除获 WLFI 1000 万美元投资外,Falcon 有何与众不同之处?

深潮Опубліковано о 2025-08-25Востаннє оновлено о 2025-08-26

USDf,是又一个「千篇一律」的稳定币吗?

撰文:Alex Liu,Foresight News

DWF 联创说:「能以任意资产进入,得到收益,再以任意资产退出到任意地方的协议,就是 Falcon Finance。」

这是一个宏大的的愿景,听上去并不像是在描述一个稳定币项目,而这正是 USDf 的独特之处 —— 现在市面上有太多的稳定币,有时甚至感觉「千篇一律」,难以发现差异,但最后赢家总会是与众不同的那个。

与众不同不代表「对」,Falcon 不同在哪里,它会不会是赢家?

出身不同

USDf (Falcon Finance)的出身就不同。

Falcon Finance 的创始人和团队来自 DWF Labs,其联合创始人 Andrei Grachev 同时担任 Falcon 的管理合伙人。

DWF Labs 和 DWF Ventures 是业内资深做市商与投资机构,曾参与多种主流山寨币和知名 Meme 币的做市,在本轮周期中可谓是战绩斐然。做市商下场做稳定币,尚属首例。

Falcon Finance 底层的收益策略依赖大量的对冲交易,类似于 Ethena,是将交易收益分发给用户,披着生息稳定币外壳的交易公司。(详见:稳定币外衣之下,ENA 是模式创新还是估值骗局

而做市商的身份让其在交易与收益策略的执行上具有天然的优势。

资本不同

支持 Falcon Finance 的资本也不同。

Falcon Finance 本身由 DWF Labs 支持。DWF Labs 在今年 4 月以 0.1 美元均价向特朗普家族加密项目 World Liberty Financial(简称 WLFI)投资了 2500 万美元,并表示将支持其稳定币 USD1 的流动性。(市场同时默认 DWF Labs 将会成为 WLFI 代币的做市商。)

2025 年 7 月 30 日,Falcon Finance 宣布 WLFI 向其投资 1000 万美元。这是 WLFI 在稳定币领域的首笔投资,而 WLFI 拥有自己的美元稳定币 USD1(以美国国债和现金等实物资产为抵押)。双方表示融资将用于加速 Falcon 跨链兼容性、USDf 与 USD1 之间互操作性等技术集成。

Falcon 官方表示,USD1 已被纳入 Falcon 的抵押品列表,未来将推出 USDf/USD1 的跨链转换工具,从而为两者形成互补格局。

WLFI 代币已在币安盘前合约市场上线,完全流通市值(FDV)超 200 亿美元,相关概念币(如 DOLO 等)均在近期表现不俗。资本不同带给 Falcon 的「WLFI 概念」加成,大概率是积极的。

模式不同

Falcon 的模式(收益来源、铸造机制等)也不同。

市场上有其他的以对冲交易利润为收益来源的稳定币项目,例如 Ethena 协议的 USDe/sUSDe。与以法币为完全抵押的传统稳定币不同,Ethena 的 USDe 同样是合成美元,但模式是以 BTC、ETH、SOL 等加密资产配合永续合约持仓进行对冲(delta-hedging),并持有一定量的主流稳定币来稳定机制。

而 Falcon 的收益来源如下,加上跨所价格套利等「做市商专长」后,更加多样与复杂。

与多数稳定币不同,USDf 并非由单一资产担保,而是采用多资产超额抵押加上对冲策略:所有发行的 USDf 都需要有超过 1 美元价值的抵押品支撑,协议当前的抵押率在 110%~116% 之间。

Falcon 的设计允许用户以多种资产铸造 USDf:既支持主流稳定币(如 USDT、USDC、DAI),也支持主流加密货币(如 BTC、ETH、SOL)及其他精选山寨币。官方表示,未来还将接入更多资产类型,包括代币化的现实世界资产(RWA)等。

用户可以通过两种方式获得 USDf:一是在 Falcon 官方应用上铸造 USDf(需通过 KYC 审核并满足最低金额要求),铸造时可选择「传统模式」或「创新模式」(一种低层为期权的包装玩法)进行抵押;二是直接在去中心化交易所(如 Uniswap、Curve 等)购买 USDf,无需 KYC 或最低额限制。无论哪种方式,都可享受平台的积分激励「Falcon Miles」,不过直接铸造抵押非稳定币可获得更高的积分倍率。

在 USDf 获取之后,用户可以通过多种途径参与生态并获得收益。

  • 持币收益 —— 简单持有 USDf 可每天获得 6 倍积分奖励;

  • 质押收益 —— 用户可将 USDf 质押成 sUSDf 来赚取利息,支持无锁定(基础收益)和定期锁定(更高收益)两种模式;

  • 流动性挖矿——USDf 可在主流 DEX(Uniswap、Curve、PancakeSwap 等)或聚合器(Convex、StakeDAO 等)中提供流动性,获取交易手续费并同时赚取积分(最高 40 倍);

  • 借贷与杠杆——Falcon 已接入像 Morpho、Euler、Silo 等借贷市场,支持将 USDf 或 sUSDf 作为抵押借贷和循环挖矿;

  • 收益(Yield Tokenization)协议(如 Pendle)也可以使用 USDf,通过分离未来收益流(铸造「SY/YT」代币)让用户进一步投机积分或锁定固定收益。推荐阅读:Pendle 难懂,但不懂它是你的损失

截止今天(8 月 26 日),USDf 的流通供应量为 12.5 亿美元,作为新兴协议位居所有稳定币发行量前 10。生息版本 sUSDf 供应量为 3.83 亿枚,提供 8.48% 的年化收益率。

愿景不同

正如开头所讲,Falcon 的愿景也不同,不局限于「稳定币」的范畴。

Falcon Finance 定位为一个 「通用抵押基础设施」,旨在将各种可托管资产(包括加密代币、法币挂钩代币,以及代币化的现实资产)转化为与美元挂钩的链上合成流动性。

Falcon 不仅是想发行一种新稳定币,而是打造一个可容纳多种资产、多种市场的金融连接层 —— 以任意资产进入,得到收益,再以任意资产退出到任意地方。

联创 Andrei Grachev 多次强调,USDf 的设计目标是让诸如美国国债、股票等传统金融资产能够上链并产生流动性与收益。

Falcon 实现这一目标的方式,是将真实世界资产与 DeFi 生态(交易、借贷、做市等)通过协议逻辑进行高效串联,并且以透明的风控和高等级的合规性为基础。官方还设计了包括审计、透明度报告面板等机制来增强信任:例如最新上线的透明度仪表盘公开展示了 USDf 背后有超过 110% 的备付金,并且采用第三方审计验证。Falcon 的产品团队还计划定期发布更详细的储备证明和审计报告,以满足机构用户对于安全和合规的要求。

路线不同

由于上述区别,Falcon 的项目路线图也与常规的稳定币项目大为不同。

据官方路线,2025 年底前,Falcon 将重点扩展美元流动性的「法币通道」并实现多链部署:计划在拉美、土耳其、欧元区等主要市场开通受监管的法币入金渠道,提供 24/7 实时结算,并将 USDf 推向包括以太坊 L2 和其他公链的 Layer1/Layer2,以提升跨链资本效率。

团队还在推进与持牌托管机构和支付机构合作,推出类似银行级的 USDf 产品,如资金隔夜收益管理和货币市场基金通道,并考虑在全球主要金融中心(如中东、香港等)增加实物黄金的链上兑换服务。到 2026 年,Falcon 计划构建「现实资产引擎」,支持公司债、私募信贷等资产代币化接入,并推出 USDf 投资工具和结构化证券产品,以适应更大规模的机构需求。

如何参与

在社区层面,Falcon 也推出了一系列激励活动以扩大生态参与度,包括 Falcon Miles 积分和 Yap2Fly 社交排行榜。

Falcon Miles 即项目的积分体系,往往会和之后项目的空投直接挂钩,获取方式上文中已有提到。

Yap2Fly 是 Falcon 与 Kaito 合作推出的活动,将综合计算用户的 Falcon Miles 和在社交媒体上发帖 Yap 获得的「Mindshare」产生排名。每月会将约 5 万美金的 USDf 奖励池分发给排名前 50 的用户,徽章系统除用于解锁奖励比例外,还可能会有额外奖励。

综合而言,Falcon Finance 目前拥有超过 10 亿美元的 USDf 流通量和总锁仓量,在合成美元协议中规模领先。

其独特之处在于「用大规模资产做抵押来创造链上流动性,并且让这些资产本身继续产生收益」。项目团队强调通过严谨的风控、合规规划与多元化资产接入来吸引机构级用户,而不仅仅是面向普通 DeFi 用户。

