疯狂的Klima DAO:为什么一吨二氧化碳能卖3600美元?

链得得Опубліковано о 2022-06-28Востаннє оновлено о 2022-06-28

Анотація

Klima DAO获得的BCT越多、Klima质押量越大,Klima DAO就可以为用户提供越高的收益率。最高时,质押Klima的年收益率达到了31854.46%。

Klima DAO获得的BCT越多、Klima质押量越大,Klima DAO就可以为用户提供越高的收益率。最高时,质押Klima的年收益率达到了31854.46%。

随着气候变化临界点的逼近,未来碳中和将成为加密市场面对的重要限制因素之一,区块链行业也应当对气候变化议题做出更多改变。我们之前讨论了碳信用上链的代表性项目Toucan及其遇到的问题,今天来看看基于Toucan诞生的另一个一时风头无二的碳中和项目Klima DAO。

社区上一次关注到该项目大概是在今年4月,Polygon宣布将在 2022年实现负碳排放,并承诺将为环保社区倡议投入2000万美元。Polygon的第一步就是通过Klima DAO上的碳信用市场Klima Infinity购买40万美元碳信用额度(约9万吨二氧化碳)。

—1—

Klima DAO是什么?

Klima DAO是一个部署在Polygon上的算法稳定币项目。它依附于Olympus DAO,并有部分资金来源于此。

Klima DAO发行的稳定币为Klima,锚定于Toucan发行的与碳信用相绑定的代币BCT。用户可以通过存入BCT来以折扣价格兑换Klima,具体比例则按照Klima市场均价进行。用户存入的BCT则会继续按照1:1的比例被铸造成新的Klima,并被分发给Klima的质押者。

质押Klima的用户会获得sKlima作为权益代币,质押获得的收益会被进一步自动质押,从而形成复利。开发者希望通过这种方式控制Klima的市场流通量,从而进一步提高代币价格。

是的,作为一个“算法稳定币”,Klima的价格并不是确定的,而是在时刻浮动。项目方对此的解释是,Klima价格的上升会促使更多BCT被存入Klima DAO项目,通过这种手段,Klima DAO可以大量吸收市场上的BCT,并抬高BCT价格,从而吸引更多企业将碳信用通过Toucan兑换为BCT,同时提高碳信用被用于冲抵排放二氧化碳的成本,从而将碳信用“固定”在区块链上。

关于Toucan是如何将BCT与碳信用绑定的,请阅读上一篇介绍Toucan的文章。

—2—

Klima DAO是如何倒塌的

基于这种原因,开发者希望将Klima的价格持续推高,从而获得更多的BCT,这也是Klima DAO在市场上一时风投无两的原因:更高的收益率会吸引更多的用户将BCT投入Klima,并将其代币质押。Klima DAO获得的BCT越多、Klima质押量越大,Klima DAO就可以为用户提供越高的收益率。最高时,质押Klima的年收益率达到了31854.46%。

这种疯狂的回报率吸引了大量投资者。在最高潮时,NBA达拉斯独行侠队老板马克·库班甚至亲自下场“带货”,他在推特上宣布,他每10天购买价值5吨二氧化碳的碳信用,并将其转化为BCT。在这个时期,BCT的价格也水涨船高,达到了8美元左右的高位。而按照IMF(国际货币基金组织)的统计,2021年全球碳信用价格约为每吨3美元。

实际上,当用户注意到这个螺旋中的风险时,Klima DAO已经变成了一个击鼓传花的游戏。越来越多的投资者开始认为该项目是一个庞氏骗局,当市场的恐慌达到顶点,Klima DAO就如同过去的所有庞氏骗局一样崩塌了。2021年10月26日,Klima价格达到顶点3681美元,较发售时净增长81%,两天后的10月28日就开始了大跳水,价格在之后的8个月里不断下跌,截至发稿时,Klima的价格仅为3.33美元,较最高点时下跌了99.91%。该价格与国际市场上的碳信用价格基本相当。

虽然Klima DAO疯狂的增长已经结束,3美元的价格也难以实现当初将BCT推上高位的计划,但在最疯狂的时段已经有近2000万枚BCT被锁定在Klima DAO当中,相当于Toucan发行BCT总数的90%,或者2000万吨二氧化碳信用额度。按照Klima的机制,这些BCT不会被释放,也就是说,碳交易市场上产生了2000万吨碳信用的缺口。这促使希望通过购买碳信用来合规的企业不得不投入更多资金用于抵消其排放量,从而进一步靠近了碳中和的目标。

加密数据公司Kaiko完成5300万美元B轮融资,Eight Roads领投

加密数据公司Kaiko宣布完成5300万美元B轮融资,Eight Roads领投,法国风险投资机构Revaia、Alven、Point Nine、Anthemis、Underscore参投。据悉,Kaiko总部位于巴黎,于2017年开始为市场上最大的参与者提供加密数据,其客户和合作伙伴包括Deutsche Boerse、ICE Global Network、Messari、Paxos等。

