3 People with 100 AI Programmers, Burning Through $1.3 Million a Month! OpenAI: I'll Foot the Bill

marsbitОпубліковано о 2026-05-17Востаннє оновлено о 2026-05-17

Анотація

In a striking demonstration of AI-powered development, Peter Steinberger (creator of OpenClaw) shared that his three-person team spent $1.3 million in one month to run approximately 100 AI agents (primarily Codex instances). OpenAI covered the cost. The expenditure consumed 6.03 trillion tokens across 7.6 million requests. Steinberger argues that, with "fast mode" disabled, the cost falls below that of a single engineer while providing significantly greater output. This "cloud programmer army" handles core but tedious software engineering tasks: reviewing pull requests, finding security vulnerabilities, deduplicating issues, fixing bugs, monitoring benchmarks, and even generating PRs after meetings. This shifts AI's role from merely writing code to maintaining the entire collaborative fabric of a project. Steinberger's tool, CodexBar (a macOS menu bar app), tracks usage and costs across various AI coding services, highlighting how token consumption is becoming a key metric—a new "means of production." The experiment poses a profound question: if token cost ceases to be a barrier, how will software development transform? As model prices fall, the capability for small teams to leverage large numbers of AI agents could become commonplace, fundamentally altering the scale and speed of development. The future, Steinberger suggests, is arriving rapidly.

Peter Steinberger

Editor: Solomon

[New Zhiyuan Report] 3 people, 100 AI agents, burning through $1.3 million a month — The father of OpenClaw has turned software development into an "AI assembly line," with OpenAI picking up the tab.

While others show off their pay stubs, he shows off the bill — $1.3 million a month!

That's nearly 9 million RMB per month. It's left netizens utterly dumbfounded.

OpenClaw father Peter Steinberger casually posted a screenshot on X.

Peter Steinberger

But the numbers on the screenshot were anything but casual:

30-day spend: $1,305,088.81. Consumed 603 billion tokens. Made 7.6 million requests.

You read that right, 1.3 million U.S. dollars. And it's not a quarterly AI budget for some big tech company — it's the monthly usage of a three-person team.

Even more explosive: OpenAI is reimbursing this cost.

The comment section instantly went wild.

Some were amazed, some skeptical, some whipped out their calculators to figure out "how many programmers this equals."

Steinberger himself calmly responded: "With fast mode off, my cost is less than an engineer, and it really helps a lot more."

Translation: — It's genuinely cost-effective!

Other netizens were shocked by the $400k/month engineer — "The San Francisco job market is insane."

Netizen comment

Netizen comment

Others were curious about where this massive token usage went.

Peter responded that most was used for OpenClaw development.

Netizen comment

A Cloud-Based Programmer Army

The most outrageous thing is that Pete's small team only has 3 people.

They have about 100 Codex instances running long-term in the cloud, handling the dirtiest, most grueling, most mind-numbing work in software engineering —

Reviewing PRs, finding security vulnerabilities, deduplicating issues, fixing bugs, monitoring benchmarks, posting to Discord upon discovering regressions, even opening PRs directly after listening to meetings.

Thus, AI isn't just "helping you write code," but is infiltrating every crevice of software collaboration.

This is terrifying.

Because what's truly expensive in software development is communication, comprehension, context switching, review, regression, fixes, waiting, and repetitive tasks.

In the past, a team spent a huge amount of time each day on these things that don't seem like "creation" but without which the project would rot.

Now, Peter has tossed all these processes to a bunch of AI agents at once.

This is AI starting to maintain the nervous system of an organization for you.

Illustration

There's another important detail in this screenshot: it's not the OpenAI backend, but CodexBar made by Peter.

CodexBar is a macOS menu bar tool for tracking usage windows, credits, costs, and reset times for various AI programming tools.

It supports a bunch of services like Codex, Claude, Cursor, Gemini, Copilot, etc.

What used to be in a programmer's menu bar? CPU, memory, battery, network speed.

Now there's one more thing: tokens. Tokens are becoming a new "means of production."

CodexBar

A Final Word

$1.3 million a month, 3 people, 100 AI agents.

Ponder this set of numbers — three living humans, leading a hundred digital employees who don't eat, sleep, or demand raises, doing the work of an entire engineering team.

Some felt invigorated after reading this: AI finally isn't just a decorative vase for chatting! Others felt a chill down their spine: Wait, so what do we coders do in the future?

But honestly, what keeps me up at night is Steinberger's casual remark: "I'm exploring what software development would look like if token cost wasn't an issue."

