指数下周有震荡调整,观察重要点位得失!

比推Опубліковано о 2025-10-06Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-06

(本文附经典案例分析:微博_WB,唯品会_VIPS)

一、一周行情回顾:(09.29~10.03)

本周开盘价6661.58点,周二触及最低价6641.00点,周五创出最高价6750.87点,最终收盘价6715.79点,周振幅1.65%,涨幅1.09%,周线收出一根阳K线,收在5周均线之上,创出标普指数历史新高。

从4月7日到10月3日,指数已连续上涨了26周,共计125个交易日,累计最大涨幅为39.62%左右。

标普500指数周线图:(动能量化模型*情绪量化模型)

image.png

(图一)

标普500指数日线图:

image.png

(图二)

标普500指数周线图:(历史数据回测:2009年3月6日至2025年4月4日)

image.png

(图三)

笔者上周文章的题目是《标普指数多指标发出调整信号,警惕下跌风险!》,在文章中依据多周期技术指标共振以及十几年历史数据回测,对本周指数做出预测。

在指数走势方面:

上周四指数第六次回踩通道下轨获得支撑,本周需要观察支撑有效性;指数向上压力位在通道上轨,向下支撑位在通道下轨附近。

在操作策略方面:

1、在日线级别中,动能顶背离信号等多组指标叠加在一起形成共振,笔者提示下跌风险。

2、总仓位:多单持股仓位增加到70%左右,若指数跌破生命线通道,需将仓位降到30%以下。

2、对于短线投资者,可以从仓位中拿出20%左右筹码,依据支撑、压力位做“短差”。

现在回顾本周的实际走势:

周一指数开盘后小幅震荡,振幅很小,当天收出涨幅为0.26%的“十字星”K线;随后两天延续“低开高走”的走势,分别收出涨幅为0.41%、0.34%的两根小阳线;周四、周五两天指数波动不大,成交量较前几天有所萎缩,分别收出两根涨幅为0.06%、0.01%的小K线。最终本周收出一根涨幅为1.09%的阳线,并在周五创出指数历史新高6750.87点。本周实际走势与笔者预测大致相符。

接下来,笔者将根据多模型技术指标,分析当前指数发生的变化。

(一)、量化模型信号分析:

1、周线视角(见图一):

①、动能量化模型:本周没有信号显示,目前两条动能线缓慢上行。

模型提示下跌风险指数:中性

②、情绪量化模型:情绪1指标强度是5.03(取值范围0~10)左右,情绪2强度是5.05左右,顶峰信号指标是12.05。

模型提示震荡风险指数:高

③、数字监测模型:本周显示数字“9”,观察下周信号数字变化。

模型提示下跌风险指数:中性

2、日线视角(见图二):

①、动能量化模型:本周三收盘后,两条信号线由“死叉”变为“金叉”,量能柱由红变绿,动能顶背离信号消失,模型再次发出高位钝化信号。

模型提示目前指数多空双方争夺激烈,下跌风险指数:高

②、情绪量化模型:周五收盘后,1号情绪指标强度为3.56,2号情绪指标强度为0.21,顶峰信号指标是7.76。

模型提示下跌风险指数:高

③、数字监测模型:本周三盘后,收盘价大于上周四收盘价,预示上周四发出的日线顶部拐点信号消失。

模型提示下跌风险指数:中性

(二)、趋势时序与历史数据回测分析(图三):

1、笔者制定的数据回测模型:

①、回测数据区间:2009年3月6日2025年4月4日,共计840根周K线。

②、设定调整规则:回调≤2周且跌幅≥5%,或者回调≥3周,回测数据中符合条件的调整共有52次。

2、统计历史数据寻找规律:每当指数从低点连续上涨26周后,出现调整的概率为98.08%左右。

3、在笔者回测的模型中,最大的一次上涨周期出现在2017年7月19日至2018年1月26日,指数连续上涨29周后,出现了一次跌幅为13.43%的下跌走势;还有两次分别是上涨26周之后出现大幅度调整。

4、从4月7日到10月3日,指数已连续上涨了26周。

二、下周行情预测:(10.06~10.10)

1、指数在日线级别处于高位钝化状态;历史数据回测显示,目前指数回调概率约98.08%。笔者“谨慎看多”指数,下周初指数有调整。

2、目前指数仍然在(图二)所示的上升通道内运行,如果出现调整,重点观察通道下轨的得失。

3、指数向上压力位在通道上轨附近;向下第一支撑位在通道下轨附近,第二支撑位在6490~6550点附近。

三、下周操作策略:(10.06~10.10)

