从喊单150美元到清仓HYPE仅用三天,Arthur Hayes的公信力还剩多少?

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-06-09Востаннє оновлено о 2026-06-09

Анотація

“加密永续合约之父”、BitMEX联创Arthur Hayes近期因其市场操作引发争议。他曾多次公开喊单Hyperliquid代币HYPE,预言其将涨至150美元,但仅数日后便于6月初清仓HYPE及NEAR,成功逃顶。此后,他又在公开看涨Worldcoin(WLD)仅三天后迅速抛售,导致WLD价格大幅波动。链上侦探ZachXBT对此提出质疑,指责其利用粉丝创造退出流动性。 Hayes通过长文解释其操作,称因担忧地缘政治推高能源成本、AI股IPO及美国政治风向变化可能刺破AI泡沫,故其家族办公室已转而持有能源股及核心加密货币(BTC、ETH),并清仓AI相关资产。然而,这并非其首次“先喊多后抛售”,早在2025年,他便在唱多HYPE后高位套现,并在ETHFI、ENA等资产上重复类似操作。 投资者已总结出应对策略:对Hayes的言论需保持警惕,但可密切跟踪其链上操作,其建仓可谨慎参考,但其卖出信号则应果断跟随。文章指出,若继续此类操作,其市场公信力将受损,如同“狼来了”的故事,最终可能遭市场反噬。Hayes本人亦在文章中承认自己“依然是个不折不扣的赌徒”。

原创 |Odaily 星球日报(@OdailyChina)

作者|Golem(@web3_golem)

Arthur Hayes 的市场公信力还剩多少?近期,“加密永续合约之父”、BitMEX 联创 Arthur Hayes 遭到了舆论讨伐,链上侦探 ZachXBT 也公开发文质问他究竟利用粉丝创造了多少退出流动性。

清仓 HYPE、NEAR、WLD

从上周开始,Arthur Hayes 便上演了多次毫无预兆的抛售逃顶操作。

Arthur Hayes 曾多次公开表示 HYPE 将在本轮涨至 150 美元。6 月 1 日,Arthur Hayes 还在因 Multicoin Capital 前联创 Kyle Samani 诋毁 Hyperliquid 激情开喷并与其立下 10 万美元的对赌协议。然而,3 天后 Arthur Hayes 便宣布已全部清仓 HYPE 和 NEAR,HYPE 当天跌幅一度超 13.6%。他的抛售确实成功逃顶,HYPE 在 6 月 4 日创下 75.5 美元新高后便一路下跌,目前价格维持在 62-64 美元附近。

除了抛售 HYPE 和 NEAR 外,Arthur Hayes 还清仓了 ZEC 和 WLD。因 Orchard Pool 遭攻击,Arthur Hayes 清仓 ZEC 或许还说得过去,但其抛售 WLD 就像是一场经典的提前埋伏、公开喊单、最后拉高出货的“KOL 割韭菜”操作。

因为从公开喊单 WLD 到清仓 WLD,Arthur Hayes 只“装”了 3 天。6 月 3 日,在抛售 HYPE 前一天,Arthur Hayes 公开喊单 WLD 目标 10 美元,认为 WLD 将成为那些难以直接参与 SpaceX 股权交易投资者的替代选择。消息发酵后,WLD 当天上涨超 35%。但到了 6 月 6 日,Arthur Hayes 话锋一转,称已清仓了 WLD,原因是 SpaceX 盘前价格走势“反常”,就这么一句轻飘飘的解释使 WLD 当天一度跌超 20%。

Arthur Hayes 与“三流 KOL”的不同之处在于,他会写小作文,并且往往能从宏观经济和顶层设计角度为自己的操作做出合理解释。

6 月 9 日,Arthur Hayes 发表长文Reality Test(完整阅读完约需 20 分钟)解释近期自己的操作。其认为霍尔木兹海峡交通受限导致的能源成本上升,SpaceX、Anthropic 和 OpenAI 三大 AI 股 IPO,以及特朗普将为了中期选举转向反对 AI,这三个因素会刺破 AI 泡沫。

