绝大多数NFT遭受巨大打击,少数知名蓝筹的热度不减

NansenОпубліковано о 2022-09-07Востаннє оновлено о 2022-09-07

Анотація

从更宏观的角度来看,市场对 NFT 领域的整体兴趣和活跃度仍呈现出上升趋势。

从更宏观的角度来看,市场对 NFT 领域的整体兴趣和活跃度仍呈现出上升趋势。

NFT 市场年初至今一直表现不佳,Nansen 分析了 NFT 市场趋势,认为:NFT 价格呈现横向趋势,市场供需力量相当。NFT 的社区归属和文化认同价值要高于实用价值。市场对该领域的整体兴趣仍然高于 2021 年的大多数时期。BlockBeats 对其整理翻译如下:

NFT 价格年初至今大幅下跌,但上周呈水平趋势

从 2022 年 1 月迄今为止,大多 Nansen NFT 指数呈下降趋势。u 本位降幅为 60-90%,币本位降幅为 10-76%。

其中表现最佳的指数为「Nansen 社交-100」(Social-100 Index),该指数由知名蓝筹 NFT 项目构成,包括无聊猿 BAYC、Pudgy Penguins、Azuki、Moonbirds 和 Doodles 等。

NFT 周交易量大部分时间基本持平

然而,过去三周的周交易量呈现微弱增长趋势,约为 7.56 万枚 ETH。截止 9 月 5 日,sudoswap 周成交量约为 4500 枚 ETH,占比 6%,涨幅 23%。

OpenSea , LooksRare ,x2y2 周交易量波动并不显著。NFT 铸造总额涨幅达 20%。

NFT 周成交笔数与周用户数量均平稳波动

在大多数 NFT 交易平台的数据呈下跌趋势或维持不变的时候,x2y2 用户数量与成交笔数分别上涨了 19% 和 21%。

sudoswap 用户数量与成交笔数则下降了 33% 与 23%。

2022 年 NFT 单日老玩家数量几乎高于全部 2021 年同期数据

2021 年 12 月 17 日,NFT 单日老玩家数量达到当年峰值 48,485 人,而目前市场上单日老玩家数量为 47,769 人。

2021 年至 2022 年,NFT 单日新玩家数量在一定范围内维持区间波动。

市场对少数项目的兴趣偏好不减

在过去几个月,销售量为 1 万和 10 万个的 NFT 项目周活跃度一直呈横向趋势。最显著的周活跃度跌幅发生在销售量为 100 和 1000 个的 NFT 项目,跌幅分别为 30% 和 50%。

我的个人观点

NFT 项目的社区归属、文化认同属性,以及已经成为主流项目的共识要高于任何形式的实用价值。正如加密 KOL Cobie 所言,唯一真正的稀缺资源是注意力。没有注意力=没有价值,而社区=注意力。

