85% of Tokens Launched in 2025 Have Fallen Below Their Market Entry Price

RBK-cryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-23Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-23

Анотація

According to an analysis by Memento Research, 85% of tokens launched in 2025 have fallen below their initial listing price. The study of 118 token generation events (TGEs) found that 84.7% of assets are trading below their starting valuation, with two-thirds losing over 50% of their value. A significant 38% have experienced a devastating 70-90% decline, entering what analysts term the "token graveyard zone." Notably, all 28 tokens with a high initial fully diluted valuation (FDV) of over $1 billion are in the red, with a median decline of 81%. The worst-performing category was infrastructure projects, which formed the bulk of the sample and fell an average of 72-82%. The DeFi sector performed relatively better, with 31.6% of its tokens still trading above their TGE price. The report concludes that purchasing tokens at launch in 2025 was largely unprofitable. Success was limited to assets with a low starting valuation; in this group, 40% traded above their launch price. For all other segments, the median decline ranged from 70% to 83%, indicating that the TGE often marked a price peak followed by a sharp correction.

Analysts at Memento Research analyzed 118 token launches (token generation event, TGE) since the beginning of the year and recorded massive declines. According to their data, 84.7% of assets are trading below their initial valuation.

Two-thirds of the tokens in the sample have lost more than 50% of their value, and 38% have a current market capitalization that is 70–90% below the initial level. The authors refer to this range as the "token graveyard zone" (highlighted in red on the chart). The authors rely on data from aggregators CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap, their own calculations, and data from public blockchains, with prices recorded as of December 20, 2025.

Large TGEs with inflated initial valuations performed particularly poorly. Out of 28 launches with an initial valuation (fully diluted value, FDV) of $1 billion or more, none are in profit. The median decline was about 81%.

The authors analyzed token launches in categories such as infrastructure projects (Infra, 46 launches in 2025), artificial intelligence (AI, 23 tokens), decentralized financial platforms (DeFi, 19 tokens), consumer services (Consumer, 14 tokens), gaming projects (Gaming, 6 tokens), stablecoins and related projects (Stablecoin, 4 tokens), decentralized futures platforms (Perp DEX, 3 tokens), data providers (Data, 2 tokens), and one token from a scientific crypto project (DeSi). For the 30 largest tokens, the median initial valuation was $1.58 billion, while for another 28, it was around $680 million.

The largest losses were recorded in infrastructure projects. They made up the bulk of the sample and showed an average decline of 72% to 82%. The DeFi sector performed relatively better, with 31.6% of tokens trading above their TGE price. The perp DEX segment stands out from the rest with an average increase of 213%, but the result is heavily skewed by the launch of the Aster DEX platform, whose token ASTER surged in price due to prolonged aggressive support from the largest crypto exchange Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao.

Projects with high initial valuations (FDV) failed to meet expectations and were revalued by the market significantly downward. This particularly affected infrastructure and AI-focused projects, which accounted for the majority of the decline.

Buying tokens at launch in 2025 meant betting on rare exceptions, the authors write. Most launches turned out to be unprofitable, and only assets with low initial valuations showed significantly better results. In this group, 40% of tokens traded above their launch price, and the median decline was about 26 percent. For all other segments, the average declines ranged from 70% to 83%, and there were almost no successful examples.

Thus, for most tokens in 2025, TGE was an unfortunate entry point. The median decline was about 70%, and in the case of inflated initial valuations, the market perceived the token launch as a local price peak, followed by a sharp decline.

Experts allowed for a Bitcoin drop to as low as $56k. Where did this conclusion come from?

Bitcoin's price fell short of 2025 forecasts. Who predicted what and why?

Coins of the year. How and why Tron's TRX token outperformed almost the entire crypto market.

Пов'язані питання

QAccording to the analysis, what percentage of tokens launched in 2025 are trading below their initial valuation?

A84.7% of the tokens are trading below their initial valuation.

QWhat is the median drawdown for tokens with a high initial fully diluted value (FDV) of over $1 billion?

AThe median drawdown for tokens with an initial FDV of over $1 billion is approximately 81%.

QWhich token category performed the worst in terms of price decline, and what was the average drop?

AInfrastructure projects (Infra) performed the worst, showing an average price decline between 72% and 82%.

QWhich specific sector showed an average price increase of 213%, and what was the primary reason for this outlier performance?

AThe perp DEX sector showed an average increase of 213%, primarily due to the strong performance of the Aster DEX token, which was aggressively supported by the Binance exchange and its founder, Changpeng Zhao.

QWhat was the key factor that distinguished the performance of tokens with a low initial valuation from the rest?

A40% of tokens with a low initial valuation traded above their launch price, with a median decline of only about 26%, significantly outperforming other segments which saw average declines of 70% to 83%.

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报41 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报41 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News59 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News59 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片