BlackRock CEO: Crypto and Gold Are ‘Assets of Fear’ Against Inflation

TheCryptoTimesОпубліковано о 2025-10-28Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-28

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink said more people are buying crypto and gold because they are scared of losing money as government debts keep rising.

During a recent interview at the Future Investment Initiative (FII) conference in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, he explained that “Owning crypto assets or gold are assets of fear,” he said, according to Bloomberg.

“You own these assets because you’re frightened of the debasement of your assets. You’re worried about your financial security. You’re worried about your physical security.”

Investors Turn to ‘Fear Assets’ Cause of Inflation

Fink’s remarks come at a time when investors are showing interest in what experts call the “debasement trade”, meaning away from government money and buying hard assets such as gold, silver, and Bitcoin.

In a statement, Fabian Dori, Chief Investment Officer at Sygnum Bank explained that the trend is happening because of weakening purchasing power caused by loose fiscal and monetary policies

“There are good reasons why private investors, banks, and institutions may start to hedge using Bitcoin,” he said. However, he warned that crypto’s price changes fast, so it needs better risk systems and needs to be monitored round-the-clock.

Global Debt Concern is on the Rise

According to data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), America’s government debt will reach 143.4% of its total economy by 2030. That would be higher than debt levels in Italy and Greece.

The IMF also says the U.S. will keep a large yearly budget deficit above 7% of GDP until 2030. This number has made lots of investors panic, and many are trying to protect their money from possible inflation and weaker currency values.

Bitcoin Price Chart | Source: CoinMarketCap

Recently, Bitcoin hit a record high of over $126,000 before falling sharply after President Donald Trump threatened 100% tariffs on China. The crash wiped out about $19 billion in leveraged crypto futures, and Bitcoin briefly dropped below $110,000. Currently, the token is trading for $115,162, according to CoinMarketCap.

According to Fink, the U.S. still relies heavily on foreign investors to buy its Treasury assets. “We still are a nation that needs 30% to 35% of all our Treasury sales going overseas,” he said. Still, he added that many investors believe the U.S. will remain the best place to invest for the next 18 months.

Also Read: Trump Media Enters Prediction Markets with Crypto.com

Follow The Crypto Times on Google News to Stay Updated!

Пов'язані матеріали

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

"Investors are pouring billions into Chinese AI startups with no profits, betting on the future of the industry. A state-backed fund is reportedly in talks to lead DeepSeek's funding at a $45B valuation, just weeks after it was valued at $10B. Along with companies like Zhipu AI, MiniMax, and Kimi (backed by Meituan and Alibaba), their combined valuation exceeds $140B. This isn't a typical venture capital play. Investors are paying for 'future definition rights'—a chance to set the standards for the next tech era. Morgan Stanley notes a 6-12 month window for this scarcity premium before more AI companies go public. Despite massive losses, these companies show strong growth. Zhipu AI's API revenue grew 60x, Kimi's annual recurring revenue doubled to $200M in a month, and MiniMax turned its gross margin positive, with over 70% of revenue from overseas. Their valuations vastly exceed profitable firms like iFlytek. Crucially, technical progress underpins this growth. DeepSeek's latest model boasts costs just 1% of a leading competitor's, while Zhipu AI has raised API prices due to high demand. However, gaps with top global models remain. Tech giants like Tencent and Alibaba, investing heavily while describing their own AI efforts as 'leaky boats,' are also investing in these startups as a hedge. Key risks loom: the closing scarcity window, computing power bottlenecks limiting growth, and the sustainability of DeepSeek's cost-advantage model. With state capital now a major player, the success of these companies has become a strategic national concern. The next year will test if their soaring valuations can be justified by future profits."

marsbit28 хв тому

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

marsbit28 хв тому

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

On May 22, the U.S. SEC postponed the release of a key "innovation exemption" draft that would have permitted crypto-native platforms to issue and trade tokenized U.S. stocks on decentralized venues without full traditional exchange compliance. This would have legalized a "third-party token" model used overseas, where platforms issue tokens tracking stock prices without the underlying company's involvement, raising unresolved questions about shareholder rights, dividends, and sanctions enforcement. Meanwhile, the SEC had already approved a different, compliant path for tokenization led by Nasdaq and NYSE. Their model integrates tokenized stocks into existing settlement systems (like DTCC), preserving all shareholder rights. This creates a fundamental conflict: crypto platforms seek a permissionless, 24/7 on-chain parallel market, while traditional exchanges advocate for an upgraded, regulated version of the current system. Intense lobbying from traditional exchange groups like the World Federation of Exchanges argued the exemption would create an unfair regulatory advantage and dilute investor protection. Even some compliant crypto firms favored delay. Internally, SEC commissioners were divided on the scope and pace of the exemption. The delay highlights a critical policy crossroads. With significant trading volume already occurring overseas, the SEC's decision will determine whether the U.S. embraces a dual-track system for tokenized equities or sidelines itself from an emerging global infrastructure. The core unresolved question remains the legal status and rights of holders of third-party tokenized stocks. The SEC paused because the draft framework risked creating a major new asset class with profound, unanswered legal implications.

marsbit37 хв тому

SEC Slams the Brakes at the Last Minute, Halting "Tokenized U.S. Stocks"

marsbit37 хв тому

Interview with the Founder of an AI-Focused Investment Fund: Forget the False Narrative of 100x Returns, What Crypto x AI Assets Are Worth Watching?

