Alameda Research链上持仓和操作分析:杠杆债务已基本还清,仍有超过1亿美元的主流币

PanewsОпубліковано о 2022-11-09Востаннє оновлено о 2022-11-09

Анотація

Alameda Research的以太坊钱包显示,抵押借贷债务已基本还清,仍有超过1亿美元主流币,FTT等资产未动用,持有质押的SUSHI,山寨币已充值至Binance。

头部交易所FTX遭到挤兑,Crypto面临“雷曼时刻”,作为FTX的兄弟公司,Alameda Research的链上持仓和操作如何呢?

“”

The Block的研究副总裁Larry Cermak在11月7日公布了他整理的Alameda Research的钱包,共31个地址。当时钱包余额为2.69亿美元,比上个月减少了47%。PANews整理了最近Alameda Research的主要链上操作。

地址1:余额2811万美元,债务基本偿还

“”

地址:0xbefe4f86f189c1c817446b71eb6ac90e3cb68e60

“”

该地址两天前余额为8730万美元,是11月7日余额最多的地址。

“”

目前该地址余额2811万美元,持有的主要头寸为在Abracadabra上抵押FTT借入MIM,为加杠杆的操作。不过到目前为止,FTT抵押品的数量为507万,价值为2559万美元,债务仅141.6 MIM,债务基本已经全部偿还,解除风险。

从链上数据看,该地址最近的操作主要是从Bitfinex提取MIM,以及从Binance提取USDT再通过Cow Protocol兑换为MIM,用于偿还MIM债务。

“”

地址2:余额3657万美元,质押600万美元Sushi

“”

地址:0xc5ed2333f8a2c351fca35e5ebadb2a82f5d254c3

“”

该地址两天前余额为5901万美元,目前余额3657万美元。

“”

在DeFi协议中,该地址质押在SushiSwap中的xSUSHI价值607万美元,在Sushi中还有少量SRM+ETH、REN+ETH、UBXT+ETH、MAPS+ETH、OXY+ETH的流动性。在BENQI中有404万美元的sAVAX抵押品,没有债务。在Abracadabra上有67.5万FTT抵押品,价值351万美元,MIM债务已基本还清。另外在Uniswap、Synapse、Balancer等协议上也有少量流动性。

“”

钱包中的余额为1568万美元,持有的资产主要为SRM、DAI、renBTC、WBTC、UNI。

该地址最近的链上操作也主要是偿还抵押FTT借MIM的债务,另外还将一些BIT、SUSHI、USDC代币转移到其它地址。

“”

地址3:余额753万美元,仅3万多美元债务

“”

地址:0xca436e14855323927d6e6264470ded36455fc8bd

“”

该地址两天前余额3429万美元,目前余额753万美元。

“”

该地址现在的持仓包括钱包中的20万FTT和Abracadabra中的120万FTT抵押品,这部分价值就超过700万美元,Abracadabra中只有32775美元的债务。

同样,该地址也从Binance提取了USDT,兑换成MIM,偿还债务。

“”

值得注意,该地址3天前才从Convex/Curve提取了1500万美元的稳定币,发送到其它地方。但昨晚随着FTT的剧烈下跌,不得不偿还债务。

“”

地址4:余额1773万美元,仅少量CRV债务

“”

地址:0x712d0f306956a6a4b4f9319ad9b9de48c5345996

“”

该地址两天前余额3063万美元,目前余额1773万美元。

“”

目前该地址钱包中持有1177万美元的代币,主要为价值1008万美元的549 WBTC和价值146万美元的29.8万FTT。

“”

DeFi项目中,在Aave中抵押有208 WBTC,借入了价值约10%的CRV;在Ankr中有1798 aETHc的余额,价值253万美元。

该地址最近从Compound中赎回了800 WBTC,并将其中的250.9 WBTC充值到Binance,剩余部分保留在钱包中。

“”

地址5:余额7513万美元,全仓USDC

“”

地址:0xe31a9498a22493ab922bc0eb240313a46525ee0a

“”

