Apple and the Metaverse: Everything We Know So Far

DecryptОпубліковано о 2022-10-15Востаннє оновлено о 2022-10-15

Анотація

Apple’s mixed reality headset is reportedly on the horizon, but will its immersive vision tie into the Web3 metaverse?

Tech giants see huge opportunity in the metaverse—the name given to a future, more immersive vision of the internet with potential real-world ties. Facebook parent Meta has bet big on the prospect, as its rebrand suggests, while Microsoft has both teamed with Meta and acquired a major game publisher as it builds momentum in the space.

What about Apple?

The iPhone and Mac maker has famously taken a unique approach to hardware and software design, even incorporating that “Think Different” ethos into its marketing. As the metaverse takes shape through new hardware and online worlds—some of which will be built with interoperable Web3 tech like NFTs—Apple may again take its own path.

Reports suggest that Apple will begin its entry into the metaverse with a pricey headset that bridges the gap between virtual environments and digitally enhanced real-world use. Can Apple take the metaverse mainstream as it has with so many past gadgets? Here’s what we know so far.

What is Apple building?

Apple’s augmented reality (AR) ambitions have been tracked by tech media for years as the firm reportedly has been building in that direction since 2015. The latest reports suggest that Apple will begin with a high-end mixed reality headset that offers both virtual reality (VR) and AR functionality, with ambitions to release other AR-specific hardware further in the future.

Bloomberg reports that Apple’s first headset is expected sometime in 2023 and may be called the Reality One or Reality Pro, based on trademark filings believed to be tied to Apple. It’s expected to be a premium device that will sell for upwards of $3,000—although noted Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has pegged a price in the $2,000-$2,500 range.

In either case, it would be a notable increase over Meta’s new Quest Pro mixed reality headset, which sells for $1,500. Still, Meta’s headset offers a glimpse of the types of experiences that are possible with a mixed reality headset that can overlay digital content atop a user’s full-color, real world view—and the more lifelike interactions potentially enabled by the tech.

On one hand, it’s a fully-loaded VR headset that can access online social platforms (like Meta’s own Horizon Worlds) and play immersive games. On the other hand, mixed reality functions can be used for interacting with digital screens and models while still seeing the real world, or creating art and music with digital tools alongside physical collaborators.

Apple’s first headset will reportedly use a powerful M2 processor from the firm’s Macs and feature a wider array of cameras and sensors—including ones that can accurately recreate users’ leg movements, which Meta is still figuring out. The Information reports that retina scanners will enable biometric security for logging in, making payments, and more.

Other potential features mentioned in reports include an external screen to show the wearer’s facial expressions—a potential drain on battery life—plus custom, snap-on prescription lenses for glasses wearers to use. However, nothing has been confirmed by Apple at this point, and some reported features may not make the first device (or even later ones).

The metaverse won’t be limited to VR and AR headsets. There are already early Web3 metaverse games and applications that live on computers and mobile devices, and that will likely continue to be the case as more metaverse platforms pop up and overlap with each other, creating a more immersive, experiential internet at scale.

But mixed reality headsets are considered a key stepping stone towards that future, and what many believe will be the best way to experience metaverse worlds. After all, such headsets can amplify immersion and more naturally capture the nuances and interactions of wearers, all while retaining a link to the real world—potentially the best of both scenarios.

Such hardware is useless without compelling software, however, and Apple knows well the need for a smooth marriage of the two. Apple is reportedly developing a RealityOS operating system, per Bloomberg, along with experiential versions of apps like Maps and FaceTime, as well as avenues to consume media and games and collaborate with other wearers.

Whether Apple’s vision for mixed reality experiences and immersive online interactions matches the efforts of other builders remains to be seen, but it’s very likely that Apple will not embrace the buzzy “metaverse” term itself. Apple always uses its own unique branding—and, besides, CEO Tim Cook says he’s not a fan of the word.

"I always think it's important that people understand what something is,” Cook told Dutch outlet Bright in September. “And I'm really not sure the average person can tell you what the metaverse is."

But Cook is bullish on augmented and mixed reality tech, and the potential use cases there, telling the publication, “I think AR is a profound technology that will affect everything. Imagine suddenly being able to teach with AR and demonstrate things that way. Or medically, and so on. Like I said, we are really going to look back and think about how we once lived without AR."

What about Web3 and interoperability?

Web3 enthusiasts want to see a metaverse that’s built on open-source blockchain technology, uses NFTs to represent ownership of digital assets, and is spread across interoperable platforms that users can hop between and still utilize all of their digital stuff.

Given that, there’s been fear of centralized tech giants trying to muscle in and steer the direction of the future internet towards a direction that they can control. Interestingly, however, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that he believes an “open, interoperable” metaverse is “better for everyone,” and said that Meta will work alongside other builders far and wide.

