“我们早已不是加密货币公司”:Tether首席执行官在KPMG审计后发表声明

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-18Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-18

Анотація

稳定币巨头Tether聘请了“四大”审计机构毕马威对其储备金进行审计,包括在瑞士金库对约150吨黄金进行实物清点。审计结果证实黄金储备真实存在,且公司总储备金超出负债68亿美元。Tether首席执行官保罗·阿尔多伊诺在采访中表示,这标志着关于USDT缺乏足够支持、公司可能大规模撤资的长期传言可以终结。 阿尔多伊诺同时宣布,公司不再将自己定位为加密货币公司,而是“数字美元和数字黄金公司”。他指出,Tether在全球拥有超过6.5亿用户,主要集中在非洲和南美洲,这些地区由于本国货币频繁贬值,对稳定数字资产的需求很高。 公司已将其业务扩展到金融服务之外,投资于去中心化通信、农业以及提供低成本自主供电的太阳能基站网络。下一战略方向是为发展中地区的用户提供基础性人工智能服务,覆盖医疗、金融、体育等多个领域,旨在通过稳定币或数字支付实现每月数美元的平价服务。阿尔多伊诺表示,其主要担忧是当前的高收入不平等可能进一步演化为因AI技术获取不均造成的“智力鸿沟”,从而加剧社会不公。

稳定币巨头Tether聘请了“四大”会计师事务所KPMG审计其储备金——包括在瑞士金库中对大约150吨黄金进行实物清点。审计确认:黄金实物在位,且总储备金超过其负债68亿美元。

“这是一项体力上很艰巨的工作。”Tether首席执行官Paolo Ardoino在接受《财富》杂志采访时评论此次审计时说道。

记者强调,此次审计本应终结加密货币世界最持久的一个阴谋论:即声称USDT没有适当的资产支持,公司总有一天会大规模“取消赎回”。

Tether不再认为自己是加密货币公司

“我们早已不认为自己是加密货币公司。我认为我们是一家数字美元和数字黄金公司。”Ardoino声明。

据他称,Tether在全球拥有超过6.5亿用户,其中大部分集中在非洲和南美洲——这些地区的政府曾多次使本币贬值,因此对稳定数字资产的需求特别高。

声明指出,该公司已经在金融服务领域之外积极投资了两年:投资方向包括去中心化通信、农业以及提供每月几美元即可获得自主供电的太阳能供电网络亭。

人工智能与Tether

Tether的下一个战略方向是为其发展中国家的受众提供基础性人工智能服务。Ardoino指出,即使在最贫穷的国家,几乎每个人都有一部可以运行简单AI模型的手机。目标不是尖端模型,而是医疗保健、金融、体育等几个垂直领域中可访问的基础工具。

商业模式设想通过Tether稳定币或其他形式的数字支付方式,每月支付几美元。

Paolo Ardoino指出,他主要担忧的是社会本已严重的收入不平等,这会动摇其稳定性,进而转变成一个更深层次的鸿沟——财富差距将再叠加一个智力差距。

end-content

Пов'язані питання

QTether邀请哪家审计公司对其储备进行了审计?审计涉及了哪些内容?

ATether邀请了'四大'会计师事务所之一的KPMG进行审计。审计内容包括对其储备金的全面核查,特别是实地清点了存储在瑞士金库中的约150吨黄金。

Q根据CEO的声明,Tether现在如何定位自己的业务性质?

ATether的CEO帕奥尔·阿尔多伊诺表示,公司早已不再将自己视为一家加密货币公司。他认为Tether是一家'数字美元和数字黄金公司'。

Q本次审计的主要发现和目的是什么?

A审计主要发现是Tether持有的黄金真实存在,且其总储备金超出负债68亿美元。其目的在于澄清长期存在的、认为USDT缺乏足够储备支持的阴谋论,并证明其稳健性。

QTether正积极投资于哪些非金融领域?

A过去两年,Tether积极投资于金融服务业之外的领域,主要包括去中心化通信、农业,以及一个能够以每月数美元提供自主电力的太阳能供电亭网络。

QTether下一个战略重点是什么?其目标用户群体和商业模式是怎样的?

ATether的下一个战略重点是为基础人工智能服务,目标是为其在发展中国家的用户提供可负担的AI工具,涵盖健康、金融、体育等多个垂直领域。商业模式是用户每月支付几美元,通过USDT或其他数字支付方式订阅服务。

Пов'язані матеріали

RWA Tokenization Enters the Next Phase: What is the Truly Time-Consuming Advantage to Build?

The article argues that as tokenization frameworks for Real-World Assets (RWA) mature, the ability to issue assets is becoming less of a competitive advantage. The focus is shifting to what happens *after* issuance: which RWA operations can build enduring trust, maintain stable operations, and remain integrated into the financial ecosystem over the long term. The piece introduces the concept of a **Reserve Layer**—infrastructure that connects tokenized assets to the necessary verification, liquidity, and operational systems for on-chain finance. For an asset to serve as a reliable reserve (e.g., short-term U.S. Treasuries, gold), it needs predictable value, standardized features, deep markets, and observable pricing. However, the true, hard-to-replicate advantage lies not just in the underlying asset but in the **operational track record** built over time. This includes consistent reserve management, independent audits, successful redemptions, maintained liquidity, and protocol integrations. Each successful operation adds evidence, creating a reinforcing cycle: more evidence builds stronger institutional confidence, leading to wider distribution, deeper liquidity, and more use cases as collateral. The article presents a framework combining two dimensions: an asset's suitability as a reserve and the issuer's operational capability. The most sustainable model combines **high-quality reserve assets with strong, long-term operational discipline**. A critical blind spot is an asset with high reserve suitability (like gold) issued by an entity with a limited operational track record; the quality of the infrastructure is separate from the quality of the asset itself. In conclusion, the next phase of RWA will be defined by participants who can pair appropriate reserve assets with the operational rigor to support them through market cycles, thereby transforming tokenized RWAs into durable financial infrastructure.

marsbit16 хв тому

RWA Tokenization Enters the Next Phase: What is the Truly Time-Consuming Advantage to Build?

marsbit16 хв тому

Claude Code Easily Compromised with Just a Fake Tool

Researchers have demonstrated a novel attack, dubbed ToolLeak, that can easily compromise AI coding assistants like Claude Code. The method exploits a "mode gap" by stealing the system prompts (instructions) not through direct chat queries, but by tricking the model into leaking them as parameters during tool calls. This extracted information is then used to craft a "two-channel prompt injection" attack. Attackers register a malicious tool with a description formatted to mimic legitimate instructions, prompting the AI agent to call it. The tool's return value then instructs the agent to execute a malicious command (e.g., `curl | bash`), achieving Remote Code Execution (RCE). In tests against six major AI programming tools (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf, Cline, Trae) using older versions, all were fully compromised, with attack success rates reaching up to 1.0. Notably, Claude Code's secondary guard model (Haiku) was overridden by the main model (Sonnet), which had been manipulated by the injected instructions. Newer versions show improved defenses. Claude Code and Cursor implemented mitigations like "progressive tool description exposure," reducing RCE success to 0 and 0.3 respectively in some configurations. However, tools like Cline, Windsurf, and Trae paired with certain models remained fully vulnerable. The research underscores that architectural isolation is crucial for defense, as long as tool return values can ambiguously function as both data and executable instructions, the threat of tool hijacking persists. The paper "TIPExploit: Tool-Invocation Prompt Extraction and Exploitation in AI Coding Agents" has been accepted at ISSTA 2026.

marsbit20 хв тому

Claude Code Easily Compromised with Just a Fake Tool

marsbit20 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片