Peter Steinberger

Everyone, he said "if."

The problem is, this "if" is visibly turning into "when" at an astonishing speed.

The work that costs $1.3 million today, after one price cut for models, becomes $130k. Another cut, $13k.

On that day, having 100 AI agents working simultaneously is no longer a game exclusive to Silicon Valley big shots, but a basic operation for any three-person startup team.

Three young people in a garage, holding a hundred tireless AI programmers — this image, just thinking about it is absurd.

Peter Steinberger has revealed the bottom card.

On the card it says: The future is already knocking, and it doesn't plan to wait for you to be ready.

References:

https://the-decoder.com/for-1-3-million-a-month-openclaw-founder-peter-steinberger-runs-100-ai-agents-that-code-review-prs-and-find-bugs/

https://x.com/steipete/status/2055346265869721905

https://developers.openai.com/codex/speed

This article comes from the WeChat public account "New Zhiyuan", author: New Zhiyuan

Пов'язані питання

QHow much money did the three-person team spend on AI development in one month, and who covered the cost?

AThe three-person team spent $1,305,088.81 (approximately 1.3 million USD) in one month on AI development, and the cost was covered by OpenAI.

QWhat is the name of the tool Peter Steinberger created to track AI development costs and usage?

APeter Steinberger created a tool called CodexBar, a macOS menu bar application that tracks usage windows, credits, costs, and reset times for various AI programming tools like Codex, Claude, Cursor, Gemini, and Copilot.

QApproximately how many AI agents (instances) does Peter Steinberger's team run for development tasks?

APeter Steinberger's team runs approximately 100 AI Codex instances to perform various development tasks.

QWhat kinds of software development tasks do the AI agents in the article handle?

AThe AI agents handle tasks such as reviewing pull requests (PRs), finding security vulnerabilities, deduplicating issues, fixing bugs, monitoring benchmarks, reporting regressions to Discord, and even opening PRs after listening to meetings.

QWhat is the core implication Peter Steinberger highlights regarding the future of software development with AI?

APeter Steinberger highlights that the core implication is exploring what software development would look like if token cost were not a limiting factor, suggesting a future where small teams can leverage large numbers of AI agents as a standard practice, dramatically changing the development landscape.

Пов'язані матеріали

Bitcoin's Weak Rebound Fails to Mask Adjustment Trend, HYPE's Top Signal Warns of Short-Term Risks | Invited Analysis

**Title:** Bitcoin's Weak Rebound Fails to Mask Downtrend; HYPE Top Signal Alerts of Short-Term Risks | Exclusive Analysis **Abstract:** This weekly market analysis examines the current technical structures of Bitcoin and HYPE, outlining key trading strategies. Bitcoin's daily chart shows it has broken below the median line of its primary ascending channel, indicating structural weakness. It is currently experiencing a weak rebound within a short-term descending channel, targeting resistance at $75,000-$76,000. Failure to break above this zone could lead to a resumption of the downtrend, testing support at $69,500-$70,500. Trading strategies include positioning for a rebound rejection (Plan A) or a breakdown below key support (Plan B) with controlled short positions. For HYPE, the 4-hour chart reveals a potential seven-wave advance from the May 14 low, now showing signs of exhaustion. A bearish divergence (momentum weakening) has been observed, coupled with a top signal from the proprietary "Spread Trading Model" at potential endpoint 47. The key this week is to monitor if a confirmed top forms here, especially upon a breach of the $62.5-$64.57 support area. If broken, a larger corrective move towards $54-$56.30 is anticipated. The short-term strategy for HYPE focuses on cautious long entries only upon confirmed stabilization within the support zone. The report also details a successful short BTC trade from the previous week, yielding a ~5.07% profit, executed based on model signals and price action. Strict risk management rules, including dynamic stop-loss adjustments, are emphasized.

marsbit10 хв тому

Bitcoin's Weak Rebound Fails to Mask Adjustment Trend, HYPE's Top Signal Warns of Short-Term Risks | Invited Analysis

marsbit10 хв тому

Bitcoin's Weak Rebound Fails to Conceal Adjustment Trend; HYPE's Top Signals Warn of Short-Term Risks | Guest Analysis

