未来三个月要苟住,年底或迎来狂暴大牛市

coinvoiceОпубліковано о 2025-08-07Востаннє оновлено о 2025-09-08

撰文:arndxt

编译:AididiaoJP,Foresight News

 

普通劳动力无关紧要

 

「普通劳动力无关紧要」是因为在当今的宏观体制下,劳动力市场疲软并不会阻止经济增长。它只会迫使美联储降息,向市场释放更多流动性。生产力、资本支出和政策支持意味着资本持续增值,即使个体工人遭受痛苦。

个体工人对生产的重要性降低,因为他们的议价能力在自动化和全球资本支出面前正在逐渐崩溃。

该系统不再需要强劲的家庭消费来推动增长,资本支出主导了 GDP 的计算。

工人的困境直接助长了资本收益。对于资产持有者而言,劳动力市场的痛苦是利好消息。

工人的挣扎不会破坏经济周期。市场不再为「平民」定价,它现在为流动性和资本流动定价。

市场再次被以下因素拉动:流动性。

全球 M2 已飙升至 112 万亿美元的历史新高。在超过十年的数据中,比特币与流动性的长期相关性保持在 0.94,比股票和黄金更紧密。

当中央银行放松政策时,比特币上涨。当他们进行流动性收缩时,比特币遭受打击。

让我们回顾一下历史。

2014-15 年:M2 收缩,比特币崩盘。

2016-18 年:稳步扩张,BTC 的首次机构牛市。

2020-21 年:COVID 流动性泛滥,比特币抛物线式上涨。

如今,M2 再次上升,比特币的表现优于传统对冲工具。我们再次处于流动性驱动周期的早期阶段。

2025 年的 TGA(财政部一般账户)补充资金比之前的周期构成更大风险,因为隔夜逆回购缓冲实际上已耗尽。现在筹集的每一美元都会直接从活跃市场中抽走流动性。

加密货币将首先发出压力信号。9 月份稳定币的收缩将是一个领先指标,远在股票或债券反应之前就亮起红灯。

弹性等级是明确的:

压力时期:BTC > ETH > 山寨币(比特币最能吸收冲击)。

复苏时期:ETH > BTC > 山寨币(随着资金流和 ETF 需求重新加速)。

基本预测:一个波动剧烈的 9 月至 11 月,以流动性紧张为标志,随后随着发行放缓且稳定币增长稳定,年底前会出现更强劲的走势。

放眼全局,情况就清晰了:

流动性正在扩张。

美元正在走弱。

资本支出正在激增。

机构正在重新配置到风险资产中。

但使此刻独特的是各种力量的汇合。

 

受困于债务与通胀之间的美联储

 

美联储陷入了困境,债务偿还成本变得难以承受,然而通胀压力依然存在。

收益率已经暴跌,美国 2 年期国债收益率降至 3.6%,而大宗商品徘徊在历史高位附近。

我们以前看过这样的场景:在 1970 年代末,收益率走软的同时大宗商品飙升,导致了两位数的通货膨胀。政策制定者当时没有好的选择,而他们今天的选择更少。

对于比特币而言,这种紧张局势是利好的。在历史上每一个政策可信度破裂的时期,资本都会寻求抗通胀资产作为避风港。黄金在 1970 年代捕获了这些资金流;今天,BTC 被定位为具有更高凸性的对冲工具。

 

劳动力疲软,生产力强劲

 

劳动力市场讲述了一个发人深省的故事。

离职率已暴跌至 0.9%,ADP 就业人数低于长期平均水平,信心正在减弱。然而与 2008 年不同,生产率正在上升。

驱动因素:人工智能引领的资本支出超级周期。

仅 Meta 就承诺到 2028 年投入 6000 亿美元,数万亿美元流入数据中心、回流本土和能源转型。工人正在被 AI 取代,但资本正在增值。这是当前经济的悖论:实体经济受苦,华尔街金融市场繁荣。结果是可预测的,美联储降息以对劳动力市场进行缓冲,而生产率保持活力。这种组合将流动性注入风险资产。

 

黄金的悄然积累

 

