The AI Stock Genius Who Made 60x Bets $7.7 Billion on Nvidia Topping Out

链捕手Опубліковано о 2026-05-20Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-20

Анотація

An AI-focused hedge fund named Situational Awareness LP, known for its 60x returns, has taken a significant bearish stance on semiconductor stocks in Q1 2026. Its 13F filing reveals a massive 148% quarterly increase in nominal exposure to $13.677 billion, with over 60% of the new exposure directed towards put options on major chip players. Key bearish bets include $2.04 billion in puts on the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and $1.56 billion on NVIDIA, alongside positions against Broadcom, Oracle, AMD, and others. The fund simultaneously increased its long equity holdings in AI infrastructure and compute providers like CoreWeave and Bitcoin mining companies repurposing for compute. The core thesis behind this positioning is a shift in the primary constraint for AI expansion. The fund argues that while GPU supply was the critical bottleneck in previous years, the new limiting factors for large-scale AI cluster deployment are physical infrastructure: electrical grid access (with multi-year backlogs in the US), power availability, land, and data center construction timelines. The fund is not betting against AI's success but rather hedging against potential valuation corrections in semiconductor stocks whose prices may have run ahead, while directly investing in the downstream physical bottlenecks—power and data center capacity—it believes will capture value next. This move translates a previously theoretical narrative about infrastructure constraints into a concrete, high-convic...

Author: BiBi News

On May 18, 2026, Situational Awareness LP submitted its 13F filing for the first quarter of 2026.

The fund's nominal exposure to U.S. stocks and options expanded from $5.52 billion at the end of 2025 to $13.677 billion, a single-quarter growth of 148%.

However, what caught market attention was not the size, but the structure: over 60% of the new nominal exposure was entirely placed in put options on the semiconductor sector.

What Q1 Did

The put options cover nine targets: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH), NVIDIA, Broadcom, Oracle, AMD, Micron, TSMC, ASML, Intel.

Among them, SMH has the largest put nominal size at $2.04 billion, followed by NVIDIA at $1.56 billion. Micron and TSMC hold both call and put options, indicating a bet on volatility rather than a one-sided short.

It should be noted that the 13F filing only discloses the nominal value of options, making it impossible to directly determine the net short size. These put positions could be active shorting or could be hedging protection purchased while holding long positions.

The full intent cannot be reconstructed from the filing alone.

In the stock direction, the fund continued to bet on computing infrastructure.

CoreWeave holdings increased from 6.1 million shares to 7.18 million shares; IREN and Applied Digital were similarly increased;

The expansion was most pronounced in the miner direction: Bitfarms (now renamed Keel Infrastructure) increased from 6.9 million shares to 19.88 million shares, CleanSpark increased from 1.64 million shares to 12.28 million shares, Riot Platforms increased from 6.17 million shares to 11.5 million shares.

Bloom Energy reduced holdings by 3.59 million shares but still holds about $879 million in market value, while retaining 408.5 thousand call options. This is profit-taking, not a change in direction.

Exits were concentrated in the optical communication direction.

Lumentum and Coherent were completely liquidated; last quarter, Lumentum's position accounted for as much as 8.68%, this quarter it is zero.

Intel's operation deserves separate attention: last quarter held about 20 million call options, all liquidated this quarter, while establishing new put option positions.

Not a flat position, but a complete reversal in direction, from bullish to bearish.

Where the Bottleneck Is, the Money Is

The logic behind this 13F is a specific judgment on supply and demand: the constraints on AI expansion are shifting.

Over the past two years, the core constraint limiting AI scale was GPU shortage, so the market persistently traded NVIDIA, HBM memory, advanced manufacturing, and optical communication. During this phase, the semiconductor sector as a whole received a significant premium.

However, as computing clusters scale towards hundreds of thousands or even millions of GPUs, new constraints are emerging.

Grid connection applications in the US currently have a backlog exceeding 2TW, with an average wait time of over five years; transformer capacity is limited, and new data center construction cycles are measured in years; chips can continue to expand production, but the electricity, land, and construction capabilities needed to support their operation cannot keep pace.

Under this judgment, the logic of shorting the semiconductor sector is not the belief that AI will fail, but that valuations in the chip sector have already priced in expectations, and value is migrating to downstream physical infrastructure.

Buying puts on SMH and NVIDIA hedges against potential valuation corrections in the chip sector; continuing to hold CoreWeave, transformed miner companies, Bloom Energy, is betting on the real bottlenecks: electricity and data center capacity.

CoreWeave's operation also confirms this thinking: call options were slashed from 10.81 million to 1.81 million, while common shares increased from 6.1 million to 7.18 million shares.

