Bankless: Strategy 与 BitMine 的对决

比推Опубліковано о 2025-08-15Востаннє оновлено о 2025-08-15

来源:Bankless

作者:Jack Inabinet

编译及整理:BitpushNews


image.png

Strategy 和 BitMine 都处于各自资产的数字资产金库游戏领先地位。然而,尽管迈克尔·塞勒(Michael Saylor)的公司开创了将比特币(BTC)转化为资产负债表炼金术的华尔街先驱之路,但汤姆·李(Tom Lee)的大胆、爆炸性的承诺——在创纪录的时间内进行数十亿美元的交易来积累以太坊(ETH)——也同样引人注目。

Strategy 正在通过复杂的金融工程不断积累比特币,而 BitMine 则以更精简的模式大步前进,并有许多需要证明的地方。这两家公司玩的是完全相同的游戏,但使用的却是截然不同的策略手册。

今天,我们将 Strategy 与 BitMine Immersion Technologies 进行比较,并剖析比特币和以太坊这两家加密金库巨头之间的差异。

新的 Strategy

曾几何时,MicroStrategy 将自己定义为一家向公司和机构销售分析软件的商业智能公司。如今,这个重生的“Strategy”是一家庞大的比特币持有工具,其估值已多次超过其 2000 年代科技泡沫时期的峰值,其最受追捧的产品是金融工程。

Strategy 最初为比特币购买融资的核心方式是“按市价(ATM)”股票销售和可转换票据,但在本轮牛市中,Strategy 转向了混合型奇异固定收益和优先股发行。

2025 年,Strategy 扩展了其产品线,新增了 STRK(可转换优先股,附带 8% 股息)、STRF(高级永续固定收益产品,附带 10% 股息)、STRD(初级永续固定收益产品,附带可选的 10% 股息)以及 STRC(可变利率永续优先股,初始股息率为 9%)。

image.png

尽管这些新时代的 Strategy 产品之间的众多区别无疑令人眼花缭乱,但为了本文的目的,我们可以忽略这些细节;更重要的是,每种工具都协同运作,从具有不同风险和回报偏好的投资者那里筹集资金。

例如,寻求远高于市场水平的 10% 收益,并且优先索赔权仅次于可转换票据持有人的投资者,可以购买 STRF;同时,那些想要稍低 8% 收益并对 MSTR 股票有一定上行风险敞口的人可以购买 STRK。

image.png

这些奇异的永续优先股市场规模小于 MSTR 股票本身,但 Strategy 通过这些渠道取得了成功,自今年年初以来,通过这套产品已筹集了超过 55 亿美元。

值得注意的是,这些产品似乎已经取代了 Strategy 的可转换票据,因为该公司自 2025 年 2 月以来就没有发行过任何新的零息债务。此外,筹集的绝大部分资金来自这些证券的首次发行,只有 14% 来自随后的公开市场销售。

在其 7 月 31 日的第二季度财报电话会议上,Strategy 制定了新的普通股稀释准则,禁止在 MSTR 交易价格低于其比特币持股量 2.5 倍乘数时进行“按市价”股票销售,除非是为了支付债务利息和为优先股股息提供资金。

image.png

在市场下行的情况下,Strategy 可能会发行新的优先股来偿还债务,但如果融资渠道真的关闭,强制性的 MSTR 销售最终将减少每股所代表的比特币数量。

BitMine 的蓝图

将时间倒回到 Strategy 的近五年前,将比特币换成以太坊,你就会得到 BitMine Immersion Technologies(BMNR)!这家前比特币矿企在 6 月下旬宣布了其以太坊金库策略后,便开始了加密货币购买狂潮;在撰写本文时,它持有价值 52 亿美元的 115 万枚以太坊。

与 2025 年后的 Strategy 不同,后者现在依赖复杂的奇异优先股组合来筹集现金,BitMine 仍处于其“经典”时代,依靠“按市价”股票销售和可转换票据作为主要的融资工具。

Strategy 和 BitMine 都是将自己与单一代币捆绑在一起的上市公司。唯一的重大区别是,BitMine 专注于市值较小的资产,并且可能拥有更显著的公众形象,其董事长汤姆·李(Tom Lee)是白天投资者电视网络观众熟悉的面孔。

多亏了 Strategy 对加密金库公司的常态化,BitMine 在早期增长阶段取得了巨大成功,在其运营的第一个月内积累的加密资产价值就超过了 Strategy 在前六个月的积累量。

image.png

结论

Strategy 和 BitMine 都作为其所代表的加密货币的高beta代理而脱颖而出。两者都在单一加密资产上进行了一系列大胆押注,其中 Strategy 扮演着经验丰富的老将角色,而 BitMine 则是迅速崛起的挑战者。

