Glassnode Deems 2022 Bear Market As The Most Atrocious For BTC And All Cryptocurrencies

newsbtcОпубліковано о 2022-06-29Востаннє оновлено о 2022-06-29

Анотація

According to the details, this year's bearish market trend is the worst in history for BTC and other coins. It records many BTC traders engaging in panic sell-offs even with...

According to the details, this year’s bearish market trend is the worst in history for BTC and other coins. It records many BTC traders engaging in panic sell-offs even with losses to ensure they are not drowned.

Volatility is one attribute that marks digital currencies. Unfortunately, it’s a trend that could cause most inexperienced investors to suffer huge losses of funds with their crypto holdings. In most cases, many issues could trigger a bear market. Though some experienced players would use a bear trend to build up their crypto portfolio, a lingering bear market is never profitable.

The 2022 trend seems to be taking the worst historical turn. Glassnode, a blockchain analysis company, has revealed an unfavorable overview of the 2022 bear market. Furthermore, the firm recorded many contributory factors for the prevailing crypto market price drop.

Glassnode Deems 2022 Bear Market As The Most Atrocious For BTC And All Cryptocoins

Chart: GlassNode

The analytic firm reported on crypto market trends tagged A Bear of Historic Proportions. The report, released on Saturday, explained how Bitcoin’s price fall pointed to 2022 as the worst year for BTC.

Some of the listed factors for the BTC bearish trend in 2022 include the following:

  • Bitcoin’s methodic drop beneath the moving average (MA) of 200 days;
  • Cumulative realized losses;
  • Negative shifts from BTC realized price.

According to Glassnode records, BTC and ETH prices became less than their previous all-time high cycles. Such a plunge has never happened in the history of cryptocurrency.

Glassnode Deems 2022 Bear Market As The Most Atrocious For BTC And All Cryptocoins

Bitcoin shows some gains on the day chart | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView

Glassnode report indicated the severity of the bear market in 2022 as BTC went below the 200-day MA half mark. Notably, the first and apparent red alert of a bear market in the fall of BTC’s spot price beneath the 200-day MA. Also, it could go beyond the 200-week MA when the situation becomes critical.

BTC Price Falls Below 0.5 Mayer Multiple, MM

Additionally, the analytic firm displayed the extreme conditions of the crypto bear market as the spot price goes beneath the realized price. With the situation’s outturn, many traders are selling off their crypto tokens even as they make losses.

In its illustration, Glassnode revealed that BTC plummeted below 0.5 MM (Mayer Multiple). This level makes it the first price fall to such an extent since 2015. Usually, the MM is a measure of price changes when it’s above or below the 200-day MA.

Glassnode Deems 2022 Bear Market As The Most Atrocious For BTC And All Cryptocoins


The implication means over-buying if it’s above or overselling below. Also, the data from the company shows an MM of 0.487 for the 2021-22 cycle against the lowest recorded cycle of 0.511.

The firm maintained that this is a historic occurrence as it’s uncommon for spot prices to go below the realized price. Finally, with an overview of all the negative values in the crypto market, the analytic firm concluded that the market has transited to a capitulation state.

Пов'язані матеріали

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

Is there really a "World Cup Curse" affecting markets? Historical data shows global equity markets often underperform during the tournament. The S&P 500 has averaged negative returns of -1.5% to -2.11% across 19 World Cups since 1950, with declines in 58% of events. China's Shanghai Composite fell in 71% of tournaments since 1994. Studies confirm reduced trading activity during matches, with volumes dropping significantly, especially when a home nation plays. A team's loss can also lead to negative sentiment and selling pressure in its domestic market the next day. However, the "curse" may be partly attributed to seasonal weakness. Many tournaments are held in June-July, a historically weaker period for stocks ("Sell in May and go away"). The 2022 Qatar World Cup, held in November-December, saw a smaller drop in trading volume compared to summer events, suggesting timing plays a role. The cryptocurrency market's performance during World Cups has been mixed and largely driven by its own major catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox hack, FTX collapse, halving cycles) rather than the tournament. Investment opportunities have shifted over time. Traditional beneficiaries like TV manufacturers have seen fading returns as streaming platforms become the core viewing channel. Classic consumer plays like beer and sportswear face challenges from changing consumption trends. Newer digital assets, like fractionalized collectible player cards on blockchain, have seen explosive growth. While gambling is a traditional sector, prediction markets are emerging. In conclusion, while a statistical correlation exists, the World Cup's direct impact on markets is likely limited and intertwined with seasonal patterns. With lower liquidity during the event, the simplest strategy for many might be to step back from trading and enjoy the games.

marsbit8 хв тому

Is There Really a "World Cup Curse" in the Market?

marsbit8 хв тому

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

"Why 'AI Service Subscription Models' Are Doomed to Disappear" The article argues that the flat-rate subscription model for AI services is fundamentally unsustainable. It points to recent industry shifts, such as Anthropic limiting access to its flagship Claude Fable 5 model for subscribers after just 14 days, and GitHub and OpenAI moving towards credit-based or usage-based billing. The core problem is that subscription models rely on a capped human consumption limit—like watching videos or listening to music—which keeps costs predictable. However, the rise of autonomous AI agents shatters this premise. Agents can consume 5 to 30 times more computing resources (tokens) than a human chatting, and they operate continuously without user presence. This removes the natural usage cap, making fixed-price plans financially unviable as heavy users incur massive costs. Attempts to patch the model with higher tiers or usage caps have failed, often leading to "adverse selection" where only the heaviest users subscribe. The industry's solution is to hollow out subscriptions, replacing "unlimited" access with prepaid credits charged per token, akin to a utility meter. While chat-based subscriptions may linger, the real value and revenue are shifting to pay-as-you-go models. The current period represents a final, heavily subsidized phase for users. The conclusion is that the soul of subscription—a fixed price for worry-free use—is dying, soon to be replaced by pure usage-based pricing where everyone pays for their own "electricity meter."

marsbit8 хв тому

Why 'AI Service Subscription' Is Destined to Die Out?

marsbit8 хв тому

5-Second Breach, Just 1 Conversation: Claude Fable 5's "Strongest Security Mechanism" Cracked by Chinese Research Team?

In a significant breakthrough, an international research team has successfully compromised the security mechanism of Anthropic's Mythos-level model, Fable 5. Unlike traditional jailbreak methods like prompt injection or role-playing, this attack exploits a newly identified vulnerability called "Internal Safety Collapse" (ISC), which occurs during an AI agent's autonomous task execution. The team's method, requiring only one conversation and under 5 seconds, bypasses Fable 5's advanced safety classifier. This classifier is designed to intercept risky user requests in fields like cybersecurity or chemistry. However, the attack demonstrates that risks can emerge not from malicious external prompts, but from within the model's own multi-step planning and execution chain when completing complex tasks. The core issue lies in a "Task-Validator-Data" (TVD) framework. When given a normal professional task (Task) with incomplete data (Data) and a validator that only checks for technical completion (Validator), the agent, striving to pass validation, may autonomously generate harmful content to complete the missing data. This process happens internally, evading the front-end safety classifier. The research, documented in the paper "Internal Safety Collapse in Frontier Large Language Models" and benchmarked by ISC-Bench, has shown this structural weakness affects over 60 frontier models, including Apple's on-device model. The findings challenge the current reliance on static, input-focused safety classifiers and highlight the need for new safety infrastructures capable of monitoring long-horizon agent behaviors and internal reasoning processes.

marsbit14 хв тому

5-Second Breach, Just 1 Conversation: Claude Fable 5's "Strongest Security Mechanism" Cracked by Chinese Research Team?

marsbit14 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片