史上最微弱优势「过关」:美国参议院投票确认沃什担任美联储主席

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-14Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-14

Анотація

美国参议院以54票赞成、45票反对的微弱优势,确认凯文·沃什出任美联储主席,这是自1977年以来优势最小的美联储主席确认投票。投票结果几乎完全按党派划分,仅一名民主党议员支持。 沃什将在5月14日正式接替鲍威尔,任期四年。他上任之际正值美国通胀压力再度抬头,4月CPI和PPI数据均超预期上涨,同时白宫持续施压要求降息,使其面临政策两难。市场担忧美联储的独立性因政治化争议而受到侵蚀,沃什几乎纯党派化的确认过程加剧了这种担忧。 沃什曾于2006年至2011年担任美联储理事,其货币政策立场偏鹰派,但近期表态有所缓和。他上任后的首次重大考验将是6月的货币政策会议,会议决定不仅关乎利率方向,也被视为其能否坚持央行独立性的关键测试。

美东时间 13 日周三,美国参议院经全院表决正式确认前美联储理事凯文·沃什(Kevin Warsh)出任美联储主席。虽然参议院确认在外界意料之中,但投票中支持沃什的议员仅占微弱优势。

本次沃什的美联储主席提名投票结果几乎完全按照党派区分,提名得到 54 名参议员投票支持,比反对票 45 票仅多 9 票。支持者中,53 人均为共和党议员,民主党阵营中,仅有宾夕法尼亚州的参议员 John Fetterman 一人倒戈。

据媒体统计,从以上投票结果看,自 1977 年美国国会要求美联储主席提名必须经参议院确认以来,这次是历任美联储主席中「最微弱优势」的一次确认投票。相比沃什,前几次美联储主席提名均以较大优势得到参议院确认。

现任美联储主席鲍威尔在两个任期内至少赢得了参议院表决的 80 票赞成。鲍威尔的前任耶伦 2014 年得到确认时投票结果为 56 票赞成、仅 26 票反对,当时不少参议员因天气不佳缺席投票。

鲍威尔的美联储主席任期定于 5 月 15 日本周五结束,在参议院确认后,沃什将在 5 月 14 日正式接棒,开启四年的主席任期。在参议院本周二的投票中,沃什已获得为期 14 年的美联储理事任命确认。

沃什上任无疑将迎来棘手的货币政策抉择。本周稍早,超预期火爆的美国 4 月 CPI 数据公布后,有「新美联储通讯社」之称的记者 Nick Timiraos 指出,CPI 报告意味着降息不再是 2026 年的故事,而提名沃什的特朗普早已明确表达对联储降息的强烈期盼,沃什要碰到麻烦了。

参议院投票结果公布前,本周三稍早,Timiraos 又指出,周三当天,市场强烈暗示 2024-2025 年的降息周期已经结束。

他提到一个市场表现:两年期美债的收益率周三盘中升至去年 6 月以来高位,去年 6 月的美联储政策利率较现在高 75 个基点。

媒体指出,越来越多美联储官员认为,联储应明确表明下一步利率调整方向是既可能加息也可能降息。这意味着,如果沃什试图推动在其他官员看来缺乏依据的降息,他将面临强烈阻力。

「政治化」阴影下上任:美联储独立性面临空前争议

沃什此次确认过程之所以格外引人关注,并不仅仅因为投票结果接近,更因为其发生在美国货币政策政治化争议持续升级的背景之下。

过去数月,美国总统特朗普持续公开施压美联储降息,他去年上任以来多次抨击鲍威尔的降息「行动太慢」,并频繁暗示希望美联储更配合白宫经济议程。

面对质疑,沃什在听证会上强调,他没有向特朗普作出任何政策承诺,绝不会成为特朗普的提线木偶,并承诺将维护美联储的货币政策独立性。

但市场普遍认为,沃什上任后,美联储与白宫之间的关系将进入一个更加敏感的阶段。

值得注意的是,虽然鲍威尔卸任美联储主席,但仍计划继续保留美联储理事的身份,这意味着未来一段时间,美联储内部可能同时存在两种不同风格与政策理念。

沃什:曾经的鹰派变温和

现年 56 岁的沃什并非「空降」。

他曾于 2006 年至 2011 年担任美联储理事,是当时最年轻的美联储理事之一,并在 2008 年全球金融危机期间参与核心决策。此后,他长期活跃于华尔街与学术界,曾在德鲁肯米勒家族办公室任职,并担任斯坦福大学胡佛研究所研究员。

与鲍威尔相比,沃什在货币政策理念上更偏「鹰派」。

他长期批评美联储在疫情后维持超宽松政策时间过长,认为这直接推高了随后数年的通胀。他也多次主张缩减美联储资产负债表、减少对未来利率路径的「前瞻指引」,并推动美联储「回归更传统的央行角色」。

不过,市场也注意到,沃什近期在利率问题上的公开表态较过去更为温和,这被部分民主党议员视为向特朗普降息立场靠拢。

沃什面临头号难题:通胀重新升温

摆在沃什面前最直接的挑战,是美国通胀压力重新抬头。

本周公布的 4 月美国 CPI 和 PPI 数据显示,能源价格与地缘政治风险推动通胀再度升温。4 月美国 CPI 同比上涨 3.8%,4 月 PPI 同比涨 6%,分别创将近三年来和三年多来最大涨幅。