鉴于此,其家族办公室 Maelstrom 持有大量美国上市能源生产商仓位,并且卖出了 AI 相关股票及非核心加密资产,仅持有 BTC 和 ETH。

Arthur Hayes 的话不能听,但操作得盯

Arthur Hayes 的文章不仅善于使用大量的经济数据、图表来论证观点,有时还会叠加政治和历史视角,能把人唬的一愣一愣的。但当你对他的话信以为真并投入真金白银跟随其操作时,没准第二天他就会宣布自己清仓并开始唱空,仿佛完全忘记了自己前一天说过什么,而你的账户也会被同步打击。

这样的操作屡见不鲜。早在 2025 年,Arthur Hayes 就多次上演了“前脚看多,后脚清仓”的戏码。最经典的例子依旧是 HYPE,2025 年 8 月,Arthur Hayes 在日本 WebX 上演讲时鼓吹 HYPE,称该代币还有着高达 126 倍的上涨潜力(Odaily 注:当日价格为 45.9 美元),但仅 1 个月后,他就宣布清仓了 HYPE 并获利数百万美元,理由是规避代币解锁风险。

Arthur Hayes 这次抛售正是在 HYPE 上轮行情的最高点,此后 HYPE 便一路震荡下跌。直到 2026 年的 1 月中旬,Arthur Hayes 才再次大规模购买 HYPE。从走势来看,他买入 HYPE 的点位又刚好是本轮行情的低点。

同样的例子还有 ETHFI 和 ENA 等,均是公开发言唱多,然后毫无征兆的抛售,最后实现精准逃顶。(相关阅读:你小子又先跑了!盘点 Arthur Hayes 的逃顶记录)

长期关注 Arthur Hayes 的投资者已经总结出了一套方法论,即 Arthur Hayes 的话不能听,他的操作必须得盯,建仓谨慎跟随,卖出果断清仓

不过 Arthur Hayes 若仍持续上演这样的戏码,特别是如本次操纵 WLD 价格波动的案例,不管借口被掩饰得多么合理,其市场公信力也将受到威胁。这就如一个币圈版“狼来了”的故事,演到最后,Arthur Hayes 必定被反噬。

他在发表的最新文章中有一句话说对了——“我依然是个不折不扣的赌徒”,而赌徒一般没什么好下场。

Пов'язані питання

QArthur Hayes在近期清仓了哪些加密货币资产?

AArthur Hayes近期清仓了HYPE、NEAR、WLD和ZEC。他随后在文章中解释,其家族办公室Maelstrom现已仅持有BTC和ETH,并增持了美国上市能源生产商的仓位。

QArthur Hayes从喊单HYPE到150美元到宣布清仓,中间经历了多长时间?

AArthur Hayes曾多次公开喊单HYPE将涨至150美元,但仅在三天后(即6月4日)便宣布清仓了HYPE。他在6月1日还与别人因该代币立下对赌协议。

Q文章提到了Arthur Hayes关于WLD的什么具体操作?

AArthur Hayes在6月3日公开喊单WLD,目标价为10美元。然而仅三天后(6月6日),他就宣布清仓了WLD,导致其价格当日一度下跌超过20%。他给出的清仓理由是SpaceX的盘前价格走势“反常”。

Q长期关注Arthur Hayes的投资者总结出的应对策略是什么?

A长期关注Arthur Hayes的投资者总结出的策略是:他的话不能听,但他的操作必须紧盯。具体来说,就是对他建仓的操作要谨慎跟随,而一旦他卖出,则应果断清仓离场。

QArthur Hayes在最新文章中如何解释自己的近期操作?他引用了哪些原因?