当股市摇摆不定、劳动力市场出现裂痕时,黄金已悄然重新成为系统性对冲工具。仅上周就有 33 亿美元流入 GLD(SPDR 黄金 ETF)。中央银行是主要的买盘:76% 的央行打算增加储备,高于 2022 年的 50%。

以黄金衡量,标普 500 指数已处于隐性熊市:年初至今下跌 19%,自 2022 年以来下跌 29%。历史上,股票相对于黄金连续三年表现不佳标志着长期的结构性轮动(1970 年代,2000 年代初)。

但这并非散户驱动的狂热,这是耐心的机构资金,战略性资本,悄然的积累。黄金正在承担债券和美元曾经扮演的稳定器角色。然而比特币仍然是贝塔值更高的对冲工具。

 

美元的衰落与寻找替代品

 

美元正经历自 1973 年布雷顿森林体系崩溃以来最糟糕的半年。历史上每当比特币与美元走势背离,体制转变随之而来。4 月份美元指数(DXY)跌破 100,呼应了 2020 年 11 月,那是流动性推动的加密货币上涨的发令枪。

与此同时,中央银行正在采取多元化措施。美元在全球储备中的份额已下滑至约 58%,76% 的央行计划增加黄金持有量。黄金正在吸收这些悄然的资本配置,但比特币有望捕获边际资金流,尤其是来自寻求高于被动对冲回报的机构。

 

近期压力:财政部账户补款

 

注:财政部账户补款指的是美国财政部为了增加其美联储账户(TGA)中的现金余额而采取的行动,其过程会从金融体系中抽走流动性。

财政部账户补款接近 5000-6000 亿美元。

2023 年,充足的缓冲(RRP、外国需求、银行资产负债表)减弱了影响。如今这些缓冲已经消失。

补款的每一美元都直接从市场中抽走。稳定币,加密货币的现金通道首先收缩,山寨币流动性枯竭。

这意味着未来 2-3 个月将动荡不安。预计 BTC 表现将优于 ETH,ETH 表现将优于山寨币,但所有币种都会感受到压力,流动性风险是真实存在的。

财政部账户补款会削弱趋势,但这只是上涨潮水中的一场风暴。到 2025 年底,随着发行放缓且美联储政策转向鸽派,比特币有望测试 15 万至 20 万美元,不仅得到流动性的支持,还得到来自 ETF、公司和主权国家的结构性资金流的支持。

 

论点

 

这是一个流动性周期的开始,在这个周期中,资本增值而劳动力分化,美元走弱而替代品走强,比特币从投机性资产转变为系统性对冲工具。

黄金将发挥其作用。但比特币,凭借其对流动性更高的贝塔值、机构通道和全球可访问性,将是这个周期的龙头资产。

流动性决定命运,而命运的下一个篇章属于比特币。


声明:本内容为作者独立观点,不代表 CoinVoice 立场,且不构成投资建议,请谨慎对待,如需报道或加入交流群,请联系微信:VOICE-V。

来源:Foresight News

Пов'язані матеріали

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

"DeepSeek and the $1 Trillion Infrastructure Question" The article examines whether DeepSeek's AI optimization breakthroughs could potentially save China $1 trillion in future AI infrastructure costs. The analysis begins with Nvidia's upcoming Vera Rubin AI platform, costing ~$7.8 million, where memory (HBM4/LPDDR5X) constitutes $2 million—a 435% cost increase in one year, highlighting how AI hardware spending is shifting toward expensive memory components. DeepSeek's approach works in the opposite direction. Through three key technical innovations showcased in DeepSeek V4, the company dramatically improves hardware efficiency: 1. **Memory Compression (MLA)**: Re-engineers the attention mechanism to compress long-context memory (KV Cache) by over 90%, drastically reducing expensive HBM usage. 2. **Selective Activation (MoE)**: Employs Mixture-of-Experts architecture where only a small fraction of parameters (e.g., 49B out of 1.6T in V4-Pro) are activated per token, allowing most parameters to reside in cheaper memory/SSD. 3. **Computation Caching**: Reuses previously computed results via cache hits, replacing expensive GPU computations with cheap memory reads. Combined, these optimizations allow the same hardware to produce approximately 4x more tokens, effectively reducing required hardware investment by 75%. DeepSeek's pricing reflects this: a 10-billion token workload costs ~$522 monthly versus ~$9,000-$10,000 for competitors. The $1 trillion savings projection stems from McKinsey's estimate that global AI infrastructure will require ~$5.2 trillion investment by 2030. As China's daily token consumption grows toward quadrillions, even marginal efficiency gains scale massively. With a conservative 4x throughput improvement, China could avoid building tens of thousands of AI data centers equivalent to ~7 trillion RMB ($1 trillion) in saved investment. Critically, this strategy shifts dependency from scarce, expensive GPU/HBM—where China lags—toward more accessible storage, caching, and systems engineering where domestic suppliers like CXMT are gaining strength. Rather than "replacing Nvidia," DeepSeek rebalances AI's value chain away from monolithic hardware dependency. Ultimately, DeepSeek's technical breakthroughs could lower the barrier to AI adoption across Chinese industries by making advanced capabilities affordable at scale—transforming who can access next-generation AI.

