Bitcoin Price Tanks, But Miners Flex With Record Hashrate

bitcoinistОпубліковано о 2025-09-24Востаннє оновлено о 2025-09-24

Анотація

On-chain data shows the Bitcoin miners have pushed their Hashrate to a new all-time high (ATH) despite the plunge in...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

On-chain data shows the Bitcoin miners have pushed their Hashrate to a new all-time high (ATH) despite the plunge in the asset’s price.

7-Day Average Bitcoin Hashrate Has Shot Up Recently

The “Hashrate” is a Bitcoin indicator that keeps track of the total amount of computing power that the miners have connected to the network for the purpose of mining. This metric is measured in terms of hashes per second (H/s), or the more practical exahashes per second (EH/s).

When the value of the indicator rises, it means new miners are joining the blockchain and/or old ones are expanding their facilities. Such a trend implies the miners are finding the network to be profitable.

On the other hand, the metric going down suggests some miners are disconnecting their machines from the blockchain, potentially because they are no longer able to break even on BTC mining.

Now, here is a chart from Blockchain.com that shows how the 7-day average value of the Bitcoin Hashrate has changed over the past year:

Bitcoin Hashrate

The 7-day average value of the metric appears to have sharply been going up in recent days | Source: Blockchain.com

As displayed in the above graph, the Bitcoin Hashrate registered a steep climb earlier in the month and set a new record of 1,045 EH/s on September 12th. With the extra computing power, miners started mining blocks at a notably faster pace than usual.

There exists a rule on the BTC network, however, that the block time should stay constant at 10 minutes. To ensure that this is followed, Satoshi built the “Difficulty” into the blockchain, a metric that controls how hard miners would find it to mine on the chain. The network automatically changes its Difficulty in biweekly adjustments to correct for increases or decreases in the Hashrate.

In response to the earlier rise in the indicator, the Bitcoin blockchain significantly increased its Difficulty. From the chart, it’s visible that this led to a plunge in the Hashrate, as miners not able to cope with the harder Difficulty dropped out.

Interestingly, though, it didn’t take long for miners to resume expansion. In fact, not only have they started expanding again, they have been doing so at an explosive pace during the last few days.

This has resulted in a fresh ATH of 1,079 EH/s. The growth in the Hashrate has come despite the fact that the Bitcoin price has observed a plummet toward the $112,000 level.

Generally, miners expand or decommission their facilities depending on the price trend, as the asset’s USD value directly impacts the value of their mining rewards. It would appear, though, that miners are this time betting in advance on the cryptocurrency’s trajectory reversing in the near future. It only remains to be seen whether the gamble will work out.

BTC Price

At the time of writing, Bitcoin is floating around $112,200, down around 2.5% over the last seven days.

Bitcoin Price Chart

Looks like the price of the coin has gone down recently | Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView
Featured image from Dall-E, Blockchain.com, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Keshav is a Physics graduate who has been employed as a writer with Bitcoinist since June 2021. He is passionate about writing and through the years, he has gained experience working in a variety of niches. Keshav holds an active interest in the cryptocurrency market, with on-chain analysis being an area he particularly likes to research and write about.

Пов'язані матеріали

Coldcard Theft Reflection: Source Code Visibility Does Not Equal Security

The article examines the open-source vs. closed-source debate in crypto, prompted by a theft of over $100M in Bitcoin from Coldcard hardware wallets. It clarifies key terminology: true "Free and Open Source Software" (FOSS) grants four essential freedoms (use, study, share, modify), while "source available" code, like Coldcard's firmware, may have usage restrictions. The piece argues that visible source code alone does not guarantee security; actual safety depends on the economic incentives for thorough, ongoing review by skilled individuals. Using Bitcoin Core as a model, the article describes a successful, transparent open-source development culture built on public review and consensus. It contrasts this with the Coldcard case, where a critical bug in a lightly-reviewed, source-available library went undetected for years, highlighting a "tragedy of the commons" scenario where assumed but absent scrutiny creates vulnerability. The economics of licensing are crucial: restrictive licenses can limit the pool of motivated commercial reviewers. Finally, the article explores AI's impact. It cites the Bitcoin Red Team's use of AI to rapidly audit codebases and find vulnerabilities at scale, demonstrating a powerful new tool for security. However, AI also floods projects with low-quality code, straining maintainers. The piece concludes that in high-stakes crypto, only well-audited projects—whether open or closed-source—can withstand evolving threats, with AI both challenging and aiding security practices.

marsbit6 хв тому

Coldcard Theft Reflection: Source Code Visibility Does Not Equal Security

marsbit6 хв тому

Mysterious "Ox Alpha" Large Model Goes Viral with Limited-Time Free Access

A mysterious anonymous AI model named "Ox Alpha," nicknamed "Cow is Coming" by Chinese netizens, has appeared on OpenRouter, sparking widespread speculation. The model offers a 1 million token context, supports text, image, and video inputs, can call tools, and is currently free. Its standout feature is strong coding ability. Initial tests on the DeepSWE benchmark, which evaluates real-world software engineering tasks, showed an 80% pass rate on a subset of tasks, reportedly nearing top-tier code models. However, follow-up tests yielded a 63% score, with variations attributed to different task sets and configurations. The model's true developer is a major topic of debate. The prevailing theory points to Zhipu AI's unreleased GLM-5.3 Flash or its multimodal variant. Evidence cited includes identical visual token consumption patterns with GLM-5V-Turbo for videos, a consistent offset in text token counts compared to GLM-5.3, and similar behavioral traits like refusing audio processing. Zhipu has a precedent of anonymous testing. Simultaneously, another anonymous model, "korrine," appeared on Code Arena, with guesses ranging from Moonshot's Kimi K3.1 to models from Qwen or MiMo, adding to the industry's guessing game. This trend of anonymous "undercover" testing allows for unbiased performance evaluation in platforms like Arena and provides real-world, high-pressure testing through tools like OpenRouter before official release. It also serves as an effective marketing tactic, prolonging discussion through suspense. If Ox Alpha is indeed a "Flash" model, its performance raises expectations for the full-scale version's potential.

marsbit4 год тому

Mysterious "Ox Alpha" Large Model Goes Viral with Limited-Time Free Access

marsbit4 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片