Crypto market’s weekly winners and losers – M, CFX, BONK, FARTCOIN

ambcryptoОпубліковано о 2025-08-03Востаннє оновлено о 2025-08-03

Key Takeaways

MemeCore [M], Four [FORM], and CONFLUX [CFX] led the week with sharp price surges. In contrast, Fartcoin [FARTCOIN], Bonk [BONK], and Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] saw significant decline.


This week in crypto saw a sharp market pullback. 

Bitcoin [BTC] dipped below $113,700 and Ethereum [ETH] slipped over 5%, driven by weak U.S. jobs data and rising recession fears.

Meanwhile, ETFs saw major outflows, ending a strong inflow streak. In policy, the U.S. unveiled a 160-page crypto report.

And yet, the standout volatility came from the memecoin sector, underscoring its high-beta, speculative character.

Weekly winners

Memecore [M] — Memecoin blockchain posted a sharp bullish reversal 

MemeCore [M] dominated the charts this week with a clean 35%+ move off its $0.32 base. In fact, it snapped a two-week bleed where it dumped over 50% from its $0.07 ICO level.

The week kicked off with a textbook retest of the $0.30 support after a brutal 29% drawdown the week prior. 

From there, bulls stepped in hard. M saw a 42% intraday rip on the 2nd of August that sent it smashing through the $0.45 resistance. Despite the surge, RSI stayed below overheated territory.

M

Source: TradingView (M/USDT)

But things cooled quickly near $0.70.

That level acted like a supply wall, triggering sell pressure and trimming gains into the weekly close.

Still, M made back nearly all of its recent losses and reclaimed bullish structure, definitely one to watch if it consolidates above $0.45.

Four [FORM] — Community-governed asset repeated a key pattern

Four [FORM] wrapped the week as the second-highest gainer, notching a clean 20% move and printing a high wick up to $4. 

While it’s since pulled back to around $3.70, it’s still holding above the key $3.60 level which is a spot that acted as stiff resistance for the past two weeks.

This kind of S/R flip suggests solid bid support underneath. Bulls are clearly defending that level, and if this zone continues to hold, it could set the stage for a proper breakout setup. 

Technically speaking, if FORM can build acceptance above $3.80 on strong volume, it opens the door for a breakout toward new local high, making it the altcoin to monitor going into next week.

Conflux [CFX] —  Public Layer-1 blockchain attracted strong bid support

Conflux [CFX] is gaining ground fast, clocking a 15% weekly move off its $0.18 open, landing it back in the top gainers for the second week straight.

Interestingly, CFX was last week’s breakout leader but ended up closing down nearly 15% at $0.15, as spot demand didn’t follow through and longs got wiped out hard.

This week looks stronger. The daily chart is flashing solid demand, with CFX breaking the $0.20 resistance at press time. But bulls still need a clean break above the $0.25 mark to lock in the breakout.

Until then, it’s at a make-or-break level. Keep an eye — CFX is coiling at a key inflection zone.

Other notable winners

Outside the majors, altcoin rockets stole the spotlight this week.

TROLL [TROLL] led the charge with a staggering 228% rally, fueling an explosive memecoin breakout. League of Kingdoms [LOKA] followed with a 127% gain, while Pepe Bundle [PUNDLE] surged 73%, respectively.

Weekly losers

Fartcoin [FARTCOIN] —  Memecoin extended its weekly decline

Fartcoin [FARTCOIN] printed its worst weekly close since March. It has slipped 29% off its $1.30 open and ended the week around $0.93. That makes it the biggest loser on the board.

In fact, the move nuked all the progress it had made clawing out of its months-long range. The $1.60 rejection level from late May is now looking like a firm ceiling.

To make matters worse, FARTCOIN flipped its weekly MACD bearish for the first time, signaling that downside momentum could linger heading into next week.

FARTCOIN

Source: TradingView (FARTCOIN/USDT)

In that case, a retest of the $0.75 demand zone is back on the radar. That level acted as a springboard in the June–July run, lining up with a bullish MACD flip back then.

This time, though, the setup looks weaker.

With MACD crossing bearish and momentum fading, a breakdown below $0.75 wouldn’t be a shock. And as it stands, a clean bounce from here feels unlikely unless fresh bids show up fast.

Bonk [BONK] — Meme asset posted its worst weekly close of the quarter

Bonk [BONK] pulled back 24.6% this week from its $0.000033 open, making it the second-biggest loser. 

After a strong Q2 run, this is BONK’s first red weekly candle, snapping a five-week streak of higher highs that finally saw it break through the $0.000040 mark.

Technically, the structure isn’t broken. 

The broader market flipping risk-off dragged BONK with it, but the trend still holds for now. The last three daily candles are showing signs of range-building around the $0.000025 level.

If this base holds and flows return, BONK might be setting up for a re-entry, especially if we see volume pick up near that support.

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] — Digital layer failed to hold key support 

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] wrapped the week with a rough 24% drop from its $1.60 open, landing it among the top weekly losers. 

While it’s seen sharp pullbacks before, this one hit harder. It broke clean below the $1.70-$2.00 range it had been holding for weeks.

The breakdown dragged VIRTUAL all the way to $1.12 which flips the chart structure decisively bearish. This move invalidates the prior range and confirms sellers are in control.

Even though it saw a brief 4.54% intraday pop, price is struggling to get traction above the $1.20 zone. Without clear demand, that bounce looks more like relief than any kind of trend reversal.