1、总仓位:多单持股仓位70%;如果指数跌破生命线通道,需将仓位降到30%以下。

2、对于短线投资者,可以从仓位中拿出20%左右筹码,依据支撑、压力位做“短差”。

3、短线操作时,建议把分析周期切换到60分钟或者120分钟的小周期,以便获取更精准的买卖点。

4、个股交易也可以参照上述操作策略。

特别提示:

对于个股波段操作,无论买入多单或者空单,建仓后立即设置初始止损位。当股价盈利5%时,立刻将止损位移动到成本线(即盈亏平衡点)附近,确保该笔交易不会亏损;当盈利达到10%时,将止损位上调至盈利5%的位置。此后,每当盈利增加5%时,止损位就同步上移相同幅度,以动态保护已实现利润(关于5%盈利设置的问题,投资者可以自行决定)。

四、经典案例分析:(只作为案例分析,不作为投资推荐)

1、微博(股票代码_WB):(多单)

微博(WB)日线图:


image.png

• 买入条件(多单):买入价是11.50~12.00美元,初始止损位是10.80美元,第一目标位是14.5~15美元,波段操作。

• 推荐理由:从周线形态来看,自2023年9月份以来,该股票持续在6.2~11.58美元之间做箱体震荡,持续时间大约两年左右,本月初股价放量突破箱体上沿,打开上升空间。

• 该股票本周开盘价12.63美元,最高价12.96美元,最低价12.36美元,收盘价12.61美元,周线收出涨幅为2.27%的“十字星”K线。笔者将止损位上调到12美元附近,持股待涨。

2、唯品会(股票代码_VIPS):(多单)

唯品会(VIPS)周线图:

image.png

• 买入条件(多单):买入价是19.30~19.50美元,初始止损位是18.00美元,第一目标位是24.00美元,波段操作。

• 推荐理由:从周线形态来看,唯品会本周放量突破“三角形”整理形态上轨,量价配合良好。下周若缩量回调19.30美元附近,可以考虑适量买入。

由于市场消息瞬息万变,笔者会适时调整操作策略及建议,投资者想及时获取最新信息,请关注下方链接。

以上各种模型是本人操作时遵守的交易规则,不构成任何买卖依据。个人观点,仅作参考。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush


说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Пов'язані матеріали

GitHub Empire on the Brink of Collapse: Source Code Leak, 18-Year Veteran Leaves, Microsoft Loses 1.5 Billion Developers

GitHub is facing an unprecedented crisis, marked by a massive exodus of developers and severe operational failures. The tipping point came when Mitchell Hashimoto, creator of Ghostty and an 18-year GitHub user, publicly severed ties, citing persistent platform outages that made serious work impossible. This departure highlights a broader pattern of user frustration. The platform's instability has drawn complaints from major corporate clients like Citibank and Intel, forcing Microsoft to issue substantial service credits. A critical incident last month saw an accidentally triggered, unreleased feature cause widespread repository rollbacks, erasing recent code changes and pushing enterprises to migrate. Security has catastrophically breached. In May 2026, hackers infiltrated over 3,800 of GitHub's internal repositories via a poisoned VS Code extension installed by a developer, leading to the attempted sale of core source code for $50,000. This follows the discovery of a critical zero-day vulnerability in March that threatened access to millions of repositories. Internally, GitHub's autonomy has collapsed. After the resignation of CEO Thomas Dohmke in mid-2025, Microsoft eliminated the CEO role, folding GitHub into its CoreAI division under the unpopular leadership of Jay Parikh. This triggered a talent drain, with key executives and engineers leaving. A disruptive migration of GitHub's infrastructure to Azure servers, pushed by CTO Vladimir Fedorov, is blamed for the recurring outages. Competitively, GitHub Copilot is under "existential threat" from superior AI coding tools like Cursor (now owned by SpaceX) and Claude Code, which offer more advanced contextual coding and automation. Ironically, Microsoft's own engineers reportedly preferred Claude Code, forcing management to revoke licenses. Financially, GitHub is a loss leader. Despite Copilot surpassing 4.7 million paid users and $3 billion in annual revenue, the AI inference costs for free services massively outstrip subscription income, hurting Microsoft's cloud margins. The recent shift from a flat fee to a pay-as-you-go model for Copilot has further alienated developers. The core question for Microsoft is whether a centralized code repository remains essential in the AI agent era. The erosion of trust, developer culture, and platform reliability threatens the very ecosystem Microsoft spent decades building.

