近3亿美元瞄准美国中期选举,Tether高管掌舵加密行业第二大政治基金

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-04-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-04-03

Анотація

加密行业政治行动委员会(PAC)Fellowship宣布任命Tether US监管事务副总裁Jesse Spiro为主席,这是Tether与该PAC首次建立正式关联。Fellowship去年9月宣称筹集超1亿美元,但联邦选举委员会记录显示其至今零支出。与此同时,由Coinbase等支持的Fairshake PAC已拥有1.93亿美元资金,并在伊利诺伊州投入860万美元。两大PAC合计近3亿美元资金将瞄准11月美国中期选举。 此次任命正值加密行业关键立法《数字资产市场明确法案》(CLARITY Act)在参议院陷入僵局,争议焦点是稳定币收益问题。最新妥协方案拟禁止基于持有余额的被动收益,但允许交易奖励计划,遭Coinbase等反对。Tether作为全球最大稳定币USDT发行方,其美国业务将直接受该法案影响。分析认为,Tether通过此次高管任命公开介入政治运作,旨在为行业立法博弈提供资金支持。

深潮导读:成立七个月、号称筹集逾 1 亿美元却至今未花一分钱的加密超级 PAC Fellowship,周三宣布任命 Tether US 监管事务副总裁 Jesse Spiro 为主席。这是 Tether 与该 PAC 之间首次建立正式公开关联。与此同时,加密行业另一大 PAC Fairshake 已坐拥 1.93 亿美元弹药库,两大 PAC 合计近 3 亿美元的政治资金正瞄准 11 月中期选举,而国会围绕稳定币收益的立法博弈仍悬而未决。

加密行业的政治军备竞赛正在升级。

据 Cointelegraph 4 月 1 日报道,Fellowship PAC 周三宣布,Tether US 监管事务副总裁 Jesse Spiro 将出任该组织主席,负责领导其下一阶段扩张,并将在未来数日内公布首批候选人背书名单。Fellowship 是一家成立于 2025 年 8 月的超级 PAC,去年 9 月宣称已从与加密行业结盟的未具名捐赠者处筹集「超过 1 亿美元」。

Spiro 在声明中表示:「这是美国创新的关键时刻。我们有机会确保美国继续作为建设者、企业家和技术进步的全球中心。Fellowship PAC 致力于支持那些理解利害所在并愿意采取行动的领导者。」

从「否认关联」到「高管坐镇」,Tether 与 Fellowship 的关系浮出水面

Fellowship PAC 自去年 9 月高调亮相以来,其背后金主身份一直是行业最大悬念之一。

该 PAC 成立时未披露任何管理人员、捐赠者或关键雇员。早期报道将 Tether 列为预期支持者,但 Tether International 随后正式否认与该 PAC 存在任何关联。据 CoinDesk 今年 2 月报道,Tether 国际发言人明确表示「Tether International 与 Fellowship 无任何隶属关系」。

但 FEC 记录讲述了另一个故事。Fellowship 的注册财务主管 Mitchell Nobel 是 Cantor Fitzgerald 的高管,而 Cantor Fitzgerald 正是为 Tether 管理数十亿美元储备金的托管机构。PAC 注册地址位于马里兰州贝塞斯达。

如今,一位现任 Tether US 高管正式出任 PAC 主席,此前的种种传闻终于落定为公开记录。据 BeInCrypto 报道,这是 Fellowship PAC 与 Tether 官方之间首次建立正式、公开的关联。

Spiro 在 2024 年加入 Tether,担任政府事务主管,此前曾在 PayPal 负责区块链与数字资产监管关系,更早之前在链上分析公司 Chainalysis 担任政府事务领导职务。

1 亿美元「弹药库」至今一弹未发,FEC 记录显示零支出

尽管 Fellowship 声称坐拥 1 亿美元资金,FEC 记录显示,截至去年 12 月 31 日,该 PAC 未报告任何捐赠收入或支出。自去年 9 月发布会以来,Fellowship 在 X 平台上仅发布过三条公开声明,近乎「隐身」运营。

