Messari 研究员:用 Perp DEX 炒美股,可能是真正的新蓝海

比推Опубліковано о 2025-10-28Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-28

作者:Sam

编译:深潮TechFlow


关键洞察

  • 股票永续合约仍属于高潜力但尚未被验证的领域,在链上市场的吸引力有限,主要因为受众错位、需求疲软以及更受欢迎的替代品(如0DTE期权)。

  • 例如,Ostium 平台的日均股票永续合约交易量仅为180万美元,而加密货币永续合约的交易量则高达4430万美元,显示出市场需求较弱。

  • 这可能暗示由于基础设施和监管限制,市场需求尚未完全释放。Hyperliquid近期的HIP-3升级为股票永续合约提供了最佳机会,但预计采用过程将是渐进的。

来源:Messari (@0xCryptoSam)

股票永续合约被认为是链上市场不可避免的下一片蓝海,但目前的数据表明短期内这一领域还难以实现突破。Ostium 作为一个专注于真实世界资产(RWAs)的永续合约去中心化交易所,其日均股票永续合约交易量仅为180万美元,而加密货币永续合约的交易量则达到4430万美元,这反映了需求的疲软。

这种采用差距主要源于受众错位。链上交易者对股票兴趣不大,而链下平台(如Robinhood)的交易者可以轻松交易股票和期权,但无法交易永续合约。国际投资者可能成为潜在目标群体,因为他们无法直接接触美国股市。然而,这些投资者可能更倾向于直接持有股票以获得股东权益,同时避免资金费和清算风险。

与代币相比,股票的互操作性挑战较少,而代币则因合成包装的便利性受益。对于普通投资者而言,全球市场中的几乎每一只股票都已通过搜索栏的个别股票代码实现抽象化。因此,尽管永续合约为股票增加了无许可和抗审查的特性,但普通股票投资者要么对此毫不知情,要么并不感兴趣。

https://www.fow.com/insights/analysis-cboe-points-to-retail-flow-as-zero-day-options-grow

最可能的股票永续合约用户是零售期权交易者(他们在Robinhood平台上推动了50%-60%的 0DTE 交易)。然而,依赖银行服务的传统交易所只有在法律明确时才会采纳股票永续合约。美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)已批准BTC和ETH的永续合约交易,但这两者已被认定为非证券。虽然永续合约比期权更直观,但由于零售采用路径与法律明确性紧密相连,股票永续合约的普及可能比预期更为缓慢。

来源:@Kaleb0x

让我们探讨在 Hyperliquid 的 HIP-3 升级背景下,股票永续合约可能的发展方向。HIP-3 引入了去许可的永续合约市场,而数据显示,少于10%的 Hyperliquid 地址已桥接至 Aster、Lighter 和 edgeX,甚至更少用户选择了多个永续合约去中心化交易所(DEX)。这表明 Hyperliquid 的资金具有粘性,且质量较高。基于此数据,可以从两个角度预测股票永续合约的未来:

  1. Hyperliquid 用户对平台忠诚,无论资产列表或功能如何,他们更倾向于选择 Hyperliquid 而非其他永续合约 DEX。

  2. Hyperliquid 用户对当前永续合约市场的产品感到满意。

我认为这两种观点都有道理。考虑到 Hyperliquid 用户在面对激励时并未大规模转移资金,他们可能对 Hyperliquid 忠诚。但由于 Hyperliquid 上的大部分交易量和未平仓合约(open interest)集中在主流资产,与其他永续合约 DEX 类似,目前尚难判断 Hyperliquid 用户是否在意市场多样性,以及股票永续合约对普通用户(更重要的是持有 Hyperliquid 70%未平仓合约的大户)是否具有吸引力。

此外,这些交易者可能同时在传统交易所和券商平台拥有账户,这进一步限制了 Hyperliquid 上股票永续合约的潜在市场规模。

需要注意的是,股票永续合约可能不会为 Hyperliquid 带来新的未平仓合约或交易量,而是可能会分流现有的交易流量。

尽管 Ostium(年均永续合约交易量达220亿美元)和股票代币包装工具(如 xStocks,其现货交易量为2.79亿美元)尚未实现爆发性增长,这或许反映了基础设施的限制,而非潜在需求的缺乏。这种模式类似于永续合约早期的增长轨迹。GMX 证明了链上永续合约市场的需求存在,但当时的基础设施无法支持持续的交易量。而 Hyperliquid 解决了这一瓶颈,释放了潜在需求。以同样的逻辑,股票永续合约在 HIP-3 提供必要的性能和流动性后,可能会在 Hyperliquid 上找到其第一个可扩展的产品市场契合点。虽然当前数据无法确认这一结果,但这一先例值得关注。

与 0DTE 期权相比,股票永续合约的长期潜力仍然显而易见。像 Trade[XYZ]这样的项目可以利用监管套利,在传统交易所进入市场之前建立早期用户群。然而,真正的挑战在于吸引链下的零售交易者,而这对加密应用来说一直是困难的。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Пов'язані матеріали

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

The countdown for the largest IPO in AI history, a potential $2 trillion listing for Anthropic, is underway for October. The staggering valuation, reportedly projected by several investors, contrasts with the company's own internal restraint on setting a public target. Founded five years ago by former OpenAI core members, Anthropic's growth has been meteoric. Annual recurring revenue (ARR) surged from ~$9B in late 2025 to $47B by May 2026, with Q2 2026 revenue of $11.5B marking a 14x year-over-year increase. Bank valuations are even based on internal 2028 revenue forecasts of $190-200B. A key growth driver is Claude Code, its AI coding assistant. Its ARR quintupled in five months to $2.5B by February 2026, now constituting nearly 20% of total revenue. Surveys indicate Anthropic commands roughly 40% of enterprise LLM spending, doubling OpenAI's share in programming-specific use. However, alongside this explosive growth, reports detail significant internal cultural strife. Critics describe a divisive "priesthood" of PhD executives, led by CEO Dario Amodei, who promote a "save humanity" narrative that some employees find cult-like and alienating. This has reportedly created a demoralized workforce and a covert "underground network" of dissent among engineers torn between lucrative pre-IPO equity and a toxic work environment. Anthropic now faces a pivotal paradox: pursuing its mission of "safe" AI requires immense capital for compute, yet that capital demands relentless commercial growth. As it approaches its historic IPO, the company must navigate intense regulatory scrutiny, soaring operational costs, and internal tensions—any of which could destabilize its post-listing trajectory, much like SpaceX's significant post-IPO stock drop. The stage is set for a defining moment in tech history.

marsbitЩойно

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

marsbitЩойно

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

"AI for Cost Reduction Makes VC Funding More Expensive" Despite the "cost-reduction and efficiency" narrative of AI, venture capital (VC) investment in the AI sector is becoming increasingly costly. While AI tools lower the initial costs for many startups—with team sizes shrinking across funding stages—the market is polarizing. For top-tier AI teams, especially those from leading companies like Google and OpenAI, funding rounds are now larger and valuations are higher than ever at the seed and early stages. For example, new ventures by prominent researchers are securing billions in funding with valuations reaching tens of billions before having a mature product. This creates a "barbell" market: lightweight startups need less capital, while elite AI firms attract massive investments early on. This dynamic raises the cost for VCs to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership stakes. As valuations soar early, securing the same equity percentage requires significantly larger capital commitments. VCs must now invest more upfront and reserve substantial funds for follow-on rounds to avoid dilution, prompting large firms like Accel and a16z to raise massive new funds. Consequently, capital is concentrating intensely in a few perceived winners like OpenAI and Anthropic, widening the gap between large and small VC funds. While high valuations bake in future growth expectations, they also compress potential returns, demanding that portfolio companies achieve unprecedented scale. For major VCs, the core strategy is clear: secure early positions in potential winners and maintain the capital to keep investing as valuations rapidly escalate.

marsbit25 хв тому

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

marsbit25 хв тому

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a significant shift in Ethereum's Layer-1 cryptographic roadmap: abandoning the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon in favor of traditional functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision ends eight years of research and investment, marking a major revision to the post-quantum security strategy. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, was highly efficient for zkRollups and zkVMs within SNARK circuits. However, its need for prolonged cryptanalysis and the pressing timeline for quantum resistance revealed limitations. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design, specifically using binary fields, now enable traditional, battle-tested hash functions to perform as efficiently as Poseidon within SNARKs. Benchmarks show modern laptops can now verify over a million traditional hash calls per second. This change is partly driven by accelerated concerns over quantum computing threats. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" could break current blockchain signatures like ECDSA by the early 2030s, risking trillions in assets. Ethereum's response focuses on hash-based post-quantum signature schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant than some lattice-based alternatives under pressure from AI cryptanalysis. Ethereum's updated post-quantum roadmap targets a production-ready "leanVM" for signature aggregation by 2027, with full deployment across consensus, execution, and data layers by 2028. The shift to mature hash functions like SHA2 reduces reliance on newer algorithms and aligns with the goal of using widely analyzed cryptographic primitives. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core teams have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for its compact size. Starknet plans a phased migration, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. Ethereum's move signifies a strategic pivot towards proven security foundations for the quantum era.

marsbit1 год тому

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

marsbit1 год тому

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbit3 год тому

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbit3 год тому

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

The United States is preparing to demand that European and other partners abandon Chinese artificial intelligence initiatives, threatening exclusion from the American-led "Pax Silica" coalition, according to a leaked U.S. State Department document. This ultimatum forces signatories of the "AI Opportunity Statement" to choose between the Western technological ecosystem and alternative frameworks, with China not explicitly named but clearly targeted. Pax Silica is a U.S. strategy for AI and semiconductor hegemony, launched in late 2025. Its European presence expanded significantly in mid-2026. Concurrently, China, Russia, and 27 other nations established the World AI Cooperation Organization (WAICO) in July 2026 as an independent intergovernmental platform promoting AI governance based on UN principles. This situation creates a difficult choice, especially for European nations balancing strategic autonomy with dependence on U.S. tech and security. It also pressures Global South countries with pragmatic ties to both Washington and Beijing. The formation of competing blocks risks fragmenting the global tech landscape, forcing companies to split supply chains, increasing costs, and potentially leading to incompatible standards and protocols. The era of open globalization in AI may be ending, replaced by geopolitical confrontation where technological sovereignty trumps economic efficiency. The decisions made will shape the global digital economy for decades.

cryptonews.ru5 год тому

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

cryptonews.ru5 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片