El staking de Ethereum experimenta fuertes oleadas de retiradas, pero el crecimiento a largo plazo se mantiene firme

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-12-23Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-23

Анотація

El staking de Ethereum experimenta fuertes oleadas de retiros semanales en las principales entidades, pero la tendencia a largo plazo sigue mostrando un crecimiento sólido. Según datos de Dune Analytics, aunque plataformas como Lido, Binance y Frax Finance realizaron retiros significativos, el total de ETH apostado supera los 33 millones, con Lido liderando con un 24,26%. Estos picos de retiros se deben principalmente a rebalanceos operativos, migraciones técnicas o reestructuraciones de validadores, y no a una pérdida de confianza en el ecosistema. De hecho, servicios realineados con restaking como ether.fi y Renzo han crecido rápidamente, indicando una redistribución hacia modelos de recompensa alternativos. El número de entidades de staking sigue aumentando, los retiros son compensados por nuevos validadores, y el interés por el staking se mantiene robusto, reforzando la seguridad y perspectiva a largo plazo de la red.

El staking de Ethereum está experimentando fuertes picos semanales de retiradas en las principales entidades. Sin embargo, la tendencia general sigue indicando un crecimiento sostenido a largo plazo.

Nuevos datos on-chain de Dune Analytics revelan que, a pesar de grandes lotes de retiradas totales de plataformas como Lido, Binance y Frax Finance, entre otras, la cantidad total de ETH en staking continúa aumentando de manera constante.

Las oleadas de retiradas se intensifican en los principales proveedores de staking

El último gráfico de "Retiradas Totales de ETH" muestra que varias entidades iniciaron lotes de retirada considerables en las últimas semanas.

Grandes salidas de Lido, Binance, HTX, Rocket Pool, Frax y Coinbase contribuyeron a que los totales semanales alcanzaran entre 800,000 y 1.5 millones de ETH retirados en los períodos pico.

Aunque estos picos pueden parecer alarmantes a primera vista, el desglose sugiere una rotación más que una salida generalizada del mercado.

Históricamente, estas oleadas ocurren cuando las entidades reequilibran su infraestructura de validadores, migran configuraciones de clientes o manejan reembolsos de clientes.

Varios custodios corporativos y proveedores de LST (Liquid Staking Tokens) rotan periódicamente sus validadores por razones operativas, lo que se muestra como retiradas totales en lugar de una disminución en el compromiso con el staking.

El total de Ethereum en staking sigue tendencia alcista

A pesar de los aumentos en las retiradas, el gráfico a largo plazo de "ETH en Staking por Entidad" muestra que el suministro total de ETH en staking continúa su ascenso de varios años.

La red ahora supera los 33 millones de ETH en staking, respaldada por un conjunto diverso de participantes, con Lido aún a la cabeza con el 24.26% del ETH apostado.

La pendiente ascendente constante indica que nuevos validadores están ingresando al sistema a un ritmo que compensa las retiradas periódicas.

Más importante aún, varios servicios nuevos alineados con el restaking, como ether.fi, Renzo y P2P.org, han crecido considerablemente este año, lo que sugiere una redistribución del ETH apostado a través de modelos de recompensa alternativos en lugar de una disminución de la confianza.

Una rotación, no una retirada

Un patrón claro en los datos es un alejamiento de los servicios antiguos de staking líquido de un solo proveedor hacia estructuras de rendimiento multicapa vinculadas al restaking, LRTs (Liquid Restaking Tokens) y ecosistemas de staking modular.

Estos movimientos explican las retiradas totales periódicas, particularmente al examinar entidades que recientemente han expandido sus ofertas o se han integrado con frameworks de restaking.

Esto ayuda a posicionar la actividad actual de retiradas como parte de la economía en evolución de los validadores de Ethereum.

El impacto más amplio en el panorama económico de ETH

A pesar del tamaño visual de las retiradas, la tendencia subyacente del suministro en staking aún se inclina estructuralmente alcista:

El número de entidades de staking activas continúa aumentando.
El total de ETH en staking se mantiene cerca de máximos históricos.
Nuevos validadores reemplazan consistentemente a los que salen.
Los protocolos alineados con el restaking están absorbiendo nuevas entradas de fondos.

Esto indica que la demanda de validadores se mantiene saludable incluso durante períodos de incertidumbre del mercado o caídas de precios.

