FTX被盗资产去向分析：黑客疯狂洗钱

知帆科技Опубліковано о 2022-11-23Востаннє оновлено о 2022-11-24

Анотація

当地时间 11 月 12 日，据外媒报道，加密货币交易所 FTX 在其 Telegram 频道宣布遭到黑客攻击，加密钱包中被盗资金超过 6 亿美元。

事件回顾

11 月 12 日午间， FTX 疑似被黑客攻击。链上记录显示，FTX 与 FTX US 的大量交易所资产开始归集到同一个链上地址——0x59abf3837fa962d6853b4cc0a19513aa031fd32b。

多个项目方提醒用户存在信息泄漏的可能性，建议卸载 FTX App，请勿下载新版 FTX 或进行版本更新。

此外，FTX Telegram 管理员 Rey 表示 FTX 遭黑客攻击，并提示不要访问 FTX 网站，因为它可能会下载木马病毒。

FTX US 法律总顾问 Ryne Miller 回应称，正在调查与跨交易所合并 FTX 余额相关的钱包异动情况，会尽快分享更多信息。

图片

一直追踪本次事件的推特用户 Autism Capital 则给出了更为耸人听闻的猜想：黑客子虚乌有，系内部人员卷款潜逃。

资金流向

黑客地址 0x59ab...d32b 同时对 FTX 在以太坊和币安链上的资产进行转移。使用虚拟货币追踪查证平台逐迹的通用工具查询，该黑客的 ETH 地址持有 20 万枚 ETH。

此外，黑客在币安链地址上持有 74041 个 BNB，1685309 个 DAI。

黑客的资金中转地址如下：

0x585ed783c9246553e8bc9f9046c80f54afee7765

0xb7e3d0fe8349c980a7a93e8378ec6d728970bd52

0x2cb356d17ce28135d593795de6a398f2b997a69f

0xadb8ddf11607fc5faf1d6b50beed9f6c3577203e

0x23a43cf429ec32ebca4624e2182a799141425556

0xc40abf7e6499694ea6f965df96e39e51305e019a

0x29bd06bfb1b52bdae3190f7151ec0367b745b67f

0x961baeb17b99da67daba6de02933fa0195cb425e

0xd73ac858a9b5a83792d2a5e56fb755273620fe73

0x866eeecd1f248d1a0a2e0263f13594a6b8b7c01a

0x60478ad54604f63fe1e46dcee72a7f6463a08f77

资金来源

1、多种资产发生转移

以太坊链的 FTX 地址：

0x2faf487a4414fe77e2327f0bf4ae2a264a776ad2

以太坊链的 FTX US 地址：

0x7abe0ce388281d2acf297cb089caef3819b13448

以太坊链的 FTX 地址以及 FTX US 地址，向黑客地址 0x59ab...d32b 转移资产，共转移了ETH、USDT、UNI、stETH、1INCH、WBTC、SUSHI、YFI、LDO、LINK、MATIC、AAVE、SHIB、APE、PAXG、cUSDT、SNX、USDP、DAI 十九个币种。

币安链上的 FTX 地址也同时被转移转移资产到黑客地址 0x59ab...d32b，转移了BNB、BSC-USDT、BSC-ETH、BSC-DAI 四种币种。

AVAX 链黑客地址 0x59ab...d32b 同时转入 USDT。

2、被转移资金汇总

根据链上交易可知，FTX 地址被转移资产金额 4 余亿美元：以太坊链上被转移资产达 2.88 亿美元，币安链上被转移资产 1 亿美元，AVAX 链被转移 397 万美元。

3、多种手法兑换资产

黑客转移完资产后将以太坊链上的所有代币通过去1inch、Compound、Curve、Uniswap 等去中心化交易所兑换为 ETH，并且滑点极高。币安的一部分的资产利用跨链桥进行跨链转移到了以太坊上，并且中间利用多个地址进行资产兑换。

