Ransomware Hits 5,289 in 2024, but Many Victim Companies Won’t Talk About It

ccn.comОпубліковано о 2025-08-07Востаннє оновлено о 2025-08-09

Key Takeaways
  • Many companies hide ransom payments, often made in crypto, to avoid reputational damage or regulatory scrutiny.
  • 2024 saw 5,289 reported ransomware incidents worldwide, up 15% from 2023.
  • Experts stress that stopping ransomware requires more prevention techniques.

Ransomware attacks reached 5,289 reported cases worldwide in 2024, up 15% from the previous year and more than double the total in 2022.

However, the true scale of the crisis may be obscured, as many victim companies reportedly refuse to disclose when they pay attackers.

The Culture of Secrecy

Earlier this year, James Babbage, director general at the U.K.’s National Crime Agency, told BBC’s Panorama that “it is the paying of ransoms which fuels this crime.”

A culture of secrecy may be helping to fuel a cycle of ransomware attacks.

Adnan Malik, head of data protection at Barings Law, told The Epoch Times that companies “do not openly declare they have paid a ransom,” often to avoid reputational harm or regulatory scrutiny.

This can be easily concealed through cryptocurrency payments, which are the most common form of payment in ransomware cases.

Andy Jenkinson, a fellow of the Cyber Theory Institute, told The Epoch Times that “ransoms are almost always paid in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, which are harder to trace than bank transfers.”

While blockchain transactions are public, tracing them to a specific organization often requires sophisticated investigative work, which is made more difficult by mixers and other obfuscation techniques.

Ransomware Attacks Grow, But Payments Decrease

Ransomware incidents surged again in 2024, hitting 5,289 reported cases worldwide—a 15% year-on-year increase, according to U.S. law enforcement data.

While that’s a sharp slowdown from the 77% spike in 2023, it still marks more than a doubling of global incidents since 2022.

The U.S. has remained the epicenter of the threat, accounting for roughly half of all attacks, driven by what authorities describe as a “broad range of profitable targets.”

Authorities partly credit the slowdown in growth to coordinated international crackdowns.

Operation Cronos, launched in February 2024, targeted the LockBit network, one of the world’s most prolific ransomware operations, leading to arrests , the freezing of over 200 cryptocurrency accounts, and the seizure of more than 7,000 decryption keys.

Still, the disruption failed to significantly reduce the overall volume of ransomware events.

Ransomware payments decreased | Credit: Chainalysis

Chainalysis data also showed that while reported incidents climbed, the total value of ransom payments fell 35% year-over-year to $813.55 million, suggesting more victims refused to pay or negotiated lower settlements.

This shift may highlight a growing disconnect between the frequency of attacks and attacker revenue.

Ransomware Can Be Stopped, But Silence Complicates Things

While global law enforcement operations have dented ransomware revenues, many cybersecurity experts stress that lasting progress depends on preventing attacks from succeeding in the first place.

Jason Soroko, Senior Fellow at Sectigo and co-host of the award-winning Root Causes podcast, told CCN that the battle against ransomware should start with identity security.

“Stopping ransomware relies on combining identity-first principles with least-privilege data access security, all while leveraging a variety of cybersecurity best practices and technologies,” Soroko said.

By “identity-first,” Soroko means putting user authentication and verification at the heart of a security strategy.

“An identity-first approach that leverages proven identity security technologies such as public key infrastructure (PKI) helps to protect identity through the usage of strong phishing resistant credentials,” he explained.

Soroko argues that this is not just about technology, but about giving security teams full oversight of who is inside the system at any given time.

However, the effectiveness of this is undermined when victims remain silent.

In 2023, British authorities warned that it’s “the attacks we don’t hear about… that aren’t reported to us and pass quietly by, pushed to one side, the ransoms paid to make them go away,” that cause the most damage.

“If attacks are covered up, the criminals enjoy greater success, and more attacks take place,” the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) said.

For Soroko, the conversation about ransomware has been too focused on the ransom payment itself.

“A growing number of cybersecurity experts have now figured out that ransomware is not solely a malware problem, it is a data access and identity problem,” he told CCN.