marsbit40 хв тому

GitHub Empire on the Brink of Collapse: Source Code Leak, 18-Year Veteran Leaves, Microsoft Loses 1.5 Billion Developers

marsbit40 хв тому

SEC Promotes Tokenized Stocks, Is the Traditional Finance Industry Starting to Worry?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is preparing to formally release an "innovation exemption" framework this week. This framework would allow third parties to tokenize U.S. stocks like Apple and Tesla without approval from the listed companies. The move, rooted in a deregulatory vision proposed by pro-crypto commissioners earlier this year, could accelerate the migration of traditional stock markets to blockchain. This development poses a structural threat of "fragmentation" to traditional finance. Core concerns are liquidity fragmentation—where trading volume disperses across multiple blockchains and platforms, leading to price disparities and reduced market efficiency—and revenue fragmentation—where trading fees and intermediary income shift away from domestic exchanges to overseas or competing platforms. The report compares the traditional stock market to a monopolistic "supermarket." Tokenization enables countless "street stalls" to operate outside this system, threatening the exchange's dominance, diluting liquidity for large orders, and slicing into revenue streams. Evidence of this capital fragmentation is already emerging. On the same day the SEC signaled the framework, decentralized platform Hyperliquid saw its RWA (real-world asset) open interest hit a record $2.6 billion, driven by demand for 24/7 on-chain trading of traditional assets. Traditional institutions face a dilemma: either collaborate to build tokenization infrastructure proactively or lobby regulators to block innovation. Regulators must balance controlling the pace of innovation with preventing domestic revenue from being captured by offshore platforms. Key future battles will revolve around defining shareholder rights for tokenized assets and regulating platforms that have grown in regulatory gray areas. In the digital asset era, inaction risks the permanent loss of long-held fee monopolies and financial leadership as capital continues to disperse.

marsbit56 хв тому

SEC Promotes Tokenized Stocks, Is the Traditional Finance Industry Starting to Worry?

marsbit56 хв тому

A Comprehensive Analysis of On-Chain Pre-IPO: Why is the Pricing Power of SpaceX and OpenAI Moving On-Chain?

This podcast episode explores the rise of on-chain pre-IPO price discovery and trading, focusing on companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Key trends include the recent launch of a SpaceX pre-IPO perpetual contract on Hyperliquid, the secondary market trading of AI company shares, and a new partnership between Nasdaq Private Market and Polymarket. Dio Casares explains why AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic actively deny the legitimacy of secondary trades. Primary reasons are to protect their primary funding rounds (as secondary trades don't provide cash to the company) and to avoid complex legal and administrative responsibilities associated with settling these transactions. He argues that on-chain **derivatives** (like perpetuals) are a more viable solution than **tokenized spot markets**, as they better navigate U.S. regulatory holding period requirements, provide effective hedging, and avoid antagonizing the companies themselves by competing with their primary raises. The discussion covers the risks and methods of gaining pre-IPO exposure, from direct investments and SPVs to riskier, layered structures that can lead to legal complications and settlement issues. Casares also maps the landscape of key players, differentiating between traditional secondary brokers (like Forge, Hiive, and Setter) and on-chain derivatives protocols (like Trade.xyz/Ventuals on Hyperliquid) and tokenization platforms (often on Solana). He positions Patagon as a facilitator for access to private market deals but clarifies it avoids on-chain tokenization to maintain good relations with portfolio companies. Looking ahead, the convergence of a historic IPO pipeline (with potential trillion-dollar valuations), the 24/7 nature of crypto markets, and the strategic use of pre-market perpetuals as a "loss leader" suggest continued growth and competition in the on-chain pre-IPO space.

marsbit1 год тому

A Comprehensive Analysis of On-Chain Pre-IPO: Why is the Pricing Power of SpaceX and OpenAI Moving On-Chain?

marsbit1 год тому

Token Packages Are Here, Are Telecom Operators in a Hurry?

Major Chinese telecom operators are launching token-based AI computing packages, sparking public debate and highlighting a strategic shift amid slowing traditional revenue growth. In May, Shanghai Telecom introduced token plans (e.g., 9.9 RMB for 10 million tokens), quickly followed by nationwide offerings from China Telecom, China Mobile, and China Unicom. While priced higher than major AI firms like DeepSeek, these packages allow users to access multiple AI models via API using their phone bills, similar to purchasing universal mobile data. The move reflects operators' anxiety as traditional voice, SMS, and data services stagnate. With revenue growth hitting multi-year lows in 2025, AI and computing power represent a critical new frontier. However, current C端 offerings, such as AI photo editing or virtual pets, are seen as non-essential and highlight operators' role as "pipes" or integrators rather than creators of compelling AI products. Beyond consumer packages, operators aim to become key infrastructure players in China’s national computing power network. They position themselves as the "power grid" delivering AI算力, leveraging their vast network of base stations to ensure low-latency, reliable coverage, especially for applications like autonomous driving. This infrastructure role, coupled with unified national调度, could make算力 a ubiquitous utility, driving new consumption scenarios even if mass adoption of token packages remains uncertain.

marsbit1 год тому

Token Packages Are Here, Are Telecom Operators in a Hurry?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片