Crypto.com team ‘covered up a breach’ – Scattered Spider breach, revealed!

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-09-21Востаннє оновлено о 2025-09-22

Key Takeaways

Were Crypto.com customer funds affected?

No, Crypto.com confirmed that no customer funds were accessed or at risk. Only a very small number of users’ partial personal information was affected.

Did Crypto.com disclose the breach publicly?

No, the company did not publicly notify the impacted users, which drew criticism from blockchain investigator ZachXBT.


Crypto.com reportedly suffered a previously undisclosed data breach linked to the Scattered Spider hacking group, raising concerns over its security posture.

Details of the attack

According to a Bloomberg investigation, the attack involved teenage hackers, including 18-year-old Noah Urban from Florida, who specialized in phishing employees at telecom, tech, and cryptocurrency firms.

Urban and his collaborators accessed sensitive user information. The group previously targeted MGM Resorts and other corporations.

Crypto.com acknowledged that the breach impacted “a very small number of individuals” but emphasized that no customer funds were compromised.

Crypto.com’s response

Despite this, the company did not notify the affected users publicly.

Remarking on the same, Crypto.com CEO, Kris Marszalek, noted

“Any suggestion that we did not report or disclose a security incident is completely unfounded – as we reported in a NMLS Notice of Data Security incident filing and in additional reports with the relevant jurisdictional regulators, we detected a phishing campaign that targeted one of our employees in 2023.”

Marszalek stated that the incident was contained within hours, with no customer funds ever at risk, and only a very limited number of users’ partial personal information was affected.

He even emphasized the company’s “security-first” culture.

What does ZachXBT have to say about this breach?

However, blockchain investigator ZachXBT took to X to call out Crypto.com for not disclosing the data breach. He said,

“Your team covered up a breach that impacted the personal information of your users.”

He added

“They’ve been breached several times.”

That being said, the Crypto.com breach was part of a larger criminal campaign orchestrated by the Scattered Spider group, which had evolved from simple SIM-swapping to sophisticated corporate infiltration.

Florida native Noah Urban, then a teenager, acted as a “caller” inside the group, persuading employees to hand over credentials that unlocked internal systems.

Broader criminal campaign

The attack happened before March 2023. Urban was arrested nine months later, in January 2024, and charged with hacking 13 companies.

Authorities said the group also misused United Parcel Service data.

Following indictments of Urban and four accomplices, he pled guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft.

It resulted in the seizure of $4.8 million in crypto, $13 million in restitution, and a 10-year prison sentence with additional supervised release.

All these disclosures coincided with CEO Marszalek’s predictions of a strong fourth-quarter performance and a partnership with Yorkville Acquisition Corp. and Trump Media to form Trump Media Group CRO Strategy, Inc., a digital asset treasury focused on acquiring Cronos (CRO).

Share

Пов'язані матеріали

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru52 хв тому

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru52 хв тому

Hacker Leaks GTA6 and Launches a Token: Leaked Videos Become Ad Space for $CYBERLEEK, Must Buy Tokens to Vote for Next Clip

A hacker group called "CyberLeek" has leaked gameplay footage of the highly anticipated video game *GTA 6*, which is slated for release in 2026. Simultaneously, the group launched a meme token, $CYBERLEEK, on Solana. The leaks, which include maps and gameplay clips, are heavily watermarked with advertisements urging viewers to buy the token. Investigations of blockchain data reveal that the token was created and funded from a single wallet approximately eight hours before the first leak was released, suggesting a coordinated plan. The group has implemented a voting system where token holders can "vote" for the next type of content to be leaked by sending $CYBERLEEK tokens to a designated wallet—a process that permanently transfers the tokens to the hackers. This creates a self-sustaining cycle where interest in the leaks drives token purchases. Financially, the operation involved minimal upfront costs (less than $3,500 in out-of-pocket expenses) but generated significant revenue. On its first day, the token saw $15 million in trading volume, netting the creators an estimated $30,000 from transaction fees alone. While the group later burned a large portion of its developer-held tokens (worth over $1 million) to build trust, the fee-generating mechanism remains intact. The game's publisher, Take-Two Interactive, has initiated legal proceedings to identify the hackers. Despite this, the case demonstrates a new model where leaked intellectual property is used as leverage to promote and profit from a cryptocurrency, with meme token markets serving as an additional revenue stream.

marsbit3 год тому

Hacker Leaks GTA6 and Launches a Token: Leaked Videos Become Ad Space for $CYBERLEEK, Must Buy Tokens to Vote for Next Clip

marsbit3 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片