Chainlink realizó una recompra de tokens LINK por $1,1 millones

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-15Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-15

Анотація

Los desarrolladores de Chainlink han realizado una recompra de aproximadamente 1,12 millones de dólares de su propio token $LINK, a un precio medio de 11,14 dólares por token. Se transfirieron 127.740 $LINK a una billetera de reserva especial, elevando el total de la reserva a 5,48 millones de $LINK (unos 48,5 millones de dólares). Esta recompra forma parte de la estrategia a largo plazo del proyecto para controlar el precio del token, reduciendo la oferta en circulación, un mecanismo similar a la recompra de acciones en las finanzas tradicionales, que suele interpretarse como una señal alcista. Chainlink, proveedor clave de datos para el sector DeFi, es seguido de cerca por los inversores. Aunque el volumen de la recompra es modesto frente a la capitalización de mercado de $LINK (unos 5.600 millones de dólares), refuerza la confianza y puede actuar como un catalizador a corto plazo. Actualmente, $LINK cotiza a 9,34 dólares, con una subida del 5,71% en 24 horas y de más del 12% en la última semana.

Los desarrolladores de Chainlink realizaron una recompra de sus propios tokens $LINK por casi $1,12 millones. El precio promedio de adquisición fue de $11,14 por activo. Se transfirieron 127,740 $LINK a una billetera de reserva especial, después de lo cual el volumen total de la reserva alcanzó los 5,48 millones de $LINK (aproximadamente $48,5 millones).

La recompra de tokens es parte de la estrategia a largo plazo de Chainlink. Al acumular $LINK en la reserva, el proyecto reduce la oferta circulante para controlar el precio de la criptomoneda. El mecanismo se asemeja a la recompra de acciones en las finanzas tradicionales. Permite reducir la oferta y potencialmente aumenta la escasez del activo, lo que generalmente se percibe como una señal alcista.

Chainlink juega un papel importante en el sector de las finanzas descentralizadas (DeFi), proporcionando datos a cientos de protocolos. Por lo tanto, las acciones del proyecto en el ámbito de la tokenómica son seguidas de cerca tanto por inversores institucionales como minoristas. Y aunque el volumen de la recompra es relativamente pequeño en comparación con la capitalización de mercado de $LINK (aproximadamente $5,6 mil millones), fortalece la confianza en el proyecto y puede ser un catalizador a corto plazo para los traders.

Al momento de escribir este artículo, $LINK cotizaba a $9,34, según datos de CoinMarketCap. En las últimas 24 horas, la altcoin se apreció un 5,71%, y en la última semana el aumento superó el 12%.

end-content

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

Пов'язані питання

Q¿Qué acción llevó a cabo Chainlink en relación con su token nativo LINK?

AChainlink realizó una recompra de su token nativo LINK por un valor de aproximadamente 1,12 millones de dólares.

Q¿A qué precio promedio se realizó la recompra de los tokens LINK?

ALa compra se realizó a un precio promedio de 11,14 dólares por token LINK.

Q¿Cuál es el propósito de la recompra de tokens según la estrategia de Chainlink mencionada en el artículo?

AEl propósito es acumular LINK en una reserva para reducir la oferta en circulación, controlar el precio del activo y crear un posible déficit, lo que suele interpretarse como una señal alcista.

Q¿Cuál es el volumen total de tokens LINK en la reserva de Chainlink después de esta última compra?

ADespués de esta transacción, el volumen total en la reserva alcanzó los 5,48 millones de tokens LINK, equivalentes a unos 48,5 millones de dólares.

Q¿A qué precio se cotizaba el token LINK al momento de la publicación del artículo?

AAl momento de la publicación, el token LINK se cotizaba a 9,34 dólares, según datos de CoinMarketCap.

Пов'язані матеріали

Crypto short liquidations pass $3B mark as Bitcoin price nears $72K

Bitcoin and altcoins surged as the cryptocurrency market witnessed over $3.1 billion in short position liquidations from August 19-20, driven by Bitcoin's rise toward $72,000. This price increase was partly a reaction to a US Treasury liquidity intervention, leading to the largest single-day short squeeze on record. While Bitcoin accounted for about half of these liquidations, this event was smaller than previous long liquidation cascades. Concurrently, short-term Bitcoin holders took profits, moving a record 43,300 BTC to exchanges in 2026 as their cost basis was surpassed, signaling a significant profit-taking move after a period of unrealized losses.

cointelegraphЩойно

Crypto short liquidations pass $3B mark as Bitcoin price nears $72K

cointelegraphЩойно

HYPE Soars 26.86%, Approaching All-Time High: What Is the Market Buying Into?

HYPE surged 26.86%, nearing its all-time high. The primary catalyst is news that former President Trump stated U.S. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig is actively working to bring the Hyperliquid protocol into the U.S. in a fully compliant manner. This aligns with Hyperliquid's own lobbying efforts, including a recent proposal with trade.xyz to the SEC for introducing pre-IPO perpetual contracts (IPOPs) to provide price discovery before public listings. Key points driving the optimism include: Hyperliquid's established position as a leading on-chain perpetual exchange; active engagement with U.S. regulators (SEC and CFTC) on frameworks for compliant derivatives trading; and significant political and regulatory momentum under the current administration to foster crypto innovation with clearer rules. Potential paths for Hyperliquid's U.S. entry are discussed: 1) Partnering with licensed U.S. entities for clearing and KYC, 2) Listing Hyperliquid assets on already compliant platforms like Coinbase, or 3) The more complex route of acquiring/building a fully regulated U.S. exchange. The process is estimated to take several months to a year but marks a significant step towards legitimizing on-chain derivatives in the U.S. market, boosting HYPE's price prospects.

