ENS Plans Large-Scale Expansion of Institutional Activity via Foundation Launch

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2026-08-11Востаннє оновлено о 2026-08-11

Анотація

The Ethereum Name Service ($ENS) DAO token holders ratified the "Next Era of $ENS DAO" proposal, leading to the launch of the $ENS Foundation on-chain as a legal operational entity with a paid executive director, staff, and a five-member board, according to an August 11 blog post by $ENS Labs. This new foundation addresses limitations of the DAO structure, enabling activities like signing standardization agreements, hiring full-time staff, pursuing trademark infringements, and interacting with regulators and courts. $ENS Labs will now focus on technical development, including the ENSv2 upgrade, while the foundation handles off-chain operations, engages with bodies like ICANN and W3C, and pursues a .eth top-level domain. The $ENS DAO retains 54.6% of the total token supply and control over the protocol. The foundation is funded by .eth domain registration revenues, with its transactions subject to a 9-day security council veto period. It is a separate legal entity from $ENS Labs. The inaugural board includes Alexander Urbelis (Executive Director, former $ENS Labs CISO), founder Nick Johnson ($ENS Labs CEO), and three independent directors. Board terms last two years. This update follows governance tensions earlier in the year, including a June proposal for a temporary security council restructure. CEO Nick Johnson's significant token holdings reportedly influenced a vote against extending prior security council agreements, leading to a new eight-member council. Currently,...

$ENS token holders have ratified the "Next Era $ENS DAO" proposal and launched the executable code on the blockchain, creating the $ENS Foundation as a working organization with a paid executive director, employees, and a five-member board of directors, $ENS Labs announced in a blog post on August 11.

This change provides $ENS with its first legal entity capable of holding meetings where the DAO cannot. Furthermore, this entity will handle day-to-day operations, while token holders will continue to control the protocol.

Why the DAO Could Not Sign Documents

According to data from $ENS Labs, the DAO is not qualified to sign standardization agreements, hire full-time employees, sue a trademark owner for a phishing clone, or respond to legal inquiries.

Until now, most representative work remained undone, with some of it being handled by $ENS Labs; however, given that the company primarily specializes in engineering development, it was not prepared to objectively assess this role.

Now that the Foundation has been launched, $ENS Labs states it can focus on development, including the upgrade to ENSv2.

The Foundation has been tasked with taking on the off-chain computational workload. It can now join discussions with ICANN, IETF, and W3C and pursue recognition for the .ens top-level domain.

As a legal entity, it is also responsible for engaging with regulators, registrars, standardization bodies, and courts. Additionally, its duties include consolidating the $ENS brand's trademarks and assets to be able to combat impersonators.

What $ENS Says About Where the Money Remains

$ENS DAO's share of the total token supply is 54.6%, and it will continue to be under the control of the DAO, which includes token holders.

The Foundation, funded by revenue from .eth domain registrations, stores its assets in its own accounts; however, its transactions are now subject to a nine-day lock.

During these nine days, the $ENS Security Council can cancel any transaction that falls outside the Foundation's mandate.

The same post emphasized that the $ENS Foundation and $ENS Labs are not legally identical, and each functions as a separate legal entity. The Foundation does not own $ENS Labs, and the latter has no governance rights over the Foundation, its funds, or the protocol.

The closest ties the labs have with the Foundation are that the founder holds a seat on the Foundation's five-member board of directors; however, he does not participate in decisions regarding funding for the labs.

Who is on the $ENS Foundation's Five-Person Board of Directors?

The inaugural board includes Alexandre Urbelis, a cybersecurity attorney who previously held the roles of Chief Legal Counsel and Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) at $ENS Labs, and served as CISO for the NFL, and now holds the position of Executive Director.

Nick Johnson, founder and CEO of $ENS Labs, holds the founder seat.

The board consists of the remaining three Ventures and ETHGlobal; Brett Sun, co-founder of Prelude; and Anthony Leutenegger, CEO of Aragon. Kartik Talwar from A.Capital

Board directors will serve for two years, and their terms may be renewed by token holders.

The update from $ENS comes in a year already marked by some governance conflicts on the platform. In June a proposal for an interim review aimed to restructure their operations with a focus on the DAO and the foundation.

Johnson, the CEO, who owns approximately 3.26 million $ENS (equivalent to US bonds), has also been a source of some controversy, as, given the size of his holdings, he has the ability to influence the course of voting. This occurred when, reportedly, at the end of June, he managed to secure around 80% of votes against extending agreements with the Security Council.

They later approved a new eight-member council with a stricter requirement of 5 out of 8 votes for a two-year term.

Currently, $ENS is trading at approximately $4.12, down over 1.9% in the last 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap data. It is now more than 95% below its peak of $85.69 reached in November 2021.

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QWhat did the token holders of Ethereum Name Service ($ENS) vote to create, and what is its main purpose?

AThe $ENS token holders ratified the 'Next Era $ENS DAO' proposal and launched the executable code on the blockchain, creating the $ENS Foundation. Its main purpose is to serve as a legal operating entity that can handle tasks the DAO cannot, such as signing standardization agreements, hiring full-time employees, pursuing legal action, and engaging with regulatory bodies and standards organizations.

QWhy was a foundation necessary for the $ENS ecosystem, according to the article?

