstein's predictions. For example, Tokyo Electron guides for over $190 billion in 2028, whereas Bernstein forecasts $259 billion. Bernstein believes equipment companies are being conservative and will likely raise their guidance later.

QAccording to Bernstein's analysis, which specific company is ranked first among U.S. equipment stocks and what are the reasons given for this preference?

AApplied Materials is ranked first among U.S. equipment stocks. The reasons include its largest exposure to advanced logic, DRAM, and packaging businesses, coupled with a relatively cheaper valuation compared to its peers.

Пов'язані матеріали

‘White hats’ take 4000 BTC from Liquid, ETFs see best week of 2026: Hodler’s Digest

A purported "white hat" hacking group has withdrawn nearly 4,000 BTC (worth $319 million) from the Blockstream-run Liquid Network sidechain, leaving a message to "contact us on chain." The network has been paused as its team investigates the security breach and negotiates for the funds' return. Analysis suggests the transaction pattern is more consistent with a white hat extraction than a theft. In other news, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw their strongest three-week inflow stretch of 2026, attracting a net $3.8 billion. Meanwhile, AMC's CEO Adam Aron has threatened legal action against Robinhood's Ethereum L2 for tokenizing AMC stock without permission, sparking a public feud. A consortium of 21 major financial institutions, including Bank of America and Goldman Sachs, plans to launch a USD-denominated stablecoin in the first half of 2027. Prediction market platform Kalshi has issued a lifetime ban to former lawmaker George Santos for alleged insider trading, while facing a legal challenge from New Jersey over state jurisdiction. Bitcoin traded around $80,234 at week's end. Arthur Hayes predicted Bitcoin could reach $1 million by 2030 but stated his best risk-adjusted bet is currently Ethereum. The IMF reported El Salvador used private donations, not public funds, for recent Bitcoin accumulation, a claim President Bukele disputes. A fake Claude desktop app is spreading crypto-stealing malware, and Hyperscale Data has ended Bitcoin mining in Michigan to convert the site for AI operations.

cointelegraph31 хв тому

‘White hats’ take 4000 BTC from Liquid, ETFs see best week of 2026: Hodler’s Digest

cointelegraph31 хв тому

Robinhood Chain Fees Spark Debate Over Business Models: To Be a Tenant or a Landlord?

A public debate erupted over the weekend of September 5th regarding the fee model of Robinhood Chain, highlighting a fundamental conflict between two blockchain philosophies: Solana's "lowest Gas" approach versus Arbitrum's focus on "finding a sustainable business model." Robinhood Chain, an L2 built on Arbitrum Orbit that launched in July 2026, saw its average Gas fee rise to around $0.40 as transaction volume grew—over 100 times more expensive than Solana and even double Ethereum's mainnet cost. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko ("Toly") criticized this model, arguing that the 10% of net protocol revenue Robinhood shares with the Arbitrum ecosystem (with 90% retained) could cover quadruple the fees on Solana. He contended that applications, not the base layer, should charge users, with the base layer focusing on ultra-low costs. In response, Offchain Labs co-founder Steven Goldfeder defended the Arbitrum model. He stated that by operating its own sequencer, Robinhood captures 90% of the Gas revenue—acting as a "landlord"—whereas on Solana, all fees go to validators, leaving Robinhood as a "tenant" that would have to subsidize user costs out of pocket. This exchange framed the core debate: should chains be free with applications monetizing, or should chains themselves capture value? The discussion broadened with contributions from Nina Rong (BNB Chain Growth Lead and former Arbitrum employee), who argued that endlessly lowering Gas is no longer the top priority. The industry must establish sustainable business models—whether through fees, revenue sharing, or other agreements—to ensure long-term viability beyond reliance on foundation grants. The debate underscores two diverging paths: 1. **Solana's "Ultra-Low Cost + Ecosystem Flywheel":** Prioritizes high throughput and minimal fees to attract users and applications. Value capture for apps happens off-chain (e.g., front-end fees, subscriptions). 2. **Arbitrum's "Customizable App-Chain + Revenue Share":** Allows projects to launch their own chains, control sequencers, and retain most fee revenue while sharing a portion with the parent ecosystem, creating a clearer business闭环 for large entities like Robinhood. An underlying issue is Ethereum's minimal value capture. While Robinhood Chain settles on Ethereum, over 99.99% of the fees are retained by Robinhood and Arbitrum, with only a tiny fraction going to Ethereum for data availability and security—posing a long-term challenge for the mainnet's security budget. The conclusion is that the industry is moving beyond a simple "cheapest Gas" competition. The real challenge is finding a sustainable balance between user experience, infrastructure profitability, and security incentives. The winners will be those who successfully navigate this complex trilemma.

marsbit35 хв тому

Robinhood Chain Fees Spark Debate Over Business Models: To Be a Tenant or a Landlord?

marsbit35 хв тому

Solana and Arbitrum Co-founders Clash Over Robinhood Chain Fee Model

The co-founders of Solana (Anatoly Yakovenko) and Arbitrum/Offchain Labs (Steven Goldfeder) have engaged in a public debate over the fee economics of Robinhood Chain. The discussion intensified as average transaction fees on Robinhood Chain reached $0.40, over 100x higher than on Solana and more than double Ethereum's fees. Yakovenko argued that the 10% of net revenue Robinhood Chain pays to Arbitrum (with 8% to Arbitrum DAO and 2% to Developer Guild) would be enough to cover Solana's transaction fees four times over, suggesting Robinhood could make user transactions free. He proposed Robinhood could charge fees at the application frontend while using a cheaper backend infrastructure. Goldfeder countered, stating Yakovenko's view focuses on costs but ignores revenue. He emphasized that by building on Arbitrum, Robinhood keeps 90% of the gas fees. If it were merely a user of Solana's infrastructure, it would earn 0% from gas and would have to subsidize any free transactions from its own funds. Goldfeder framed the choice as Robinhood opting to be a "landlord" (earning from the chain's activity) rather than a "tenant." The debate comes amid surging activity on Robinhood Chain, which recently saw daily DEX trading volume exceed $1.72 billion and generated $24.5 million in fees in a single day. Over the past 30 days, the chain's fees totaled $188.16 million.

cryptonews.ru4 год тому

Solana and Arbitrum Co-founders Clash Over Robinhood Chain Fee Model

cryptonews.ru4 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片