Interview with Austin Barack, founder of AI-focused fund Relayer Capital. He emphasizes prioritizing real value over hype, especially in the Crypto x AI sector. Key assets discussed include: * **Venice:** A private AI platform where user data isn't shared with model providers. Its unique two-token model (VVV and DM) provides sustainable, capped user incentives for computation. Rapid user growth (3M) and token usage (15x in months) suggest significant upside. * **Grass:** Sells high-quality, specialized web-scraped datasets to AI labs for model training. With ~$50M+ ARR and triple-digit growth, its ~$400M valuation is seen as undervalued. * **NEAR:** Praised for its superior cross-chain swap infrastructure via intents, positioning it as crucial infrastructure for AI agents and decentralized applications. * **Akash:** A decentralized GPU compute marketplace gaining traction, with visible usage on platforms like OpenRouter. * **Investment Framework:** Shift from generic "buyback-and-burn" narratives to analyzing the "net token value flow"—whether token holders genuinely capture value from the underlying business. Markets are consolidating around a smaller set of quality projects with strong fundamentals like Venice, Grass, and NEAR, making targeted investments more effective.

marsbit39 хв тому

Interview with the Founder of an AI-Focused Investment Fund: Forget the False Narrative of 100x Returns, What Crypto x AI Assets Are Worth Watching?

marsbit39 хв тому

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

The article discusses concerns about a potential "super IPO wave" hitting the U.S. stock market, with major companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic preparing to go public. While these large IPOs could collectively raise hundreds of billions, raising fears of a market "blood drain," analysis suggests the impact may be limited. Key points include: * Historical data shows IPO waves often coincide with strong market returns, as they typically occur during periods of high investor demand. * Model estimates suggest even the largest IPOs might only cause a market dip of around 1%. They are more likely to trigger a routine market pullback rather than end a bull market. * The current demand side remains supportive due to high household cash balances, strong corporate earnings growth, continued stock fund inflows, and robust share buyback announcements. * The main risk lies in concentrated investor positions, particularly in large-cap tech stocks, which are at elevated levels. A shift in funds towards new issuances could pressure these crowded sectors. * Recent fund flows show strength concentrated in U.S. and tech stocks, while other regions like Europe and Japan are experiencing outflows. The conclusion is that the IPO wave itself is unlikely to crash the market unless it coincides with a weakening in underlying demand factors like earnings or fund inflows into U.S. equities. The focus should be on whether demand can continue to absorb the new supply.

marsbit42 хв тому

Is a Super IPO Wave Coming? Will It Drain and Crash the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbit42 хв тому

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

Vitalik Buterin recently published an extensive article addressing core concerns about Ethereum's future direction and the role of the Ethereum Foundation (EF). He clarifies that the EF is not his personal domain nor the central authority of Ethereum; it operates as just one node within the broader ecosystem. The board makes collective decisions, with significant operational work led by Aya Miyaguchi, allowing Vitalik to focus on technical matters. The article critiques the perception that the EF should act like a conventional, fast-moving tech company. Buterin warns that merely chasing higher TPS, lower latency, or better marketing—like other chains—risks diluting Ethereum's foundational values. He draws a parallel to Google's evolution away from its "Don't be evil" ethos. Instead, the EF's renewed mandate is to focus on preserving and strengthening Ethereum's core principles, summarized as CROPS: **C**ensorship-resistance, **R**esistance to capture, **O**pen source, **P**rivacy, and **S**ecurity. The foundation will concentrate its limited resources (holding only ~0.16% of ETH) on these long-term, non-commercializable fundamentals, while ecosystem growth, applications, and market-facing activities should be driven by external teams and capital. Buterin outlines key technical priorities aligned with this vision: 1) Advancing formal verification to mathematically prove the absence of bugs; 2) Enhancing consensus security to maintain operation without reliance on social coordination during outages; and 3) Reducing dependency on intermediaries (like RPCs) to strengthen user sovereignty and privacy. He acknowledges ETH as Ethereum's most valuable asset, crucial for security, but stresses that promoting its value is a task for the wider ecosystem, not the EF. Ultimately, Buterin's message is a strategic refocus: the EF will become a smaller, more focused entity guarding Ethereum's essential, harder-to-achieve properties, ensuring it remains distinct not just in performance but in its commitment to decentralization, resistance, and security.

marsbit47 хв тому

Vitalik is Personally 'Dismantling' the Ethereum Foundation

marsbit47 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот

Ф'ючерси

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни PEOPLE (PEOPLE).