Other notable losers

In the broader market, downside volatility hit hard.

Radix [XRD] led the losers with a 38% drop, followed by Graphite Protocol [GP], down 36.7%, and Tokenize Xchange [TKZ], which slipped 36.6% as momentum sharply cooled.

Conclusion

This week was a rollercoaster. Big pumps, sharp dips, and nonstop action. As always, stay sharp, do your own research, and trade smart.

Share

Пов'язані матеріали

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit26 хв тому

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit26 хв тому

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手30 хв тому

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手30 хв тому

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

Last Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department issued an enforcement letter that forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. The stated reason was unspecified national security concerns, initially linked to potential "jailbreaks" of the models' safeguards. However, new details suggest the action stemmed more from a deteriorating relationship between the Trump administration and Anthropic, rather than a genuine technical threat. According to reports, the government cited a little-known export control regulation, compelling Anthropic to block access for all non-U.S. persons, including its own international employees. The company complied, shutting down the models without a court order or specific technical details from the government. Cybersecurity expert Katie Moussouris revealed she was privately shown a research paper detailing a potential safeguard bypass in Fable 5. She argued the described method was minor and did not warrant an export ban, stating that attempts to "fix" it would only weaken the model's defensive capabilities. Moussouris and other experts have since called for the order to be revoked, warning it dangerously removes advanced cybersecurity tools from U.S. defenders. Analysts like Justin Hendrix suggest the move appears retaliatory and sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down a tech company's products. The incident has raised concerns about the reliability of American AI and the potential for political interference in the tech industry, serving as a warning to the broader sector.

marsbit33 хв тому

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

marsbit33 хв тому

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

In his latest notes, Ray Dalio addresses a critical question for investors amid the AI-driven stock market surge: how should one allocate assets during a transformative technological revolution? Dalio emphasizes that technological advancement does not automatically make related stocks attractive. Historical tech cycles—marked by excitement, crowding, volatility, and eventual shakeouts—show that even long-term winners like Microsoft and Apple experienced severe drawdowns. Today's AI sector faces similar uncertainties: overinvestment, intensifying competition, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan's chip supply), tax policy shifts, anti-AI sentiment, and potential disruption from future technologies like quantum computing. Dalio's core argument focuses on the highly concentrated market structure, where a few tech giants dominate major indices. He warns investors against unknowingly holding concentrated, correlated exposures. Instead of chasing a handful of AI leaders, he advocates for a robust, diversified portfolio of 15 or more high-quality, uncorrelated investments, risk-balanced to match an investor's volatility tolerance. Mathematically, such diversification significantly improves the risk-return ratio—for example, holding 15 uncorrelated assets can boost the ratio by over four times compared to a single concentrated bet. Dalio cautions that future equity returns appear low, with his bubble indicator suggesting real returns could be negative over the next 5-10 years. He stresses that knowing what you don't know is as important as knowing what you do. In an environment of high uncertainty and concentration, avoiding large, concentrated bets on AI stocks is prudent. The optimal strategy is disciplined diversification—the "holy grail" of investing—to navigate this technologically driven cycle with lower risk and comparable or better returns.

marsbit37 хв тому

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

marsbit37 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот
Ф'ючерси

Популярні статті

Як купити FARTCOIN

Ласкаво просимо до HTX.com! Ми зробили покупку Fartcoin (FARTCOIN) простою та зручною. Дотримуйтесь нашої покрокової інструкції, щоб розпочати свою криптовалютну подорож.Крок 1: Створіть обліковий запис на HTXВикористовуйте свою електронну пошту або номер телефону, щоб зареєструвати обліковий запис на HTX безплатно. Пройдіть безпроблемну реєстрацію й отримайте доступ до всіх функцій.ЗареєструватисьКрок 2: Перейдіть до розділу Купити крипту і виберіть спосіб оплатиКредитна/дебетова картка: використовуйте вашу картку Visa або Mastercard, щоб миттєво купити Fartcoin (FARTCOIN).Баланс: використовуйте кошти з балансу вашого рахунку HTX для безперешкодної торгівлі.Треті особи: ми додали популярні способи оплати, такі як Google Pay та Apple Pay, щоб підвищити зручність.P2P: Торгуйте безпосередньо з іншими користувачами на HTX.Позабіржова торгівля (OTC): ми пропонуємо індивідуальні послуги та конкурентні обмінні курси для трейдерів.Крок 3: Зберігайте свої Fartcoin (FARTCOIN)Після придбання Fartcoin (FARTCOIN) збережіть його у своєму обліковому записі на HTX. Крім того, ви можете відправити його в інше місце за допомогою блокчейн-переказу або використовувати його для торгівлі іншими криптовалютами.Крок 4: Торгівля Fartcoin (FARTCOIN)Легко торгуйте Fartcoin (FARTCOIN) на спотовому ринку HTX. Просто увійдіть до свого облікового запису, виберіть торгову пару, укладайте угоди та спостерігайте за ними в режимі реального часу. Ми пропонуємо зручний досвід як для початківців, так і для досвідчених трейдерів.

650 переглядів усьогоОпубліковано 2024.12.10Оновлено 2026.06.02

Як купити FARTCOIN

Обговорення

Ласкаво просимо до спільноти HTX. Тут ви можете бути в курсі останніх подій розвитку платформи та отримати доступ до професійної ринкової інформації. Нижче представлені думки користувачів щодо ціни FARTCOIN (FARTCOIN).

活动图片