While that’s not an explicit embrace of Web3 tech, or an acknowledgement that Meta will build a truly open metaverse platform, it is a more permissive tone than many have come to expect from the company in the past. Will Apple follow suit and build its own metaverse apps and experiences with a similar mindset?

History suggests otherwise. Apple is arguably the biggest purveyor of the “walled garden” closed ecosystem, with its locked-down iOS platform and App Store model that takes a sizable cut from developers’ app and content sales.

That’s riled up rivals like Fortnite maker Epic Games, which is waging legal battles against Apple and Google in the hopes of opening up its app ecosystems. In November 2021, Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney said that “no company can own” the metaverse, and Epic itself is making significant moves in that arena while also not using Web3 tech itself.

Recent evidence also suggests that Apple isn’t keen on letting Web3 technology disrupt its immensely profitable business model. Apple lets App Store developers sell NFTs through their iOS apps, but still takes a 30% cut of all sales—several times more than any leading NFT marketplace. That poses a sizable challenge to many current Web3 distribution models.

But Apple isn’t necessarily anti-crypto. Many notable crypto exchanges and wallet makers have iOS apps that let users spend their cryptocurrency from an iPhone. Cook has said in the past that Apple is “looking at” cryptocurrency, plus said he owns cryptocurrency and has been interested “for a while.” Apple has also listed job openings with crypto experience required.

All of that amounts to a decidedly murky outlook on Apple embracing a Web3-centric, open metaverse. Apple may well choose to build the metaverse its own way, apart from the rest of the industry, but it's unclear if that model will continue to bear fruit in the future as Web3 adoption grows and open platforms rise in prominence.

Zuckerberg, at least, is convinced that Apple is making its own play towards the metaverse. In response to an employee question in July 2022, per a transcript seen by The Verge, the Meta CEO said that it and Apple are in a “​​very deep, philosophical competition about what direction th

Пов'язані матеріали

A New Player Enters at Third Place, Rothera Disrupts the Prediction Market Landscape

"Rothera Skyrockets to Third in Prediction Market Rankings, Disrupting Industry Landscape" Rothera, Robinhood's newly launched prediction market platform, has rapidly climbed to become the third-largest player in the sector by trading volume, trailing only giants Kalshi and Polymarket. Its growth is attributed not to attracting new users, but to migrating existing Robinhood user orders away from partner Kalshi. Previously, Robinhood served as a major distribution channel for Kalshi, accounting for an estimated 25%-35% of its volume. With the launch of Rothera, Robinhood now internally executes events like World Cup contracts, capturing revenue that was previously shared with Kalshi. Data shows Rothera's weekly trading volume surged from $21.9 million to $559 million within weeks, reaching nearly one-fifth of Polymarket's volume. Analysts estimate Robinhood's prediction market business could generate around $10 billion in annual revenue at this pace, potentially surpassing its historical crypto revenue peak. In response, Kalshi is reportedly exploring new distribution channels by engaging with investment banks for a potential IPO, requiring them to integrate their systems with Kalshi to access institutional clients. This shift highlights a new competitive focus in prediction markets: controlling user access and distribution channels rather than just product offerings.

marsbit1 хв тому

A New Player Enters at Third Place, Rothera Disrupts the Prediction Market Landscape

marsbit1 хв тому

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

China's Ministry of Commerce placed 10 U.S. entities, including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth, Red Cat Holdings, and Teal Drones, on an export control list, banning the export of dual-use items. This move is seen as part of an ongoing countermeasure in the rare earth sector. The analysis suggests the primary impact is on U.S. companies within the **military, drone, and rare earth** sectors, aiming to restrict their access to critical Chinese materials and technology. For the Chinese market, the event is interpreted as reinforcing the **strategic value and pricing power** of domestic rare earth suppliers. However, the potential stock market reactions are nuanced: 1. **Chinese Rare Earth Upstream:** Companies like Northern Rare Earth are near yearly highs, indicating this event's "beneficiary" logic is largely priced in. It may confirm the trend but is unlikely to be a new major catalyst. 2. **Chinese Rare Earth Mid/Downstream & Drones:** Sectors like magnetic materials (e.g., Da Di Bear, Zhenghai Magnetic) and military drones (e.g., China Aerospace) are relatively undervalued. While the drone listing highlights sectoral competition, it doesn't directly translate to new orders for Chinese firms. 3. **Impact on Listed U.S. Companies:** The effect on stocks like MP Materials is ambiguous. While Chinese restrictions pose a challenge, these companies are also core to U.S. supply chain security efforts and may receive increased government support, potentially offsetting negative impacts. Their pre-announcement stock prices did not indicate panic selling. In summary, the export controls strengthen China's position in the global rare earth supply chain but have uneven effects across related stock market segments, with upstream Chinese gains likely priced in and downstream/drone sectors receiving more indirect, sentiment-driven attention. The outcome for the targeted U.S. stocks depends on the balance between restriction impacts and potential compensatory U.S. policy support.

marsbit11 хв тому

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

marsbit11 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片