[Key interpretation] BTC has accumulated momentum of breaking down, and EOS has mainly increased its holdings in hard bifurcated markets

HuobiОпубліковано о 2022-08-26Востаннє оновлено о 2022-08-29

Анотація

The loss is large. BTC plans to break the position and fall at the weekend. EOS will increase its holdings and wait for the hard fork price to soar.

1. BTC seeks a breakthrough during sideways Trading

In the 4-hour K-line diagram, during the horizontal operation stage of BTC, the price fluctuation space is very limited. It is generally limited to the distance between the middle rail of the Bollinger line and the rail of the Bollinger line, with a span of only US $350. At the same time, the longer the sideways time, there are signs that BTC will further fall below the middle rail of the brin line. The corresponding point of the middle rail of brin line is 21492 US dollars. At present, the trading volume continues to shrink, and the possibility of the price choosing the direction in the short term is increased. Pay attention to the falling signal after the weekend change.

2. BTC does not realize high loss operation

The unrealized loss of BTC remained at a high level, which indicates that the loss of investors will not be reduced during the period of price sideways adjustment. With the completion of the downward falling signal of BTC price during the horizontal trading period, the impact of unrealized losses on the market remains unchanged. On the premise that the unrealized loss has not significantly decreased, it is more likely that BTC will further adjust. Recently, the chain and spot trading volume have remained stable, which has formed a certain support for the BTC price. However, the buying does not seem to be strong, and the real direction can be confirmed after the BTC fluctuation strengthens.

3. EOS short line 2nd pulse

After the EOS short-term pulse volume rose for two times in a row, the price rose to below $2 and then fell. Due to the short release time, the price fluctuation space of EOS is weakened. After falling for three consecutive trading days recently, there are obvious signs of continued decline. In terms of indicators, the RSI index on the 12th rebounded to the highest 74 and then retreated. Although there was no overbought article reaching 80, it still suggested that the short-term high level appeared and the position reduction signal was formed. In terms of growth, after the EOS hit the bottom from the low of US $0.815, it reached US $1.958, up 140%. In terms of trading volume, the peak volume did not significantly exceed the previous high, and attention should be paid to adjusting the risk.

4. EOS main currency holding growth

Among the top 10 main holders of EOS, the number of coins held by EOS also increased as the price fluctuated upward. In terms of specific value, it rebounded from 68.16% on August 4 to 69.62% on August 25, and the recovery space reached 1.46 percentage points. In terms of price increase, the EOS price rose from the closing price of US $1.118 on August 4 to US $1.732 on August 25, with an increase of 54%. The trend of main positions increased in synchronization with the price increase.

5. Message side

On August 17, Yves la rose, CEO of EOS network foundation, announced the launch of a new forked public chain antelope to replace EOS on social media. According to the introduction, antelope is an open framework for building the next generation of Web3 products and services. Its community run code base supports the fastest and safest user-friendly blockchain.

At the time point, on September 21, EOS will hard fork and activate its v3.1 consensus upgrade (hardwork). EOS EVM (trustevm) will soon be available on the EOS network.

Previously, Yves La Rose said that trust EVM launched by EOS might become the preferred L2 solution for Ethereum. Trust EVM is the official EOS EVM platform with deterministic gas computing, EVM compatibility at instruction set level and full RPC compatibility. It will soon be launched on the EOS main network

In fact, the hard fork is EOS foundation and block In the process of one seizing power, the hard bifurcation news can indeed attract investors to enter the market for trading, but the duration of the heat should be vigilant. At the same time, the ecological development after the hard bifurcation is the most noteworthy place. As for the time of speculation, there is still half a month to go before the hard bifurcation. In the near future, we can pay attention to the low-income opportunities.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbit46 хв тому

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbit46 хв тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手47 хв тому

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手47 хв тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit3 год тому

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit3 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手4 год тому

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手4 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit5 год тому

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit5 год тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси