Эксперты оценили крупнейшее сжигание USDT TRC20 на $4 млрд за последние 4 года

cryptonews.ruОпубліковано о 2025-02-25Востаннє оновлено о 2025-09-26

Исследователи напомнили, что 16 сентября 2025 года в сети Tron (TRC20) произошло крупнейшее за последние четыре года сжигание USDT на сумму $4 млрд. Обычно подобные операции означают либо выкуп токенов у держателей, либо сокращение предложения, что может повлиять на ликвидность и настроения инвесторов. Однако в этот раз ончейн-данные показали, что эквивалентный объем стейблкоина был выпущен в сети Ethereum (ERC20).

Эксперты отметили, что речь идет не о сокращении общей эмиссии, а о перераспределении ликвидности между блокчейнами. Такой шаг может быть связан с изменением спроса со стороны институционалов, бирж или платежных платформ, которые предпочитают работать именно в сети Ethereum. Это позволяет гибко управлять объемами в зависимости от активности пользователей.

Исторически масштабные сжигания USDT совпадали с повышенной волатильностью и изменениями потоков на биржах. На этот раз ситуация выглядит иначе: монеты просто были перемещены между сетями без уменьшения общего объема предложения. Это демонстрирует модель управления ликвидностью, при которой Tether балансирует спрос среди основных блокчейнов.

Тем временем Tron продолжает доминировать на рынке стейблкоинов. По данным аналитика Амра Таа, недельный объем транзакций USDT в сети TRC20 достиг $108 млрд. Такой показатель значительно превосходит конкурентов и подтверждает лидерство Tron как ключевого канала для перевода стейблкоинов.

USDT на Tron занимает почти весь рынок стабильных монет в этой экосистеме. Другие проекты остаются на дальнем плане с минимальной долей. Это подчеркивает монополию Tether в инфраструктуре Tron и делает сеть фактически «магистралью» для глобальных расчетов. Ключевыми факторами популярности Tron стали низкие комиссии, высокая скорость транзакций и поддержка крупнейших мировых бирж.

Пов'язані матеріали

Humanity Protocol, Kelp DAO stolen funds commingle – Same attacker?

Investigations into the 2026 exploits of Kelp DAO and Humanity Protocol have revealed that stolen funds from both attacks were recently commingled, suggesting a connection between the attackers. Blockchain analyst ZachXBT identified the activity, where 15,403 ETH ($23.6 million) from the Humanity Protocol hack was moved to a new Ethereum address and then to the Bitcoin network, merging with proceeds from the Kelp DAO exploit. Over $8 million of these funds has been laundered using methods associated with groups like the Lazarus Group. The Kelp DAO attack drained about $292 million in April 2026, while Humanity Protocol lost around $32 million in June due to a compromised developer device. This commingling points to a shared external threat actor and highlights ongoing security risks in DeFi.

ambcrypto2 год тому

Humanity Protocol, Kelp DAO stolen funds commingle – Same attacker?

ambcrypto2 год тому

Ethereum ETFs see $12.85M outflows – Why ETH bulls face an uphill battle

Institutional demand for Ethereum (ETH) is weakening as investors reduce exposure to risk assets amid uncertain market conditions. U.S. spot ETH ETFs recently recorded $12.85 million in net outflows, extending a broader slowdown in fund demand despite cumulative net inflows remaining near $11 billion. This reduces institutional capital available to support ETH prices. Consequently, Ethereum now relies more on staking demand, layer-2 activity, and organic spot buying to stabilize prices. An increase in network demand could help absorb excess supply. However, if institutional demand does not recover, ETH faces prolonged consolidation and increased vulnerability to sentiment-driven price swings. On-chain analysis shows significant holdings moving to a new wallet. While not a direct sell signal, similar past movements have preceded liquidity events. If these funds are deposited to exchanges, it could reinforce bearish sentiment and selling pressure. In summary, ETH remains vulnerable due to weak institutional demand and a bearish market structure. Stronger spot demand is needed to offset selling pressure and restore sustained bullish momentum.