Strategy 在加密金库领域的长期主导地位,加上其能够利用多种融资来源的能力,使其在应对不利市场条件时具有更大的选择性。相反,BitMine 较小的规模可能提供更大的投资上行空间。

尽管设计上有所不同,但 Strategy 和 BitMine 最终的兴衰都将取决于其所选资产的实力。


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

比推 TG 交流群:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

比推 TG 订阅: https://t.me/bitpush

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点,不构成投资建议

Пов'язані матеріали

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

Grayscale Research suggests a third wave of public focus on financial privacy is approaching, driven by stablecoin/blockchain adoption and new AI-powered surveillance tools. In this context, Zcash emerges as a decentralized digital currency, similar to Bitcoin but with built-in, robust privacy mechanisms via its "shielded" transactions that conceal sender, receiver, and amount using zero-knowledge proofs. While privacy is often seen as a niche feature, it is argued to be a core requirement for functional money, needed by individuals and businesses alike. Zcash's optional privacy is distinct from mixers or default-private chains like Monero. After years of development (Sapling, Orchard/NU5, Ironwood upgrades) to improve usability, key metrics show growing adoption: shielded transactions comprise ~90% of network activity, and ~25% of circulating ZEC is in shielded pools—a historical high. Despite this, ZEC's market valuation remains low (~0.6% of the "digital currency" sector), implying the market prices privacy as a marginal concern. The investment thesis hinges on a potential re-rating if the value of financial privacy is recognized more broadly. Risks include regulatory challenges around shielded transactions, legacy trusted setup pools, quantum computing threats, and execution risks for upcoming upgrades like Tachyon for scaling. In summary, Zcash represents a significant, technologically mature option in the privacy currency space, with current valuation offering potential upside if privacy demand grows.

marsbit8 хв тому

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

marsbit8 хв тому

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

**Title: Bear Market Over, New Bull Cycle Begins** Bitcoin surged over 20% in just three days, from a low of $64,100 on August 19th to a high of $79,500 by August 21st, marking a dramatic shift in market sentiment. This rapid rise triggered massive liquidations exceeding $4 billion, with short positions accounting for $3.7 billion—the largest short squeeze since 2021. The rally was fueled by several key factors. Macroeconomic conditions improved as the US Treasury doubled its long-term bond buyback size, easing pressure. Significant regulatory developments included a White House meeting where former President Trump urged Senate action on the CLARITY Act and hinted at potential US Bitcoin reserves, followed by the CFTC Chairman stating the agency would establish crypto market rules if the bill stalls. On-chain data revealed a fierce battle: large whales faced substantial liquidations on short positions, while others took profits or doubled down on longs. Major altcoins like ETH and XRP also saw impressive gains. Analysts are divided but increasingly bullish. Many, including CryptoQuant's founder, declare the bear market over and a new bull cycle begun. Price targets range from $100k by year-end to ambitious long-term projections of $200k. However, some caution against immediate chasing, noting overbought conditions and viewing the move as a potential "trap" ahead of the crucial September 15th Senate vote on the CLARITY Act. The market's next test is sustaining the momentum with real buying pressure, holding above key resistance near $78k-$80k, and watching ETF inflows and the upcoming regulatory vote.

marsbit12 хв тому

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

marsbit12 хв тому

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

Xiaomi's Q2 2026 financial report reveals a company navigating a complex transition. While smartphone gross margin held steady at 8.5% through strategic product mix and a record-high average selling price (ASP), this came at the cost of a 26.5% year-over-year decline in global shipments, pressuring its core user acquisition engine. This illustrates Xiaomi's central challenge: managing the "timing gap" between its established and emerging growth engines. Its smartphone business is pivoting from scale to premiumization, but it's unclear if high-end models can fully offset the volume loss from more price-sensitive segments, especially in markets like India and Africa. Meanwhile, the electric vehicle segment has become a significant revenue contributor, delivering 104,200 units and generating ¥23.9 billion. However, its profit contribution remains unclear as it, along with AI investments, is still in a scaling and investment phase. The AI and humanoid robot initiatives, though strategically prioritized and tested in Xiaomi's own factories, are in early-stage validation with no near-term commercialization timeline. Financially, the company remains stable, supported by a robust cash position and its high-margin internet services business, which hit a new high in monthly active users. Management emphasized continued heavy investment in AI, chips, and robotics to fuel the next growth cycle. The key question is whether these new engines—cars, AI, robotics—can achieve commercial scale and profitability before the smartphone engine's growth slows further.

marsbit12 хв тому

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

marsbit12 хв тому

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbit33 хв тому

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

marsbit33 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片