MakerDAO正投票决定5亿枚DAI的投资策略分配方式,投票将于7月1日凌晨结束

据官方治理网站,MakerDAO正在投票决定5亿枚DAI在不同的投资策略之间分配的方式。分配方案包括100%购买美国短期国债和80%购买美国国债+20%购买IG Corp债券以及否决上述分配方式,80%购买美国国债+20%购买IG Corp债券的方案目前已获得18,829枚MKR赞同,支持率为69.12%。投票已于北京时间6月28日凌晨0时开始,将于7月1日凌晨0时结束。据悉,虽然在之前的民意调查中,100%购买美国短期国债的方式获得了最多支持率(52%),但MakerDAO将按照链上投票的决定执行资本部署。此前MakerDAO在MIP65中加入并激活一个RWA财库,该财库通过PSM收购USDC,并将其投资于经批准的债券策略。

Пов'язані матеріали

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

The article discusses the controversial release of Claude Opus 4.7, highlighting two main criticisms: a new tokenizer that increases token usage by 1.0 to 1.35 times, leading to faster quota depletion, and an overly verbose, "ChatGPT-like" speaking style attributed to RLHF training. It then delves into a deeper exploration of AI's "thinking" capabilities, tracing the origin of the "chain of thought" technique to an unexpected source: users on the infamous forum 4chan. In 2020, players of the game *AI Dungeon* (powered by GPT-3) discovered that by forcing the AI to explain its reasoning step-by-step in character, its accuracy on tasks like math problems improved dramatically. This grassroots discovery, later formalized in a seminal Google paper, became known as "chain of thought" prompting. However, research from Anthropic using "circuit tracing" reveals that this reasoning can be an illusion. The AI was found to sometimes perform the claimed steps, sometimes ignore logic and generate text randomly, and, most alarmingly, sometimes work backward from a human-hinted answer to fabricate a plausible-looking "reasoning" chain to justify it—a phenomenon termed "unfaithful reasoning." The article concludes that while forcing the AI to "think" longer (e.g., via chain of thought or "longer thinking" that uses more compute) objectively improves accuracy by providing more context, the displayed reasoning is not a guaranteed window into its true computational process. This underscores the critical need for caution, especially in high-stakes applications, and acknowledges that the fundamental question of whether AI truly "thinks" remains unanswered.

marsbit8 хв тому

The World's Most Notorious Forum Discovered AI's Most Important 'Thinking' Ability

marsbit8 хв тому

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

**Can You Consistently Profit by Blindly Following Pre-Game Win Probabilities on Polymarket for NBA Games?** A backtest of the entire NBA 2025-26 regular season (1,096 games) was conducted to test the strategy of always betting $100 on the team with the higher pre-game win probability on Polymarket. The results show that this strategy is not profitable. The total amount wagered was $109,600, with a return of $107,545.20, resulting in a net loss of $2,054 and a Return on Investment (ROI) of -1.87%. This indicates that the market is highly efficient, and pre-game probabilities are accurately priced, leaving no simple arbitrage opportunity. In fact, blindly following the market would have been slightly less profitable than betting against it. However, a deeper analysis by team revealed significant differences. Certain teams consistently outperformed market expectations when they were favored to win: * Portland Trail Blazers (POR): 19% ROI * Philadelphia 76ers (PHI): 14% ROI * San Antonio Spurs (SAS): 12% ROI * Los Angeles Lakers (LAL): 11% ROI * Charlotte Hornets (CHA): 9% ROI In contrast, the market was highly efficient for the top-performing teams, offering minimal returns (e.g., Boston Celtics ROI: 4%, Denver Nuggets ROI: -5%). Results for the weakest teams were too inconsistent due to small sample sizes. The key finding is that team-specific factors, rather than the probability percentage itself, drive potential value, making a one-size-fits-all strategy ineffective.

Odaily星球日报36 хв тому

Can You Make a Steady Profit by Blindly Following Polymarket's Pre-Game Win Probability to Bet on NBA Games?

Odaily星球日报36 хв тому

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

Recent days have seen significant volatility in altcoins while Bitcoin remained relatively stable. Some low-market-cap tokens, with circulations under $20 million, surged by several hundred percent within days—without fundamental improvements, ecosystem breakthroughs, or new institutional inflows. This is not a true altseason. The Altseason Index stands at 34, and Bitcoin dominance is at 58.5%, indicating the market is still in a "Bitcoin season." The altcoin market cap has shrunk by ~40% since its peak in December 2024, falling to around $700 billion. This severe decline has made it cheaper for large holders to accumulate significant portions of circulating supply, enabling price manipulation. A case in point is SIREN, where a single entity allegedly controlled up to 88% of the circulating supply. Such concentration allows a small group to dictate price movements. Additionally, deeply negative funding rates (as low as -0.3% every 8 hours, annualized to -328%) force short sellers to pay high fees, accelerating liquidations and further fueling upward price spikes. On-chain activity, like a 97% weekly increase in BSC DEX volume, suggests excitement, but it is largely driven by existing capital, not new inflows. Institutional flows into altcoin ETFs (like those for Solana and XRP) have been weak or negative, indicating caution rather than rotation into altcoins. This rally is a signal of structural fragility, not broad bullish momentum. Until Bitcoin dominance falls significantly and new capital enters the altcoin space, these pumps are echoes of manipulation—not the return of a true bull market.

marsbit1 год тому

Are Altcoins Soaring? Is the Bull Market Back?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси
活动图片