指数高位震荡,多头不能失守6750点!

比推Опубліковано о 2025-11-04Востаннє оновлено о 2025-11-04

(本文附经典案例分析:新东方_EDU)

一、一周行情回顾:(10.27~10.31)

本周指数开盘于6845.46点,周三触及6814.26低点,周五创出6920.34高点,全周最终报收于6840.20点,周涨幅0.71%,振幅1.56%,周线收出阳“十字星”,技术上指数站在5周均线之上并创出历史新高。

本周,标普500指数成份股平均股价下跌1.74%,全部美股平均股价下跌2.10%。标普成份股中,泰瑞达(代码_TER)以25.98%的涨幅领涨,而费哲金融服务(代码_FI)则下跌46.72%,位列榜尾。

从4月7日到10月31日,指数已连续上涨了30周,共计145个交易日,期间累计最大涨幅高达43.13%。

标普500指数周线图:(动能量化模型*情绪量化模型)

image.png

(图一)

标普500指数日线图:

image.png

(图二)

标普500指数周线图:(历史数据回测:2009年3月6日至2025年4月4日)

image.png

(图三)

笔者在10月26日的文章《敏感时段,风控为先!》中,以多周期技术指标共振和十几年历史数据回测为依据,对本周指数走势做出了预测,指出本周有两个重要时间节点,敏感时段,首要任务是控制仓位。具体行情预测及操作策略如下:

在指数走势方面:

1、走势预判:下周将回踩通道下轨,检测突破的有效性。

2、关键位置:

• 上方压力:第一压力位6850点;重要压力位通道上轨。

• 下方支撑:第一支撑位通道下轨;第二支撑位6650点;第二区间6500-6550点。

在操作策略方面:

• 仓位管理:多单整体仓位控制在30%。

• 短线交易:从整体仓位中提取20%的筹码,依据提示的压力与支撑位做“短差”。

现在回顾本周的实际走势:

本周市场呈“先扬后抑”格局:前三日震荡上扬,周三创出6920.34点的历史新高;周四起行情逆转,受美联储降息影响连跌两日,指数两度回踩通道下轨并获支撑。走势完美验证了此前关于“下轨支撑”的判断。

接下来,笔者将依据多模型监测指标,从技术层面分析当前指数发生的变化。

(一)、量化模型信号分析:

1、周线视角(见图一):

①、动能量化模型:本周没有信号显示,动能1号线逐步走平,能量柱转为增长。

模型提示下跌风险指数:中性

②、情绪量化模型:情绪1指标强度是3.58(取值范围0~10)左右,情绪2强度是3.32左右,顶峰信号指标是9.13,数据与上周相比差别不大,市场超买情绪回升。

模型提示下跌风险指数:高

③、数字监测模型:未发出顶部拐点信号。

模型提示下跌风险指数:中性

2、日线视角(见图二):

①、动能量化模型:在周一盘后发出顶部钝化信号(此信号是形成顶部背离的前兆);本周前三天能量柱逐步增长,后两天转化逐步萎缩。

模型提示下跌风险指数:较高

②、情绪量化模型:本周两个情绪指标及顶峰信号指标逐步减弱,周五收盘后两个情绪指标强度均0,顶峰信号指标为4.93,表明市场超买情绪降温。

模型提示下跌风险指数:日线级别开始调整

③、数字监测模型:周三盘后发出数字信号“A”,随后数字保持不变,预示顶部拐点信号生效过程中。

模型提示下跌风险指数:高

(二)、趋势时序与历史数据回测分析(图三):

1、数据回测模型设定:

• 回测数据区间:2009年3月6日2025年4月4日,共计840根周K线。

• 调整规则:满足以下条件之一即定义为有效调整:

▪回调周期≤2周,且跌幅≥5%;

▪回调周期≥3周(跌幅不限)。

▪ 根据上述规则,回测区间内共识别出52次有效调整。

2、截至10月31日,本周指数再创历史新高,标志着自4月7日启动的本轮上涨已持续30周。这不仅延续了上升周期,更刷新了长达16年来的持续上涨时长纪录。

二、下周行情预测:(11.03~11.07)

1、 走势预判:下周将通道下轨作为指数短期强弱的分水岭;若站稳,则意味着当前上升趋势的动能仍在,市场有望延续强势震荡上行的格局;若跌破,市场将进入弱势震荡,并向下回踩6750点寻求支撑。

2、 关键位置:

