Galaxy Digital Launches GalaxyOne Platform for U.S. Investors

TheCryptoTimesОпубліковано о 2025-10-06Востаннє оновлено о 2025-10-06

Galaxy Digital Inc. (NASDAQ: GLXY) has launched GalaxyOne, a new financial platform aimed at U.S. investors. The platform combines high-interest cash accounts, cryptocurrency trading, and U.S. stock trading to let investors manage different types of investments on a single app or website.

GalaxyOne’s main offering, Galaxy Premium Yield, gives U.S. accredited investors the chance to earn an 8% annual return on their cash through investment notes issued by Galaxy Digital LP. These notes are backed by Galaxy’s institutional lending operations, which have been active since 2018. 

Each investment requires a minimum of $25,000 and is capped at $1 million per investor, with a total platform limit of $250 million. Interest is calculated daily and paid monthly into a GalaxyOne Cash account.

For all investors, GalaxyOne Cash provides a high-yield cash account with a 4% APY, insured by the FDIC up to $250,000 through Cross River Bank. Investors on GalaxyOne can choose to have the interest they earn automatically reinvested into major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Solana.

With GalaxyOne, trading cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana happens instantly, and interest can even be set to reinvest automatically. The platform also lets investors trade U.S. stocks and ETFs without paying commissions, with the option to buy small fractions of shares starting at $10. Retirement accounts, including traditional and Roth IRAs, are available, and earning extra income is possible by lending out eligible stocks.

GalaxyOne was developed from the mobile platform Fierce, acquired by Galaxy in 2024. Zac Prince, Galaxy Digital’s Managing Director, leads the platform, while Fierce’s former CEO, Rob Cornish, now serves as GalaxyOne’s Chief Technology Officer.

Positioning in the market

The platform enters a regulatory environment that has become clearer for both traditional and digital assets in the U.S. GalaxyOne is trying to stand out from platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood by focusing on strong risk management, clear information, and solid security for all its products. It is positioning itself as a versatile tool for U.S. retail investors looking to combine traditional and digital investments.

Mike Novogratz, Galaxy’s CEO, said, “We’ve spent years building institutional-quality infrastructure to serve the world’s most sophisticated investors. Now, we’re extending that edge to individuals.” Zac Prince added, “GalaxyOne delivers exactly that: a unified opportunity to earn yield on cash, trade crypto, and access U.S. equities.”

Also Read: CME Group to Launch 24/7 Trading for Crypto Futures and Options


Mobile Only Image

Пов'язані матеріали

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit3 хв тому

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit3 хв тому

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

On the night of February 9th, GitHub suffered a major outage caused by a simple configuration change—reducing a cache refresh interval from 12 to 2 hours—that triggered a cascade of failures. This was not an isolated event, but part of a broader pattern. In early 2026, GitHub experienced at least 8 major incidents, failing to meet its promised 99.9% availability. These outages stemmed from structural issues: explosive growth in load, tight service coupling, and insufficient protection against abnormal traffic. This unprecedented load is driven by AI Agents. In 2025, GitHub handled ~1 billion commits. By 2026, weekly commits reached 275 million, projecting to ~14 billion for the year—a 14x increase. AI tools like Claude Code now contribute 4.5% of all public repository commits, with weekly submissions surging 25x in just three months. AI-generated pull requests jumped from 4 million to 17 million per month in half a year. Unlike human developers, AI Agents work continuously, generating commits at a scale that overwhelms infrastructure designed for human rhythms. The surge also shattered GitHub's business model. Copilot's flat-rate pricing, based on assisting human developers, became unsustainable as Agentic AI sessions consumed resources worth hundreds of dollars for a few dollars in fees. In response, GitHub imposed usage limits and, by June 1st, shifted to a pay-per-use "AI Credits" system. Facing this new reality, GitHub realized a 10x scaling plan was insufficient. It announced a need to *redesign* its architecture for 30x current scale—decoupling services, adding fault isolation, and improving change management to prevent cascading failures. Other platforms like Stripe and AWS are facing similar challenges with AI Agents. Fundamentally, GitHub is transitioning from a human collaboration platform to an "exhaust pipe" for automated AI workflows. Its detailed post-mortem reports aim to maintain trust during this turbulent rebuild. The February outage was not just a technical glitch, but a signal of the software industry's entry into a new, AI-driven era.

marsbit43 хв тому

GitHub, Transfixed by AI

marsbit43 хв тому

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit50 хв тому

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit50 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片