Para el modelo de seguridad de Ethereum, esta participación sostenida en el staking es una señal positiva. Para la acción del precio, los gráficos sugieren que la base de staking permanece estable y orientada a largo plazo, incluso cuando las oleadas de retiradas crean volatilidad a corto plazo.

Reflexiones Finales

Los picos de retiradas reflejan una rotación del ecosistema, no un debilitamiento de la confianza en el staking de Ethereum.
El total de ETH en staking continúa aumentando, reforzando la seguridad a largo plazo de la red y la demanda de validadores.

Пов'язані питання

Q¿Qué revelan los datos on-chain de Dune Analytics sobre las retiradas de ETH staking?

ALos datos on-chain de Dune Analytics revelan que, a pesar de grandes retiradas completas de plataformas como Lido, Binance y Frax Finance, la cantidad total de ETH en staking continúa aumentando de manera constante.

Q¿Qué entidades contribuyeron significativamente a las grandes retiradas semanales de ETH?

AGrandes salidas de Lido, Binance, HTX, Rocket Pool, Frax y Coinbase contribuyeron a que los totales semanales alcanzaran entre 800,000 y 1.5 millones de ETH retirados en los períodos pico.

Q¿Por qué ocurren estas oleadas de retiradas según el artículo?

AEstas oleadas ocurren históricamente cuando las entidades reequilibran su infraestructura de validadores, migran configuraciones de clientes o manejan reembolsos de clientes. Es una rotación, no una salida generalizada del mercado.

Q¿Cuál es la participación actual de Lido en el staking de ETH y cuál es la tendencia general?

ALido lidera con el 24.26% del ETH en staking. La tendencia general es alcista, con la red superando los 33 millones de ETH apostados y una pendiente ascendente constante que indica que nuevos validadores entran al sistema.

Q¿Qué indican los movimientos hacia servicios de restaking como ether.fi y Renzo?

AIndican una redistribución del ETH staking hacia modelos de recompensa alternativos y estructuras de yield multicapa vinculadas al restaking, LRTs y ecosistemas modulares, en lugar de una disminución de la confianza.

Пов'язані матеріали

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit14 хв тому

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit14 хв тому

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

On June 12th, SpaceX debuted on the Nasdaq, reaching a valuation that briefly touched $2 trillion. This marked the culmination of a 24-year journey from its founding in 2002, driven by Elon Musk's frustration at the high cost of buying rockets. The company's path was defined by early failures, with its first three Falcon 1 launches ending in explosions before a successful 2008 flight opened the era of commercial spaceflight. Key to its model was a fixed-price NASA contract, incentivizing cost reduction. SpaceX mastered rocket reusability, first achieving a Falcon 9 landing in 2015, which drastically cut launch costs. This enabled its profitable Starlink satellite internet constellation, envisioned years before reusability was proven, to create an internal market for frequent launches. Similarly, the next-generation Starship rocket was in development long before its first flight, with its business case evolving from Mars colonization to supporting the emerging concept of in-orbit data centers for AI—a story now central to its valuation. The company's recent IPO, a reversal of its long-standing "no IPO" stance, is funding this ambitious "space-based compute" vision. While major tech players like Google, Blue Origin, and others are investing heavily, significant technical and cost hurdles remain. Ultimately, SpaceX's history is one of creating its own demand: first with Starlink and now with space-based AI compute, betting that its next rocket will enable its next giant market.

marsbit17 хв тому

Behind SpaceX's $2 Trillion Market Cap: Why Does Musk Always Have the Next Move Planned?

marsbit17 хв тому

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

In drafting the GENIUS Act, Congress prohibited licensed payment stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders—a rule that forced changes for USDC. However, Ethena's USDe, a rapidly growing "yield dollar," operates outside this regulation. USDe is a delta-neutral synthetic dollar backed by crypto collateral and hedged perpetual futures positions, generating yield from funding rates rather than traditional reserves. Because it doesn't fit the legal definition of a payment stablecoin, the GENIUS Act's restrictions do not apply. USDe's supply peaked above $14 billion in 2025, making it a top-three dollar-denominated crypto asset. Its model carries distinct risks, notably dependence on sustained positive funding rates and vulnerability during market deleveraging events, as seen in a brief depeg in October 2025. Regulatory approaches differ: Germany's BaFin banned USDe sales, viewing it as an unregistered security, while U.S. institutional capital, like Janus Henderson, has embraced it for treasury management. The GENIUS Act defined and regulated payment stablecoins but left synthetic dollars like USDe in a gray area. The unresolved question is whether future regulations will address this category or if yield will continue migrating to undefined spaces.

