Desbloqueo de tokens de la semana: STRK desbloquea el 4% del suministro circulante mientras el precio sube

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-10Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-10

Анотація

**Resumen de desbloqueo de tokens esta semana** **Starknet (STRK)** - **Cantidad desbloqueada:** 130 millones de tokens - **Valor aproximado:** ~7.19 millones de dólares - **Detalles:** Starknet es una solución de Capa 2 (Layer 2) para Ethereum que utiliza tecnología zk-STARKs para hacer las transacciones más rápidas y económicas. Este desbloqueo representa aproximadamente el 4% del suministro circulante. A pesar de esta liberación de tokens, se observó una tendencia alcista ("pull-up") en el precio. **Arbitrum (ARB)** - **Cantidad desbloqueada:** 95.87 millones de tokens - **Valor aproximado:** ~13.71 millones de dólares - **Detalles:** Arbitrum es un rollup optimista de Ethereum diseñado para mejorar su escalabilidad. Agrega y procesa transacciones fuera de la cadena principal, ofreciendo operaciones más rápidas y baratas mientras mantiene la seguridad de Ethereum. Los poseedores del token ARB pueden participar en la gobernanza del protocolo.

Starknet

Twitter del proyecto:https://twitter.com/Starknet

Sitio web del proyecto:https://starknet.io/

Cantidad desbloqueada esta vez: 130 millones

Valor del desbloqueo esta vez: Aproximadamente 7.19 millones de dólares

Starknet es una capa 2 de Ethereum que utiliza tecnología zk-STARKs para hacer que las transacciones en Ethereum sean más rápidas y económicas. La empresa matriz de StarkNet, StarkWare, fue fundada en 2018 y tiene su sede en Israel. Sus principales productos desarrollados son Starknet y StarkEx. Al utilizar STARK, Starknet verifica transacciones y cálculos sin necesidad de que todos los nodos de la red verifiquen cada operación. Esto reduce significativamente la carga computacional y aumenta el rendimiento de la red blockchain.

Arbitrum

Twitter del proyecto:https://twitter.com/arbitrum

Sitio web del proyecto:https://arbitrum.io/

Cantidad desbloqueada esta vez: 95.87 millones

Valor del desbloqueo esta vez: Aproximadamente 13.71 millones de dólares

Arbitrum es un Rollup de Ethereum diseñado para mejorar la escalabilidad de Ethereum. Agrega y procesa transacciones fuera de la cadena antes de enviar una única transacción a la red principal de Ethereum. Esto significa que los usuarios pueden disfrutar de transacciones más rápidas y económicas, al tiempo que se benefician de la seguridad y descentralización de la red de Ethereum. El token nativo de Arbitrum es ARB. Los poseedores de ARB pueden participar en el proceso de toma de decisiones, como proponer y votar sobre actualizaciones o cambios en el protocolo.

Пов'язані питання

Q¿Qué es Starknet y cuál es su propósito principal?

AStarknet es una solución de capa 2 (Layer2) para Ethereum que utiliza tecnología zk-STARKs para hacer que las transacciones de Ethereum sean más rápidas y con tarifas reducidas. Su propósito principal es aligerar la carga computacional y aumentar el rendimiento de la red blockchain.

Q¿Cuántas monedas STRK se desbloquearán esta semana y cuál es su valor aproximado en dólares?

AEsta semana se desbloquearán 130 millones de monedas STRK, con un valor aproximado de 7.19 millones de dólares.

Q¿Qué es Arbitrum y cómo funciona para mejorar Ethereum?

AArbitrum es un Rollup de Ethereum diseñado para mejorar su escalabilidad. Funciona agregando y procesando transacciones fuera de la cadena antes de enviar una sola transacción a la red principal de Ethereum, permitiendo transacciones más rápidas y baratas mientras mantiene la seguridad y descentralización de Ethereum.

Q¿Quién fundó Starknet y cuál es otra de sus principales soluciones?

AStarknet fue fundada por la empresa StarkWare, establecida en 2018 con sede en Israel. Otra de sus principales soluciones es StarkEx.

Q¿Cuántas monedas ARB (Arbitrum) se desbloquearán esta semana y cuál es su valor aproximado?

AEsta semana se desbloquearán 95.87 millones de monedas ARB, con un valor aproximado de 13.71 millones de dólares.

Пов'язані матеріали

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit6 хв тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit6 хв тому

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit16 хв тому

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit16 хв тому

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit30 хв тому

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit30 хв тому

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbit33 хв тому

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbit33 хв тому

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

In drafting the GENIUS Act, Congress prohibited licensed payment stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders—a rule that forced changes for USDC. However, Ethena's USDe, a rapidly growing "yield dollar," operates outside this regulation. USDe is a delta-neutral synthetic dollar backed by crypto collateral and hedged perpetual futures positions, generating yield from funding rates rather than traditional reserves. Because it doesn't fit the legal definition of a payment stablecoin, the GENIUS Act's restrictions do not apply. USDe's supply peaked above $14 billion in 2025, making it a top-three dollar-denominated crypto asset. Its model carries distinct risks, notably dependence on sustained positive funding rates and vulnerability during market deleveraging events, as seen in a brief depeg in October 2025. Regulatory approaches differ: Germany's BaFin banned USDe sales, viewing it as an unregistered security, while U.S. institutional capital, like Janus Henderson, has embraced it for treasury management. The GENIUS Act defined and regulated payment stablecoins but left synthetic dollars like USDe in a gray area. The unresolved question is whether future regulations will address this category or if yield will continue migrating to undefined spaces.

marsbit35 хв тому

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

marsbit35 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни 4 (4).