PLUME’s epic price pump meets a swift reversal – Here’s what happened

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-11-26Востаннє оновлено о 2025-11-27

Key Takeaways

Why did Plume rally?

The news that USDG0, the Paxos multi-chain stablecoin, would be deployed on the Plume network has enthused the bulls.

What are the next key levels?

The $0.03 and $0.0475 resistances need to be flipped to support quickly to keep the fizzling momentum going.

Plume posted a 39.55% rally in two hours on the 26th of November.

This price move came after Plume’s announcement that it has joined Hyperliquid [HYPE] and Aptos [APT] as part of the inaugural launch cohort for USDG0.

This is the multi-chain version of Paxos’ regulated stablecoin USDG. The deployment of the stablecoin on the Plume network reflected Paxos’ confidence in the network.

It has the institutional-grade infrastructure required to support the stablecoin, the announcement read.

Plume also has 280k+ active RWA users and $645 million in RWA total value locked (TVL). This was evidence for a fast-growing ecosystem. The Upbit listing announcement also aided this sentiment.

Plume: Bullish prospects shine, but not for long

Source: PLUME/USDT on TradingView

The 1-day chart showed that a significant horizontal resistance lay at $0.076. The recent rally nearly retested $0.0475, which had been a support level earlier in November but was ceded to the sellers.

The structure and trend on the 1-day chart were firmly bearish. A move past $0.058 is needed to shift the structure.

While Plume [PLUME] skyrocketed initially, this rally has not held up. In recent hours, a deep retracement of the quick price rally has occurred.

At the time of writing, PLUME was nearly at the $0.025 base that launched the rally.

Source: PLUME/USDT on TradingView

The 4-hour chart showed that the bulls have been extremely inconsistent. The short-term resistance at $0.028-$0.03 was not defended as support.

Nor was the $0.0475 level challenged, since the momentum reversed very quickly.

Therefore, even though the MFI showed buying pressure and upward momentum, traders and investors can remain bearishly biased.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Трендові криптовалюти

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Пов'язані матеріали

With 80% of HBM Capacity but Financially Savaged: South Korea's Foundry Labor, Finally Becomes America's Fattened Slaughter Lamb

Over the past month, the South Korean stock market experienced a dramatic crash, with the KOSPI index plunging from historic highs in June to levels equating to a loss of one year's GDP. This triggered massive forced liquidations of leveraged retail investor accounts. The crisis is paradoxical given South Korea's dominant position in the high-bandwidth memory (HBM) market, with SK Hynix and Samsung collectively holding nearly 80% of global production capacity—a critical component for AI systems like NVIDIA's. The article argues that despite this manufacturing monopoly, South Korea lacks pricing power and control over demand. HBM production is entirely dependent on orders from US AI giants like NVIDIA, Google, and Meta, making Korean firms effectively high-end subcontractors. The Korean stock market's AI boom was largely a leveraged bet on these two companies, tying national retail investor fortunes directly to US capital expenditure cycles. The piece suggests this crash represents a strategic financial harvest by Wall Street. It outlines a pattern: US capital first built positions and fueled a speculative bubble through bullish narratives, attracting massive Korean retail investment, often via leveraged ETFs. Once散户 were heavily invested, a series of targeted negative events unfolded—including US antitrust lawsuits, patent investigations, and political pressure for greater profit-sharing and onshoring of production to the US. This combination precipitated the crash, allowing capital to exit at highs and potentially re-enter at lows, transferring wealth from Korean散户 to foreign investors. The article draws a parallel to the US dismantling of Japan's semiconductor dominance in the 1980s, noting the current method utilizes financial markets rather than just trade policy. The core lesson is that without controlling downstream demand, technical standards, and having a robust domestic market, even a manufacturing leader remains vulnerable. South Korea's predicament is framed as the inherent risk of a "subcontractor" model in global tech: when you work for the boss (the US tech ecosystem), you cannot be allowed to earn more than the boss. True industrial security requires mastering the entire value chain.

marsbit6 хв тому

With 80% of HBM Capacity but Financially Savaged: South Korea's Foundry Labor, Finally Becomes America's Fattened Slaughter Lamb

marsbit6 хв тому

South Korean Stocks Plunge Again, Latest Response from the Blue House

Korean Stock Market Plummets Amid Global Sell-Off, Presidential Office Responds South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline on Thursday. The benchmark KOSPI index fell over 4%, with major components SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics dropping over 8% and 5%, respectively. The sell-off quickly spread to related Hong Kong ETFs. The trigger was weak forward guidance from U.S. memory chip giants SanDisk and Western Digital, whose revenue forecasts fell short of lofty market expectations despite strong prior-quarter results. Their subsequent stock plunge led to a sell-off in Asian semiconductor stocks, highlighting the region's dependence on U.S. market sentiment. Since hitting a record high in mid-June, the KOSPI has fallen over 21% in about a month. In response to market volatility, the South Korean government has implemented measures, including raising cash margin requirements for single-stock leveraged ETFs. This led to a significant drop in their trading volume. A senior presidential official stated the focus is on closely monitoring the situation and formulating appropriate countermeasures. Analyst views on the market outlook diverge: while Morgan Stanley sees the sell-off as a buying opportunity due to low valuations, others like China Securities warn of continued high volatility as leverage unwinds. Looking ahead, analysts expect the global memory chip sector to remain in a high-sensitivity phase. However, Goldman Sachs maintains a long-term bullish target of 12,000 for the KOSPI, citing unmet AI-driven demand, with JPMorgan also viewing the pullback as a chance to accumulate positions.

marsbit23 хв тому

South Korean Stocks Plunge Again, Latest Response from the Blue House

marsbit23 хв тому

CryptoQuant: Large Investors Are Buying Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP, the Bear Market May Be Approaching Its Final Stage!

