一文读懂当前 NFT 市场的流量密码!

BiteyeОпубліковано о 2022-09-02Востаннє оновлено о 2022-09-02

Анотація

随着越来越多的人参与 NFT,如何更好地引流也成了一门学问。

随着越来越多的人参与 NFT,如何更好地引流也成了一门学问。

下面我将通过对当前热门 NFT 平台流量的分析,来探寻用户统计、社交媒体的营销表现以及 NFT 平台增长等方面的趋势。

▌ 社交媒体

Twitter 是 NFT 领域最好的营销渠道,NFT 市场的大部分流量都来自 Twitter!

Youtube 则只能排第二,而且相对于 Twitter,Youtube 上的高质量加密内容要少得多。

不过这对于内容创作者来说,至少不用在推特继续写长推文拼命卷了,去 YouTube 这种竞争更小的地方发展,可能也是一个不错的机会!

▌ NFT 平台

Opensea 在所有平台中流量最多,每个月平均有 2870万 的独立访问量。

Solana 上的交易市场 Magic Eden 以每月平均 890万 的独立访问量位居第二。

但是随着 NFT 交易量的降温,平台的访问量也是全面下降。

尽管新兴平台 X2Y2 控制了每周 NFT 交易量的 36%,但它的的访问量反而最低。这说明 X2Y2 上的大部分交易都是通过 Gem 等聚合器完成的,而不是直接在 x2y2 网站上进行。

(注:GEM 聚合了多个 NFT 平台,包括 Opensea、Rarible、LooksRare、X2Y2 等平台上的挂单,用户可以像网购一样,直接一次性购买多个 NFT,并且批量购买会更加节省手续费。)

▌ 用户统计

大部分玩 NFT 玩家都为男性,而且还是年轻男性。

▌ 设备分布

NFT 市场的访问量与来自移动设备的流量占比之间是存在相关性的。OpenSea 的访问量最多,而通过数据可以发现,它有 46% 的流量都是来自移动设备。

当然了,这种相关性也不是因果关系,并不是说平台的移动端用户越多,其总体的访问量就越多。

但是这个数据表明,越来越多的用户希望通过移动设备来参与 NFT,市场应当相应地加大移动端的资源投入。

(注:移动端 App 是一个重要的使用场景,相较于PC端,其使用频率更高,容易提高用户的 NFT 参与度,增加用户粘性,在未来有助于使NFT的购买成为类似于淘宝购物的生活方式。)

▌ 国家地区

NFT 市场的大部分网络流量都来自美国,加拿大位居第二,其次是英国、土耳其和印度。

(注:这也是为什么国内用户总感觉晚上的 Gas 费要比白天高的原因,说明 NFT 目前的主阵地还是在国外,国内参与度仍然有待提高。)

▌ NFT 与 DeFi 的对比

NFT 要比 DeFi 更能吸引流量。

(注:可能是 NFT 相比 DeFi,拥有更强的破圈能力,能够吸引更多的圈外人,而 DeFi 大部分时候,还是圈子里的人在参加。)

数据表明,OpenSea 目前每月的独立访客数量是 Uniswap 的 10 倍。

这并不奇怪,除了独立访客数量,OpenSea 上独立交易钱包数量(本月为 38 万个地址)也是高于 Uniswap 的(本月为 23.2 万个地址)。

微信扫一扫

关注该公众号

Пов'язані матеріали

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbit6 хв тому

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbit6 хв тому

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手12 хв тому

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手12 хв тому

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbit40 хв тому

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbit40 хв тому

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

The article investigates Sam Altman's personal wealth strategy, centered around his investments in approximately 400 companies while serving as OpenAI's CEO. Despite not holding direct equity in OpenAI, Altman has built a vast portfolio, with at least 10 of his investments having commercial ties or ongoing negotiations with OpenAI. This creates a complex network of potential conflicts of interest, drawing scrutiny from U.S. congressional committees and state attorneys general. Key investments highlighted include the anti-aging startup Retro Biosciences (valued at $258 million for his stake as of late last year) and the chipmaker Cerebras, whose value soared following an OpenAI procurement deal. His most significant financial gain is linked to the nuclear fusion company Helion, where a recent funding round reportedly increased his stake's value to at least $4.1 billion. The article details a decade-long relationship between Altman, Helion, and OpenAI, including a controversial non-binding power purchase agreement and Altman's efforts to secure investments from OpenAI and its backer SoftBank for Helion. Other points include internal investigations at Tools for Humanity (developer of Worldcoin) and OpenAI's massive contracts with tech giants like Nvidia. According to Forbes, Altman's net worth is around $3.4 billion, ranking him 1251st globally—a rise of over 1400 places since 2024. OpenAI's board states that Altman's external dealings are transparent and potential conflicts are carefully managed.

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

Odaily星球日报1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片