Odaily星球日报4 хв тому

HYPE Soars 26.86%, Approaching All-Time High: What Is the Market Buying Into?

Odaily星球日报4 хв тому

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

Jameson Lopp's analysis concludes that BIP-110, a proposal to restrict arbitrary data (like inscriptions) on Bitcoin, failed due to economic and technical realities, not moral arguments. The proposal, championed by Luke Dashjr and others, aimed to "cleanse" the chain but never reached its 55% miner activation threshold. Upon its forced signaling deadline in August, only the OCEAN pool (with ~1% hash rate) supported it, creating a short-lived fork that quickly died as miners faced unredeemable block rewards. Lopp's earlier predictions about its economic infeasibility were proven correct. Technically, BIP-110 was flawed; workarounds to embed data compliant with its rules were demonstrated almost immediately, proving it couldn't achieve its stated goal. The debate often devolved into moralistic rhetoric, with supporters accusing opponents of supporting child exploitation material—a tactic Lopp criticizes as ineffective for building consensus. Lopp argues Bitcoin is driven by incentives and game theory, not morality. Past forks like Bitcoin Cash promised economic benefits, while BIP-110 offered only restrictions and reduced miner fees, gaining no substantial support from major economic players. He predicts the "puritans" behind the failed fork will continue complaining but their new chain will remain insignificant. The episode reaffirms that attempting to censor data on a permissionless, anti-censorship network like Bitcoin is a futile battle.

marsbit7 хв тому

Jameson Lopp's BIP-110 Postmortem: Bitcoin Is Driven by Game Theory, Not Morality

marsbit7 хв тому

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

Securitize's first quarterly report post-IPO reveals a paradox: while its tokenized assets under management hit a record $4.3 billion (up 16% YoY) and platform trading volume surged 147% to $5.3 billion, total revenue fell 5% to $14.4 million. Tokenization revenue specifically dropped ~12% to $7.8 million, leading to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $5.5 million. CFO Francisco Flores explained that most trading volume is not yet monetized, with the majority of tokenization revenue still coming from one-time projects like new protocol integrations. In contrast, asset servicing revenue, a more recurring stream, grew slightly to $6.6 million. The company has lowered its full-year revenue guidance to $70-$80 million from an initial projection of $110 million. Industry experts note this highlights a structural challenge for the tokenization sector. Scaling assets on-chain doesn't automatically scale a profitable business model. Current implementations often rely on costly, customized projects for each new asset or jurisdiction. The future, they argue, lies in building standardized infrastructure that generates recurring "infrastructure revenue" from post-issuance activities like compliance, distributions, and secondary trading—similar to enterprise software. Analysts caution against misinterpreting high trading volumes as indicative of a mature fee-based model, as Securitize's broad volume metric includes many non-monetized actions. The key test for the industry is whether adding billions in new assets can generate sustainable revenue without constant new custom projects.

marsbit9 хв тому

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

marsbit9 хв тому

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

**Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence** Artificial intelligence (AI) is an era filled with paradoxes, which we navigate as we advance. **1. The Prediction Paradox** AI experts, from pioneers like Marvin Minsky to contemporary figures like Geoffrey Hinton and Demis Hassabis, have a history of inaccurate forecasts regarding AI's capabilities and timelines, such as achieving human-level machine intelligence or surpassing radiologists. Predictions about Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) vary wildly between optimistic entrepreneurs and skeptical academics, highlighting the inherent unpredictability of technological futures. **2. The Employment Quantification Paradox** Despite numerous studies from institutions like the OECD, IMF, and McKinsey attempting to quantify AI's impact on jobs, estimates of affected employment range from 0.4% to 67%, revealing vast inconsistencies. This paradox arises because isolating AI's effect from other economic, social, and technological factors is virtually impossible, and forecasts depend on static assumptions about a dynamically evolving technology. **3. The Productivity Paradox** While AI is a transformative General Purpose Technology, significant productivity growth has not yet materialized in major economies like the EU and has only matched historical averages in the US. This disconnect between rapid innovation and slow productivity gains, reminiscent of the "Solow Paradox" from the computer age, is often explained by time lags. History shows it takes decades for such technologies to diffuse and trigger complementary innovations that boost productivity. **4. The Data Value Paradox** Data is hailed as the "new oil" and critical for AI, yet its economic value is paradoxical. Its worth is realized only in use, not in straightforward trade. Despite policy emphasis and initiatives for data asset recognition on corporate balance sheets in China, the monetized value remains negligible—accounting for only about 0.06% of major telecom operators' total assets—highlighting the gap between perceived utility and financial valuation. **5. The Industrial Revolution Paradox** For decades, nearly every major new technology, from the internet and nanotechnology to blockchain and now AI, has been proclaimed as the driver of a "Fourth Industrial Revolution." This constant reassignment suggests prior labels were premature. True industrial revolutions are typically identified in hindsight, not in real-time. Furthermore, the coexistence of such a proclaimed transformative revolution with ongoing economic crises would be historically anomalous. Whether AI truly defines a new industrial revolution remains a narrative for the future to decide.

marsbit12 хв тому

The Five Paradoxes of Artificial Intelligence

marsbit12 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни LINK (LINK).