这种反差引发了广泛质疑。CoinDesk 在 2 月 25 日的调查报道中指出,Fellowship 成立七个月来「从未到场」,其承诺的 1 亿美元资金在联邦选举委员会的披露中没有任何踪迹。

此次 Spiro 的任命被视为 Fellowship 从沉寂期重返公众视野的信号。PAC 表示将在未来数日公布首批候选人背书,距离 11 月中期选举还有七个多月。

白宫数字资产咨询委员会执行主任 Bo Hines 在 X 平台对该任命表示支持,发文称:「美国创新的战斗需要认真的倡导者。期待看到真正理解利害关系的领导者当选。」

加密 PAC 军备竞赛:Fairshake 坐拥 1.93 亿美元,已在伊利诺伊砸下 860 万

Fellowship 并非加密行业唯一的政治资金机器。由 Coinbase、Ripple 和 a16z 支持的 Fairshake PAC 及其附属组织截至今年 1 月报告持有 1.93 亿美元现金,是目前加密行业资金规模最大的超级 PAC。

Fairshake 已开始实际行动。据 Cointelegraph 报道,该 PAC 及其附属组织已在伊利诺伊州国会竞选中支出约 860 万美元,是其 2024 年在该州支出的六倍。3 月的伊利诺伊州初选中,部分 Fairshake 支持的候选人未能胜出,但中期选举仍有七个月窗口。

在 2024 年选举周期中,Fairshake 在媒体投放上花费超过 1.3 亿美元,支持的 50 多位候选人多数成功当选。据非营利监督组织 Public Citizen 的统计,2024 年流入选举的企业资金中,近一半来自加密行业。

如今,Fellowship 和 Fairshake 两大 PAC 合计近 3 亿美元的弹药库,加上加密行业其他政治捐赠力量,2026 年中期选举有望成为行业政治支出的新纪录。

立法暗战:稳定币收益争议卡住 CLARITY 法案,Tether 利益攸关

Spiro 任命的时间点并非偶然。加密行业最核心的立法优先事项《数字资产市场明确法案》(CLARITY Act)正陷入参议院僵局,而争议焦点之一正是稳定币收益,这直接影响 Tether 的商业模式。

CLARITY 法案于 2025 年 7 月以 294 票对 134 票通过众议院,今年 1 月在参议院农业委员会通过审议。但在参议院银行委员会层面,银行业与加密行业围绕稳定币能否向用户支付收益展开激烈博弈。

3 月 20 日,参议员 Thom Tillis 与 Angela Alsobrooks 就稳定币收益达成原则性妥协:禁止基于持有余额的被动收益支付,但允许基于交易活动的奖励计划。据 CoinDesk 报道,加密行业代表 3 月 23 日在国会山闭门审阅最新条文后,认为该语言过于狭窄且含糊。Coinbase 已两次表态不支持当前草案。

参议院银行委员会的审议(markup)目前定于 4 月下旬复活节休会结束后进行。参议员 Bernie Moreno 警告,若法案未能在 5 月前推进,加密立法可能在中期选举周期内无法再获得认真考量。

雪上加霜的是,白宫 AI 与加密事务沙皇 David Sacks 于 3 月 26 日确认其 130 天任期已届满,且政府不会任命继任者。加密行业最关键的立法冲刺阶段,将在失去白宫首席倡导者的情况下推进。

Tether 发行的 USDT 是全球最大的稳定币,市值约 1840 亿美元,但不面向美国居民。Tether 于去年推出了面向美国市场的合规稳定币 USAT。稳定币收益条款的最终走向,将直接决定 Tether 及其竞争对手在美国市场的运营空间。

在这一背景下,Tether 通过让高管出任 PAC 主席,将政治影响力建设从幕后推向台前,信号明确:在立法博弈的关键窗口期,用政治资金为行业利益护航。

Трендові криптовалюти

Пов'язані питання

QFellowship PAC 宣布任命谁为主席?