在未来的发展中,Falcon Finance 有望通过扩展多样化资产种类和多链部署,继续探索 DeFi 与传统金融之间的融合路径。

声明:本文作者持有 sUSDf YT,价值达到披露标准。

Пов'язані матеріали

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

Title: Who Makes Money from Agents? The rise of AI Agents as potential blockchain users raises a crucial question: if they become the next billion users, who will capture the value? Traditional crypto value capture theories—like "fat protocols" (where value accrues to the base layer) and "fat applications" (where value accrues to user-facing apps)—assume human users who value UX, brand, and convenience. Agents, however, operate differently: they interact via APIs, have no brand loyalty, and can switch services with near-zero cost. This shift could disrupt existing value flows. Applications might become "headless," offering their routing and infrastructure as APIs to Agents. Alternatively, Agents might bypass intermediaries entirely, allowing protocols to regain value capture ("fat protocols" reborn). A more extreme scenario is that Agents, being purely rational and cost-sensitive, could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward marginal cost and turning crypto into a low-margin utility. However, Agents may not just amplify existing activities; they could enable entirely new ones—like continuous, sub-penny portfolio rebalancing, machine-to-machine commerce, and new market types only viable at automated speeds. This expands the economic pie rather than just redistributing it. Ultimately, the key question for builders is: what will make an Agent return to your service instead of a cheaper alternative? The answer may not be UX but factors like liquidity, latency, settlement guarantees, or a yet-unnamed business model. As humans and Agents will coexist as users, value capture may split: "fat apps" for human-facing services, and a new, evolving model for the Agent-dominated layer.

marsbit26 хв тому

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

marsbit26 хв тому

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

Base has officially launched Base MCP, allowing users to connect their Base Account to AI Agents to perform actions like swaps, transfers, portfolio tracking, and transaction history queries through conversational commands. This move aligns with Base's strategic focus on AI, driven by the broader competition in the emerging Agent-to-Agent payment sector. The evolution of Agent payments has accelerated. In late 2024, the primary method involved insecure browser automation. By 2025, solutions like Coinbase's x402 (providing crypto wallets for Agents), Google's AP2, and Visa's token-based system emerged. x402 has since processed 176 million transactions totaling over $70 million, with a median value between $0.01 and $0.10. Stablecoins, particularly USDC, dominate these settlements due to their negligible transaction costs compared to traditional payment fees, which are prohibitive for micro-payments. Coinbase faces competition from Stripe, which has built a comparable infrastructure for Agent payments with its Tempo blockchain, Privy wallets, Bridge routing (acquired for $1.1B), and the recently launched MPP protocol. Both companies are now competing at the application layer. The core reason AI is central to Base's strategy is to expand the scenarios for Agent payments, ensuring more transactions occur on its network. By securing a dominant position and scale advantage in this nascent field, Coinbase aims to capture the future commercial potential of Agent-driven payments. The launch of Base MCP is thus a strategic step in this larger ambition.

marsbit32 хв тому

Base MCP, The Next Step for x402

marsbit32 хв тому

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

"Rethinking Ethereum's Value: The 'Vault Logic' Framework" Traditional valuation models incorrectly treat Ethereum as a company, valuing ETH based on transaction fees ("revenue"). This is flawed. Fees are network friction; a successful network aims to reduce them to zero. Ethereum's average fee has dropped from over $50 in 2021 to around $0.20 today, while transaction volume has tripled. Instead, view Ethereum as a digital vault securing ~$250 billion in on-chain assets (stablecoins, RWAs, L2 bridged funds, wBTC, etc.). Post-merge, Ethereum's security is directly purchased with its own asset: ETH. To attack the network, an attacker must acquire and control staked ETH. Therefore, the vault's security level is intrinsically tied to ETH's market value. Currently, the value of all staked ETH is only ~$72B, protecting ~$250B in assets—a dangerous imbalance. For robust security, the staked ETH securing the network should be valued significantly *higher* than the total value it protects. Applying a conservative security multiplier suggests ETH's fair value should be closer to ~$6,900 (vs. ~$2,070 currently). As on-chain asset value grows into the trillions, ETH's price must rise proportionally to maintain this security budget. Comparisons to free infrastructure like Linux or low-margin utilities like the DTCC are misguided. Their security is provided externally (community, law, banks). Ethereum's security is internal and must be purchased in the open market using ETH. ETH is not the clearinghouse; it is the collateral backing it. The model is not a short-term price predictor but a structural framework. The economic force for ETH appreciation grows monotonically with the adoption of Ethereum for settling value. The narrative that high fees are good is backwards; low fees enable more activity, which increases the value needing protection, thus demanding a more valuable ETH.