AArthur Hayes在6月9日发表的长文《Reality Test》中解释,他清仓AI相关资产(包括部分加密货币)是基于三个因素:1. 霍尔木兹海峡交通受限导致能源成本上升;2. SpaceX、Anthropic和OpenAI的IPO;3. 特朗普可能为中期选举转向反对AI。他认为这些因素将刺破AI泡沫,因此调整了持仓。

Пов'язані матеріали

Wintermute Market Weekly: Iran War Ends, Inflation Meets Expectations, BTC Rebounds to Lower 60ks But Don’t Rush to Buy the Dip

**Wintermute Market Weekly: BTC Rebounds to $60K Lows, But Caution Advised** This week saw a broad market rebound, primarily driven by two converging factors: a US CPI inflation reading that met expectations (4.2% YoY) and former President Trump's announcement of a deal to end the Iran conflict. The latter triggered a sharp drop in oil prices, reducing geopolitical risk premiums and easing inflation fears. Consequently, risk assets like equities and cryptocurrencies rallied, with Bitcoin recovering from lows around $60,000 to close the week up 1.9%, while altcoins gained 3.1%. Despite the price bounce, the underlying liquidity picture for crypto remains weak. Key funding channels—stablecoin flows, ETF inflows, and Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) activity—show no signs of structural improvement. ETF outflows recently hit a record streak, and DAT assets have declined significantly. The rally from $60K to $83K earlier is now viewed as a bear-market rally that has failed. The current environment is characterized by low directional conviction and choppy, range-bound trading, likely persisting into summer. The report advises caution against aggressively buying the dip. While the $60K area offers attractive long-term risk/reward, a sustained bull run requires a visible turnaround in capital inflows, which hasn't materialized. The upcoming FOMC meeting and Powell's commentary, alongside the formal Iran deal signing, are noted as near-term catalysts. The core takeaway is to watch fund flows rather than price action and avoid being whipsawed by volatility before clear signs of institutional or retail capital returning emerge.

marsbit4 хв тому

Wintermute Market Weekly: Iran War Ends, Inflation Meets Expectations, BTC Rebounds to Lower 60ks But Don’t Rush to Buy the Dip

marsbit4 хв тому

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

SpaceX announced its acquisition of AI programming startup Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, for $60 billion in an all-stock deal, just days after its record-breaking IPO. The move sent SpaceX's stock soaring, briefly making it the most valuable U.S. company. Cursor, founded in 2022 by MIT graduate Michael Truell and his classmates, is a popular AI coding assistant that allows developers to switch between models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others. It saw explosive revenue growth, reaching a $4 billion annualized run rate in early 2026. However, its market share was eroded by the launch of competitor Claude Code from its key AI supplier, Anthropic. This dependence prompted Cursor to develop its own AI model, Composer, in early 2026. To scale Composer, Cursor needed immense computing power. In April 2026, it struck a deal with SpaceX, granting the latter an option to acquire it post-IPO. SpaceX exercised this option, offering Cursor access to its Colossus supercomputer, powered by hundreds of thousands of top-tier Nvidia AI chips. For SpaceX, the acquisition is a strategic move to bolster its AI capabilities, particularly for its xAI division, and advance its broader ambition of building orbital, solar-powered data centers. While the deal surprised some employees and investors given Truell's earlier stance on independence, it represents a high-stakes partnership. SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has projected the company could reach $1 trillion in revenue by 2030. For Truell, joining forces with SpaceX is a monumental gamble on an unprecedented scale in the race for AI dominance.

链捕手6 хв тому

Cursor, Why Boarded Musk's Starship?

