[Key interpretation] giant whale raised 17000 BTC, and the unconfirmed transactions of eth dropped to 149000

HuobiОпубліковано о 2022-08-24Востаннє оновлено о 2022-08-25

Анотація

BTC giant whale has attracted a small amount of funds, and the key support has been confirmed.

1. BTC horizontal plate finishing

The daily hour K-line chart shows that the BTC price has obvious horizontal adjustment characteristics, and the price has not rebounded strongly in the horizontal stage, which means that the adjustment may still last for a long time. The obv indicator shows that the value of this indicator has been moving back from the beginning of July. The falling of the indicator means that BTC has accumulated more trading volume during the falling period. This shows that BTC will have greater pressure to rebound after more falling traders continue to increase their volume and increase their turnover. After the current 21000 US dollars has locked in short-term investors.

2. The number of giant whale addresses increased slightly

With the continuation of the BTC shock, the decreasing trend of the number of giant whale addresses tends to ease. The number of addresses increased from the recent low of 2128 to 2145 on August 23, an increase of 17. Based on 1000 BTCs per address, 17000 BTCs are absorbed by the giant whale. Compared with the number of giant whale addresses on March 21 in the previous period, the number of giant whale addresses is still relatively down. That is to say, the number of BTCs tends to diverge, and further low absorption opportunities can be considered after the main force further confirms its entry into the market.

3. The realized price is $21669

The realized price of BTC is calculated as the realized upper limit divided by the total coin supply. It measures the supply weighted average price paid by the entire market participants for their coins. It can be interpreted as support or resistance price on the chain.

When the BTC price retreats to the realized price, the corresponding support will be reflected. At the beginning of 2020, BTC completed the bottom form below the realized price of $5400, which is a typical low absorption trading signal.

On August 23, the realized price of BTC fell to US $21669, and the current price of BTC is close to the realized price of US $21300. According to this judgment, BTC can effectively verify the bullish signal if it can rebound above the realized price.

4. Eth rebounded slightly

In the recent trend of eth in the past two months, the trading volume rebounded during the price rebound period, and the obv index value rebounded slightly, which means that the trading volume during the rise period is higher. Therefore, unlike BTC, ETH has recently been actively bought by more investors. In terms of price performance, ETH operates around us $1627, which is still lower than the corresponding US $1769 of the middle rail of brin line. According to this judgment, ETH is in a relatively weak operating state, and the price performance still tends to fall.

5. The number of unconfirmed transactions in eth is low

The unconfirmed transactions of eth maintain a downward trend, which indicates that the trading heat is relatively low in the current market, which means that there are few opportunities for the ETH price to further strengthen. Before and after March 25, there was a large rebound space, and the number of unconfirmed transactions reached the peak of 1.3 million. At present, the number of unconfirmed transactions is not only sluggish, but also in a callback state. On August 24, the number of unconfirmed transactions dropped to the low of 149000, which is unlikely to boost the price.

Пов'язані матеріали

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

AI investor Leopold Aschenbrenner has made a significant portfolio shift, taking a $9 billion nominal short position against top AI infrastructure stocks like NVIDIA, ASML, and Oracle. Simultaneously, he is redirecting capital towards what he sees as the next critical bottlenecks in the AI boom: power, memory, and data center networking, alongside private investments in AI model companies like Anthropic. This move is interpreted not as a call that the AI bubble has burst, but as a rotation within the infrastructure stack. The analysis highlights NVIDIA's recent $25 billion bond issuance as a potential signal, questioning why a cash-rich company would seek external debt despite high profits and increased dividends/buybacks. The core investment thesis is that the initial, crowded "picks and shovels" trade in semiconductors is maturing. The next wave of capital is expected to flow into the physical and logistical constraints of AI expansion: electricity supply, memory chip capacity, data center construction, and enabling technologies like optical networking (fiber) for high-bandwidth communication, where copper remains crucial for short distances. Aschenbrenner's substantial (approx. 20% of fund) private stake in Anthropic is noted as a key part of his strategy—investing directly in the "mine" (AI models) rather than just the "shovels." The discussion concludes that while certain segments may be overvalued, the overarching AI infrastructure demand driven by real product usage remains robust. The most promising long-term investments are seen in essential, non-sexy infrastructure—particularly energy and power companies—whose demand is viewed as a global constant irrespective of AI's cyclicality.

marsbit16 хв тому

Analysis of the Latest Portfolio Adjustment by the "Top Player" in the U.S. Stock Market: $9 Billion Short on NVIDIA, Shifting Focus to Power and Memory Sectors

marsbit16 хв тому

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit44 хв тому

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit44 хв тому

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit1 год тому

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片