White hat: I returned most of the stolen Nomad funds and all I got was this silly NFT

CointelegraphОпубліковано о 2022-08-24Востаннє оновлено о 2022-08-24

Анотація

Hackers behind the $190 million Nomad Bridge are now being incentivized with "whitehat" themed non-fungible tokens (NFTs) if they return nearly all of the funds they stole from the protocol at the start of this month.

Hackers behind the $190 million Nomad Bridge are now being incentivized with "whitehat" themed non-fungible tokens (NFTs) if they return nearly all of the funds they stole from the protocol at the start of this month.
The exclusive NFT, which simply depicts a white wizard’s hat, is being offered by NFT firm Metagame and can be minted by those that return at least 90% of their stolen funds to Nomad.
1/ Our friends at @metagame created an earned NFT as a thank you to whitehats who returned funds from the Nomad Bridge Hack. Head over https://t.co/TWwuJwnRXj to claim it! pic.twitter.com/V87rkGhBEE
— Nomad (⤭⛓) (@nomadxyz_) August 23, 2022
“If you haven’t yet returned funds, you can still do so now! Metagame checks your on-chain tx history automatically,” the Nomad team stated via Twitter on Aug. 23.
Speaking with Cointelegraph, Metagame founder Brenner Spear noted that while he has “no idea if it’ll nudge anyone to return funds that wouldn’t have otherwise,” the move is part of a broader attempt to foster and support good behavior in the sector:
“I am supportive of people doing the right things for the wrong reasons. More of the right things will happen, and maybe, people will start doing more of the right things for the right reasons too.”
The non-fungible token doesn’t have any function, as it essentially serves as a trophy to represent an act of good faith. The first 50 people to return the funds in relation to this promo, will also receive 100 FF tokens ($53) from web3 platform Forefront.
We at @Metagame have teamed up with @nomadxyz_ @nomadxyz_, @divine_economy @divine_economy, and @forefront__ @forefront__ to produce a free NFT exclusively mintable by Nomad whitehat hackers.
Here’s what happened and why we’re giving status to this elite cohort of whitehats…
— brenner.eth (@BrennerSpear) August 23, 2022
The Nomad Bridge was initially hacked on Aug. 2, after bad actors discovered a security loophole in Nomad’s smart contracts which allowed them to extract funds that didn’t belong to them via dubious transactions.
According to a post-mortem analysis earlier this month from Coinbase’s principal blockchain threat intelligence researcher Peter Kacherginsky, and Heidi Wilder, a senior associate of the special investigations team, hundreds of copycats then joined in on the fun by copying the same code used to start the hack but slightly modified the target token, token amount and recipient addresses.
The concept doesn’t appear to have gone down well on Twitter, however, with many users taking the time to clown on the idea. @Huzmond wrote “Incentive go brrrrr” while @aldy_argr questioned whether this was a “comedian account?”
“That's what the team comes up with to solve the problem? Rewarding a hacker with worthless NFT?” @hinzpak chimed, with the Metagame team responding that “It was Metagame’s idea, and built by Metagame - we just brought it, Nomad. They have much more important things to focus on!.”
As of Aug. 8, Cointelegraph reported that white hat hackers had returned around $32.6 million of the total $190 million that was stolen.

Пов'язані матеріали

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

The crypto market is currently in an adjustment phase driven by policy expectations and liquidity shifts. Despite a brief rebound fueled by geopolitical easing and SpaceX's strong IPO performance, unexpectedly hawkish signals from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh have removed anticipated easing support. Concurrently, stablecoin liquidity is shrinking, with insufficient new capital inflows, pushing the market into a typically quiet summer period. Pricing lacks catalysts for a sustained rally. Daily trading volume has significantly contracted, stablecoin growth has slowed markedly, and the supportive effect of Strategy's (formerly MicroStrategy) STRC preferred stock-financed Bitcoin purchases is fading. Amid policy uncertainty, seasonal weakness, and liquidity contraction, Bitcoin faces near-term downward pressure. Warsh's hawkish pivot and refusal to provide a clear policy outlook have increased risk premiums, historically unfavorable for Bitcoin. Technically, the trend remains bearish below $73,700, with $62,446 as critical support. A break below could accelerate declines, though a prolonged consolidation phase, similar to 2022's bottoming process, is possible. Liquidity is a core constraint. Current daily volume is around $500 billion, roughly 25% of the peak during the July-Oct 2025 rally. The 12-month growth rates for USDT and USDC have fallen to ~20%, with 6-month growth near zero, indicating weak new inflows. Bitcoin ETF and Strategy-driven inflows have also weakened, with a 30-day rolling net outflow. With inflation at 4.2% above the Fed's target, combined hawkish policy, seasonal factors, and liquidity shortages challenge Bitcoin's ability to hold above $60,000. However, this adjustment phase may be forming a cyclical low this summer, potentially setting the stage for the next bull cycle.

marsbit19 хв тому

BIT Research: Liquidity is Disappearing, Will Bitcoin Replay the Bottoming Pattern of 2022?

marsbit19 хв тому

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

Claude Code Usage Report Summary (Based on ~400k sessions) Core Finding: In agentic programming with Claude Code, a clear division of labor has emerged: humans primarily decide *what* to build (planning decisions), while Claude decides *how* to build it (execution decisions). Key Insights: 1. **Effectiveness is not limited to programmers.** In code-generation tasks, success rates for users in non-technical fields (law, finance, management, research) are nearing those of software engineers. What matters most is the user's domain expertise and understanding of the problem to be solved. 2. **Domain expertise drives success and efficiency.** Sessions where users exhibited "expert" proficiency in the task's domain saw verified success rates double compared to "novice" sessions. Experts also delegated more work per instruction, with Claude executing more actions and producing more output. 3. **AI is amplifying, not replacing, domain knowledge.** Claude Code lowers the *implementation* barrier, not the *judgment* barrier. The value of knowing the "what" and "why" is increasing relative to just knowing the "how" to code. 4. **Usage is evolving.** Over a 7-month period (Oct '25 - Apr '26), the share of sessions for debugging halved, while use for software operations, data analysis, and non-code writing roughly doubled. The estimated economic value of typical tasks increased by ~25%. Conclusion: The data suggests coding agents are making programming background less critical for completing technical tasks. However, they reward and amplify deep domain understanding. The ability to successfully direct an AI agent stems more from mastery of a specific field than from coding skill itself. The primary gains come from being competent in a domain; deep specialization adds only marginal additional advantage. This may signal a shift where software creation becomes integrated into various professions.

marsbit54 хв тому

Who Makes the Best Use of Claude Code? The Answer Might Not Be Programmers

marsbit54 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片