人民币逆袭:稳定币从影子美元到风险资产的转变

比推Опубліковано о 2025-12-04Востаннє оновлено о 2025-12-04

作者:Liam,深潮 TechFlow

原标题:人民币强势反击,稳定币变成了“风险资产”


过去半年,人民币悄悄完成了一次“逆袭”。

离岸人民币(CNH)一路从 4 月最高 7.4 上方升至 7.06,创下一年来新高。在全球货币普遍震荡的背景下,人民币成为亚洲市场表现最强的货币之一。

有人欢喜有人愁,曾经坚信人民币会破 7.3 的空头们被迫平仓,长期持有美元,包括持有影子美元 USDT 的投资者被动“亏损”(以人民币计价)。

人民币为什么会在这个时间点走强?是否可以持续?

市场买起来的

过去,大家谈到人民币升值,大家常用的表述是“央妈出手了”,不过本轮人民币升值,与过去更多由政策驱动不同,而是市场自然选择的结果。

为什么这么说?

因为从数据来看,收盘价变动是人民币中间价调升的主要贡献项。

这里简单科普一下,每天的人民币汇率有两种关键价格:

  • 收盘价:市场上真实买涨买跌造成的最终价格

  • 中间价:第二天早上央行公布的“参考价”,指导当天的交易

如果这轮人民币升值主要是靠政策强行托住的,那么你会看到中间价提前被调得很强,但收盘价依然走弱,说明市场不买账。

但这次完全相反,收盘价自己先涨了,中间价只是根据上涨后的收盘价“顺势调升”,说明市场资金真的在买人民币。

推动人民币升值的第一大因素,来自于外部,跌跌不休的美元造成人民币被动升值。

今年以来,美元指数累计下跌近 10%。

一方面,美国就业和零售数据持续走弱;另一方面美元降息预期不断强化,引发套利资金集中平仓。

美元的“被动走弱”,使得全球新兴市场货币普遍反弹,其中人民币表现最亮眼。

随着美联储降息不断深入,人民币仍存在进一步升值空间。

如果说以上是人民币的“被动升值”,那么 A 股的变化则提供了“主动升值”的第二条逻辑链。

今年 8 月以来,A 股显著走强,上证突破 4000 点,创近十年新高,特别以芯片和 CPO 为代表的科技股一路长虹,涨势惊人。

中国资产吸引力显著上升,外资风险偏好正在回归,当中国资产变得更能吸引全球资金时,人民币自然更容易升值。

当美元走弱,人民币上涨,结汇和套保意愿的回暖也会拉动人民币需求。

今年以来,在外贸市场,人民币的真实需求快速上升。

贸易净结汇率从年初的 23.9% 一路上涨到 7 月的 54.8%,套保率(远期结汇签约额 / 外币收入)升至 10%,为近一年新高。

这说明什么?企业愿意把美元换成人民币,以及企业愿意锁定未来人民币汇率,看涨未来走势。

总结起来,本轮人民币走强,是一次“三重合力”的结果:

美元进入下行周期,人民币被动上涨。

中国资产进入“估值修复周期”人民币从“主动升值”继续涨。

实体层面,企业结汇需求强。

这三股力量相互强化,构成了人民币升值的闭环。

利好大 A

短期来看,人民币升值对出口会造成压力,但长期利好股市。

过去几年,人民币贬值预期曾是压制海外资金的“隐性成本”。

现在,这个成本正在消失。特别是美元降息背景之下,大量资金开始流向全球,寻找更佳的投资机会。

国家外汇管理局最近公布的数据显示,2025 年上半年外资净买入境内股票和基金 101 亿美元,扭转了过去两年净减持趋势。

特别是红利央企,电信、电力、公用事业,AI + 半导体的细分龙头这种权重资产,会首当受益。

根据高盛的一份报告,中国股票往往在货币上涨时表现良好,股票回报与人民币汇率(双边和篮子条件下)呈现正向相关性和贝塔系数。

具体而言,自 2012 年以来,平均外汇/股票相关性和贝塔系数分别为 35% 和 1.9,表明人民币走强时股票 66% 的时间呈正向交易。

人民币升值可能通过会计、基本面、风险溢价和投资组合流动渠道惠及中国股票。高盛估计,在其他条件相同的情况下,人民币兑美元每升值 1% 可推动中国股市上涨 3%,包括汇兑收益。

持 U 有风险

USDT 长期以来是中国散户与链上世界交互的“标准货币”,也是长期存在的影子美元,但本轮人民币升值叠加政策动向,使持有稳定币也面临风险。

人民币长期升值意味着,长期持 USDT 等于长期承担美元贬值损失。

其次,最近央行等十三部门联手打击虚拟货币交易炒作,正式将稳定币纳入虚拟货币监管范畴,包括金融和外汇风险的重点监测,虚拟货币换汇是未来重点打击方向,换言之,USDT 被纳入了“外汇管理框架”。

这会导致 USDT 在场外换人民币的成本与风险上升,USDT 的“人民币流动性”下降,所以,最近 USDT 兑人民币汇率已跌破 7。

在加密熊市之下,投资者不想直接接触高波动加密资产,但也想规避 USDT 的监管与汇率风险,于是正在转向一个新的领域,用稳定币投资非加密资产,比如链上美股和链上黄金, 仍然可以对冲美元下跌周期,且更加便利。