marsbit1 год тому

Can DeepSeek Save China One Trillion Dollars?

marsbit1 год тому

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

This paper, "Hallucinations Undermine Trust; Metacognition is a Way Forward," proposes a paradigm shift in combating AI hallucination. It argues that the current mainstream approaches—striving for omniscience by scaling data/models or having AI abstain from uncertain answers—are fundamentally flawed. The former has inevitable knowledge gaps, while the latter imposes a crippling "utility tax," requiring the rejection of many correct answers to achieve high accuracy, due to models' poor "discrimination" (the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect answers internally). The core contribution is redefining hallucination not as "being wrong," but as "expressing false information with unwarranted certainty." The proposed solution is **Faithful Uncertainty** or **Metacognition**: enabling AI to accurately perceive its internal uncertainty and honestly express it in its language (e.g., using hedging phrases when unsure). This creates a more reliable assistant that provides useful information while signaling its confidence, minimizing harm from errors. The paper emphasizes that metacognition is critical for the era of AI Agents. Without it, Agents cannot intelligently decide when to use tools like search engines, leading to inefficiency and misuse. Key implementation challenges are highlighted: the "bootstrapping paradox" of training with static uncertainty data, the "alignment distortion signal" where human preference training suppresses internal uncertainty cues, and the difficulty of causally evaluating true metacognition vs. its superficial imitation. The paper concludes that the goal should not be an infallible AI, but one that is honest about the limits of its knowledge, thereby building user trust through transparent communication of its certainty.

marsbit1 год тому

Overturning the Mainstream Approach to Hallucinations: Metacognition is the New Solution for Large Models to Break the Hallucination Barrier

marsbit1 год тому

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

Bitcoin has recently declined, hitting a two-month low near $66,123, while Ethereum fell to a three-month low around $1,837. Analysts suggest the drop is not merely due to factors like ETF outflows or MicroStrategy's selling but reflects a deeper issue: Bitcoin is losing a broader asset competition. In a near-zero interest rate environment, Bitcoin previously thrived as an outlet for investor dissatisfaction with inflation and limited options. However, the market landscape has shifted. Bitcoin now occupies an "awkward middle ground," facing competition on three fronts. For inflation hedging, investors prefer gold, energy stocks, and commodity producers—assets with tangible backing and clearer pricing power. For growth exposure, AI-related companies with actual revenues and profits are more attractive. Even within crypto, investors can choose stablecoins, exchanges, or infrastructure firms tied directly to adoption, offering clearer business models and leverage. Thus, Bitcoin is no longer the top choice for hedging, growth, or crypto exposure. This shift is evident in market reactions: despite recent warnings about persistent inflation from a Fed official, Bitcoin did not rally as it might have in the past. Instead, capital flowed to assets with direct commodity or energy exposure. The recent ETF outflows and MicroStrategy sales are symptoms, not causes, of this new reality. Investors are becoming more selective, demanding clearer value propositions beyond mere scarcity. The emerging bear case for Bitcoin is not about it being a bubble or failed technology, but that scarcity alone is no longer sufficient.

华尔街日报1 год тому

Hedge by Buying Gold and Oil, Chase Soaring Returns with AI. ‘Dated’ Bitcoin Enters a Bear Market

华尔街日报1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片