【重磅解读】 粉丝代币CHZ释放抛压,BTC长期投资者仍然出逃

jinjin说币Опубліковано о 2022-11-21Востаннє оновлено о 2022-11-22

Анотація

BTC价格继续调整,粉丝代币CHZ表现低迷。

1、BTC重新测试低点支撑

BTC价格在日K线图中第二次出现回落表现,价格以及达到了最低15815美元附近,迹象测试前期15588美元的支撑效果。从BTC反弹后回落表现来看,价格走势仍然较弱。日线级别的成交量并不高,使得近期的行情仍然处在弱势整理阶段,并且不排除收盘价会达到新低的情况出现。

压力位方面,BTC仍然在斐波那契78.6%对应的17246美元以下运行,因此可继续关注BTC反弹的压力位表现。仍然预判价格会维持压力位下方运行。

2、BTC 长期投资者继续出逃

随着调整的深入,BTC持币时间在155个交易日以上的投资者继续出逃,并且是以亏损状态下转账BTC。据此判断,BTC价格颓势还未结束,至少抛压仍然维持在高位运行。

SOPR占比数值在11月17日和18日达到了0.370和0.367,长期投资者亏损空间在60%以上。因此,在长期投资者持续换手的情况下,BTC价格近期机会减少。长期投资者的SOPR指标达到3年来最低水平,行情仍然以调整为主。

3、ETH短线回撤到支撑位

与BTC不同的是,ETH价格回撤期间达到了支撑线附近,斐波那契78.6%对应的1106美元支撑较强,已经成为价格短线走强的其实点位。实际上,ETH价格以及处在了半年来的低点附近,因此进一步破位前,首先要突破支撑线才行。目前来看,ETH价格走势较弱,但是跌幅仍然可控。因此可继续关注支撑线附近的交易机会。

4、ETH融资利率仍然低迷

ETH融资利率低位运行,数值上看,近期仍然维持在0以下的区域。这表明,经过了前期充分的下跌调整以后,多空实力已经在近期得到体现,多头并未积极抄底,预示着ETH价格近期维持底部区域运行。从绝对数值上看,ETH半年来的融资利率曾经得到9月15日的-0.199,也达到了11月10日的0.062。

5、 CHZ主力表现低迷

粉丝代币CHZ 短线价格表现相对低迷,同时持币前10到持币前100的主力中,这部分主力持币稳中有降低迹象。据此判断,CHZ价格走势上仍旧表现为大幅度回撤。尽管如此,仍旧有迹象表明投资者在积极买入,融资利率达到了0.0309%,为年内最高值,就很能说明问题。考虑到价格处在0.2美元以下的区间低位,可积极关注低吸机会。

Пов'язані матеріали

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

"Rented Faith: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money?" Bitcoin ETF inflows are often seen as a barometer of institutional conviction. However, week-to-week analysis reveals they are primarily driven by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than directional bullishness. This is the cash-and-carry trade: buying the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in the price difference (basis). This delta-neutral activity registers as ETF inflows but reflects a rate-seeking, not price-betting, strategy. Data shows weekly ETF flow volatility is closely tied to hedge fund ("leveraged funds") short positions on CME futures, with a correlation of 0.70. About half of weekly flow variation can be explained by this single factor. In contrast, Bitcoin's weekly price changes have no statistically significant power to predict flows. Crucially, while this arbitrage trade dominates weekly *fluctuations*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the ~$55 billion total net inflow, the estimated net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The vast majority is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The "rented" arbitrage capital churns, while "owned" directional capital forms the bedrock. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund shorts peaking at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and falling to ~$4.5 billion. Recent outflows align with basis compression, signaling the trade's exit, not a loss of faith. For Ethereum ETFs, the same dynamic is weaker due to negative carry from forgone staking yield. The key takeaway: To interpret ETF flows, watch the basis vs. Treasury yields and CME hedge fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the weekly "demand" headline is driven by rented, rate-seeking capital versus real conviction.

链捕手6 хв тому

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

链捕手6 хв тому

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

Title: Two Giants "Credit" Surge: Loan Balances of 99 Billion vs. 146 Billion USD, Brazil Emerges as Main Battlefield Summary: The article compares the rapid expansion of credit businesses by two major e-commerce and fintech players, Sea (via Monee) and Mercado Libre (via Mercado Pago), in overseas markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, contrasting with a slowing domestic Chinese credit market. Using Q1 2026 financial data, it highlights their significant growth. Sea's Monee reached a loan balance of $99 billion, up 71% year-over-year (YoY), contributing 17.5% to Sea's total revenue. Mercado Pago's loan balance hit $146 billion, up 87% YoY, contributing 45% to its parent company's revenue. Both maintained stable risk metrics (e.g., Monee's 90+ day NPL at 1.1%) despite rapid scaling. Brazil is identified as a key and accelerating growth market for both. Sea's Brazilian operations saw loan volumes exceed $10 billion, growing 250% YoY, with SPayLater GMV penetration still low (~10%) indicating high potential. Sea also secured a key Brazilian financial credit license (SCFI). Mercado Libre's Brazil segment contributed over half (54%) of total group revenue, with its credit business there generating $11.24 billion in revenue, up 89% YoY and accounting for 12.7% of global revenue. Mercado Pago's credit portfolio, especially credit cards (46% of loans, +105% YoY), is a strategic focus, described as crucial as building logistics was a decade ago. Its net interest margin after loss (NIMAL) remains high at 17.8%. The article concludes that while Brazil presents immense opportunities, the success is largely driven by these integrated "e-commerce + fintech" giants with proprietary transaction data and ecosystems, making it challenging for standalone fintech players to compete effectively.

链捕手27 хв тому

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

链捕手27 хв тому

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

Bernstein analyst Stacy A. Rasgon published a report on June 18 regarding Intel, assessing the potential impact of recent political support for a US-based PC chip design and manufacturing collaboration between Apple and Intel. The report views this as a significant signal for the foundry landscape shift but concludes the initial financial contribution would be minimal. Key conclusions: 1) An Apple deal is seen as a small-scale "proof of concept." Even if Intel wins 40% of Apple's premium notebook chip orders (~5 million units/year), Bernstein estimates it would generate only about $500M in annual revenue and ~$0.03 EPS, negligible against Intel's ~$55B revenue. 2) Political encouragement is not equivalent to enforceable mandates. Winning orders ultimately depends on Intel demonstrating competitive technology (like its 18A node), cost, and reliable supply. 3) The path from validation to large-scale production involves significant challenges, capital investment, and time. Due to these uncertainties, Bernstein maintains a Market-Perform (Hold) rating with a $100 price target, implying potential downside from the ~$121.10 price at the report date. The analysis highlights the tension between near-term validation value—serving as a crucial trust signal for Intel's foundry ambitions and US supply chain resilience—and the long-term opportunity to attract larger cloud and AI chip customers. The investment thesis hinges on successful 18A execution and sustained policy support, not on immediate financial gains from Apple.

marsbit52 хв тому

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

marsbit52 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片