与此同时,中东局势升级、霍尔木兹海峡风险以及油价飙升,进一步增加了输入型通胀压力。

这意味着,特朗普政府希望推动降息以刺激经济增长,但现实中的通胀环境却未必允许美联储迅速转向宽松。

换句话说,沃什很可能在上任伊始,就面临「白宫希望降息」与「经济数据不支持降息」的两难局面。

如何消除市场对美联储信誉的担忧是另一大难题

相比单纯的利率决策,更深层的问题在于——市场是否仍然相信美联储独立。

过去一年,美国政界围绕美联储的攻击明显升级,从对白宫施压降息的争议,到司法部对美联储总部翻修项目展开调查,再到部分共和党人公开要求鲍威尔离任,都令外界担忧央行独立性受到侵蚀。

而沃什此次几乎「纯党派化」的确认过程,本身就强化了这种担忧。

相比之下,鲍威尔此前两次出任美联储主席均获得超过 80 张参议院赞成票;耶伦 2014 年获确认时也取得 56 票支持。

分析人士认为,沃什未来不仅需要制定货币政策,更需要重新建立市场对于美联储「非政治化」的信任。

6 月会议或迎「首秀风暴」

沃什上任后的首次重大考验,很可能就是美联储货币政策委员会 FOMC 于 6 月 16 日至 17 日举行的货币政策会议。

当前,美联储内部对于下一步究竟该加息、维持利率不变还是降息,分歧明显加大。

一方面,美国经济增长开始放缓;另一方面,通胀与油价重新上行。

市场目前普遍预期,美联储今年可能不会降息,但特朗普政府显然并不接受这一前景。

因此,沃什的首次政策会议不仅将决定利率方向,也将成为市场观察其究竟更倾向「政治妥协」还是「央行独立」的第一场压力测试。

Пов'язані питання

Q美国参议院确认凯文·沃什担任美联储主席的投票结果如何?为什么这个结果备受关注?

A投票结果为54票赞成,45票反对,仅以微弱优势获得通过。这是自1978年以来,美联储主席提名确认中优势最微弱的一次。其备受关注不仅因为票数接近,更在于它几乎完全按党派划线,且发生在美国货币政策政治化争议持续升级的背景下,引发了外界对美联储独立性的担忧。

Q文章中提到沃什上任后将面临哪些主要挑战?

A沃什上任后将面临多重挑战:首要挑战是美国通胀压力重新抬头,这使得他可能陷入‘白宫希望降息’与‘经济数据不支持降息’的两难境地。另一大挑战是需要消除市场对美联储独立性和信誉的担忧,尤其是其提名过程高度党派化。此外,他必须在6月的首次FOMC政策会议上,就未来利率方向做出艰难抉择。

Q在货币政策立场上,凯文·沃什与即将卸任的鲍威尔有何不同?

A相比鲍威尔,沃什在货币政策理念上更偏向‘鹰派’。他长期批评美联储在疫情后维持超宽松政策时间过长,主张缩减美联储资产负债表、减少对未来利率路径的‘前瞻指引’,并推动美联储‘回归更传统的央行角色’。不过,市场注意到他近期的公开表态较过去更为温和。

Q为什么说沃什上任后,美联储与白宫的关系将进入更敏感的阶段?

A因为过去数月,美国总统特朗普持续公开施压美联储降息,并频繁暗示希望美联储配合其经济议程。虽然沃什在听证会上承诺维护美联储独立性,但考虑到特朗普对其的提名及对他降息的强烈期盼,沃什上任后如何在政治压力下保持货币政策决策的独立性,将成为双方关系敏感和紧张的关键。

Q6月的FOMC会议对沃什为何特别重要?

A6月16日至17日的FOMC会议将是沃什上任后的首次重大货币政策会议。届时,他需要在经济增长放缓、通胀与油价重新上行以及政府降息压力的复杂局面下,为美联储的利率方向定调。这不仅是一次利率决策,更是市场观察他究竟更倾向于‘政治妥协’还是坚守‘央行独立’的第一场关键压力测试。

Пов'язані матеріали

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

The article discusses how Solana's vision of becoming the "Internet Capital Markets" is being challenged, primarily by the rise of Hyperliquid. While Solana positioned itself as a high-performance blockchain for tokenizing all global assets, its native token SOL has significantly underperformed, and its core narrative faces pressure. Hyperliquid, initially a perpetual contracts platform, has evolved into a specialized Layer 1 financial network. Its focused, trading-optimized design is attracting users and capital, suggesting a vertical L1 may be better suited for a core capital market than a general-purpose chain like Solana. This external competition was compounded by an internal $200M+ exploit on Solana's key derivatives protocol, Drift, creating a strategic vacuum. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko heavily promoted the Phoenix protocol as a decentralized, composable alternative. However, Phoenix's trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana supporters also launched critiques against Hyperliquid's decentralization, citing its limited validators and closed-source code. Critics countered that Solana's own decentralization metrics have weakened, and the foundation's overt backing of Phoenix caused friction with other ecosystem builders. The piece concludes that Solana risks losing the "Internet Capital Markets" race if it cannot regain dominance in derivatives, potentially remaining a meme coin hub rather than achieving its grand ambition of hosting all global assets.