AThe $ENS DAO lacked the legal authority to perform key functions like signing contracts, hiring full-time staff, suing trademark infringers, or responding to court requests. The new foundation takes over these off-chain operational burdens, allowing the DAO to focus on protocol governance and $ENS Labs to concentrate on technical development, including the upgrade to ENSv2.

QHow is the $ENS Foundation funded, and what financial safeguards are in place?

AThe $ENS Foundation is funded by revenue from .eth domain registrations. As a financial safeguard, the foundation's transactions are locked for nine days. During this period, the $ENS Security Council has the power to veto any transaction that falls outside the foundation's mandate.

QWho is the Executive Director of the newly formed $ENS Foundation, and what is his background?

AThe Executive Director of the $ENS Foundation is Alexander Urbelis. His background includes serving as Chief Legal Officer and Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) at $ENS Labs, and previously as CISO for the NFL.

QWhat recent governance controversy involving $ENS founder Nick Johnson is mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions a governance controversy where $ENS Labs CEO and founder Nick Johnson, who holds approximately 3.26 million $ENS tokens, reportedly influenced a vote in late June. He was able to sway about 80% of votes against extending agreements with the Security Council. This later led to the approval of a new, 8-member council with stricter requirements.

Пов'язані матеріали

Haiwei Huaxin's Official Seal Seized by Over a Hundred People, High-Stakes Corporate Battle's 'Nuclear Deterrence' in Action Again

On August 18th, Haowei Huaxin, a semiconductor firm specializing in gallium arsenide and gallium nitride wafers, reported that over a hundred individuals forcibly entered its offices and seized the company's official seals from a safe, including the corporate, contract, and party committee seals. The incident is the latest escalation in a protracted control dispute. Haowei Huaxin, established in 2010, was originally a joint venture. Control became contested after 2021 when Zhenwei Financial Holding injected capital, becoming the largest shareholder (34.01%), while former parent Haite High-Tech's stake was diluted to 33.79%. An agreed-upon governance structure collapsed, leading to mutual accusations. Haite claimed it was locked out of the subsidiary's premises, while also alleging improper management like livestock being kept on the chip fabrication site. After state-owned Qingdao Haiyue Holdings took over Zhenwei's stake in 2023, Haite accused it of illegally seizing control. Despite Haite winning several legal battles in 2024-2026, which affirmed its rights to nominate directors and the chairman, it failed to regain physical control or recover the seals. The stakes are high: market valuations for Haite's stake in Haowei Huaxin are estimated between 3.7 to 5 billion USD, yet it is only valued at about 83 million USD on Haite's books. Losing control effectively jeopardizes a significant portion of Haite's value. In response to the seal seizure, Haite framed it as a "shareholder rights protection" action agreed upon by five shareholders. This mirrors a pattern in Chinese corporate disputes where seizing physical seals becomes a tactic to paralyze the opponent's daily operations, seen in past conflicts at companies like Dangdang and Bitmain. However, such actions don't resolve underlying ownership issues; the opposing party can report the seals stolen, declare them void, and apply for new ones, albeit with significant delay. The incident underscores how fragile corporate governance can devolve into physical confrontations over symbols of authority, with control ultimately determined by law and shareholding, not possession of a seal.

marsbit3 хв тому

Haiwei Huaxin's Official Seal Seized by Over a Hundred People, High-Stakes Corporate Battle's 'Nuclear Deterrence' in Action Again

marsbit3 хв тому

Bernstein Interprets MRNA's 177% Surge: What's Fundamentals and What's Hype?

Bernstein's analysis of Moderna's 177% stock surge following positive Phase 3 results for its individualized neoantigen therapy (INT) in melanoma distinguishes fundamental drivers from market speculation. The clinical breakthrough is real: the INTerpath-001 trial met its primary and key secondary endpoints, providing crucial validation for mRNA technology in oncology beyond infectious diseases. However, Bernstein argues the magnitude of the stock move cannot be justified by this single trial's fundamentals alone. The surge was amplified by three key factors: 1) A re-rating of Moderna's mRNA platform potential for expansion into other cancers, 2) A massive short squeeze, given ~15% of shares were sold short pre-announcement, and 3) The compelling "cancer vaccine" narrative that fueled broader investor enthusiasm. While the melanoma success is significant, Bernstein cautions that replication in lung, kidney, and bladder cancers—which have different immunogenicity—is not guaranteed. Furthermore, INT's commercial model faces challenges: it's a personalized treatment, not a mass-market vaccine, implying higher production costs and potential margin pressures despite a projected multi-billion dollar peak sales opportunity. The report also notes sector rotation, with some funds moving from crowded AI/semiconductor trades into defensive healthcare stocks, adding further momentum. In conclusion, Bernstein maintains a "Market-Perform" rating and a $45 price target, far below the post-surge price. It views the current valuation as pricing in an optimistic multi-cancer platform success and efficient commercialization that are yet to be proven. The clinical inflection point is clear, but the earnings inflection point awaits validation across future trials and commercial execution.

marsbit4 хв тому

Bernstein Interprets MRNA's 177% Surge: What's Fundamentals and What's Hype?

marsbit4 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Популярні статті

Як купити ENS

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Ethereum Name Service (ENS) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Ethereum Name Service (ENS).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Ethereum Name Service (ENS)Після придбання Ethereum Name Service (ENS) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Ethereum Name Service (ENS)Легко торгуйте Ethereum Name Service (ENS) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

271 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.10Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити ENS

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни ENS (ENS).

活动图片