Crypto Markets Bet Big on What’s Next For Ethereum Miners

BlockworksОпубліковано о 2022-08-02Востаннє оновлено о 2022-08-02

Анотація

Ethereum classic and bitcoin gold were the best performing top-100 crypto assets in July, with both tokens doubling in value

Crypto traders are betting on the next blockchain to attract out-of-work Ethereum miners after the network’s pending scheduled switch to proof-of-stake.

The hoards of high-performance graphics chips that once secured the Ethereum network will be practically useless for mining its blockchain after “the merge” which is set to ditch the energy-intensive proof-of-work in favor of its own brand of collateral-powered consensus.

Digital asset markets — speculative beasts — have largely gambled on two potential new homes for all those mining rigs: Ethereum Classic (ETC) and Bitcoin Gold (BTG).

The native tokens for both blockchains, which were hard-forked away from Ethereum and Bitcoin in 2015 and 2017, respectively, were easily the best performing top-100 digital assets in July.

Hard forks occur when network participants seek substantial changes to a protocol’s rules, splitting the network into two versions. In Ethereum Classic’s case, some sought to protect its immutable nature following The Dao hack, after which lost funds were rolled back.

Bitcoin Gold, on the other hand, forked to adopt a new mining algorithm which made high-performance ASIC rigs obsolete to prioritize mining with standard graphics processing unit (GPU) chipsets.

ETC skyrocketed 143% in the past month, from $15 to $36.50, nearly triple the returns of ether (ETH), which jumped 56%. ETC’s is now about flat year-to-date.

BTG, meanwhile, more than doubled in July, from $15 to nearly $31, outperforming bitcoin (BTC), which rose a comparatively meager 16%. BTG is still down about 30% in 2022.

For scale, the top-100 tokens (sans stablecoins and crypto-backed assets) on average climbed 26% throughout the month.

Ethereum Classic hash rate hits all-time high

Both ETC and BTG are mineable with the same GPUs on which Ethereum miners rely. ETC is the second-biggest cryptocurrency mineable with graphics cards.

So, the market is betting that Ethereum miners will increasingly support the ETC ecosystem in their attempts to strengthen the coin, Jaran Mellerud, Arcane research analyst, told Blockworks in an email.

“At current price levels, other GPU mineable coins don’t provide nearly enough mining revenue to support a significant share of the current Ethereum hashrate,” Mellerud said. “Miners’ only option to avoid dumping their GPUs and crashing the GPU market is to pump the prices of other GPU mineable coins like Ethereum Classic.”

For what it’s worth, Ethereum Classic has attracted more miners lately. Its hash rate (which measures overall computing power on the network) jumped 40% last month, now at its highest point ever at 25.34 terahashes per second, per mining portal CoinWarz.

Bitcoin Gold’s hash rate, which is far smaller than Ethereum Classic, also rose, but only by 9%, — and it’s still a tiny fraction of its initial hash rate from 2017.

Ethereum’s hash rate has remained relatively steady all month. At 996 terahashes per second, the network boasts almost 38 times the processing power than both Bitcoin Gold and Ethereum Classic combined.

Pent-up Polygon price action leads to overperformance

Ethereum scaling platform Polygon’s native asset MATIC was the next-best performer of the month, booking 93% gains.

Positive sentiment was in part fueled by pent-up demand for MATIC following a string of high-profile partnerships secured throughout the year — including deals with Meta and Stripe — said Vivek Raman, head of Proof of Stake at crypto financial services firm BitOoda.

Raman noted Polygon has also delivered new products in Polygon Avail and Supernets, and has also been fostering a strong DeFi ecosystem with a push into NFTs and media via Polygon Studios.

“Despite all the business development wins, Polygon’s token suffered through the crypto crash,” Raman told Blockworks. “The 93% gain in July was likely sparked by the announcement of Polygon’s zkEVM, or a zero-knowledge based L2 solution that will scale Ethereum.

that @0xPolygon business development team has been pretty busy!

all of this while launching the #Polygon zkEVM

who's next? pic.twitter.com/I1vdJg93Dg

— Crypto Texan 🔜 KBW 🇰🇷 | Polygon DeFi 🦇🔊💜 (@Crypto_Texan) July 26, 2022

Raman dubbed ZK rollups the “holy grail of scaling solutions,” with Polygon being one of the first to market with a scalable product.

“This, coupled with a renewed focus on the Ethereum ecosystem in July, likely drove Polygon’s outperformance,” Raman said.

DeFi sentiment usurps centralized crypto exchange tokens

Over the past few months, traders have sought shelter in native tokens for centralized crypto exchanges, which are perceived to be relatively insulated from the broader market’s ups and downs.

Many of these assets, including Bitfinex’s LEO and KuCoin’s KCS, have burn mechanisms tied to trade volumes, which — combined with buy-back schemes — reduce overall supply as trades are executed.

But sentiment has shifted. LEO, which was the only top-100 digital asset to increase in value throughout June, was the worst performing last month, having sunk nearly 14%. Similarly, Huobi’s offering, HT, fell 7%, while KCS fared slightly better, having risen about 1.5%.

Instead, investors flocked to blue-chip DeFi tokens tied to protocols Curve Finance (CRV), Aave (AAVE), and Convex (CVX) — those assets pumped 92%, 71% and 70%, respectively. Aave’s DAO recently approved the launch of a new overcollateralized stablecoin, while Curve has its own in the works, both geared towards competing with MakerDAO’s stablecoin DAI.

The community has given the greenlight 🟢 for GHO 👻 The next step is voting on the genesis parameters of GHO, look out for a proposal next week on the governance forum https://t.co/ba4oK50Wb8

— Aave (@AaveAave) July 31, 2022

Convex’s native asset is heavily intertwined with Curve, leading to correlation between the two assets, Katie Talati, director of research at digital asset management firm Arca, told Blockworks.

Lenders such as Celsius and Voyager blew up over the past two months, while Singaporean exchange Zipmex halted withdrawals. “This really shakes consumer confidence. Are you going to hold a token for an exchange that won’t let you get your money out? Probably not,” she reasoned.

Talati highlighted that DeFi protocols make it possible to see digital assets inside asset pools, how much lend and borrow activity there is, and what their capital efficiency ratios look like, and even at what levels liquidations occur.

“There’s a lot more transparency. From a narrative standpoint, I would say that’s why blue chip DeFi has outperformed,” Talati said.

Пов'язані матеріали

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit1 год тому

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片