该地址两天前余额为1952万美元,目前余额7513万美元,持仓全是USDC。

从链上交易记录看,该地址主要用于钱包间USDC的中转。

“”

地址6:余额1704万美元,高频向Binance充值

“”

地址:0x3507e4978e0eb83315d20df86ca0b976c0e40ccb

“”

该地址为Alameda Research在Binance的充值地址。

“”

该地址两天前余额为1074万美元,目前余额1704万美元。由于该地址由Binance掌握私钥,地址上的余额也并不代表仍由Alameda Research掌控,同样Alameda Research在Binance的余额也可能高于地址上的余额。但是,充值情况能够反映一些问题。

从链上数据看,该地址的交易非常活跃,仅在过去24小时就有36笔充值记录。近期的充值数据包括稳定币和MASK、SRM、SAND、KNC等山寨币的充值。

“”

地址7:余额3429万美元,存放BIT

“”

地址:0x84d34f4f83a87596cd3fb6887cff8f17bf5a7b83

“”

该地址两天前余额仅16万美元,现在余额3429万美元。

“”

近段时间,该地址几乎没有进行操作。但在过去22~18小时期间,Alameda Research从FTX和Coinbase提现BIT到该地址。

此前,迫于BitDAO社区指责双方互换的代币可能已遭抛售,Alameda Research不得不将这些代币重新充值到链上。目前,该地址上主要就为1亿枚BIT代币。

“”

小结

“”

在分析了Alameda Research的链上持仓后,我们发现此前Alameda Research确实在Acracadabra上有抵押FTT的借贷行为,但到目前为止,两天前余额超过1000万美元的地址上的债务都已基本还清,Alameda Research也没有动用这些FTT。

“”

在主要的前五个地址中,抛开FTT、SRM等全家桶外,稳定币、BTC、ETH的余额约为1亿美元,再加上其它地址,主流币余额超过1亿美元,仍有部分流动性。山寨币已经充值到Binance,此外还有约600万美元的SUSHI处于质押中。

“”

本次整理的持仓仅参考了以太坊地址,Solana等链上的并未包括在内。

Пов'язані матеріали

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

"Rented Conviction: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Is Real Money" The weekly inflows into Bitcoin ETFs are often interpreted as a gauge of institutional belief. However, a significant portion of this activity is driven by a hidden arbitrage trade, not directional conviction. The core mechanism is a cash-and-carry arbitrage: traders buy spot Bitcoin (often via ETFs) while simultaneously shorting CME futures to lock in the price difference, or "basis." This delta-neutral trade is essentially an interest rate play. In weekly data, about half the fluctuation in ETF flows can be explained by new short positions added by leveraged funds (hedge funds), with a correlation of 0.70. Bitcoin's price movement in a given week shows no statistical power in predicting these flows. While this arbitrage trade drives weekly *volatility*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the total ~$55 billion in net ETF inflows, the current net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The remainder is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week, which constitutes the vast majority of the accumulated "mountain" over two years. Thus, ETF flow data overstates the *volatility* of conviction, not its *level*. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for nearly two years. Leveraged fund short positions peaked at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and have since declined to ~$4.5 billion. When the basis compresses to unprofitable levels, ETF inflows and short positions retreat together. Recent outflows should not be mistaken for a loss of faith but rather the routine unwinding of this rate trade. For Ethereum ETFs, the pattern is weaker. Accounting for staking yield makes the basis often negative, so neither strong conviction buying nor robust arbitrage supports its flows. To interpret ETF flows correctly, monitor the CME basis versus T-bill rates and leveraged fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the next "demand" headline is real. The real, patient buy-and-hold demand is what constitutes the enduring bulk of ETF assets.

marsbit20 хв тому

Rented Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Inflows Is Real Money?