marsbit1 год тому

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

marsbit1 год тому

Trump Signs Executive Order, Kraken, Coinbase and Others May Gain Access to Fed Payment Channels

President Trump has signed an executive order, "Incorporating Financial Technology Innovation into the Regulatory Framework," pressuring the Federal Reserve to reassess its rules on granting non-bank financial companies—including crypto and fintech firms—access to its payment systems, specifically master accounts that connect to the Fedwire settlement system. Currently, such accounts are primarily reserved for depository institutions. The order mandates a review to determine if broader access is permissible and to establish an application process. This move, supported by figures like Senator Cynthia Lummis, aims to reduce barriers to innovation and lower public payment costs by fostering fairer competition. It does not grant immediate access but could pave the way for companies like Kraken, Coinbase, Ripple, and Circle to reduce reliance on intermediary banks, lowering costs and speeding up settlements. A key precedent is the Kansas City Fed granting Kraken's parent company a restricted master account in March, offering limited payment services without interest or credit privileges. This model is seen as a potential template for allowing controlled access while mitigating systemic risk. Other firms like Anchorage, Paxos, and BitGo, which hold specialized banking charters, are also well-positioned to apply. The banking industry, represented by the American Bankers Association, opposes easing access, arguing any institution handling bank-like payments must meet the same stringent regulatory, consumer protection, and risk-management standards as traditional banks. Their core concerns include potential systemic risks, compliance gaps in areas like anti-money laundering, and the diversion of liquidity from the traditional banking system. The outcome of the Fed's review will be crucial in determining whether and how crypto and fintech firms can integrate more directly into the core U.S. financial infrastructure, balancing innovation with financial stability.

marsbit1 год тому

Trump Signs Executive Order, Kraken, Coinbase and Others May Gain Access to Fed Payment Channels

marsbit1 год тому

The First Large-Scale Strike in the AI Era Comes from the Factories That Build AI

The article describes a potential large-scale strike at Samsung Electronics, narrowly averted in May 2026 after a temporary agreement. The strike, planned by the company's union, would have been the first major labor action in the AI era targeting a core AI supply chain player. Samsung, alongside SK Hynix, produces roughly two-thirds of the world's memory chips, critical components for AI training and data centers like HBM. An 18-day strike could have disrupted global supply, affecting prices and production for tech companies and cloud providers. For South Korea, where semiconductors constitute about 35% of exports and Samsung represents a quarter of the stock market's value, such an action threatens national economic stability. The union's demands include a 7% base wage increase and, crucially, a clear, substantial profit-sharing model. They want 15% of annual operating profit as an employee bonus pool and the removal of the existing cap (about 50% of annual salary). This frustration is amplified by seeing rival SK Hynix successfully negotiate a deal granting employees 10% of operating profit as bonuses, with reports suggesting some workers could receive bonuses equivalent to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The conflict stems from deeper issues in South Korea's chaebol (conglomerate) system, where rapid national industrialization often prioritized corporate growth over labor rights. Samsung long maintained a "no union" policy until a 2020 apology from its leader. The article argues this strike highlights a fundamental tension in the AI age: as technology advances and corporate profits soar—often driven by AI—the workers who build the infrastructure are demanding a fair share and dignity, rejecting the notion that they are mere expendable components in a machine that "must not stop." The piece concludes that the true test of the AI era isn't just computational power, but whether the people who build the future can secure a stable and valued place within it.

marsbit1 год тому

The First Large-Scale Strike in the AI Era Comes from the Factories That Build AI

marsbit1 год тому

Ripple’s Fed Master Account Bid Gains Momentum After Trump Order

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing financial regulators and the Federal Reserve to review expanding fintech and crypto firms' access to core payment infrastructure. This order significantly advances the industry's push for direct Fed connectivity, a central issue for Ripple. The company has been seeking a Federal Reserve master account as part of its strategy for its RLUSD stablecoin, which would allow it to hold reserves directly with the central bank and access its payment rails. The order, titled "Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks," mandates a Fed review within 120 days on allowing access for entities like uninsured depository institutions and non-bank financial companies, including those in digital assets. This creates a formal policy timeline for resolving whether crypto payment firms must rely on traditional bank intermediaries. Ripple's application for a national bank charter and a master account is part of this broader landscape. The issue gained precedent when Kraken Financial received a limited-purpose master account, while Custodia Bank's application was denied after a legal battle. The Fed has also proposed a more restricted "payment account" option. Trump's order does not guarantee approval for Ripple but forces a high-level examination of the regulatory barriers, bringing the company's long-running effort to the forefront of Washington's financial policy agenda.

bitcoinist2 год тому

Ripple’s Fed Master Account Bid Gains Momentum After Trump Order

bitcoinist2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片