AFellowship PAC 宣布任命 Tether US 监管事务副总裁 Jesse Spiro 为主席。

QFellowship PAC 和 Fairshake PAC 合计拥有多少政治资金?

AFellowship PAC 和 Fairshake PAC 合计拥有近 3 亿美元的政治资金。

QFellowship PAC 自成立以来是否已经支出任何资金?

A截至去年 12 月 31 日,FEC 记录显示 Fellowship PAC 未报告任何支出。

Q稳定币收益争议是围绕哪项法案的焦点问题?

A稳定币收益争议是围绕《数字资产市场明确法案》(CLARITY Act) 的焦点问题之一。

QTether 发行的面向美国市场的合规稳定币叫什么?

ATether 面向美国市场发行的合规稳定币叫 USAT。

Пов'язані матеріали

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

Gate Research Institute: Chart Pattern Analysis and Breakout Trading Strategies Chart patterns are crucial tools in technical analysis for observing market supply and demand shifts, trend continuations, and reversals. This analysis involves a comprehensive evaluation of trend, volume, support/resistance, time cycles, and breakout validity, not just rote pattern recognition. Patterns are broadly categorized into reversal patterns (e.g., Double Tops/Bottoms, Head and Shoulders) and continuation patterns (e.g., Flags, Triangles, Rectangles). An effective breakout, key for trading, requires clear support/resistance, prolonged consolidation, a prevailing trend backdrop, and volume confirmation. However, breakouts are not guaranteed, as false breakouts are common. Risk must be managed through position sizing, stop-loss orders, pullback confirmations, and profit-taking in stages. Key pattern types discussed include: * **Rectangle Patterns:** Indicate market indecision within parallel support and resistance, with breakouts projecting a move equal to the pattern's width. * **Flag & Pennant Patterns:** Short-term continuation patterns following sharp price moves ("flagpoles"). * **Triangle Patterns:** Symmetrical, Ascending (bullish bias), and Descending (bearish bias) triangles, representing consolidation before a directional move. * **Head and Shoulders Patterns:** Major reversal patterns signaling trend exhaustion. The article details breakout trading strategies, defining valid breakouts by price closing beyond a key level with increased volume and minimal immediate re-entry into the prior range. It contrasts range trading with breakout trading and outlines entry methods (immediate entry, pullback entry, scaling in), stop-loss placement (based on pattern failure), and profit-taking techniques (target-based, structure-based, trend-following). It further classifies breakout outcomes: 1. **Valid Breakouts:** Strong, sustained moves in the breakout direction. 2. **Pullback Breakouts:** Price breaks out, retests the breakout level as support/resistance, then resumes the trend—offering a lower-risk entry. 3. **False Breakouts:** Price briefly breaches a level but quickly reverses back into the prior range, a common risk managed by strict stop-losses. Key validation tools for breakouts include volume analysis, the principle of support/resistance role reversal, and momentum indicators like ATR, Moving Averages, Bollinger Bands, and RSI. In conclusion, while chart patterns and breakout analysis provide a structured framework, their effectiveness relies on multiple confirming factors—trend context, volume, and proper risk management. They should be integrated into a broader trading system rather than used as standalone signals.

marsbit9 хв тому

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

marsbit9 хв тому

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

In a speech titled "The Industrialization of Trust," Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom (former BlackRock digital assets head) discussed the future transformation of global finance. Drawing from 20 years at BlackRock, where he led the launch of Bitcoin/ETH ETFs and tokenized funds, Chalom highlighted the immense hidden costs of establishing trust in traditional finance—estimated at over $9.3 trillion annually in the US alone due to fragmented systems, multi-day settlements, and countless reconciliations. He argued that Ethereum is emerging as the global financial "settlement layer for trust," with its robust, decentralized infrastructure securing over $300 billion in on-chain assets and most stablecoins and tokenized assets. The future, he stated, will be driven by three accelerating pillars: stablecoins (evolving beyond crypto gateways to become efficient cross-border payment rails), tokenized assets (enabling 24/7 trading and reshaping capital markets), and DeFi (providing automated, accessible financial services). A potential game-changer, Chalom added, is the fourth pillar: "Agentic Finance," where AI agents autonomously execute programmable financial transactions via smart contracts and stablecoins. He envisions individuals soon having AI-powered "CFOs in their pockets" to optimize idle capital and manage tokenized portfolios. This shift, facilitated by Ethereum's trustless settlement, could multiply on-chain transaction volume 1000x within a year, moving finance toward a seamless, digitized future.

