[Key interpretation] BTC has hit the cost price of long-term investors of $20239. What will happen next?

Huobi ResearchОпубліковано о 2022-07-11Востаннє оновлено о 2022-07-12

Анотація

Is BTC's trading volume amplified by 20 times in just 30 minutes a signal of bull counterattack?

1、 BTC volume fallback

In the daily K-line chart of BTC, the rising and falling signal reappears, and the trading volume is significantly enlarged during this price fall.

On July 8, the trading volume reached 1.58 times of the recent peak, indicating that the high turnover performance of BTC has not ended. The record high peak trading volume means that the turnover rate has reached a higher level, making investors' holding costs more consistent. As a result, BTC will confirm important bottom signals in the performance of more trading volume.

However, the short-term trading volume of BTC is excessively enlarged, and the long and short competition of positive BTC is still quite fierce. The intensification of long and short competition in low-cost areas means that the signs of bottoming are not clear, and there is still a greater opportunity for the market to fluctuate repeatedly. In the short term, we cannot rule out the emergence of a relatively volatile market. In the near future, it is more likely that BTC will withdraw to the corresponding $19033 of brin line off track.

The basis for the daily K-line volume is the 20 times of the volume of BTC on July 8. The main force quickly increased in large quantities in the 30 minute K-line chart, and BTC rose. Although the BTC price finally rose and fell, the main trading intention is clear, and the further operation of bulls is worthy of attention.

2. Investors' cost of holding money has changed significantly

With the intensification of the volatility of BTC in a small price range, the cost price of currency held by different investors changes greatly.

From the change of short-term and long-term investors' holding money, the cost price of investors who hold money for a period of 1 week to 1 month fell to $20706. The cost price of investors with a holding period of 18 to 24 months rebounded to $20239. As the cost prices of short-term and long-term investors meet in the price range of $20000 to $21000, the market is on the verge of change. After 18 to 24 months of significant recovery in the cost price of investors, their holding cost is very close to the current price. Therefore, from the perspective of selling intention, the number of short-term BTC sales may decrease, which is beneficial to the stabilization of BTC price. The disadvantage is that BTC changes hands quickly, and the stability of investors' holdings in the short term is questionable.

3. The number of BTC giant whale addresses decreased

The number of BTC giant whale addresses showed signs of continuous decline. Although the decline trend was slow, it showed that the enthusiasm of the main force for holding coins continued to weaken. The number of giant whale addresses peaked at 2282 on March 21, and fell to 2186 on July 10, a decrease of 96. According to the calculation of more than 1000 BTCs held at each Jujing address, as many as 96000 BTCs have been transferred from Jujing. Generally speaking, the decline in the number of megawhale addresses indicates that BTC chips are loose, and more small and medium-sized investors hold BTC, so the price is unlikely to rise significantly in the short term.

4. Eth shrinkage fallback

In the daily K-line chart of eth, with the short-term decline of eth, the adjustment performance reappears. The difference is that there was no volume signal during the price retreat of eth, indicating that after the trading heat cooled, the selling pressure decreased accordingly. This eth drawdown stage is the most important trading volume contraction performance. When the trading volume is close to falling below the equivalent line, the price may still rebound around $1000.

Therefore, while paying attention to the volatility intensity of eth, if the market heat remains the status quo, you can pay attention to the low buying point of $1000.

5. Eth estimated high leverage operation

Recently, the estimated leverage ratio of eth has obviously been at a high level. This shows that when the price of eth is below $1300, investors make full use of leveraged trading eth. In terms of market conditions, ETH has little room for fluctuation under the premise of high leverage, and the intraday amplitude remains at a low level. The fluctuation intensity on most trading days is less than 10%. In terms of leverage ratio, the leverage ratio reached 0.22 on July 10, which was a high level in one month.

Compared with investors' eth reserves, investors' contract leverage ratio is high, which proves that investors' leverage energy is enhanced. When eth is around $1100, high leverage means that volatility is also high. Although the support of $1000 is still valid, it should be noted that after the fluctuation of eth price increases, the area that can be reached is the source of risk for leveraged traders.

Пов'язані матеріали

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbit37 хв тому

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbit37 хв тому

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbit1 год тому

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbit1 год тому

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbit1 год тому

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbit1 год тому

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

A country that has been mining Bitcoin for eight years has established its own dedicated crypto bank. DK Bank, located in Bhutan's newly developed GMC special administrative zone, aims to fill the significant banking service gap for the cryptocurrency industry. Its CEO, Zheng YD, explained that most banks avoid crypto businesses due to a lack of risk management frameworks for decentralized and anonymous protocols. Operating under a unique "one country, two systems" governance model separate from mainland Bhutan, GMC aspires to become a financial hub for South Asia. DK Bank differentiates itself by offering integrated multi-currency accounts where users can manage both fiat currencies and stablecoins like USDT and USDC in one place, alongside services like Bitcoin-backed loans. The bank faces technical challenges in merging traditional banking systems with 24/7 crypto markets and implements rigorous on-chain and off-chain transaction monitoring for risk control. GMC's regulatory framework draws from Singaporean common law and Abu Dhabi's ADGM rules, offering a fast-track licensing process for already licensed firms while maintaining high standards. The initiative is part of Bhutan's longer-term crypto strategy, which includes Bitcoin mining since 2018. The focus, however, is on building a diversified institutional-grade crypto ecosystem—including custody and asset management—rather than retail speculative tokens. Proponents argue such sovereign crypto infrastructure is necessary, and Bhutan's early, measured approach exemplifies the thoughtful integration needed in global finance.

Foresight News2 год тому

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

Foresight News2 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片