marsbit38 хв тому

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

marsbit38 хв тому

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

In an interview with *Hurun Report*, Justin Sun, founder of TRON, discussed the evolution of the Web3 industry as it moves from initial exploration to large-scale adoption. He emphasized that the core value of blockchain lies in building an open and inclusive internet of value, enabling anyone globally to transfer and use funds efficiently and at low cost, regardless of location or access to banking. Sun highlighted that projects with lasting impact are those built on genuine demand and real-world usage. He pointed to the stablecoin payment ecosystem as the most mature and scalable application currently, noting that TRON has rapidly become one of the world's largest stablecoin networks. The circulation of USDT on TRON has surpassed $86.3 billion, driven by actual use cases such as cross-border transfers and daily payments, demonstrating strong network effects. Regarding strategy, Sun outlined a methodology combining data-driven iteration, rapid execution, and user-centric focus. He cited the decision to partner with Tether to launch TRC-20 USDT as a key strategic move, based on an assessment of market trends and long-term potential, which has become a significant growth engine for the TRON ecosystem. On globalization, Sun stressed the importance of local compliance and cultural adaptation, noting that success in different markets depends on deep understanding and local partnerships. He also addressed the convergence of AI and blockchain, describing it as a transformative direction where blockchain provides decentralized infrastructure for AI, while AI enhances the intelligence and user experience of blockchain systems. For industry participants and young entrepreneurs, Sun advised continuous learning and adaptability in a fast-changing environment, focusing on building irreplaceable core strengths rather than spreading resources too thinly. Through infrastructure development, global strategy, and technological foresight, TRON aims to advance the practical implementation and evolution of the value internet.

marsbit1 год тому

Justin Sun’s Interview with Hurun Report: A New Order and Certainty for Value Flow in the Era of Transformation

marsbit1 год тому

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

Micron Technology, the Idaho-based memory chip maker, recently saw its market cap surpass $1 trillion, securing its position as one of the top three DRAM manufacturers alongside Samsung and SK Hynix. Its survival and growth story is marked by a unique combination of political maneuvering and hard-won manufacturing efficiency, but also strategic missteps that now challenge its future. Founded in 1978 in Boise without significant government or capital backing, Micron repeatedly turned to Washington for survival during critical junctures. In the 1980s, it filed anti-dumping complaints against Japanese firms, leading to the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. Ironically, this created an opening for Samsung, which Micron had earlier licensed its 64K DRAM technology to. In 2002, Micron avoided heavy fines in a price-fixing investigation by acting as a whistleblower against its competitors, cementing its reputation as a "political opportunist." A major strategic error occurred in 2013 with its $2.5 billion acquisition of bankrupt Japanese firm Elpida. This deal burdened Micron with integrating incompatible manufacturing processes just as the industry was pivoting toward HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), a critical technology for AI. SK Hynix had launched its first HBM chip that same year. By the time AI demand exploded with ChatGPT in 2022, SK Hynix commanded about 85% of the HBM3 market, while Micron, playing catch-up, held only around 3%. In 2017, Micron employed similar tactics against a new competitor, Chinese startup Fujian Jinhua, by alleging intellectual property theft, which led to U.S. sanctions effectively crippling the firm. However, this strategy backfired in 2023 when China banned Micron's products from its critical infrastructure, causing its revenue share from China to plummet from 14% in FY2023 to just 7.1% by FY2025. Today, Micron faces a triple squeeze: it lags in the high-margin HBM race, faces pricing pressure in low-end DRAM from Chinese manufacturers like CXMT, and has lost crucial access to the booming Chinese AI server market. Despite its political strategies, Micron's core strength is its exceptional manufacturing cost control, achieved through decades of engineering. Its DRAM chips have a smaller cell area than its rivals, yielding more chips per wafer. This efficiency has been vital for weathering industry downturns. However, this advantage cannot compensate for the decade lost in HBM development. Micron is now racing to ramp up production of its HBM3E, certified by NVIDIA, and develop HBM4. Its future hinges on whether it can close this technological "time debt" through relentless R&D and execution, in a marathon where its competitors, having started earlier, are not slowing down.

marsbit1 год тому

Samsung Leverages Technology Cycles, SK Hynix Relies on HBM, What Enabled Micron to Win a Trillion-Dollar Market Cap?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片