marsbit9 хв тому

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

marsbit9 хв тому

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

The article analyzes the recent significant de-pegging of Strategy's perpetual preferred stock, STRC, whose price fell to approximately $89, far below its $100 face value. This discount has pushed its simple yield to around 12.9%, creating a paradox. The stock was designed as a high-yield instrument trading near par, and Strategy maintains an 11.5% annual dividend, even recently switching to semi-monthly payments to support the price. The author explores several reasons why the high yield hasn't attracted enough buying pressure to restore the par value. A key factor is potential reverse deleveraging from carry trades, where leveraged investors may be forced to sell due to margin calls as the price falls, creating a self-reinforcing downward spiral. Additionally, the tokenization and integration of STRC into DeFi protocols (like Apyx, Saturn, Pendle) have introduced faster, more transparent, and potentially more volatile price adjustment mechanisms through leverage and yield-splitting products. The emergence of a competing product, Strive's SATA, offering a 13% yield with daily dividends, has also changed the yield benchmark, challenging STRC's unique high-yield narrative. Furthermore, the market is questioning the distinction between Strategy's substantial Bitcoin reserves, which provide long-term balance sheet coverage, and the certainty of stable near-term cash flow for dividends. Ultimately, the price dip represents a stress test for this type of BTC-backed, high-yield financing tool. The future path of STRC depends on whether Strategy acts to reinforce the $100 peg (e.g., by adjusting dividends), whether DeFi-related leverage unwinds further, and how investors ultimately price the risks of leverage, competition, and cash flow uncertainty against the offered yield.

marsbit21 хв тому

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

marsbit21 хв тому

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

The LIT token of decentralized perpetual exchange Lighter surged to a six-month high above $1.90 on June 18th, with a market cap of $425 million. After a price correction earlier this year, the recent rebound is attributed to its core "buyback flywheel" mechanism. All protocol fee revenue is used for programmatic, hourly market buybacks of LIT. Since its TGE in December 2025, approximately 15 million LIT (6% of circulating supply) has been repurchased for around $21 million. Additional price support comes from the LLP (Lighter Liquidity Pool), where providers must stake LIT worth 10% of their deposited USDC, locking significant token supply. However, challenges persist. Trading volume has declined amidst a sluggish market, with total volume at $1.68 trillion, significantly lower than leading competitor Hyperliquid's $4.37 trillion. While Lighter focuses on perpetual contracts, RWA, and Pre-IPO markets, Hyperliquid has expanded into prediction markets and boasts a U.S. spot ETF, attracting institutional investment and influencer endorsements like from Arthur Hayes. In contrast, LIT currently lacks similar high-profile backing. With 75% of LIT's total 1 billion supply still locked (team and investor tokens begin a 3-year linear unlock in December 2026), there is no immediate unlock selling pressure. The token's future performance hinges on sustaining trading volume growth, successful product iteration, and executing its transparent buyback strategy against a dominant competitor.

Foresight News40 хв тому

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

Foresight News40 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити SUPER

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку SuperFarm (SUPER) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити SuperFarm (SUPER).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої SuperFarm (SUPER)Після придбання SuperFarm (SUPER) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля SuperFarm (SUPER)Легко торгуйте SuperFarm (SUPER) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

207 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.11Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити SUPER

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни SUPER (SUPER).

活动图片