链捕手6 хв тому

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

Summary: The article raises concerns about the systemic risks posed by SpaceX's skyrocketing valuation, arguing that modern market mechanics, rather than fundamentals, are driving its price discovery. Following SpaceX's market capitalization surpassing $3 trillion in after-hours trading, the author contends that the market is no longer functioning properly. The core issue is not SpaceX's business prospects but the unhealthy market structure surrounding it. With limited float and the imminent launch of options trading, the stage is set for a potential "gamma squeeze"—a feedback loop where market makers hedging call options are forced to buy shares, pushing the price higher and attracting more speculative momentum traders. This mechanism, seen previously with Tesla and meme stocks, can decouple valuation from financial reality. The danger escalates as extreme valuations force passive funds, ETFs, pensions, and major indices to hold the stock. If SpaceX grows large enough—hypothetically reaching $5 or even $10 trillion—its performance would increasingly dictate broader market indices, embedding systemic risk. The author warns that when price appreciation itself becomes the primary bullish thesis, the market transforms from a capital allocation mechanism into a self-reinforcing speculative machine, endangering the retirement savings of ordinary investors tied to passive strategies. The piece questions whether such a system can still perform its fundamental role of price discovery.

marsbit11 хв тому

The More It Rises, the More Dangerous? The Systemic Risks Behind SpaceX's Soaring Valuation

marsbit11 хв тому

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

How much of your $20 Claude Pro subscription actually goes to AI model companies like Anthropic? A viral breakdown image highlights the fundamental valuation challenge for AI applications versus traditional SaaS. Unlike SaaS with high software margins, AI subscriptions face variable "inference costs": every user query consumes GPU time, power, and cloud resources. This creates a tension between fixed subscription fees and usage-driven expenses. While the specific dollar splits are illustrative, the core question is whether AI revenue can achieve SaaS-like margins as usage scales. Currently, infrastructure providers (cloud platforms, GPU makers like Nvidia, HBM suppliers, power/data centers) capture more certain revenue from growing AI usage. Their financials reflect pricing power and faster earnings validation. The bullish case hinges on efficiency improvements: model optimization, caching, smaller models, and custom chips could lower per-token costs over time. The key debate is whether cost declines can outpace increases in user workload complexity and volume. Ultimately, for AI companies to command high SaaS-like valuations, they must demonstrate not just user growth but also improving gross margins after accounting for inference costs. Investors will scrutinize not just subscriber numbers, but usage patterns, enterprise pricing tiers, and real efficiency gains.

marsbit21 хв тому

How Much of the Subscription Fee You Pay to Claude Can Optical Module Companies Get?

marsbit21 хв тому

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

The article discusses the rise and fall of Pre-IPO pricing markets on the Hyperliquid blockchain. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market for SpaceX (SPCX) by launching a contract with a clear anchor: the eventual Nasdaq listing price. This provided inherent price stability and validation. In contrast, Ventuals, a team backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding exclusive contracts for highly sought-after companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. Its key mistake was its pricing mechanism. For companies with no near-term IPO date, Ventuals' oracle relied partly on opaque private market transactions and, critically, partly on its own contract's moving average price. This created a self-referential feedback loop where prices were artificially propped up and detached from genuine supply and demand, leading to illiquid markets. Ventuals shut down after nine months, settling positions at final prices of $1,341.80 for OpenAI and $1,618.90 for Anthropic. Ironically, some employees and late-stage investors of these very companies reportedly used these flawed Ventuals prices for valuation reference, highlighting the acute demand for any price signal in illiquid private markets. The article concludes that while demand for pre-IPO trading is real and growing, with players like Coinbase now entering the space, the fundamental challenge remains: without a public listing to provide a definitive price anchor, these markets struggle to establish truly accurate and liquid pricing. The need for a transparent, self-correcting market is the critical lesson from Ventuals' failure.

marsbit37 хв тому

OpenAI's Hyperliquid Pre-IPO Pricing Venture: Why Did It Last Only Half a Year?

marsbit37 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити HYPE

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Hyperliquid (HYPE) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Hyperliquid (HYPE).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Hyperliquid (HYPE)Після придбання Hyperliquid (HYPE) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Hyperliquid (HYPE)Легко торгуйте Hyperliquid (HYPE) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

304 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.11Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити HYPE

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни HYPE (HYPE).

活动图片