【重磅解读】 BTC、ETH同步完成反转形态,3利好刺激QNT飙升50%

火币资讯Опубліковано о 2022-09-28Востаннє оновлено о 2022-09-29

Анотація

BTC冲高回落,ETH交易所抛压达到近期峰值,向下趋势延续。

1、BTC放量杀跌

BTC价格短线再次冲高回落,价格从2万美元以上回撤到1.87万美元附近,同期交易量明显处在回升状态。这说明,4小时图小时的BTC抛压相对直观,抛售相对明确,继续推动BTC价格向下回撤。 压力位的判断上,BTC在2万美元的抛压较重,意味着9月13日的价格快速回落对趋势影响依然有效,BTC明确的反弹空间已经被极度压缩,破位或将在短期内完成。

2、长期投资者出售BTC

长期投资者的抛售虽然稳定,但是持续脉冲回升的CDD指标显示,BTC的币天销毁数维持活跃,再次反弹提示了抛售压力增加。点位上,BTC在1.8万美元附近的调整迹象明确。这说明,前期低位1.76万美元支撑不再有效。BTC向下空间或将在短期内打开。

3、ETH确认反转形态

ETH日K线图显示,价格短期内冲高回落,虽然价格并未触及布林线中轨对应的1470美元,但是ETH反转走势很快确认。这说明,经过近一周的横盘调整以后,ETH抛售压力迅速提升,进一步的下跌空间已经在确认中。

目前ETH的布林线下轨在1104美元低位,因此短线回撤的有效价格区间很高。一旦价格回撤到1104美元,同时ETH价格也就靠近了斐波那契78.6%对应的1106美元的支撑位,支撑效果还难以确认。

4、ETH被大量抛售

ETH抛售压力增加,交易所抛压前十的交易大幅度反弹,数值在9月27日达到了11841枚ETH,价值1500万美元。据此判断,ETH的价格回撤或者短期内实现。除了日K线级别的回落3%以外,进一步回撤或将触及到下方支撑1100美元。

5、QNT价格迹象飙升

Quant (QNT) 是一个以互操作性为重点的协议,其价格飙升至历史新高,这个项目旨在帮助企业集成和运行分布式账本技术 (DLT)。

QNT 价格上涨的三个原因包括其最近的协议升级到 Overledger 2.0.5、推出了 Quant 开发者计划以及在最大的加密交易所上市后增加了对其供应的获取。

互操作性扩展

9月7日消息小时,Overledger 2.0.5 的发布是针对企业的 DLT 网关,提供了各种协议之间的通用互操作性,并允许用户将任何系统连接到任何网络或 DLT。

为了将生态系统与稳定币、DeFi、NFT 和流行的 ERC20/ERC721 数字资产连接起来,进行清算和结算。

QNT 为开发者提供奖励

Quant 实力不断增强的第二个原因是 Quant 开发人员计划的推出,该计划旨在吸引新的开发人员加入生态系统。

活跃的社区是成功的区块链生态系统的标志,开发人员通过创建吸引用户并鼓励链上活动的按需应用和协议发挥着至关重要的作用。

QNT在主要交易所上线促进了交易量的增加

在过去的几个月里,QNT 上线了2个大交易所,这使得24小时的日均交易量从900万美元跃升至9月6日的7.4亿美元以上。

Пов'язані матеріали

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手1 год тому

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手1 год тому

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

The article discusses how companies in the AI era are competing for talent through strategic "title arbitrage," or the renaming of key roles to reflect and attract new, high-value capabilities. It uses Palantir's creation of the "Forward-Deployed Engineer" (FDE) as a prime example. This title reframed client-facing technical work from a peripheral "implementation" role into a core, high-status engineering function. The move was strategic, allowing Palantir to attract talent that blended technical skill with business acumen and to dominate the market's perception of this capability. The piece argues that job titles are an organizational language that signals the value and authority of certain work. Effective new titles, like "Data Scientist" or "Site Reliability Engineer," emerge when a role's strategic importance genuinely outgrows its old name. Conversely, mere title inflation without substantive change is ineffective. For AI companies, particularly in B2B, this is a crucial strategy. AI transformation creates new high-leverage roles (e.g., "Legal Engineer," "GTM Engineer") that combine domain expertise with technical automation. By naming these roles, a company can help clients internally legitimize these change-makers. This, in turn, builds market mindshare, associating the company with the new capability. In conclusion, as AI blurs the lines between product and service, the ability to accurately name and organize the critical, client-adjacent work that defines product learning will be a key competitive advantage. The first to define this new organizational language plants a flag in the market's mind.

marsbit2 год тому

a16z: In the AI Era, Company Competition for Talent Starts with Job Title Naming

marsbit2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片