ambcrypto2 год тому

Ethereum ETFs see $12.85M outflows – Why ETH bulls face an uphill battle

ambcrypto2 год тому

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

**AI Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI): The Countdown to 2028 Begins** AI is no longer just a trained tool but is starting to rewrite its own evolutionary pace. According to Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, there is a 60% probability that by the end of 2028, Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) will become a reality. This means AI could autonomously design and build a more capable next-generation version of itself without any human researcher involvement—Claude 10 creating Claude 11, for instance. Supporting this timeline, Google DeepMind's CEO Demis Hassabis confirms that all leading AI labs are intensely focused on RSI, making it an industry-wide priority. He expresses profound concern, stating this potential is what keeps him awake at night. Concrete data underscores this acceleration: - METR evaluations show current top models like Claude are solving tasks up to the 16-hour limit of existing test frameworks. - In Epoch AI's challenging MirrorCode benchmark, Claude Opus 4.7 recreated complex software in hours for a fraction of the human cost. In one extreme test, AI autonomously coded for 19 days straight. - Anthropic reports over 80% of its codebase is now written by Claude, and researcher productivity has increased up to 8-fold since 2024. - OpenAI's policy blueprint highlights RSI as a major upcoming governance challenge. CEO Sam Altman reportedly hinted RSI might arrive within six months, potentially delaying OpenAI's massive IPO. The implication is an impending "intelligence explosion," where AI-driven progress outpaces human control. The central question is no longer if it will happen, but whether humanity is ready.

marsbit3 год тому

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

marsbit3 год тому

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

Title: World Models, the Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing? The article clarifies that concepts like the metaverse, Web3, simulation platforms, digital twins, and Physical AI are not the same thing but are all part of the broader trend of blurring the lines between the digital and physical worlds. It positions "world models" as the foundational "cognitive layer" or "operating system" that enables AI to understand and simulate the world. Key distinctions are made: - The **Metaverse** is a destination for immersive social and economic experiences. World models could act as its "engine," generating interactive 3D content efficiently. - **Web3** focuses on decentralized ownership and economics (rules layer), operating on a different technical level than world models. - **Simulation Data Platforms** (e.g., for autonomous vehicles) are a 1.0 version, relying on manual design. World models represent a 2.0 version, using AI to generate realistic, varied scenarios autonomously. - **Digital Twins** create high-fidelity, real-time mirrors of physical systems (e.g., a factory). World models go a step further by enabling predictive simulation of future states. - **Physical AI** (robots, AVs) refers to AI that acts in the physical world. World models are a core component, providing the understanding and prediction needed for planning. A proposed hierarchy places world models at the cognitive layer, supported by infrastructure (compute, data) and supporting application tools (simulation, digital twins), action systems (Physical AI), user experiences (metaverse), and rules (Web3). In conclusion, while distinct, many of these previously hyped concepts may ultimately rely on advances in world model technology to fulfill their promises, as world models provide the essential cognitive foundation for simulating and interacting with complex environments.

marsbit3 год тому

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

marsbit3 год тому

"Shocking" CPO: How Does the Glass Bridge Actually Work? Detailed Explanation from Corning

Chinese CPO stocks plunged over 6% following Corning's announcement of its Glass Bridge platform at a Seoul tech conference. The new technology utilizes wafer-level glass ion-exchange waveguides for passive alignment between fibers and photonic chips, potentially simplifying traditional CPO architectures that rely on complex Fiber Array Units and active alignment equipment. This raised market concerns about reduced long-term demand for mid-stream CPO components. Corning's official documentation details Glass Bridge as a platform for fiber-to-PIC connectivity in NPO, CPO, and high-density modules. Its key features include wafer-level manufacturing for consistent, cost-effective production; a standardized, removable MT ferrule interface for ecosystem integration; and a separable high-density connector design supporting over 24 channels for assembly flexibility. Corning positions the technology as complementary to FAUs, addressing limitations in ultra-high-fiber-count scenarios. The market reaction reflects a broader reassessment of the AI optical interconnect value chain. Funds shifted from CPO and PCB manufacturing stocks towards glass substrate concept stocks like Kaisheng Technology and Dyer Laser. Analysts note glass substrates are seen as a next-gen advanced packaging material, offering a potential path for domestic industry differentiation amid AI-driven demand for high-performance, large-scale packaging, marking a structural migration in value towards upstream specialty materials.

marsbit3 год тому

"Shocking" CPO: How Does the Glass Bridge Actually Work? Detailed Explanation from Corning

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片