3 People with 100 AI Programmers, Burning Through $1.3 Million a Month! OpenAI: I'll Foot the Bill

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-17

Анотація

In a striking demonstration of AI-powered development, Peter Steinberger (creator of OpenClaw) shared that his three-person team spent $1.3 million in one month to run approximately 100 AI agents (primarily Codex instances). OpenAI covered the cost. The expenditure consumed 6.03 trillion tokens across 7.6 million requests. Steinberger argues that, with "fast mode" disabled, the cost falls below that of a single engineer while providing significantly greater output. This "cloud programmer army" handles core but tedious software engineering tasks: reviewing pull requests, finding security vulnerabilities, deduplicating issues, fixing bugs, monitoring benchmarks, and even generating PRs after meetings. This shifts AI's role from merely writing code to maintaining the entire collaborative fabric of a project. Steinberger's tool, CodexBar (a macOS menu bar app), tracks usage and costs across various AI coding services, highlighting how token consumption is becoming a key metric—a new "means of production." The experiment poses a profound question: if token cost ceases to be a barrier, how will software development transform? As model prices fall, the capability for small teams to leverage large numbers of AI agents could become commonplace, fundamentally altering the scale and speed of development. The future, Steinberger suggests, is arriving rapidly.

Peter Steinberger

Editor: Solomon

[New Zhiyuan Report] 3 people, 100 AI agents, burning through $1.3 million a month — The father of OpenClaw has turned software development into an "AI assembly line," with OpenAI picking up the tab.

While others show off their pay stubs, he shows off the bill — $1.3 million a month!

That's nearly 9 million RMB per month. It's left netizens utterly dumbfounded.

OpenClaw father Peter Steinberger casually posted a screenshot on X.

Peter Steinberger

But the numbers on the screenshot were anything but casual:

30-day spend: $1,305,088.81. Consumed 603 billion tokens. Made 7.6 million requests.

You read that right, 1.3 million U.S. dollars. And it's not a quarterly AI budget for some big tech company — it's the monthly usage of a three-person team.

Even more explosive: OpenAI is reimbursing this cost.

The comment section instantly went wild.

Some were amazed, some skeptical, some whipped out their calculators to figure out "how many programmers this equals."

Steinberger himself calmly responded: "With fast mode off, my cost is less than an engineer, and it really helps a lot more."

Translation: — It's genuinely cost-effective!

Other netizens were shocked by the $400k/month engineer — "The San Francisco job market is insane."

Netizen comment

Netizen comment

Others were curious about where this massive token usage went.

Peter responded that most was used for OpenClaw development.

Netizen comment

A Cloud-Based Programmer Army

The most outrageous thing is that Pete's small team only has 3 people.

They have about 100 Codex instances running long-term in the cloud, handling the dirtiest, most grueling, most mind-numbing work in software engineering —

Reviewing PRs, finding security vulnerabilities, deduplicating issues, fixing bugs, monitoring benchmarks, posting to Discord upon discovering regressions, even opening PRs directly after listening to meetings.

Thus, AI isn't just "helping you write code," but is infiltrating every crevice of software collaboration.

This is terrifying.

Because what's truly expensive in software development is communication, comprehension, context switching, review, regression, fixes, waiting, and repetitive tasks.

In the past, a team spent a huge amount of time each day on these things that don't seem like "creation" but without which the project would rot.

Now, Peter has tossed all these processes to a bunch of AI agents at once.

This is AI starting to maintain the nervous system of an organization for you.

Illustration

There's another important detail in this screenshot: it's not the OpenAI backend, but CodexBar made by Peter.

CodexBar is a macOS menu bar tool for tracking usage windows, credits, costs, and reset times for various AI programming tools.

It supports a bunch of services like Codex, Claude, Cursor, Gemini, Copilot, etc.

What used to be in a programmer's menu bar? CPU, memory, battery, network speed.

Now there's one more thing: tokens. Tokens are becoming a new "means of production."

CodexBar

A Final Word

$1.3 million a month, 3 people, 100 AI agents.

Ponder this set of numbers — three living humans, leading a hundred digital employees who don't eat, sleep, or demand raises, doing the work of an entire engineering team.

Some felt invigorated after reading this: AI finally isn't just a decorative vase for chatting! Others felt a chill down their spine: Wait, so what do we coders do in the future?

But honestly, what keeps me up at night is Steinberger's casual remark: "I'm exploring what software development would look like if token cost wasn't an issue."

Peter Steinberger

Everyone, he said "if."

The problem is, this "if" is visibly turning into "when" at an astonishing speed.

The work that costs $1.3 million today, after one price cut for models, becomes $130k. Another cut, $13k.

On that day, having 100 AI agents working simultaneously is no longer a game exclusive to Silicon Valley big shots, but a basic operation for any three-person startup team.

Three young people in a garage, holding a hundred tireless AI programmers — this image, just thinking about it is absurd.

Peter Steinberger has revealed the bottom card.

On the card it says: The future is already knocking, and it doesn't plan to wait for you to be ready.

References:

https://the-decoder.com/for-1-3-million-a-month-openclaw-founder-peter-steinberger-runs-100-ai-agents-that-code-review-prs-and-find-bugs/

https://x.com/steipete/status/2055346265869721905

https://developers.openai.com/codex/speed

This article comes from the WeChat public account "New Zhiyuan", author: New Zhiyuan

Пов'язані питання

QHow much money did the three-person team spend on AI development in one month, and who covered the cost?