• 上方压力:第一压力位6920点;重要压力位通道上轨。

• 下方支撑:第一支撑位通道下轨;第二区间看6740~6770点;第三区间看6500-6550点。

三、下周操作策略:(11.03~11.07)

1、仓位管理:多单整体仓位控制在30%~50%(视盘面走势强弱而定)。

2、短线交易:从整体仓位中提取20%的筹码,依据提示的压力与支撑位做“短差”。

3、短线技巧:短线操作请参考60/120分钟小周期图,以提高买卖点的精准度。

4、个股应用:此策略适用于个股的整体仓位管理与交易操作。

四、特别提示:

对于个股波段操作,无论买入多单或者空单,建仓后立即设置初始止损位。当股价盈利5%时,立刻将止损位移动到成本线(即盈亏平衡点)附近,确保该笔交易不会亏损;当盈利达到10%时,将止损位上调至盈利5%的位置。此后,每当盈利增加5%时,止损位就同步上移相同幅度,以动态保护已实现利润。

(注:上述5%的盈利触发阈值,投资者可根据自身风险偏好与标的波动性灵活调整。)

五、经典案例分析:(只作为案例分析,不作为投资推荐)

1、新东方(股票代码_EDU):(多单)

新东方日线图:

image.png

• 买入条件(多单):买入价56~58.10美元,初始止损价54.4美元,第一目标位是70美元,波段操作。

• 本周实际走势回顾:

• 开盘价:61.18美元

• 最低价:55.00美元(周二)

• 最高价:61.56美元(周一)

• 收盘价:59.57美元

• 涨跌幅:周跌幅0.88%,最大振幅10.92%

• 本周已按计划于56美元完成建仓,并将止损位上移至56美元(成本价),持股待涨。

为应对市场的瞬息万变,笔者的操作策略会保持动态调整,投资者想及时获取最新信息,敬请关注下方链接。

以上各种模型是本人操作时遵守的交易规则,不构成任何买卖依据。个人观点,仅作参考。

作者:Cody Feng


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Пов'язані матеріали

Valuation $1 Billion, Nvidia Doubles Down! Is Prime Intellect Washing Off Its Web3 Label?

Prime Intellect, a decentralized AI infrastructure company founded in 2024, recently announced a $130 million Series A funding round at a $1 billion valuation, with investments from NVIDIA, Intel, and Dell's venture arms. The company claims its annualized recurring revenue (ARR) has exceeded $100 million within a year, serving over 6,000 enterprise clients. Initially rooted in Web3 and decentralized science (DeSci), Prime Intellect has evolved into a full-stack AI training and deployment platform. Its core technology enables distributed training of large language models across globally dispersed, heterogeneous GPU clusters. Key milestones include releasing open-source models like INTELLECT-1 and INTELLECT-3, and launching Prime Intellect Lab, a platform allowing users to train and optimize agentic models without managing their own GPU infrastructure. The company's deep collaboration with hardware giants, particularly NVIDIA, extends beyond investment to joint optimization of software (e.g., integrating NVIDIA Dynamo) and hardware systems. A notable commercial case involves fintech company Ramp using Prime Lab to train a specialized agent, demonstrating the platform's applied value. While achieving rapid commercial growth, Prime Intellect has systematically downplayed its earlier Web3 and token-based incentives from its official documentation, repositioning itself as a mainstream AI infrastructure provider focused on enterprise adoption and potential IPO.

Foresight News8 хв тому

Valuation $1 Billion, Nvidia Doubles Down! Is Prime Intellect Washing Off Its Web3 Label?

Foresight News8 хв тому

After 13% Daily Distribution, Why Did SATA Still Fall?

Strive Asset Management's BTC-linked preferred stock SATA transitioned from monthly to daily dividend distributions on June 16, with a current annualized yield of 13%. Despite this change, SATA's price fell approximately 9.9% from June 22 to June 26. The analysis highlights that this decline reflects fundamental credit and structural risks, not simply dividend frequency. SATA represents a perpetual, cumulative preferred equity interest in Strive, not a direct Bitcoin-backed bond. Its dividends depend on Strive's corporate credit and access to capital markets. While Strive's Bitcoin holdings grew from 15,009 to 19,864 BTC between May 12 and June 18, SATA's outstanding shares grew faster (from ~4.96 million to ~7.83 million). Coupled with a drop in BTC price, the pure Bitcoin coverage ratio for SATA's stated amount fell from ~2.44x to ~1.52x. A further ~34.3% decline in BTC to ~$39,416 would bring this coverage to 1.0x. Daily dividends smooth cash flow for investors and reduce dividend-capture trading, but do not eliminate price volatility or credit risk. SATA now trades at a ~12.25% discount to its $100 stated amount, implying a market yield of ~14.81% and a credit spread of ~1,117 bps over SOFR. Key risks include a negative feedback loop if SATA trades below par, making new issuance dilutive; reliance on capital markets for dividend funding despite a ~17-month cash buffer; and the perpetual nature of the security, where dividends can be deferred. In summary, SATA innovates by providing daily income from a Bitcoin-focused corporate balance sheet, but its recent price action underscores its exposure to Bitcoin valuation, company-specific financing risks, and perpetual duration. The market is repricing it from a near-par yield product to a deeply discounted high-risk credit instrument.

