ENA 价格暴跌,协议表现恶化,现货吸筹能否力挽狂澜?

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-28Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-30

Анотація

Ethena(ENA)在2026年第一季度表现疲软,其代币跌至0.089美元,24小时内跌幅达两位数。协议收入下降32%,总锁仓价值(TVL)减少约1.3亿美元,用户活跃度降至去年12月以来最低,反映出用户参与度和收益能力显著减弱。尽管毛利润略有增长,但远低于前期水平,难以在竞争激烈的DeFi生态中维持用户兴趣。不过,现货市场出现积极信号,近三日累计买入约341万美元,显示有资金在低位吸纳,可能对价格形成一定支撑。然而,若核心基本面未能改善,ENA的反弹空间可能有限。

Ethena的[ENA]价格目前似乎与其疲软的财务表现趋于一致。在过去24小时内,该资产录得两位数跌幅,截至发稿时已跌至0.089美元。

虽然数据反映出压力加剧,但需要更广泛地评估市场状况,以判断此次下跌是深度调整的开始还是暂时性修正。

Ethena关键指标动能减弱

链上数据显示,自2026年第一季度开始以来,ENA在多个方面表现不佳,尤其是与前两个季度相比。

协议总收入是关键关注领域,从2025年第四季度的9615万美元下降至6506万美元,降幅达32%。与2025年第三季度相比,这一下降更为显著。

这种收缩表明铸造活动减弱和质押奖励减少,两者都暗示链上参与度下降。

来源:DeFiLlama

在相较于2025年10-12月周期保持相对稳定的市场中,这种表现不佳引发了对用户需求减弱而非外部压力的担忧。

流动性状况强化了这一趋势。总锁仓价值(TVL)作为协议健康度和用户承诺的核心指标持续稳步下降。

自2026年3月初以来,TVL已下降约1.3亿美元,截至撰稿时约为66.6亿美元。仅过去24小时内就有约1600万美元解除质押,表明资金持续流出协议。

仅靠利润能否维持用户兴趣?

尽管整体增长放缓,Ethena在毛利润方面略有改善。

2026年第一季度协议产生61.419万美元毛利润,较2025年第四季度的46.32万美元有所增长。虽然这反映了边际改善,但远不足以抵消早期业绩水平的急剧下降。

作为对比,2025年第三季度实现1018万美元毛利润,约当前数据的16.5倍。这种差距凸显了盈利能力的结构性下降,尽管短期利润出现小幅改善。

这意味着,在竞争激烈的DeFi环境中,资本会快速转向更高收益机会,仅靠温和的利润增长可能不足以留住用户。

用户活动数据支持这一观点。根据Artemis数据,每日活跃用户已降至约1200人,为自12月以来的最低水平。

现货需求提供反向信号

尽管基本面和流动性持续走弱,现货市场活动却展现出更强韧性。交易所净流量数据显示,近期买压有所增加。过去24小时内,现货头寸流入达到约30.3万美元。

更值得注意的是,这并非孤立事件。过去三天内累计购买量已攀升至约341万美元,表明存在持续吸筹行为。

来源:CoinGlass

这种持续需求表明,即使资本从协议层退出,投资者仍在持续吸收卖压。

若此吸筹趋势持续,可能限制进一步下跌并支撑价格稳定。但若核心基本面(特别是用户活动和收入生成)未能恢复,任何上行空间仍将受限在狭窄区间内。

最终总结

  • Ethena协议表现在2026年第一季度恶化,尽管整体市场条件保持相对稳定
  • 尽管流动性外流增加且TVL下降,现货投资者仍在持续吸筹

Пов'язані питання

QEthena (ENA) 的价格在近期表现如何?

A在过去24小时内,Ethena (ENA) 的价格出现了两位数的下跌,截至发稿时已跌至0.089美元。

QEthena协议在2026年第一季度的总收入与上一季度相比有何变化?

AEthena协议的总收入从2025年第四季度的9615万美元下降至6506万美元,降幅达32%。

QEthena的总锁定价值(TVL)在2026年3月出现了什么趋势?

A自2026年3月初以来,Ethena的总锁定价值(TVL)持续下降,减少了约1.3亿美元,截至发稿时约为66.6亿美元。仅在过去的24小时内,就有大约1600万美元的资金被解除质押。

Q尽管整体表现疲软,现货市场的需求显示了什么信号?

A现货市场的净流入数据显示,购买压力在近期有所增加。过去24小时内,现货头寸的净流入达到约30.3万美元,而过去三天的累计购买额已攀升至约341万美元,表明市场存在持续的积累行为。

QEthena的每日活跃用户数量目前处于什么水平?

A根据Artemis的数据,Ethena的每日活跃用户数已降至约1200人,这是自去年12月以来的最低水平。

Пов'язані матеріали

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit18 хв тому

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit18 хв тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit28 хв тому

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit28 хв тому

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit38 хв тому

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit38 хв тому

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit52 хв тому

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit52 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити ENA

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Ethena (ENA) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Ethena (ENA).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Ethena (ENA)Після придбання Ethena (ENA) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Ethena (ENA)Легко торгуйте Ethena (ENA) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

262 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.10Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити ENA

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни ENA (ENA).

活动图片