The direction hasn't changed, only the high-leverage option positions were swapped for common stock to reduce portfolio volatility impact.

From $225 Million to $13.677 Billion

This fund was founded in September 2024; its first 13F disclosed U.S. stock exposure of about $225 million. By the end of 2025, this number had grown to $5.52 billion; as of March 31, 2026, the nominal exposure reached $13.677 billion.

In the first half of 2025, the fund achieved a return of about 47%, while the S&P 500 rose only about 6%; for the full year, it outperformed the S&P 500 by about 12.5 percentage points.

Before founding the fund, this 24-year-old German published a 165-page paper titled "Situational Awareness: The Decade Ahead," outlining judgments on the AGI timeline and that power and computing infrastructure would become the biggest bottlenecks. The fund's early capital came from Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, and Stripe co-founders Patrick and John Collison.

The significance of this quarterly report is that it translates a judgment that was previously more narrative into concrete portfolio structure.

Chips are merely the entry point for expansion; what truly determines the speed of AI expansion is whether, in the real world, power can be connected, data centers can be built, and grid connection approvals can be obtained within five years.

If this judgment holds, the keywords for AI investment over the past two years were GPU and models; in the coming years, they may be electricity, land, and construction time.

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the most significant action taken by Situational Awareness LP in Q1 2026, as revealed by its 13F filing?

AOver 60% of the fund's new nominal exposure was placed in put options on the semiconductor sector, signaling a major directional bet against or a hedge for the chip industry. This includes significant put positions on VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and NVIDIA.

QWhich physical infrastructure sectors did Situational Awareness LP increase its long positions in, and why?

AThe fund increased long positions in power and data center infrastructure companies like CoreWeave, IREN, Applied Digital, and bitcoin miners transitioning to data centers (e.g., Bitfarms, CleanSpark, Riot Platforms). This was based on the belief that constraints for AI expansion are shifting from GPU shortages to bottlenecks in electricity, land, and construction capacity.

QWhat was Situational Awareness LP's specific action regarding Intel in Q1 2026, and what does it indicate?

AThe fund completely closed its approximately 20 million call option positions on Intel from the previous quarter and simultaneously established new put option positions. This indicates a complete reversal in view, from bullish to bearish on the company.

QAccording to the article's analysis, what is the core logic behind the fund's seemingly contradictory moves of holding puts on chips while being long on infrastructure?

AThe core logic is that the valuation for chip companies has already priced in high expectations, while the real constraint for future AI growth is the availability of physical infrastructure like power grids and data centers. Therefore, the fund is hedging potential chip valuation pullbacks while betting on the rising value of the downstream infrastructure bottlenecks.

QHow has Situational Awareness LP's performance been since its inception, and who were its notable early backers?

ASince its founding in September 2024, the fund's nominal exposure grew from $225 million to $13.677 billion by Q1 2026. It significantly outperformed the S&P 500, delivering ~47% returns in H1 2025 versus the index's ~6%. Early backers included prominent figures like Nat Friedman, Daniel Gross, and Stripe co-founders Patrick and John Collison.

Пов'язані матеріали

Kelp DAO's $400 Million Bad Debt Was Covered, But at a $12 Billion Cost to Aave

On May 26th, Kelp DAO successfully transferred its final batch of rsETH, completing the 37-day process of fully backing rsETH 1:1 after a security incident. However, the resolution came at a significant cost to Aave. The protocol's TVL plummeted by over $12 billion in the following month. Furthermore, a separate legal battle over 30,766 frozen ETH continues in court, posing ongoing reputational risk. The recovery was enabled by an unprecedented, one-time coalition dubbed "DeFi United," involving major contributions from Aave's founder, treasury, Consensys, Mantle, and others. Despite this, the event triggered a major outflow of funds, with whales like Justin Sun moving capital to competitors like Spark. Aave's path to regaining its position relies heavily on the successful execution of its multi-pronged strategy. Its new V4 protocol, designed for open, heterogeneous asset markets, faces delays due to internal governance disputes. Meanwhile, the V3 version remains the core revenue generator, and the permissioned Horizon fork is targeting institutional RWA (Real-World Assets) growth—a segment less impacted by the rsETH incident but dependent on traditional finance adoption timelines. The key takeaway is that while the immediate bad debt was covered, Aave paid a steep price in lost trust and capital. Recovering market share depends on accelerating V4's rollout and advancing its institutional RWA offerings, both of which face external and internal hurdles. The "DeFi United" safety net is unlikely to be replicable for future crises.