AThe three-person team spent $1,305,088.81 (approximately 1.3 million USD) in one month on AI development, and the cost was covered by OpenAI.

QWhat is the name of the tool Peter Steinberger created to track AI development costs and usage?

APeter Steinberger created a tool called CodexBar, a macOS menu bar application that tracks usage windows, credits, costs, and reset times for various AI programming tools like Codex, Claude, Cursor, Gemini, and Copilot.

QApproximately how many AI agents (instances) does Peter Steinberger's team run for development tasks?

APeter Steinberger's team runs approximately 100 AI Codex instances to perform various development tasks.

QWhat kinds of software development tasks do the AI agents in the article handle?

AThe AI agents handle tasks such as reviewing pull requests (PRs), finding security vulnerabilities, deduplicating issues, fixing bugs, monitoring benchmarks, reporting regressions to Discord, and even opening PRs after listening to meetings.

QWhat is the core implication Peter Steinberger highlights regarding the future of software development with AI?

APeter Steinberger highlights that the core implication is exploring what software development would look like if token cost were not a limiting factor, suggesting a future where small teams can leverage large numbers of AI agents as a standard practice, dramatically changing the development landscape.

Пов'язані матеріали

Reddit Crypto Discussion: Tech Stocks Surge for 8 Months, Is the Crypto Community Starting to 'Accept Fate'?

Reddit Crypto Discussion: Has the Community 'Given Up' as Tech Stocks Soar? A recent post on Reddit's r/CryptoMarkets asking if the crypto market feels "dead" compared to surging tech stocks has sparked intense debate. The discussion highlights a community grappling with underperformance: Bitcoin is down ~44% from its October 2025 high and ~20% YTD in 2026, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 have gained significantly. The debate features classic opposing views. Some users, citing Bitcoin's history, are "cycle believers" who anticipate a return to form, arguing it has "died" many times before. Others counter that crypto's narratives keep shifting without delivering a stable, compelling real-world use case beyond speculation. A prevalent third view pinpoints AI as the core issue: the tech sector's transformative boom is absorbing all attention and capital, while crypto lacks a comparable, impactful utility. Data supports the pessimistic mood. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw their largest monthly net outflow in May 2026 (~$2.3B), indicating institutional de-risking. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has fallen to "Fear" levels. When asked about the timing of a potential market rotation back to crypto, answers are uncertain. A key practical point raised is the current high-interest-rate environment, which makes stable yields from cash and bonds attractive, reducing incentive to move into volatile assets like crypto. The underlying anxiety, as one user summarized, is "opportunity cost"—the worry about missing gains elsewhere while waiting for a crypto revival.

marsbit1 год тому

Reddit Crypto Discussion: Tech Stocks Surge for 8 Months, Is the Crypto Community Starting to 'Accept Fate'?

marsbit1 год тому

Chatbot has been burning money for three years, is it still the 'New Continent' of the AI era?

For years, the AI industry has been guided by a singular "map" — the belief that the AI era's "new continent" would be found in the Chatbot, a super-app akin to the mobile internet's super-apps. This belief was fueled by ChatGPT's explosive 2022 debut. However, three years of heavy investment reveal a different reality: the Chatbot-as-ultimate-entry-point model is struggling. The core issue is economic. Chatbots defy traditional internet economics. Unlike apps with near-zero marginal cost, each AI query consumes significant, expensive compute. More users mean higher costs, not profits. OpenAI, despite ~900M weekly active users, reportedly loses money. The expected network effects and data flywheels that power internet giants are weak in Chatbots, as one user's interactions don't improve another's experience. Monetization is a major hurdle. The subscription model faces low conversion rates, especially in China where users expect AI to be free. The "free + ads" model also struggles. Chatbot interactions often lack commercial intent, and inserting ads compromises the trust essential for an answer engine. Perplexity's minimal ad revenue and subsequent pivot away from ads highlight this difficulty. Switching between Chatbots is easy, making user loyalty low and competition a potential race to the bottom on price. Data suggests the standalone Chatbot's growth is slowing, and user engagement (avg. ~6 mins/day) pales compared to apps like TikTok. The product form itself is limiting; studies show nearly half of interactions are simple Q&A, trapping AI's potential in a passive, single-turn "cage." A contrasting, more successful path is emerging, exemplified by Anthropic. With over 85% of its ~$30B annualized revenue from enterprises, it focuses on AI as a productivity tool, not a companion. The rise of AI Agents (like OpenClaw) and the integration of AI into existing workflows (e.g., Google's AI Overviews, Apple Intelligence in OS) signal a shift. The future may not be a dominant Chatbot app, but AI embedded seamlessly into social apps, operating systems, and hardware — a capability-layer revolution, not a new distribution container. The conclusion is clear: the old "map" centered on a standalone Chatbot super-app is leading to a dead end. To find the true valuable "continent" of the AI era, the industry must update its navigation to prioritize deep integration, practical utility, and sustainable economics over a generic conversation window.

marsbit1 год тому

Chatbot has been burning money for three years, is it still the 'New Continent' of the AI era?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити BILL

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Billions Network (BILL) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Billions Network (BILL).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Billions Network (BILL)Після придбання Billions Network (BILL) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Billions Network (BILL)Легко торгуйте Billions Network (BILL) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

212 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2026.05.07Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити BILL

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни BILL (BILL).

活动图片