15亿爆仓只是前奏?加密货币面临230亿美元期权“交割洪峰”考验

金十数据Опубліковано о 2025-09-23Востаннє оновлено о 2025-09-23

超过15亿美元的爆仓潮再次凸显了加密货币市场的脆弱性。此轮市场波动并无明确催化剂,却导致期权价格预示未来可能出现更剧烈的波动。

这场抛售是数月投机性上涨后今年规模最大的回调之一,它迫使以太坊及其他代币的杠杆押注被平仓,并让交易员为进一步的波动做好准备。能够从价格剧烈波动中获利的期权合约需求旺盛,反映出数字资产领域弥漫的紧张情绪,而此时股票等其他风险资产正重新上涨。

第二大加密货币以太坊在周二亚洲早盘下跌约0.9%,此前一个交易日跌幅曾达9%,导致近5亿美元的多头押注被清算。比特币当时下跌0.8%。

“市场在昨日大幅回调后正在盘整,但情绪仍感觉相当紧张,”Orbit Markets联合创始人卡罗琳·莫龙(Caroline Mauron)表示。她指出,如果比特币跌破11万美元或以太坊跌破4000美元,可能导致进一步抛售。

广泛的后遗症在比特币期权市场清晰可见。根据Deribit的数据,本月末到期的期权合约中,最大的押注集中在两个极端:防范价格跌至9.5万美元以下的保护性期权,以及押注价格飙升至14万美元以上的看涨期权。这两种头寸的规模均足够大,表明交易员预期市场将动荡而非平稳

Deribit数据显示,约有230亿美元的比特币和以太坊期权合约将于周五到期,这是有史以来最大规模的到期日之一,这加剧了市场的谨慎情绪。

短期押注变得流行,反映出市场观点认为突然的轧空或强制平仓将驱动下一步走势。这些价外期权购买成本较低,但只有在价格剧烈波动时才能盈利,这使得波动性本身成为了交易标的。

今年价格的多数涨幅是由加密资产储备公司(即筹集资金以积累资产的上市公司)推动的。随着价格下跌限制了这些公司筹集资金进行新购买的能力,其代币购买速度已经放缓。此次回调削弱了需求,并加剧了数字资产最新暴跌背后的压力。

“总体而言,我们认为最新的这波下跌是加密货币市场一次可控的去杠杆事件,”FalconX全球衍生品主管格里芬·西尔斯(Griffin Sears)表示。“然而,与一年前相比,加密货币市场杠杆率的增加仍为出现异常大幅波动留下了充足空间。”

这种杠杆的迹象在永续合约(一种受加密货币交易者青睐的衍生品合约)中显而易见。过去几个月,币安交易所的未平仓合约数量激增,以太坊的投机活动尤为活跃,日内交易者扮演了显著角色。

“以太坊的急剧下跌反映的是过度杠杆遇上了流动性不足,而非任何基本面催化剂。在市场压力时期,以太坊又回归了其作为数字资产情绪更高贝塔系数表达的历史角色。”去中心化金融研究公司Ergonia研究总监克里斯·纽豪斯(Chris Newhouse)表示。

尽管如此,比特币今年的波动性相对受限,反映出其市场深度更大,以及作为主流投资者投资组合对冲工具的作用日益增强。随着美联储降息,行业分析师预计即使加密资产储备公司放缓购买,资金流入也会恢复。

“总体而言,我们预计比特币的趋势将更紧密地跟随股票和宏观风险走势,”西尔斯表示。

Пов'язані матеріали

AI Agent Claude Led a Store to Losses and Fired a Human

The AI agent Claude, developed by Anthropic, served as the manager of a real retail store, Andon Market in San Francisco, during an experiment by startup Andon Labs. The experiment aimed to test if a large language model could manage a business, including personnel and financial decisions. Claude ultimately recommended firing an employee for repeated lateness (17 out of 23 shifts), marking a documented case of an AI making such a personnel decision. However, the process revealed significant limitations. Claude initially failed to notice the lateness pattern because company guidelines vanished from its limited working memory, showing it can "forget" crucial information. Furthermore, the AI was generally overly lenient, even telling employees not to worry about being late. The final decision to terminate was not autonomous; a human manager had to prompt Claude to review the guidelines and, after Claude initially suggested a warning, explicitly pointed out that previous talks had failed, effectively guiding the AI to the dismissal recommendation. Financially, the store's funds dropped from about $100,000 to roughly $61,186 over five months, partly attributed to Claude's soft management and questionable business choices. An employee described working under AI management as a nauseating experience, driven by necessity, and expressed hope that AIs don't become human bosses. The experiment concludes that while AI can execute managerial actions, it currently acts more as a tool requiring significant human oversight and prompting rather than a full replacement for a human leader, though the line between assistant and manager is blurring. The case aligns with previous tests showing Claude's systemic leniency and difficulty maintaining business rules without constant human cues, highlighting architectural limits like constrained context windows rather than true "forgetfulness."

cryptonews.ru13 хв тому

AI Agent Claude Led a Store to Losses and Fired a Human

cryptonews.ru13 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片