marsbit5 хв тому

Kelp DAO's $400 Million Bad Debt Was Covered, But at a $12 Billion Cost to Aave

marsbit5 хв тому

TechFlow Intelligence Report: Xiaomi Announces 200 Billion HKD Stock Buyback Plan, Spot Gold Falls Nearly 1%

TechFlow Report: Xiaomi announced a HK$200 billion stock buyback plan, while spot gold fell nearly 1%. A wider range of tech headlines includes Google unveiling its powerful video editing model Gemini Omni and the original "Attention is All You Need" authors advocating for a move beyond Transformer architecture. In other AI news, IBM reported its first successful use of a quantum computer to train an AI model, and Qwen3.5 released uncensored local model versions. The crypto/Web3 sector saw discussions on opaque stablecoin products and DEX fee changes. Major tech companies are under scrutiny: Uber's COO publicly questioned the ROI of AI investments, Motorola was accused of hijacking Amazon app links for affiliate codes, and Google faced criticism for using web data to fuel its AI. U.S. markets are focused on high S&P 500 valuations (31.8x P/E) and an intense concentration of capital in semiconductor stocks, with warnings about the sustainability of the AI data center boom. Geopolitical tensions, featuring simultaneous U.S. airstrikes on Iran and peace talks, caused significant oil price volatility. Other notable developments include Ferrari's first pure EV priced at 4.35 million yuan and Boston Dynamics' Atlas robot learning soccer from videos. The underlying theme suggests the AI narrative is shifting from boundless potential to requiring tangible results, while traditional geopolitical risks remain a powerful force in markets.

marsbit8 хв тому

TechFlow Intelligence Report: Xiaomi Announces 200 Billion HKD Stock Buyback Plan, Spot Gold Falls Nearly 1%

marsbit8 хв тому

Coin & Stock Barometer: Bitcoin Miner MARA Holdings Spends Over $860,000 on Bulletproof Vehicle Services for Executives; Bitmine Included in Preliminary List for FTSE Russell 1000 Index (May 19)

Crypto Market Wrap & Key Corporate Updates (May 19) The crypto market saw a decline followed by a minor rebound, while U.S. crypto-related stocks fell broadly. In corporate news: **MARA Holdings**, a Bitcoin miner, disclosed spending over $869,000 on vehicle ballistic armor services for its CEO and CFO under its security program. The board cited higher risks associated with the company's public disclosure of holding substantial Bitcoin assets. According to BitcoinTreasuries.NET, Elon Musk's **SpaceX and Tesla** collectively hold 30,221 BTC ($2.3B), which would rank them as the fifth-largest public company holder if combined. **DDC Enterprise Limited** increased its Bitcoin holdings by 200 BTC, bringing its total to 2,583 BTC. The firm stated it plans to continue accumulating BTC based on liquidity, not short-term price movements. Bitcoin treasury company **Nakamoto** announced a 1-for-40 reverse stock split to regain compliance with Nasdaq's minimum bid price requirement. The company reported a Q1 2026 net loss of $238.8M, partly due to a $102.5M unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings. **Tether** acquired SoftBank's stake in **Twenty One Capital (XXI)**, increasing its control. Tether's CEO expressed strengthened confidence in XXI's long-term Bitcoin strategy. Fundstrat's **Tom Lee** stated that **Bitmine (BMNR)** has been included in the preliminary list for the FTSE Russell 1000 Index. Concurrently, two new wallets suspected to be linked to Bitmine withdrew 60,000 ETH ($126M) from Bitgo and Kraken. Solana treasury company **Solmate Infrastructure** announced a registered direct offering of shares to raise approximately $11.4 million. **AI Financial**, a WLFI treasury company, reported a Q1 2026 net loss of $271.5M and raised substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern, partly due to unrealized losses on its WLFI token holdings. **SUI Group** disclosed it holds over 108.7 million SUI tokens (~$115M), with its market cap to net asset value ratio at 0.91x. *Disclaimer: This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.*

marsbit24 хв тому

Coin & Stock Barometer: Bitcoin Miner MARA Holdings Spends Over $860,000 on Bulletproof Vehicle Services for Executives; Bitmine Included in Preliminary List for FTSE Russell 1000 Index (May 19)

