Ant Group, JD.com Halt Stablecoin Projects After Beijing Warning

TheCryptoTimesОпубліковано о 2025-10-19Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-19

China’s leading tech firms have quietly put their stablecoin ambitions on hold after a direct intervention from Beijing, which raised red flags over the growing influence of privately issued digital currencies.

Alibaba-backed Ant Group and e-commerce giant JD.com were among the companies gearing up to participate in Hong Kong’s pilot stablecoin programme, with plans to issue asset-backed digital tokens and tokenised bonds. 

But multiple sources familiar with the matter said both firms halted progress after receiving clear instructions from mainland regulators — including the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) and the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), to stand down.

Concerns over control and China’s digital yuan project

Officials from the PBoC reportedly advised against joining Hong Kong’s first stablecoin rollout, citing unease about allowing private players to issue currency-like products. “The real regulatory concern is, who has the ultimate right of coinage — the central bank or any private companies on the market?” one person familiar with the briefings told the Financial Times.

The central bank’s stance reflects broader worries that privately managed stablecoins could compete with its own digital yuan (e-CNY) — a flagship project aimed at modernising China’s payment infrastructure and tightening state oversight of digital money.

A global echo of stablecoin caution

China’s latest move isn’t happening in isolation. Regulators worldwide are tightening their stance on stablecoins, wary of how dollar-pegged tokens could disrupt financial systems. The European Central Bank has also raised alarms, saying that the growing use of dollar-backed stablecoins could limit its ability to steer monetary policy.

Meanwhile, in August, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) opened applications for stablecoin issuers, turning the city into a closely watched testing ground for regulated digital currency innovation. Interest from mainland players surged over the summer, with discussions even exploring renminbi-backed stablecoins to promote the yuan’s internationalisation.

Zhu Guangyao, China’s former vice-minister of finance, had earlier argued that “the strategic purpose behind the US promotion of stablecoins is to preserve dollar supremacy”, urging China to respond with a yuan-pegged digital alternative as part of its long-term financial strategy.

Beijing turns cautious after Zhou Xiaochuan’s warning

Momentum shifted after former PBoC governor Zhou Xiaochuan urged restraint during a July financial forum. “We need to be vigilant against the risk of stablecoins being excessively used for asset speculation, as misdirection could trigger fraud and instability in the financial system,” he said. 

Zhou also questioned the actual need for tokenisation, arguing that “although many believe stablecoins will reshape the payments system, in reality, there is little room to cut costs in the current system, particularly in retail payments.”

For now, China’s message is clear: innovation is welcome, but when it comes to currency, control will remain firmly in the hands of the state.

Neither the PBoC nor HKMA commented on the matter, while CAC, Ant Group, and JD.com did not respond to requests for comment.

Also Read: Trump Says China Tariffs “Will Not Stand” Amid Crypto Market Crash


Mobile Only Image

Пов'язані матеріали

Will OpenAI Swallow the Application Layer? a16z Says Real Opportunities Lie Outside General Models

As large language models (LLMs) from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic become more powerful, many fear they will dominate the AI application layer, leaving no room for startups. However, this article argues that the real opportunity lies not on the "Yellow Brick Road"—the high-profile, general-purpose tasks like code and text generation that model labs are directly pursuing—but in the "rest of Oz": complex, vertical-specific applications. On the Yellow Brick Road, model companies have inherent advantages: control over the model, better margins, pricing power, and strong distribution. Startups building generic, horizontal "co-pilot" tools for standard tasks are competing directly on this path and are vulnerable. True defensibility and value are found in specialized, vertical applications. These involve deep integration into messy, multi-step business workflows (e.g., sales, insurance, legal), handling legacy systems, data quality issues, compliance, and governance. The "scaffolding" around the model—the specialized tools, automations, workflows, and industry knowledge—becomes more critical than the raw model power itself. Vertical AI companies can build defensible moats through: * **Data & Learning Flywheels:** Capturing unwritten industry practices and specific customer feedback not found in public training data. * **Managing Model Complexity:** Routinely evaluating and routing queries across multiple models (including open-source) to optimize for performance and cost, and absorbing the migration burden of model upgrades for clients. * **Cost Optimization:** Using cheaper, fine-tuned models for specific sub-tasks instead of always calling the most expensive, general-purpose model. * **Governance & Compliance:** Providing the control plane for permissions, auditing, and ensuring compliance with industry-specific regulations (e.g., HIPAA, FINRA). Examples from sales (11x) and insurance (FurtherAI) illustrate that clients pay for systems that drive specific business outcomes (e.g., sales pipeline, policy underwriting), not for generic intelligence. These systems become the "operational memory" of a business, a layer that is hard to replace, even as the underlying LLMs commoditize and improve. To test if a startup is building in the "rest of Oz," it should pass checks like the **Tool & Steps Test** (requires complex, multi-step workflows), the **System Test** (owns the end-to-end workflow, not just a tool on top), and the **Hedge Fund / P&L Test** (measured by client business outcomes, not benchmark scores). Both model labs and vertical application companies will win. The next generation of enterprise software will be built in the specialized, complex, and high-value territory beyond the Yellow Brick Road.

marsbit7 хв тому

Will OpenAI Swallow the Application Layer? a16z Says Real Opportunities Lie Outside General Models

marsbit7 хв тому

'ASIC Giant' Marvell Sets Record Quarterly Revenue, Raises Guidance Again, CEO Says Data Center Business Is 'On Fire'

Marvell Technology, a leading player in custom AI chips and data center connectivity, reported record revenue for its fiscal Q1 2027, driven by explosive demand in its data center business. Revenue reached $2.418 billion, slightly surpassing expectations, though GAAP net income fell year-over-year due to acquisition-related costs. Crucially, data center revenue hit $1.83 billion, making up 76% of the total and growing 27% YoY. The company significantly raised its full-year and next-year guidance, citing "exceptionally strong AI-related orders." Revenue is now projected at ~$11.5 billion for FY2027 and ~$16.5 billion for FY2028. CEO Matt Murphy emphasized that growth in the data center segment is accelerating. The AI Interconnect business, now expected to grow over 70% annually, saw its forecast lifted again due to rising network demands in complex AI models. Additionally, Marvell's custom chip (XPU) business is on a steep growth path, with FY2028 revenue anticipated to double and a target of over $10 billion by FY2029. The company also expanded its strategic collaboration with NVIDIA, focusing on silicon photonics, system integration, and AI-RAN solutions. To secure supply for surging demand, Marvell plans about $1 billion in supplier prepayments this fiscal year, highlighting its long-term capacity planning. Despite the strong results, the stock dipped slightly in after-hours trading.

marsbit25 хв тому

'ASIC Giant' Marvell Sets Record Quarterly Revenue, Raises Guidance Again, CEO Says Data Center Business Is 'On Fire'

marsbit25 хв тому

Top Audit Expert Warns: All DeFi is Unsafe, Withdraw Now!

A leading DeFi security expert has issued a stark warning: all DeFi is now unsafe. Manuel Aráoz, founder of major security audit firm OpenZeppelin, stated on X that he is advising friends and family to withdraw funds from major protocols like Aave, MakerDAO, and Compound. The core reason for this drastic shift is the rise of AI. Aráoz argues that AI-powered coding agents can now identify and exploit smart contract vulnerabilities at an exponentially faster rate. This turns DeFi's transparency into a liability, providing a vast training dataset for attackers. The fundamental asymmetry of security—where defenders must patch every flaw, but attackers need only find one—is being catastrophically unbalanced by AI. Recent months provide chilling evidence. April saw massive exploits, including a $280 million loss at Drift Protocol and a $292 million theft from Kelp DAO. The trend continued into May with multiple high-value attacks on protocols like THORChain, Verus, Echo Protocol, and StakeDAO, demonstrating vulnerabilities across both on-chain code and off-chain management. AI acts as a force multiplier for hackers, enabling near-instantaneous vulnerability scanning, automated exploit script generation, and sophisticated social engineering. The recent development of ultra-powerful AI models like Anthropic's Mythos—so advanced its public release was delayed over security fears—signals even greater threats ahead. The article concludes that the risk-reward calculus for DeFi participants has fundamentally broken. With yields on many "blue-chip" protocols now in the single digits, users are essentially risking 100% of their principal for minimal returns, with no recourse in case of attack. In this environment, withdrawing funds may be the most rational risk management decision.

marsbit25 хв тому

Top Audit Expert Warns: All DeFi is Unsafe, Withdraw Now!

marsbit25 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片