4、代币兑换汇总

通过链上交易可以发现，被盗资产的变现十分着急，并且滑点极高。变现资金中折损金额达 5900 万美元，除此之外，还向 0x866e...c01a 地址转移了 50000 枚 ETH，在该地址将 ETH 兑换为 rBTC，并进行跨链资金转移。以太坊链持有以太坊 20 万，PAXG 持有 8184 枚，币安链 BNB 持有 44288.94 枚，DAI 持有 1685309.12 枚，AVAX 持有 397 万枚 USDT。

事件汇总

此次的 FTX 被盗案件的资金变现可以看出黑客的变现匆忙，为了防止各种代币被冻结没收，低价出手砸盘，不惜高滑点。现在该黑客地址持有的以太坊量成为了第三大以太坊持有量钱包。

结合近期 SBF 的一系列“操作”和坊间传闻，人们对此次黑客事件尚存疑虑，幕后真相也变得扑朔迷离。目前平台已经对这起黑客事件进行调查，知帆安全团队也会持续关注此事。

最后，可以肯定的是，随着 FTX 事件影响的扩大，势必会引起全球对加密行业监管的进一步重视。

Пов'язані матеріали

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

"Rented Faith: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money?" Bitcoin ETF inflows are often seen as a barometer of institutional conviction. However, week-to-week analysis reveals they are primarily driven by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than directional bullishness. This is the cash-and-carry trade: buying the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in the price difference (basis). This delta-neutral activity registers as ETF inflows but reflects a rate-seeking, not price-betting, strategy. Data shows weekly ETF flow volatility is closely tied to hedge fund ("leveraged funds") short positions on CME futures, with a correlation of 0.70. About half of weekly flow variation can be explained by this single factor. In contrast, Bitcoin's weekly price changes have no statistically significant power to predict flows. Crucially, while this arbitrage trade dominates weekly *fluctuations*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the ~$55 billion total net inflow, the estimated net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The vast majority is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The "rented" arbitrage capital churns, while "owned" directional capital forms the bedrock. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund shorts peaking at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and falling to ~$4.5 billion. Recent outflows align with basis compression, signaling the trade's exit, not a loss of faith. For Ethereum ETFs, the same dynamic is weaker due to negative carry from forgone staking yield. The key takeaway: To interpret ETF flows, watch the basis vs. Treasury yields and CME hedge fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the weekly "demand" headline is driven by rented, rate-seeking capital versus real conviction.

链捕手4 хв тому

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

链捕手4 хв тому

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: HBM Prices Must Double Next Year, Memory Becomes a Burden for AI

Bernstein's report indicates that High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM) prices must double (increase 2-2.5x) in 2027. This is because, while standard DRAM prices have surged approximately 4.5x, HBM prices remain locked in annual contracts, making standard DRAM significantly more profitable per wafer for memory makers (2x the revenue, nearly 3x the gross profit). To maintain capacity allocation for HBM, its price must rise sharply. A critical consequence is that HBM is sold packaged within Nvidia GPUs. To protect its 75% gross margin, Nvidia is likely to pass on HBM cost increases by raising GPU/system prices by about 4x the HBM cost hike. Combined with standard DRAM and NAND price increases, this could raise total AI capital expenditure for cloud providers by around 30%. The report maintains Outperform ratings on Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, significantly raising price targets due to expected upward earnings revisions. KIOXIA is the main loser, having no HBM exposure. MediaTek could benefit if cloud providers seek more ASIC-based alternatives to avoid Nvidia's markup. Valuations have shifted to a P/E basis, reflecting record-high profitability and cash generation expected in this cycle.

marsbit16 хв тому

Bernstein Research Report Analysis: HBM Prices Must Double Next Year, Memory Becomes a Burden for AI

marsbit16 хв тому

The 'Crisis Helmsman' of Financial Markets Passes Away: Reflecting on Greenspan's Federal Reserve Career