“The lasting damage of ransomware attacks lies not in the transactions forced upon by the bad actor but in the cost of lost business, disruption to operations, and clean-up.”

U.K. To Ban Ransom Payments

In July, the UK government announced plans to ban public sector bodies and critical infrastructure operators from paying ransom demands.

Under the new measures, all businesses not covered by the ban will be required to alert the government if they plan to pay a ransom.

“The government could then provide those businesses with advice and support, including notifying them if any such payment would risk breaking the law by sending money to sanctioned cyber criminal groups, many of whom are based in Russia,” the UK government said.

NCSC Director of National Resilience Jonathon Ellison said: “These new measures help undermine the criminal ecosystem that is causing harm across our economy.

“Ransomware remains a serious and evolving threat, and organisations must not become complacent.”

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Пов'язані матеріали

Solana Expands Validator Power With Launch of On-Chain Governance

Solana has formally launched its on-chain governance system, empowering token holders and validators with a more open and decentralized way to influence major protocol decisions. Governance debates and voting are now conducted entirely on-chain using the new Solana Governance Proposals (SGP) framework, supported by stake-weighted voting and cryptographic verification. Validators with at least 100,000 SOL in delegated stake can submit an SGP. To proceed to a formal vote, a proposal must first gain support from at least 15% of the network's total staked SOL, ensuring only ideas with significant backing move forward. SGPs serve a distinct purpose from the technical Solana Improvement Documents (SIMDs). While SIMDs focus on *how* to implement protocol upgrades, SGPs determine *whether* the broader ecosystem believes a proposal should proceed, via an on-chain, stake-weighted vote. This separation allows core developers to continue building effectively while reserving community-wide votes for impactful decisions. A key feature grants delegators greater control: they can now override their validator's governance vote. If a validator votes against a delegator's preference or abstains, the delegator can cast a vote directly using their own stake weight through Solana's governance portal. The voting process is secured using Merkle proofs to verify participant stakes against an on-chain consensus snapshot. With this implementation, Solana aims to broaden community participation in governance without hindering development, combining decentralized decision-making with efficient protocol evolution.

TheNewsCrypto24 хв тому

Solana Expands Validator Power With Launch of On-Chain Governance

TheNewsCrypto24 хв тому

Trillion-Won Bet on Semiconductors: Is South Korea Really Panicking This Time?

**Summary:** South Korea, traditionally adept at "counter-cyclical" investments during industry downturns, has launched an unprecedented trillion-dollar (approximately 6.4 trillion RMB) semiconductor investment plan during a current AI-driven boom. This shift signals deep strategic anxiety, driven by the rapid rise of China's memory chip challengers. The article traces this dynamic through the history of East Asian semiconductor competition. In the 1980s, Japan used a "national system + industrial capital" model to surpass the US in DRAM, only to be overtaken in the 1990s by South Korea employing the same aggressive, efficiency-focused tactics—most notably massive, loss-tolerant investments during downturns to crush competitors like Japan's Elpida. Now, China's memory giants, Yangtze Memory (YMTC) and ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), are employing a strikingly similar playbook. Starting from near-zero a decade ago, they've used a combination of government-backed capital, strategic technology acquisition (e.g., CXMT leveraging Qimonda's legacy), and innovative architectural leaps (e.g., YMTC's Xtacking) to achieve rapid technological catch-up. Crucially, during the severe industry downturn of 2023, while Korean and US giants cut production, the Chinese firms expanded capacity and competed on price, rapidly gaining global market share (reaching ~11% in NAND and ~7.67% in DRAM by 2025). South Korea's current massive investment, therefore, is a defensive move born of fear. The historical pattern suggests that once a technological gap closes, scale and integrated supply chain advantages—areas where China holds significant potential—can determine the leader. Having used counter-cyclical strategies to become the incumbent, South Korea now faces the prospect of a formidable challenger using those very same tactics. This investment marks not just a bet on the AI cycle, but the opening chapter in a new battle for dominance in the memory industry.

marsbit34 хв тому

Trillion-Won Bet on Semiconductors: Is South Korea Really Panicking This Time?

marsbit34 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片