marsbit19 хв тому

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

marsbit19 хв тому

When Crypto Meets the World Cup: CoinW and Modrić's Art of "Navigating Cycles"

When Encryption Meets the World Cup: CoinW and Modrić's "Transcending Cycles" Philosophy In the context of the 2026 FIFA World Cup and its massive global audience, the crypto exchange CoinW announced football legend Luka Modrić as its global brand ambassador. This move is framed not merely as a marketing tactic, but as a strategic experiment in user profile migration. It targets mature, financially stable football fans—particularly in Europe, Southeast Asia, and Latin America—who traditionally have low crypto awareness but value trusted, time-tested authority figures like Modrić. The article draws parallels between Modrić's enduring, disciplined career—marked by consistency and success at the highest level over two decades—and CoinW's own development path. Founded in 2017 during a volatile industry period, CoinW focused on building robust infrastructure and risk management. It weathered the 2022 industry crisis without major security incidents, subsequently earning recognition like "Europe's Most Trusted Exchange" and growing to over 20 million registered users. This "long-termism" is translated into user-centric products. CoinW Academy lowers the initial knowledge barrier. Its integrated ecosystem (CoinW, GemW, DeriW, PropW) and the recent launch of a TradFi section—offering perpetual contracts on traditional assets like stocks, gold, and oil—aim to create a unified platform for diverse assets. For the World Cup, CoinW launched the "We Are The Game" campaign, collaborating with Alchemy Pay to offer zero-fee deposits and local payment options, aiming to transform spectators into participants and lower entry barriers. Ultimately, CoinW's sports partnerships and product strategy are presented as a concerted effort to build trust and accessibility for the "silent majority" still outside crypto—shifting the industry narrative toward inclusivity and long-term value.

Foresight News23 хв тому

When Crypto Meets the World Cup: CoinW and Modrić's Art of "Navigating Cycles"

Foresight News23 хв тому

A Panoramic View of the Solana Privacy Ecosystem: The Complete Privacy Stack from Computation to AI

**Solana Privacy Ecosystem: A Comprehensive Overview from Computation to AI** Solana's privacy ecosystem, while nascent, is rapidly evolving to address key challenges across multiple layers. Key figures like Helius CEO Mert acknowledge that Solana has lagged in privacy but highlight its unique potential for scalable, composable privacy protocols, potentially leveraging technologies like ZK compression without persistent rollups. The foundational layer is **Private Compute**, addressed by providers like Arcium and Magic Block. Arcium utilizes Multi-Party Computation (MPC) networks to process encrypted data off-chain with final settlement on Solana, supporting use cases like confidential payments (via its C-SPL token standard) and encrypted data analysis. Magic Block employs Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) to create private, ephemeral rollups, offering confidentiality, scalability, and composability. Both enable private order books, dark pools, and DeFi rails. Building on this infrastructure are applications for **Private Transfers and Balances**. Umbra, built on Arcium, offers encrypted token accounts with amount, balance, and sender-receiver linkage privacy, plus compliance features. Privacy Cash uses Tornado-style shielded pools for SOL, while Hush provides private staking and trading with integrated swaps via Jupiter. To eliminate **On-Chain Trails** from everyday activities like trading, protocols like encifherio and VanishTrade are emerging. encifherio privately routes swaps through Jupiter by encrypting transaction details within TEEs. VanishTrade routes trades through shielded liquidity pools. Darklake offers a ZK-native "blind slippage" AMM and private perpetuals to hide trading intent and prevent front-running. More advanced applications include **Private Prediction Markets**. Platforms like Melee Markets use Arcium's MPC to encrypt order books, allowing participants to place hidden bets without revealing their market position until settlement. Finally, the ecosystem is expanding into **Private AI**. Loyal leverages both Magic Block and Arcium to create a decentralized protocol where user-AI interactions, queries, and preferences are encrypted on-chain, giving users ownership and control over their data while enabling private transactions and yield generation. In summary, Solana's privacy stack is developing from core compute and transfer privacy towards sophisticated applications in DeFi, prediction markets, and AI, aiming for a future where Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) and Zero-Knowledge (ZK) proofs combine for a complete privacy solution.

marsbit25 хв тому

A Panoramic View of the Solana Privacy Ecosystem: The Complete Privacy Stack from Computation to AI