Bitcoin's Weak Bounce Fails to Mask Correction Trend; HYPE Top Signals Warn of Short-Term Risks | Invited Analysis Core Weekly View: Bitcoin's daily chart structure has weakened. The key question is whether its short-term rebound can effectively break above the upper boundary of the descending channel. Has HYPE's seven-wave advance reached its conclusion? This analysis systematically examines the current market structure across multiple timeframes and outlines operational strategies for the week. **Bitcoin (BTC) Analysis:** The daily chart shows BTC trading within a long-term rising channel (yellow) since February but has recently broken below its midline, indicating structural weakness. It is currently confined within a short-term descending channel (blue) originating from the May 6 high. The ongoing bounce appears to be a weak technical correction targeting the blue channel's upper rail (approx. $75,000-$76,000). The 4-hour chart reveals a complex 10-segment corrective structure from the May high, containing two downward pivot zones (Central D and E). The current rebound (segment 36-37) is expected to face resistance in the $75,000-$76,000 area. A failure to break above could lead to a resumption of the downtrend, testing support at $69,500-$70,500 and potentially $65,000. **BTC Weekly Strategy:** The price is currently below the "Bull-Bear Channel," placing it in a technically weak zone. The core focus is on the test of the $75,000-$76,000 resistance and $69,500-$70,500 support. * *Medium-term*: Consider initiating short positions (up to 30% allocation) if the price rejects the $75,000-$76,000 area. Increase exposure to 60% if the long-term rising channel's lower support fails. * *Short-term (30% allocation)*: Two scenarios are outlined: * *Plan A (Sell on Rally)*: Short on rejection at $75,000-$76,000, with a stop-loss above $77,000. * *Plan B (Breakdown Sell)*: Short on a confirmed breakdown below $69,500-$70,500, with a stop-loss above $72,000. **HYPE Analysis:** The 4-hour chart shows HYPE has completed a seven-wave advance from its May 14 low, including a central consolidation zone. A bearish divergence was noted at the prior high (point 45), leading to a 13% correction. The current rally leg (46-47) shows weakening momentum compared to the initial leg (42-43), suggesting a potential momentum divergence. Furthermore, the proprietary "Spread Trading Model" has triggered a strong top warning signal at point 47. A confirmed top here, combined with the momentum divergence, could signal the end of the current uptrend. **HYPE Weekly Strategy:** The core is observing whether a confirmed top at point 47 coincides with the momentum divergence. * Monitor the key support zone of $62.5-$64.75. A hold and bounce from this area, supported by model buy signals, could allow for a light long position (<30% allocation). * A decisive break below this support would indicate a shift to a larger-degree correction, targeting the $54-$56.3 area. **Trade Review:** A previous short trade on BTC was executed at $77,449 based on model top signals (bearish candlestick pattern, spread model warning, momentum divergence) and closed at $73,519 for a 5.07% profit. **Risk Management Reminder:** Always set an initial stop-loss immediately upon entry. Move the stop-loss to breakeven once a 1% profit is achieved, and trail it upwards to lock in profits as the trade progresses. *Disclaimer: Market conditions change rapidly. All views, models, and strategies are for educational purposes and personal trading logs only, not investment advice. Trading carries significant risk.*

Odaily星球日报16 хв тому

Bitcoin's Weak Rebound Fails to Conceal Adjustment Trend; HYPE's Top Signals Warn of Short-Term Risks | Guest Analysis

Odaily星球日报16 хв тому

How to Define "Real U.S. Stocks": Differences Between On-Chain Tokens, Price Contracts, and Direct Broker Connections

**Title:** Defining "Real US Stocks": Differences Among On-Chain Tokens, Price Contracts, and Broker-Direct Access **Summary:** In 2026, using stablecoins to purchase US stocks is mainstream, but products marketed as "buying US stocks with USDT" offer fundamentally different assets. This article analyzes three primary models. **1. Tokenized Stocks:** These are on-chain tokens representing economic exposure to underlying stocks, held by an issuer or custodian. They offer benefits like 24/7 trading and DeFi composability (e.g., use as loan collateral). However, users lack direct legal shareholder status; dividends may not be paid in cash, and voting rights are typically non-binding advisory expressions. Examples include platforms like Ondo Finance. **2. Stock Futures / Equity Perpetuals:** These are derivative contracts tracking a stock's price, allowing leveraged long/short positions 24/7, similar to crypto perpetuals. They offer high efficiency and flexibility but involve funding fees, which can be a significant long-term cost, especially during strong trends. Crucially, they confer no ownership rights (dividends, voting) to the holder. **3. Broker-Direct Model:** This model provides access to real securities via licensed broker-dealers. Stocks/ETFs are bought and held within the US clearing and custodial system (e.g., DTCC), making it the only path to genuine stock ownership. Users receive cash dividends and formal proxy voting rights (where applicable). It supports thousands of stocks and ETFs, far exceeding the coverage of the other two models. Key advantages include no funding fees, a clean cost structure for long-term holds, and the potential to transfer holdings to other brokers. Some platforms facilitate stablecoin (USDT/USDC) deposits, reducing reliance on traditional banking. A critical distinction exists *within* the broker-direct model: the underlying brokerage architecture (e.g., Fully Disclosed IB, Omnibus IB, Self-Clearing) determines how client assets are held, protected, and how safeguards like SIPC insurance are conveyed. Users should verify the specific clearing structure and regulatory compliance of any platform. In conclusion, "buying US stocks with USDT" can mean holding an on-chain economic proxy (Tokenized Stocks), trading a price derivative (Stock Futures), or owning the actual security (Broker-Direct). For users seeking full ownership rights and long-term investment, the broker-direct model is the definitive choice, though its implementation details require careful scrutiny.

