Sonic rebounds after 17% drop – Yet network usage lags

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-08-17Востаннє оновлено о 2025-08-18

Key Takeaways

Sonic saw a surge in price following an inflow of over $23 million in TVL and positive chain netflows. However, the potential for a sustained boom does not fully align with the recent gains.


In the past day, Sonic [S] emerged as one of the market’s top performers, posting a 10% gain—a sharp turnaround from the 17% drop it had recorded earlier.

AMBCrypto analysis found that while the broader market remains bullish, sentiment across key metrics is not in full alignment, leaving room for a possible decline. Here’s how the situation could play out.

S: Liquidity grows

The Total Value Locked (TVL), which gauges investor confidence in an asset, has taken a major shift as investors adopt a long-term outlook.

Over the past day, this group of investors added $21.05 million worth of S into protocols on the Sonic chain, according to DeFiLlama.

S total value lockedS total value locked

Source: DeFiLlama

This inflow suggests that the funds have been locked, a sign that the dominant sentiment leans toward long-term price appreciation.

Additionally, chain netflow data, which measures liquidity moving in and out of the network, shows that investors bridged assets from other chains into Sonic to acquire its native token.

As of now, $832,000 worth of S has been added to the chain, solidifying its liquidity position at current levels.

On-chain activity doesn’t tally

On-chain activity does not match Sonic’s recent price gains. At the time of the rally, both Active Addresses and Daily Transactions on the chain declined.

Active Addresses typically indicate broader network usage and rising utility for a token, which often correlates with demand.

S active addresses chart.S active addresses chart.

Source: Artemis

Currently, the number of active addresses has dropped to 15,700—just 500 addresses away from the yearly low of 15,200, a level that previously coincided with a price decline.

Similarly, Daily Transactions have fallen. At the time of writing, transactions stood at 294,800, confirming that remaining users are engaging less.

There were an average of 18.7 transactions per user, compared to 27.5 per user in May 2023, when price activity surged notably.

Off-chain sentiment remains weak

Off-chain sentiment on centralized exchanges also remains weak. During this period, liquidity movement and momentum behind the rally were minimal.

For context, Sonic’s daily trading volume stood at $6.14 million—a 32% decline.

Historically, a rise in price accompanied by declining volume indicates weak momentum behind a rally, suggesting a potential pullback.

S derivative data.S derivative data.

Source: CoinGlass

Open Interest data from CoinGlass further confirms this trend. The total liquidity in derivatives stands at just $23 million, with only $340,000 added in the past day.

Liquidation data shows traders removed less than $200 worth of positions from the market, reflecting weak derivatives sentiment and little interest in Sonic.

If this trend in on-chain and off-chain sentiment continues through the week, Sonic may face a reversal of the gains it recorded over the past day.

Share

Пов'язані матеріали

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbit14 хв тому

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbit14 хв тому

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手23 хв тому

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手23 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片