marsbit24 хв тому

China's AI Fronts: From Yan'an to Midway

This article analyzes the competitive landscape of China's AI industry through a dual-front war analogy: the "Eastern Front" of business model competition and the "Western Front" of global strategic positioning. **The Eastern Front: The Scramble for Supply Lines and Monetization** The "Eastern Front" examines the contrasting strategies of three Chinese tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—in the face of AI's high marginal costs. Tencent integrates AI as a catalyst within its existing ecosystems (advertising, gaming, cloud) for monetization, prioritizing high-value scenarios over user growth. Alibaba bets on a full-stack, self-developed approach from chips to applications, aiming to control costs and ecosystem, though this requires immense patience and resources. ByteDance, with Doubao as its flagship, pursues a traditional traffic-driven, "super app" strategy but faces severe monetization challenges as its massive user base incurs unsustainable operational costs. The central challenge for all is building a reliable "supply line" (sustainable funding/profit) and achieving efficient monetization, moving beyond being mere "token factories." **The Western Front: "Preserving Land" vs. "Preserving People"** The "Western Front" frames a global strategic divergence. The U.S. model ("preserving land") focuses on closed-source, high-premium models (e.g., Anthropic) targeting lucrative enterprise markets. China's strategy ("preserving people") leverages open-source models (e.g., Alibaba's Qwen, DeepSeek) and extremely low pricing to attract global developers and capture long-tail markets, akin to a "surround the cities from the countryside" approach. The goal is to make Chinese models the default infrastructure, locking in future ecosystem value. However, the critical test is whether this open-source ecosystem can achieve a commercial闭环, converting developer adoption into tangible revenue (e.g., via cloud services), and bridging the monetization gap with Western models that charge for value, not just tokens. **Conclusion: The Long March from Factory to Brand** The article concludes that China's AI industry possesses technology, users, and scenarios but must integrate them to create and capture value. Its ultimate success depends on navigating both fronts: companies must establish sustainable monetization on the Eastern Front, while the industry's Western strategy must evolve from simply "preserving people" (developer adoption) to truly "preserving both people and land" — transforming open-source ecosystem dominance into commercial success and premium brand value. This journey from being a "token factory" to a "value highland" will require strategic patience and the ability to outlast competitors in a prolonged contest.

marsbit55 хв тому

China's AI Fronts: From Yan'an to Midway

marsbit55 хв тому

A History of Technological Evolution Powered by Electricity: Aluminum, Bitcoin, and AI

The journey from the Rockdale aluminum smelter in Texas to space-based data centers illustrates a core economic principle: whoever controls the cheapest electricity dictates the use of computing power. The evolution is clear. Old industrial sites with pre-existing, high-capacity power grids are being repurposed. In Rockdale, a former Alcoa plant now houses vast Bitcoin mining rigs, which are increasingly being replaced by AMD chips for AI training. The logic is purely financial: while smelting aluminum yields $0.17–0.27 per kWh and Bitcoin mining $0.05–0.11, AI inference on H100 GPUs generates $1.27–3.67 per kWh. Recent deals confirm the rush for power infrastructure. Riot Platforms leases space to AMD; TeraWulf bought an old Kentucky aluminum plant for its grid; NYDIG secured a New York site for its cheap hydropower to mine Bitcoin. As AI giants like Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon aggressively expand, they now directly compete with crypto miners for the same industrial power resources, often outbidding them. This has led to a decline in Bitcoin's global hash rate and a wave of miner conversions to AI data centers. This "digital resource curse" extends globally. Gulf nations, long offering subsidized power to attract heavy industry like aluminum, are now pivoting to become AI and cloud computing hubs—exporting computational power instead of physical commodities. Similarly, Bhutan halted its sovereign Bitcoin mining to sell hydropower directly to India for a steadier return. The frontier is space. Projects like Starcloud plan orbital solar-powered data centers, leveraging constant sunlight and natural cooling, with Bitcoin mining as a secondary use for surplus power. Even consumer brands are transforming; Allbirds shifted from footwear to AI infrastructure, causing its stock to surge. Meanwhile, crypto projects like Bittensor, Render, and Akash propose a decentralized alternative, creating markets to aggregate distributed, idle computing resources from individual hardware. The underlying infrastructure—the power grid—remains constant. As profit margins shift, the facilities built upon it will continue to evolve, from aluminum to Bitcoin to AI and beyond, always chasing the highest yield per kilowatt-hour, whether in Texas, Abu Dhabi, or low Earth orbit.

marsbit1 год тому

A History of Technological Evolution Powered by Electricity: Aluminum, Bitcoin, and AI

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити GENIUS

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Genius (GENIUS) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Genius (GENIUS).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Genius (GENIUS)Після придбання Genius (GENIUS) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Genius (GENIUS)Легко торгуйте Genius (GENIUS) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

190 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2026.04.29Оновлено 2026.04.29

Як купити GENIUS

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни GENIUS (GENIUS).

活动图片