marsbit36 хв тому

After 13% Daily Distribution, Why Did SATA Still Fall?

marsbit36 хв тому

Unlocking 20%, $125 Million in Pressure, Can PUMP Hold Up?

"Pump.fun Faces Crucial Test with $125M Token Unlock Despite a cooldown in the meme coin market, Pump.fun remains one of Web3's top revenue-generating protocols, earning $28.4 million in the past 30 days. The platform has accumulated approximately $1.05 billion in total revenue from over 12 million tokens created. The protocol now faces its biggest challenge: the first unlock of team and investor tokens. A total of 82.5 billion PUMP tokens (8.25% of total supply, 20.23% of previous circulating supply), valued at around $125 million, have been unlocked. This potential selling pressure is significant compared to the token's 24-hour trading volume of only $28 million. While Pump.fun uses a portion of its revenue to buy back and burn PUMP tokens, creating buy-side pressure, this support has weakened. The buyback rate was reduced from 100% to 50% of net fees in April 2024. In June 2024, monthly buybacks totaled just $9.2 million, an over 80% drop from its peak. At this rate, selling just 7% of the newly unlocked tokens would offset a full month of buybacks. Furthermore, this unlock is only the first batch; team and investors still hold another 247.5 billion locked PUMP tokens, with 240 billion community tokens awaiting a release schedule. Despite these headwinds, PUMP is argued to be a relatively scarce asset in the current market. With a $610 million market cap against $28.4 million in monthly revenue, its valuation is lower than competitors like Hyperliquid. The investment thesis for PUMP is not betting on a single meme coin but on the persistent activity of the meme market and Pump.fun's ability to maintain its position as a key platform. The conclusion suggests that while the unlock tests short-term price resilience, the protocol's underlying revenue strength will determine PUMP's long-term trajectory, potentially making the current dip a viable entry point for long-term accumulation."

Odaily星球日报48 хв тому

Unlocking 20%, $125 Million in Pressure, Can PUMP Hold Up?

Odaily星球日报48 хв тому

Aave Withdrawal, TVL Plunges: Where is MegaETH's Valuation Anchor?

MegaETH, once a highly anticipated new blockchain, has seen a dramatic decline in its Total Value Locked (TVL) and token price. According to DefiLlama data, its TVL plummeted nearly 60% in 24 hours, falling to just over $30 million from a May peak, with the Aave V3 protocol withdrawing 80% of its liquidity. The MEGA token price dropped to around $0.048, with a market cap of ~$54 million and a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of ~$480 million. The analysis identifies three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals. First, its high FDV contrasts with minimal real usage: low protocol revenue (~$90k/30 days) and few daily active addresses. Second, its DeFi narrative is contradicted by its revenue structure, where a collectible card game (Monster) generates most income, not major DeFi protocols like Aave. Third, initial hype from VC backing and airdrop farming has faded without sustained user adoption or clear applications. The TVL was heavily concentrated in Aave and largely driven by cyclical arbitrage strategies involving stablecoins like USDm and USDe. As the yield for these strategies diminished, funds rapidly exited. The departure of this speculative capital has exposed a lack of substantial, organic ecosystem activity. While the sharp drop could be seen as a correction from inflated expectations, the article suggests MegaETH's valuation lacks a solid foundation. Future price movements may rely on short-term market sentiment rather than genuine improvement in network fundamentals, such as increased real usage, a diversified application ecosystem, and consistent user growth. The situation reflects a broader market trend of demanding clearer value propositions beyond just high TVL figures.

marsbit1 год тому

Aave Withdrawal, TVL Plunges: Where is MegaETH's Valuation Anchor?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片