marsbit1 год тому

How to Define "Real U.S. Stocks": Differences Between On-Chain Tokens, Price Contracts, and Direct Broker Connections

marsbit1 год тому

NVIDIA Launches DSX Platform, Expanding into AI Factory Infrastructure

NVIDIA has unveiled the DSX platform at its GTC Taipei event, marking a strategic expansion from GPU sales into comprehensive AI factory infrastructure solutions. The platform addresses challenges like power supply, cooling, and resource orchestration as AI models scale, shifting the industry focus from single-chip performance to overall infrastructure efficiency. DSX integrates NVIDIA's chips, systems, software, and partner technologies to cover the entire AI factory lifecycle—from design and simulation to deployment and operations. It aims to accelerate deployment, improve reliability and operational efficiency, and reduce the cost per generated token in AI inference. The software suite includes DSX MaxLPS, which uses 45°C liquid cooling and rack-level optimization to allow up to 40% more GPUs per megawatt, and DSX OS, an open-source platform for AI factory operations. The platform also encompasses reference designs, digital twin simulation (DSX Sim), dynamic workload adjustment based on grid conditions (DSX Flex), and data exchange between systems. Early adopters include cloud providers like CoreWeave and Lambda. Major hardware partners, including Dell, HPE, Lenovo, and Supermicro, are developing DSX-ready systems. Pilot projects for DSX Flex are underway with energy providers. Strategically, DSX represents NVIDIA's ongoing transition from an AI chip supplier to a full-stack AI infrastructure platform provider, aiming to set industry standards and solidify its market leadership.

marsbit1 год тому

NVIDIA Launches DSX Platform, Expanding into AI Factory Infrastructure

marsbit1 год тому

After Burning Tens of Billions of Dollars in Tokens, Silicon Valley Giants Start Limiting Employee Token Usage

After burning tens of billions of dollars on AI tokens, major Silicon Valley firms are now restricting employee usage. Companies like Microsoft, Uber, and Salesforce, which heavily promoted AI for "efficiency," are facing a cost crisis. The practice of "tokenmaxxing"—pushing employees to maximize AI tool usage—led to wasteful spending on trivial tasks like checking the weather or writing birthday messages, with studies showing significant hidden costs for bug fixes and code rewrites. The core issue is a misalignment between individual productivity gains and actual business value. While employees use AI to automate tasks they dislike, such as writing reports, this often doesn't translate to increased company revenue or improved core business outcomes. For instance, AI-generated code speeds up development but also sees an 800% increase in "code churn" (code being discarded or rewritten). As a result, only 14% of CFOs report seeing a clear, measurable return on AI investments. Firms are now shifting strategies. Microsoft has revoked most internal licenses for Claude Code, while others are implementing monitoring and cost controls. New tools from companies like Harness and CloudZero aim to track AI spending and tie costs to business results. Some AI vendors, like HubSpot, are moving from token-based pricing to charging based on outcomes, such as "resolved conversations" or "leads generated." This represents a necessary correction in the AI adoption cycle. The challenge now is for companies to move beyond using AI merely to speed up old tasks and instead rethink their workflows and business models fundamentally. The future of enterprise AI depends on proving its value, not just its usage.

marsbit1 год тому

After Burning Tens of Billions of Dollars in Tokens, Silicon Valley Giants Start Limiting Employee Token Usage

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити BILL

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Billions Network (BILL) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Billions Network (BILL).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Billions Network (BILL)Після придбання Billions Network (BILL) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Billions Network (BILL)Легко торгуйте Billions Network (BILL) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

209 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2026.05.07Оновлено 2026.05.07

Як купити BILL

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни BILL (BILL).

活动图片