Latest Wave of ETF Filings Target Crypto Yield With Leverage and Staking

ccn.comОпубліковано о 2025-10-17Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-17

Key Takeaways

  • Asset managers are looking to expand beyond vanilla crypto ETFs.
  • The latest proposals incorporate advanced strategies based on staking and leverage.
  • Ark Invest has also proposed Bitcoin ETFs with downside protections.

The first exchange-traded funds (ETFs) with crypto exposure relied on futures contracts. Then, in 2024, stock exchanges welcomed spot ETFs.

In the next wave of financial innovation, fund managers want to ramp up earning potential with staking and leverage.

Top Crypto Tax Accounting Software
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Chasing Staked Crypto Exposure

Ever since the launch of the first spot Ether ETFs last year, the prospect that funds could stake assets to grow their holdings has been tantalizing.

Asset managers like Ark Invest, Fidelity, and 21Shares did initially propose the concept in early 2024, but staking proved to be a regulatory hurdle, and it was absent when the first Ethereum ETFs launched later that year.

This summer, ETF providers, including BlackRock, filed to amend their respective ETH funds to incorporate staking.

Many of the altcoin ETF applications currently awaiting approval also include language on staking.

But so far, none of these have received the regulatory greenlight.

Regulatory Issues

The problem ETF hopefuls face is that staking rewards complicate the view of cryptocurrencies as commodities currently sanctioned by the SEC.

Compared to holding static assets, staking delivers active returns, which could be perceived as an investment contract under the Howey Test.

However, VanEck’s latest ETF application could potentially get around this.

On Oct. 16, the fund manager filed an S-1 registration with the SEC for an ETF holding Lido Staked Ethereum (stETH).

With Lido, regards are baked into the stETH–ETH exchange rate. This means ETFs wouldn’t have to operate their own validators or rely on a third-party staking service.

Bringing Leverage to Crypto ETFs

Beyond staking, ETF issuers are exploring other opportunities outside of vanilla investment strategies.

On Oct. 16, 21Shares filed to list a HYPE fund with 2x long leverage.

Volatility Shares is also expanding into leveraged crypto ETFs, filing a series of applications for funds that would invest in BTC, ETH, SOL, and XRP margin contracts.

Leveraged crypto ETFs are intended to deliver higher returns to investors.

Contracts would settle on a daily basis. Because the proposed funds are heavily invested in the respective assets, if the market rises, investors will amplify their returns; however, if it falls, their losses will multiply.

Another approach to maximizing returns is seen in Ark Invest’s proposal for a “Bitcoin Yield” ETF. The fund would invest in BTC options and premiums, with Ark strategists employed to predict the market.

Ark has also filed for two “DIET” Bitcoin ETFs that would offer downside protection with earning potential based on BTC’s quarterly price movements.

Пов'язані матеріали

White House Crypto Summit Full Breakdown: Trump Pushes for On-Chain Exchanges to Enter the U.S., September 15 Crypto Regulation Vote is the Real Deadline

White House Crypto Summit: Trump Backs On-Chain Exchange Entry, September 15th Vote is the Deadline On August 19th, former President Trump convened crypto and Wall Street executives at the White House, declaring an end to the "crypto war." He urged Congress to pass a "fair version" of the CLARITY Act by the September 15th deadline, hinted at potential further U.S. Bitcoin purchases, and announced CFTC efforts to bring the decentralized exchange Hyperliquid into the U.S. compliantly. The summit was preceded by an SEC proposal creating new exemptions for crypto asset fundraising and followed the next day by CFTC Chair Selig's stark warning. Selig stated that if Congress fails to pass the CLARITY Act by September 15th, the CFTC will independently write rules to allow registered and some unregistered platforms to offer leveraged trading under its oversight. Trump's endorsement of Hyperliquid triggered a significant market reaction, boosting its token and related stock prices. However, its path to U.S. compliance remains uncertain, potentially involving a hybrid structure with licensed brokers handling front-end operations. The primary hurdle for the CLARITY Act is not its crypto provisions but attached ethics clauses aimed at restricting federal officials, including the President, from profiting from crypto businesses. Industry leaders like Coinbase's Brian Armstrong view the September 15th vote as critical for establishing durable regulatory certainty, while Selig framed congressional action as the only sure defense against future regulatory overreach.

marsbit10 хв тому

White House Crypto Summit Full Breakdown: Trump Pushes for On-Chain Exchanges to Enter the U.S., September 15 Crypto Regulation Vote is the Real Deadline

marsbit10 хв тому

Is Poland Still a Low-Cost Gateway to the EU CASP Market?

Is Poland still a low-cost gateway to the EU’s Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) regime? As of mid-2026, the answer has fundamentally changed. Poland’s previous light-touch VASP registration system, once an attractive EU entry point, is no longer valid for providing MiCA-regulated services after its transition period ended on July 1, 2026. Furthermore, Poland's domestic legislation implementing MiCA is still undergoing final adjustments, creating uncertainty for direct CASP authorization. This shift means the old logic—choosing Poland primarily for low registration and operational costs—is no longer viable. Under MiCA, a CASP license is no longer a "light" registration, and Poland's current regulatory limbo adds unpredictable delays and risks. For projects seeking EU market access, a more practical strategy is emerging: obtain a MiCA CASP authorization in another EU member state with a stable regulatory framework (e.g., Lithuania, Malta), then use MiCA's passporting rights to serve the Polish market. This approach prioritizes regulatory certainty and EU-wide access over marginal cost savings. Poland remains a significant EU market. It is a viable CASP home country only for projects with a genuine, long-term operational presence there. For others, especially those with teams and clients across Europe, starting the CASP process elsewhere in the EU is now the more efficient and reliable path. The era of using a Polish entity as a cheap, quick EU regulatory foothold is over.

marsbit10 хв тому

Is Poland Still a Low-Cost Gateway to the EU CASP Market?

marsbit10 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片