如果从更宏观的角度来看,市场对 NFT 领域的整体兴趣和活跃度仍呈现出上升趋势。

在市场动荡中,市场除了对少数知名 NFT 蓝筹项目热度和兴趣不减,其余几乎所有 NFT 的流动性以及市场兴趣都遭受到巨大打击。

然而,也有 DigiDaigaku 这样的项目逆势而为寻求到机会,堪称熊市之光。社交-100 指标中的不少 NFT 项目的 7 日地板价增幅达 10% 以上。

Пов'язані матеріали

The War Without a Unified Name: The Domestic Tech Giants' World Model Landscape

The article outlines the diverse and fragmented landscape of "World Models" in China's tech industry, where major players are pursuing similar goals under different names like world foundational models, physical AI, or integrated within autonomous driving and embodied intelligence systems. The core aim is to enable AI to create an internal, dynamic environment for simulation, reasoning, and learning, reducing reliance on infinite real-world data. This "data engine" allows for unlimited generation, experimentation, and iteration. The report categorizes the approaches of different companies: * **Internet Giants:** Alibaba is developing models for linguistic, virtual, and physical worlds (Qwen-AgentWorld, HappyOyster, Qwen-RobotWorld). Tencent's HY-World focuses on 3D, game, and social scenarios. ByteDance leverages its vast video data for a potential "digital twin" model. Huawei integrates its model into industrial applications like smart cars and robotics without separately branding it. Baidu embeds world model capabilities within its Apollo autonomous driving and Ernie systems. * **Automakers:** Companies like NIO, Li Auto, XPeng, and Geely are using world models as virtual "driving schools" and "testing grounds." They generate complex scenarios (e.g., rain, snow) to train and validate autonomous driving systems in simulation, aiming for more capable and safer AI drivers. * **Autonomous Driving Suppliers:** Firms such as Momenta, Horizon Robotics, Haomo.ai, and DeepRoute.ai are building the underlying "world engines." They focus on large-scale video generation for simulation, reinforcement learning, and enhancing end-to-end autonomous driving models, often integrating these capabilities into commercial products. While startups bring focus and innovation, they face challenges like limited data, compute resources, and deployment channels. Large companies possess these advantages and are rapidly transitioning world models from research projects into core business infrastructure powering products in vehicles, games, and industry. The conclusion is that world models represent an evolution and convergence of existing AI fields into crucial industrial infrastructure, moving the competition from simply building a model to effectively deploying it to understand and interact with the physical world.

marsbit14 хв тому

The War Without a Unified Name: The Domestic Tech Giants' World Model Landscape

marsbit14 хв тому

The Crypto Industry Enters the 'Show Me' Era: Vision Alone Is No Longer Enough

The crypto industry has entered a "Show Me" era, where grand visions and white papers are no longer sufficient to gain traction. This shift is driven by increased skepticism, high-profile bad actors, and notably, the serious entry of traditional finance (TradFi) institutions like BlackRock, Fidelity, and JPMorgan Chase, which are launching real, scaled products such as tokenized funds and blockchain-based settlement. This raises the bar for what constitutes a credible project. The communication dynamic has fundamentally changed. The focus is no longer on "what you are building" but on "what you have built and who is using it." Startups must now provide a "proof stack": verifiable data like mainnet transaction volume and active wallets, genuine partnerships with signed contracts, and evidence of organic product-market fit from real users, not just investors. Announcements must be backed by concrete, chain-verifiable evidence. For communication strategies, this means leading with proven facts and hard data—even if modest—rather than speculative narratives. A compelling story must be grounded in demonstrated results. While vision remains important, the balance has inverted from 80% vision/20% substance to the opposite. This higher threshold ultimately benefits builders with genuine traction, filtering out noise and allowing their real signals to stand out clearly. The "Show Me" era is a permanent maturation, demanding that communication strategies prove value, not just promise it.

链捕手45 хв тому

The Crypto Industry Enters the 'Show Me' Era: Vision Alone Is No Longer Enough

链捕手45 хв тому

Meta Follows the Trend into Prediction Markets: Can It Avoid Repeating the Failure of the Metaverse?

Meta, the tech giant behind Facebook, has reportedly formed a team to develop "Arena," a new application focused on prediction markets. Users would use platform points to place bets on outcomes in politics, sports, and global events. This move follows Meta's massive, nearly $900 billion, losses from its heavily-invested metaverse division, Reality Labs. The prediction market industry is already showing strong demand, with leading platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket facilitating hundreds of billions in annual volume. Meta, with its 3.56 billion daily active users across its apps, possesses the unprecedented scale to bring this niche activity to a mainstream audience, similar to its past success in cloning features like Stories and Reels. However, Arena faces significant hurdles. Meta plans to start with a points-based system to avoid strict financial regulations, but this may dilute the core incentive of accurate prediction that real-money markets provide. More critically, Meta enters the space with a major trust deficit stemming from its past regulatory battles, notably the failed Libra/Diem stablecoin project, and its controversial history with political content and misinformation. The prediction market sector itself is under increasing regulatory scrutiny, with recent CFTC actions including fines and the first-ever insider trading case. While Meta's vast user base offers a unique opportunity to expand the market, its success hinges on navigating complex regulations and rebuilding the credibility necessary for a platform dealing with sensitive topics like elections. The outcome could range from Meta dramatically growing the industry to Arena becoming a high-profile regulatory target before it can scale.

Foresight News1 год тому

Meta Follows the Trend into Prediction Markets: Can It Avoid Repeating the Failure of the Metaverse?

Foresight News1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片