Data analysis platform CryptoQuant reports that large-scale investors, or "whales," holding significant amounts of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and XRP have recently increased their positions. The company suggests this trend may indicate the prolonged crypto bear market is nearing its final stage. Historically, periods of sustained price decline where large investors are buying rather than selling have been a significant indicator. Similar activity was observed in past market cycles when long-term investors deemed prices attractive. However, CryptoQuant emphasizes that current data is insufficient to confirm a market bottom has been reached. While whale accumulation is seen as a positive signal, prices for BTC, ETH, and XRP could still fall further before a definitive bottom forms, warranting investor caution regarding short-term volatility. Experts note this accumulation is often part of a long-term strategy, with large investors buying during panic while retail investors remain cautious—a common characteristic of past cycle endings. CryptoQuant also states that macroeconomic events and global liquidity conditions will remain crucial for price direction. Key factors include central bank monetary policy, regulatory changes, and institutional investor sentiment toward the market. *This is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ru37 хв тому

CryptoQuant: Large Investors Are Buying Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP, the Bear Market May Be Approaching Its Final Stage!

cryptonews.ru37 хв тому

Tiger Research: What Will the Crypto World Look Like in 2036?

Tiger Research envisions the crypto world of 2036 through four narrative vignettes. In a fictional nation with a hyperinflating currency, the local "Bucks" are nearly obsolete. Citizens and eventually the government itself—for taxes, bonds, and salaries—adopt dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDT and USDC, marking a fundamental shift in monetary sovereignty. In Singapore, a young trader named Lia operates in a borderless, 24/7 market. She trades tokenized versions of everything from NVIDIA stock to Korean real estate indices on decentralized platforms, representing a generation for whom constant, global asset exposure is the norm. An infrastructure engineer, Do-hyun, reflects on the consolidation of blockchain networks. The hundreds of independent chains and Layer 2 solutions that boomed in the 2020s, fueled by incentives, have largely collapsed under their own weight. By 2036, only a few major, efficient infrastructures remain, having absorbed liquidity and users. Finally, media entrepreneur Jae-hoon witnesses the end of the traditional web advertising model. With AI agents generating over half of web traffic by 2029, banner ads become irrelevant. The industry pivots to a new machine-to-machine economy, using protocols like the x402 standard to charge AI models micropayments for direct data access, creating a more reliable revenue stream than human eyeballs ever did. The article paints a picture of 2036 defined by stablecoin adoption as sound money, perpetual global trading of all assets, consolidation into few dominant blockchain infrastructures, and the restructuring of digital commerce around AI agents.

marsbit46 хв тому

Tiger Research: What Will the Crypto World Look Like in 2036?

marsbit46 хв тому

IOSG: How Can Blockchains Keep Secrets? Three Answers to On-Chain Privacy

**Title: IOSG: How Does Blockchain Keep Secrets? Three Answers to On-Chain Privacy** **Summary:** Public blockchains expose every transaction. To protect sensitive data like institutional balances or trade sizes, three main approaches have emerged: 1. **Native Privacy Networks:** Projects like Zcash (with optional privacy) and Monero (with mandatory privacy) build secrecy directly into their own blockchains. However, they exist as isolated "islands," limiting interaction with mainstream DeFi applications. Canton, a permissioned network, offers privacy by restricting data sharing only to transaction participants, which appealed to JPMorgan for its deposit token. 2. **Privacy as an Add-On Layer:** This approach adds privacy to existing chains like Ethereum. Tornado Cash was an early "mixer" but was sanctioned. Railgun provides private balances and payments via zero-knowledge proofs on Ethereum. Zama uses Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) to encrypt balances and amounts on-chain, enabling confidential DeFi activities like private yield vaults and over-the-counter trading while keeping transaction graphs public. 3. **The Core Trade-off:** All solutions sacrifice some privacy for functionality. Truly private chains (Zcash, Monero) lack smart contract versatility. Add-on layers (Zama, Railgun) reveal some metadata to enable computation. "Perfect" privacy that hides everything while allowing full functionality remains elusive. **Market Reality:** Demand is validated, with institutions moving trades off-screen to avoid slippage. However, the sector's revenue (est. $6-7M/year across all protocols) is minuscule compared to the ~$25B market cap of privacy assets. Protocols like Zama charge minimal, usage-based fees, while others like Railgun take a small percentage. The key gap is a sustainable pricing model. The conclusion is bullish on the underlying demand but suggests value will accrue to the applications (trading venues, wallets) that successfully monetize privacy, not necessarily the foundational privacy layers themselves.

marsbit49 хв тому

IOSG: How Can Blockchains Keep Secrets? Three Answers to On-Chain Privacy