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, known as the 'crisis helmsman' of financial markets, has passed away at 100. His nearly 19-year tenure spanned four presidencies, from the 1987 stock market crash to the internet boom. Initially hailed as the 'Maestro' for his crisis management—famously intervening after Black Monday and during the LTCM collapse—his legacy became intertwined with the 2008 financial crisis. His market-friendly philosophy and the "Greenspan Put," an expectation of Fed support during downturns, were praised for fostering stability and growth in the 1990s but later criticized for encouraging excessive risk-taking and contributing to the housing bubble. Greenspan's career encapsulates the central debate of his era: whether markets can self-correct and if central banks should actively deflate asset bubbles. His passing reignites questions about the fine line between stabilizing markets and inadvertently sowing the seeds for the next crisis.

marsbit20 хв тому

The 'Crisis Helmsman' of Financial Markets Passes Away: Reflecting on Greenspan's Federal Reserve Career

marsbit20 хв тому

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

Title: Two Giants "Credit" Surge: Loan Balances of 99 Billion vs. 146 Billion USD, Brazil Emerges as Main Battlefield Summary: The article compares the rapid expansion of credit businesses by two major e-commerce and fintech players, Sea (via Monee) and Mercado Libre (via Mercado Pago), in overseas markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, contrasting with a slowing domestic Chinese credit market. Using Q1 2026 financial data, it highlights their significant growth. Sea's Monee reached a loan balance of $99 billion, up 71% year-over-year (YoY), contributing 17.5% to Sea's total revenue. Mercado Pago's loan balance hit $146 billion, up 87% YoY, contributing 45% to its parent company's revenue. Both maintained stable risk metrics (e.g., Monee's 90+ day NPL at 1.1%) despite rapid scaling. Brazil is identified as a key and accelerating growth market for both. Sea's Brazilian operations saw loan volumes exceed $10 billion, growing 250% YoY, with SPayLater GMV penetration still low (~10%) indicating high potential. Sea also secured a key Brazilian financial credit license (SCFI). Mercado Libre's Brazil segment contributed over half (54%) of total group revenue, with its credit business there generating $11.24 billion in revenue, up 89% YoY and accounting for 12.7% of global revenue. Mercado Pago's credit portfolio, especially credit cards (46% of loans, +105% YoY), is a strategic focus, described as crucial as building logistics was a decade ago. Its net interest margin after loss (NIMAL) remains high at 17.8%. The article concludes that while Brazil presents immense opportunities, the success is largely driven by these integrated "e-commerce + fintech" giants with proprietary transaction data and ecosystems, making it challenging for standalone fintech players to compete effectively.

链捕手25 хв тому

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

链捕手25 хв тому

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

Bernstein analyst Stacy A. Rasgon published a report on June 18 regarding Intel, assessing the potential impact of recent political support for a US-based PC chip design and manufacturing collaboration between Apple and Intel. The report views this as a significant signal for the foundry landscape shift but concludes the initial financial contribution would be minimal. Key conclusions: 1) An Apple deal is seen as a small-scale "proof of concept." Even if Intel wins 40% of Apple's premium notebook chip orders (~5 million units/year), Bernstein estimates it would generate only about $500M in annual revenue and ~$0.03 EPS, negligible against Intel's ~$55B revenue. 2) Political encouragement is not equivalent to enforceable mandates. Winning orders ultimately depends on Intel demonstrating competitive technology (like its 18A node), cost, and reliable supply. 3) The path from validation to large-scale production involves significant challenges, capital investment, and time. Due to these uncertainties, Bernstein maintains a Market-Perform (Hold) rating with a $100 price target, implying potential downside from the ~$121.10 price at the report date. The analysis highlights the tension between near-term validation value—serving as a crucial trust signal for Intel's foundry ambitions and US supply chain resilience—and the long-term opportunity to attract larger cloud and AI chip customers. The investment thesis hinges on successful 18A execution and sustained policy support, not on immediate financial gains from Apple.

marsbit50 хв тому

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

marsbit50 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси