Dogecoin – Another 18% price drop may be on the cards because…

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-10-30Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-31

Key Takeaways

What is the short-term outlook for Dogecoin?

Though there seemed to be some evidence for accumulation on-chain, it likely isn’t enough to prevent another 18% price slide .

Why is such a price slide expected?

Dogecoin’s OBV fell below the lows it established in August – A sign that selling volume inundated the spot market in October.

Dogecoin [DOGE] suffered a bearish setback over the last 24 hours as Bitcoin [BTC] briefly fell to $106.3k, before bouncing higher. At its lowest point, DOGE hit $0.176 on Thursday, 30 June.

This was a 9.34% slide from the day’s high at $0.194. At the time of writing, Dogecoin was exhibiting strong short-term bearish sentiment, with a 3.55% drop in Open Interest in 24 hours. However, the bulls managed to defend the $0.175 demand zone. For now.

Importance of $0.178, and the warning sign for Dogecoin bulls

Bitcoin has been trading within a range since August. This range reached from $124.5k to $107.5k. The brief plunge below the range lows in recent hours suggested that there is a chance for a bullish rebound, provided we see strong spot demand.

Source: DOGE/USDT on TradingView

Therefore, the chance of a Dogecoin rebound is also present. However, it would depend heavily on the capital inflows to the market in the coming days. Recently, though the $0.175-$0.185 demand zone has been defended, the selling pressure has been high too.

This was evidenced by the OBV forming a new low, below the baseline it had established back in August. In fact, the recent selling volume has been overwhelming. And, it appeared that it may be only a matter of time before the bulls cave to the pressure.

If Dogecoin falls below $0.175, the next support level would be the $0.15-level. This has been the base of the rising wedge pattern that began in June.

Source: Santiment

The daily active addresses have been falling in October. This hinted at reduced network activity and a fall in organic demand for Dogecoin. However, the mean coin age saw an uptick over the past two weeks.

This could be a sign of on-chain accumulation, despite the spot selling seen on the price charts. The age consumed metric saw some spikes recently too, but nothing extreme.

Overall, though the aforementioned findings seemed encouraging, they are unlikely to be enough to overturn the selling spree witnessed in recent weeks. Hence, a bearish bias and a price drop to $0.15 can be anticipated.

Пов'язані матеріали

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

Token Frenzy: Is the Average Person Getting a Piece of the Pie? As AI adoption soars in China, daily Token consumption—the basic unit for AI text processing—has skyrocketed, exceeding 140 trillion. This "Token economy" is often measured like GDP, touted as a sign of progress. However, this metric primarily reflects supply-side activities: corporate investment, infrastructure scaling, and platform revenues. The crucial question of whether this growth translates into tangible benefits for ordinary citizens—higher wages, better jobs, improved public services, or increased leisure—remains largely unanswered. The article argues there's a fundamental mismatch. Policy, exemplified by subsidies in Beijing's Yizhuang district, often stimulates "demand" by incentivizing companies to consume more Tokens (an intermediate business cost), rather than by boosting household income or final consumer spending. This creates a closed loop where growth in Token usage justifies further production capacity expansion, without necessarily extending value to the broader population. Several disconnects are highlighted. High Token usage doesn't equal completed tasks, increased profits, or macroeconomic productivity gains. Even when corporate efficiency improves, the benefits may not trickle down due to existing economic structures favoring investment over household consumption. The risk is that AI, a genuinely productive technology, becomes another tool for supply-side expansion within a system adept at measuring output (like server capacity and call volumes) but less focused on distributing the gains widely. Drawing a parallel to Henry Ford's assembly line, the piece notes that Ford's revolution combined ruthless production efficiency with a social compact (higher wages, stability) that enabled mass consumption. Today's "Token economy" narrative enthusiastically champions the first part—process re-engineering and cost reduction—but lacks a credible mechanism for the second: ensuring that productivity gains lead to broader societal welfare. The ultimate challenge is not whether Tokens have value, but whether their economic benefits can escape a system that excels at building supply but struggles to cultivate its own demand.

marsbit5 хв тому

Token Economy Surges, Have Ordinary People Got a Slice of the Pie?

marsbit5 хв тому

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

Overnight, U.S. AI-related stocks fell sharply, with the Nasdaq down 1.33% and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunging nearly 5%. Panic spread globally, dragging down Asia-Pacific markets. Key negative drivers included: 1. **Geopolitical Tension & Macro Pressure:** Escalating U.S.-Iran tensions pushed oil prices higher, fueling inflation fears and expectations of prolonged high interest rates. Rising bond yields pressured high-valuation, capital-intensive AI stocks, especially as soaring AI infrastructure financing costs became evident. 2. **AI Commercialization Concerns:** OpenAI's Q2 results showed slowing revenue growth and widening losses, dampening market optimism about near-term AI application profitability. This shifted investor focus from pure capital expenditure narratives to actual commercial returns. 3. **Supply Chain Uncertainty:** U.S.-South Korea semiconductor investment disputes intensified. Market fears that Korean memory giants (Samsung, SK Hynix) face a dilemma—either divert capital to costly U.S. production or risk trade barriers—disrupted the critical HBM memory sector, amplifying sell-offs via leveraged ETFs. While long-term AI demand remains, the market is now scrutinizing real profitability, financing costs, and supply chain stability rather than paying premiums for unchecked growth stories. For markets like China's A-shares, the impact is primarily sentiment-driven, requiring distinction between short-term panic and fundamental deterioration.

marsbit6 хв тому

Overnight Global Shock: Why Did AI Stocks Plunge Across the Board?

marsbit6 хв тому

From 'Little Brain' to 'Big Brain': Unitree Robotics Raises 60 Billion Yuan in IPO, Focusing Efforts on Robot AI Models

Unitree Robotics plans to allocate approximately half of the funds raised from its IPO to the research and development of AI models for robots. AI will function similarly to the human cerebrum (perceiving surroundings and making decisions) and cerebellum (controlling complex movements and maintaining balance).

13 хв тому

From 'Little Brain' to 'Big Brain': Unitree Robotics Raises 60 Billion Yuan in IPO, Focusing Efforts on Robot AI Models

13 хв тому

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

In Q2 2024, despite a roughly 14.2% decline in Bitcoin's price, many Wall Street institutions increased their crypto holdings, revealing a divergence from ETF flow trends. Overall institutional Bitcoin exposure grew by 7.5% to ~536k BTC, while aggregate spot Bitcoin ETF holdings declined. Notably, exposure concentration increased, with fewer reporting institutions holding larger positions. A key trend was the significant outperformance of Ethereum (ETH) exposure growth over Bitcoin (BTC) among major banks. For instance, JPMorgan's ETH exposure surged 67.3% versus 12.2% for BTC, and Morgan Stanley's ETH exposure grew 18.6% versus 3.7%. Individual bank holdings of Ethereum ETFs like ETHA saw dramatic increases, even as the overall Ethereum ETF market experienced net outflows during the quarter. Trading firms like Jane Street significantly rebuilt its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) position, while several hedge funds, including Brevan Howard and Graham Capital, reduced spot ETF holdings but added substantial option positions (both calls and puts), indicating more complex strategies. Institutions showed diverging views on crypto-related equities: some sold shares of MicroStrategy (MSTR) after its announced Bitcoin sales, while others like Renaissance Technologies and BlackRock were buyers. New entrants like Spain's Santander Bank disclosed initial crypto ETF positions. Meanwhile, long-term holders like Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth funds paused their accumulation, and Harvard's endowment maintained a flat Bitcoin position. Key signals include the deepening institutionalization of crypto assets, a clear institutional preference for accumulating Ethereum, and growing divergence in views on crypto equities. This institutional buying in Q2 preceded a price recovery and renewed inflows into Ethereum ETFs in July and August.

marsbit25 хв тому

Q2 Wall Street Institutional Crypto Holdings: Most Institutions Increased Positions Against the Trend, ETH Exposure Outperformed BTC Across the Board

marsbit25 хв тому

TSMC, Another Winning Bet

TSMC Gains Another Strategic Advantage as Samsung Delays 1.4nm Process Samsung Foundry has adjusted its advanced process roadmap, postponing the mass production timeline for its 1.4nm process from 2027 to 2029. This two-year delay signals a strategic shift from aggressively pursuing the next node to focusing on maturing and scaling its 2nm platform. Samsung plans to extend the commercial lifespan of its 2nm technology through derivative versions optimized for different applications, including those incorporating backside power delivery for AI and HPC chips. A notable aspect of this shift is Samsung's cautious approach toward High-NA EUV lithography. The company views it as essential for 1nm-class nodes and beyond but not as an immediate necessity for 1.4nm, opting instead to refine its existing Low-NA EUV-based processes. This highlights a broader industry trend where the competition is evolving beyond simply reaching the next node. Success now depends on achieving high yield, managing soaring costs, integrating new transistor architectures like GAA, and delivering a compelling overall package of performance, power efficiency, and area (PPA) at a viable cost. While Samsung consolidates its 2nm efforts, TSMC continues its advance. Its N2 node is in production, and the A16 node (post-2nm, ~1.6nm) is scheduled for mass production in the second half of 2026. A16 introduces TSMC's Super Power Rail backside power delivery technology, which is expected to deliver significant performance and power efficiency gains. TSMC's previously stated cautious stance on High-NA EUV appears validated by Samsung's roadmap adjustment. The delay underscores that the competition in leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing is entering a new phase. It is no longer just a race to smaller node numbers but a multifaceted contest involving process maturity, yield, cost, design-technology co-optimization (DTCO), and advanced packaging. Samsung aims to solidify its 2nm platform over the next three years. However, as it targets 1.4nm for 2029, the industry will be watching how far ahead TSMC and Intel have moved by then.

marsbit30 хв тому

marsbit30 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот