Крипторынки реагируют на отказ Трампа от угрозы 100% тарифа на Китай

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2025-09-16Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-17

Президент США Дональд Трамп в пятницу уточнил, что предложенные 100% тарифы на китайские товары “не будут введены”, что указывает на более мягкую позицию, чем ожидалось изначально.

Это заявление прозвучало на фоне растущей напряженности в мировой торговле и уже вызвало спекуляции как на традиционных, так и на криптовалютных рынках.

Биткоин растет, так как Трамп смягчает позицию по тарифам на Китай

Хотя первоначальная угроза агрессивных тарифов вызвала опасения по поводу глобальных рисков и оттока капитала, последние комментарии Трампа сигнализируют о возможном смягчении торговой политики.

Этот сдвиг был воспринят как сигнал облегчения для рисковых активов. В ответ цена биткоина показала небольшой рост, увеличившись почти на 2% на часовом графике.

“They’re always looking for an edge. They ripped off our country for years."

"China — boy, they did a number on our country. They took money out. Now, it's reversed."

"We have a very strong adversary and they only respect strength."

EXCLUSIVE: President Trump talks trade… pic.twitter.com/RvU1zTR9WJ

— Fox News (@FoxNews) October 17, 2025

Пов'язані матеріали

Aave Withdrawal, TVL Plunges: Where is MegaETH's Valuation Anchor?

MegaETH, once a highly anticipated new blockchain, has seen a dramatic decline in its Total Value Locked (TVL) and token price. According to DefiLlama data, its TVL plummeted nearly 60% in 24 hours, falling to just over $30 million from a May peak, with the Aave V3 protocol withdrawing 80% of its liquidity. The MEGA token price dropped to around $0.048, with a market cap of ~$54 million and a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of ~$480 million. The analysis identifies three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals. First, its high FDV contrasts with minimal real usage: low protocol revenue (~$90k/30 days) and few daily active addresses. Second, its DeFi narrative is contradicted by its revenue structure, where a collectible card game (Monster) generates most income, not major DeFi protocols like Aave. Third, initial hype from VC backing and airdrop farming has faded without sustained user adoption or clear applications. The TVL was heavily concentrated in Aave and largely driven by cyclical arbitrage strategies involving stablecoins like USDm and USDe. As the yield for these strategies diminished, funds rapidly exited. The departure of this speculative capital has exposed a lack of substantial, organic ecosystem activity. While the sharp drop could be seen as a correction from inflated expectations, the article suggests MegaETH's valuation lacks a solid foundation. Future price movements may rely on short-term market sentiment rather than genuine improvement in network fundamentals, such as increased real usage, a diversified application ecosystem, and consistent user growth. The situation reflects a broader market trend of demanding clearer value propositions beyond just high TVL figures.

marsbit31 хв тому

Aave Withdrawal, TVL Plunges: Where is MegaETH's Valuation Anchor?

marsbit31 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片