marsbit20 хв тому

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

South China Morning Post The leveraged ETF tracking SK Hynix has surged over tenfold year-to-date, fueled by intense market speculation on the memory chip sector. By June 22, the value of the 'South Korea 2x Long SK Hynix ETF' listed in Hong Kong had skyrocketed by more than 1,061% since the start of the year, while its asset size exploded over twenty times from the end of last year. The rally is driven by AI-driven demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM), with SK Hynix recently sampling its next-generation HBM4E product. However, industry professionals warn of significant risks. Leveraged ETFs magnify both gains and losses. During a recent market correction, while the underlying SK Hynix stock fell 19.1%, its double-leveraged ETF dropped nearly 38%. Korean regulators noted that such products could theoretically lose 60% in a single day. Additionally, these ETFs face risks like time decay in volatile markets, liquidity spirals during mass redemptions, and extreme price dislocations from market-making failures, as seen in early June when an ETF moved opposite to its underlying stock. The trading is predominantly driven by retail investors, with institutional capital largely absent due to the products' high volatility. Analysts caution that with the semiconductor sector at elevated valuations and facing geopolitical and supply chain uncertainties, leveraged ETFs pose a substantial threat of amplified losses for uninformed investors.

marsbit1 год тому

Soaring Over Tenfold Within the Year: The Frenzy Over SK Hynix Leveraged Products

marsbit1 год тому

18 Months, Over 50x Surge: KIOXIA's Epic Comeback

KIOXIA, a NAND flash memory giant, staged a dramatic comeback driven by AI demand. After a period of significant losses, a failed merger, and missed HBM opportunities, its 2024 IPO began modestly. However, fueled by explosive demand for AI data storage, its stock price skyrocketed over 50 times within 18 months, making it Japan's most valuable company, surpassing Toyota. Its Q1 FY2026 profit guidance soared 30-fold year-over-year, with 2026 NAND capacity already sold out. Key to its success is its 3D NAND technology, BiCS FLASH. As the inventor of NAND, KIOXIA advanced its technology through generations, reaching over 200 layers by 2023. Key innovations include CBA (CMOS directly Bonded to Array), which separately manufactures control circuits and memory arrays for better performance, and OPS (On Pitch Select Gate) to increase density. The company is now developing high-capacity packages like an 8TB solution stacking 32 dies. Looking beyond NAND, KIOXIA is exploring 3D DRAM with its OCTRAM technology, using oxide semiconductor transistors for ultra-low leakage to reduce power consumption. This fundamental research differs from HBM and represents a long-term bet to extend its 3D expertise from NAND into future DRAM architectures. KIOXIA's story highlights how technological assets and shifting market cycles can rapidly transform a company's fortunes. While questions remain about sustaining growth beyond the current AI boom, its resurgence demonstrates that in semiconductors, being down does not necessarily mean being out.

marsbit1 год тому

18 Months, Over 50x Surge: KIOXIA's Epic Comeback

marsbit1 год тому

Market Trends in U.S. Stocks (June 23): Peak at Listing? SpaceX Loses Over $800 Billion in Three Days, Tech Stocks Experience Severe Internal Divergence

Stock Market Trends (June 23): Did SpaceX Peak at IPO? The company loses over $800 billion in market value in three days as a sharp divergence unfolds within the tech sector. SpaceX's post-IPO decline of over 20%, falling below its first-day close, reflects a swift market repricing. The catalyst is a clear shift in narrative from "AI platform potential" to concerns over rising capital costs, as its $8.57 billion IPO and subsequent $20 billion debt offering are earmarked for acquisitions and refinancing existing bridge loans rather than de-leveraging. While high-valuation tech stocks like Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft faced pressure, Micron surged nearly 7% to a record high following a strategic supply deal with Anthropic for HBM and memory, highlighting robust, tangible demand in AI infrastructure. The broader market saw funds rotate into more defensive industrial and financial names. Macro factors included a dip in oil prices to a three-month low on news of a US-Iran framework deal, though logistical hurdles for resuming full Strait of Hormuz shipments remain. Key events ahead include Nvidia's shareholder meeting, Micron's earnings, and the May PCE inflation data. The latter will be crucial in determining whether the sell-off in high-valuation growth stocks, which appears to have just begun, will persist.

marsbit1 год тому

Market Trends in U.S. Stocks (June 23): Peak at Listing? SpaceX Loses Over $800 Billion in Three Days, Tech Stocks Experience Severe Internal Divergence

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片