大量投资者正被迫从“稳定币储蓄”过渡到“链上美元资产储蓄”。

这一点,将对加密市场产生深远影响。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Пов'язані матеріали

Tsinghua AI Mathematician Emerges: From Intuition to Theorem, Contributing to an 84-Page Quantum Algorithm Paper

Tsinghua University’s Intelligent Industry Research Institute (AIR) has developed an AI mathematician agent named AIM, designed not just to solve math problems but to actively participate in early-stage research. In a recent study, researchers collaborated with AIM to develop "Sign Embedding Quantum Algorithms," resulting in an 84-page paper on quantum algorithms for matrix equations and functions. The research began with a human researcher's intuition: can rational approximation serve as a design principle for quantum algorithms? AIM helped expand this idea into multiple candidate research directions. Human researchers then filtered and focused on the most promising path. AIM assisted in organizing theorems, generating proof drafts, and performing complexity analysis, while humans maintained oversight, auditing assumptions and refining derivations. This case illustrates a human-AI collaborative workflow: AI rapidly explores and expands research avenues, generates draft materials, and aids in checking derivations; human researchers provide critical judgment on direction, value, and validity. The process emphasizes "high-throughput candidate generation + human value gating + AI-assisted audit and repair + human final integration." The resulting quantum algorithm framework offers a unified approach to several matrix problems, advancing quantum linear algebra under more general conditions. This work suggests AI's role in theoretical research is evolving from task-specific assistance to supporting the entire research lifecycle—enhancing exploration and efficiency while keeping human expertise central to guiding inquiry and ensuring rigor. *Paper & System Links:* - AIM application report: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24899 - Quantum algorithm paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.25333 - AIM repository: https://github.com/TheoryFoundry/AIMv2

marsbit4 хв тому

Tsinghua AI Mathematician Emerges: From Intuition to Theorem, Contributing to an 84-Page Quantum Algorithm Paper

marsbit4 хв тому

Short-Lived Meme Mania: Can It Be the Icebreaker for Robinhood's RWA Narrative?

Robinhood recently launched its own Layer 2 network, Robinhood Chain, built on Arbitrum and focusing on tokenized stocks, RWA, DeFi, and AI finance. Shortly after launch, a meme coin called CASHCAT, named after an early unused Robinhood brand, surged in popularity, achieving a market cap near $150 million and high daily trading volume. It gained traction through third-party DEXs and launchpads like Uniswap and Noxa.fun, bypassing Robinhood's official listing process. This highlights a key feature of the permissionless chain: even assets not officially approved can achieve significant liquidity and trading activity. While CASHCAT currently dominates the chain's meme coin sector, its high turnover indicates speculative trading. The rapid proliferation of new meme coins risks dispersing liquidity. Meanwhile, the chain's core RWA sector remains relatively small at $12.5 million. CEO Vlad Tenev has expressed that the chain is well-suited for both RWA and meme coins. In the optimistic scenario, meme-driven activity could bootstrap the chain's user base and liquidity for its long-term RWA vision. However, if the meme frenzy fades quickly, the RWA narrative may struggle to gain traction independently. The incident demonstrates that on a permissionless platform, the market itself can create major assets, offering Robinhood a potential new growth avenue beyond its core crypto business as it navigates the long-term development of the tokenized asset market.

Foresight News7 хв тому

Short-Lived Meme Mania: Can It Be the Icebreaker for Robinhood's RWA Narrative?

Foresight News7 хв тому

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

The Fall of Zapper: A Post-Mortem of a DeFi Pioneer In July 2026, Zapper, a once-dominant DeFi portfolio tracker, announced its shutdown. Born in 2020 from a merger, Zapper capitalized on the DeFi Summer boom, reaching 2 million monthly users and processing over $13B in transactions, backed by $16.5M in funding from investors like Framework Ventures and Coinbase Ventures. Its core "Zap" feature simplified complex multi-step DeFi operations. Despite its early success, Zapper failed to build a sustainable business model. Revenue from DEX aggregation was minimal due to fierce competition, while maintaining its multi-chain data infrastructure was costly. Furthermore, the DeFi landscape shifted: capital consolidated around top protocols, reducing the need for complex portfolio tracking across numerous platforms. Zapper's user base and core demand eroded. The company attempted multiple pivots, including an NFT-based points system, a social app (Chainchat), and plans for a ZAP token protocol. However, these initiatives—often focused on creating new, speculative C端需求 rather than solving existing pain points—ultimately failed. Critics argue Zapper remained trapped in a "blockchain purist" mindset, prioritizing costly, non-revenue-generating features over its competitive DEX aggregator. Unlike competitor DeBank, which successfully pivoted to its Rabby Wallet, Zapper lacked a diversified revenue stream. Its closure highlights the peril for tooling projects that fail to adapt to market shifts and monetize effectively, serving as a cautionary tale for the industry.

Foresight News46 хв тому

The Fall of Zapper: An Act of God or a Human Error?

Foresight News46 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片